Webb & Bordson, Attorneys at Law

Per Attorney [redacted] ***: Our closing statement is the following: First, the clients had multiple matters, A state court action they filed before retaining our firm, that we had to dismiss because patents are the exclusive jurisdiction of federal courts A federal court matter that we settled (clients signed a settlement agreement) and they signed the dismissal on A federal court matter that we went to appeals court in Washington (without being paid!) and also filed a writ of cert to the US Supreme Court, all without being paidWe did this because I believed in my client’s case, even though they weren’t paying as agreedIn sum, there simply was no dismissals that either: wasn’t agreed to by the client, or weren’t ordered by the courtPlease contact our office should you have any questionsSincerely, Heather AMartin, Office Manager WEBB LAW GROUP, APC WFallbrook Avenue, Suite Fresno, CA

Dear Ms. Carmona: I am in receipt of your correspondence dated February 16,2017 and am writing to forward a response and documents for your review. Please note our office is willing to meet with the client and discuss any concerns they may have.BACKGROUND Mses.... [redacted] and [redacted] (aka "shelcin") complain that our firm intentionally, recklessly, or repeatedly failed to perform services with competence. I cannot begin to tell you how much I disagree with that, and will address each factual allegation in turn. Evidence obtained during depositions of Capper and Filo Without understanding the exact nature of the client's concern, our firm undertook depositions in San Francisco of both these individuals and we obtained exactly the information we were able to get from these third parties who had limited understanding and knowledge of the facts surrounding the issues. As I told the client in an email on June 30,2013: "[Capper & Filo via Optum] stated in their license agreement that they were making No representation about the protection they could claim to their concept AND they have valid basis for their idea being very different from yours... AND they testify well..." Failing to utilize a pertinent witness: Peter Pook I flew to Florida and deposed a key Florida witness, and the clients stated that another witness "Peter Pook" could have been helpful. As stated in my June 30,2013 email to the clients, "First, remember that Peter Pook is in Canada and is not likely to be found". My clients never presented any evidence to the contrary that Mr. Pook would be easily found or what key evidence he would have that merited additional expenditures of time and money. Failing to file an amended complaint It is true that we made a final effort to amend our complaint to add other patent claims to our complaint when the court ruled our patent to be invalid AND not infringed by defendant, however none of this mattered. Within his discretion, Judge O'Neil denied our request to file an amended complaint. This is largely since Judge O'Neil denied our request to file an amended complaint. This is largely since Judge O'Neil not only declared our client's patent to be invalid, but Judge O'Neil also determined that the defendants patent did not infringe on our client's patent. Please contact myself directly via email or written correspondence should you have any questions regarding the foregoing. Very truly yours, [redacted] F. Webb, Esq.WEBB LAW GROUP, APC LFW:enc: Documents Numbered "Webb 501-Webb 629" (exhibits sent via hardcopy)

I am rejecting this response because:
Dear Miriam, Mr*** *** our lawyer closed our lawsuit in without our permission We just realized this after doing research on our second lawsuit we had with him Please also attach our evidence with our complaint Thank you, *** *** ###-###-#### Cell ***@aol.com

Per Attorney [redacted]: Our closing statement is the following: First, the clients had multiple matters, 1.      A state court action they filed before retaining our firm, that we had to dismiss because patents are the exclusive jurisdiction of federal courts. 2.      A federal court matter that we settled (clients signed a settlement agreement) and they signed the dismissal on 3.      A federal court matter that we went to appeals court in Washington (without being paid!) and also filed a writ of cert to the US Supreme Court, all without being paid. We did this because I believed in my client’s case, even though they weren’t paying as agreed. In sum, there simply was no dismissals that either: 1.      wasn’t agreed to by the client, or 2.      weren’t ordered by the court. Please contact our office should you have any questions. Sincerely,   Heather A. Martin, Office Manager WEBB LAW GROUP, APC  466 W. Fallbrook Avenue, Suite 102 Fresno, CA 93711

Dear Ms. Carmona:     I am in receipt of your correspondence dated February 16,2017 and am writing to forward a response and documents for your review. Please note our office is willing to meet with the client and discuss any concerns they may have.BACKGROUND     Mses....

[redacted] and [redacted] (aka "shelcin") complain that our firm intentionally, recklessly, or repeatedly failed to perform services with competence. I cannot begin to tell you how much I disagree with that, and will address each factual allegation in turn.      Evidence obtained during depositions of Capper and Filo     Without understanding the exact nature of the client's concern, our firm undertook depositions in San Francisco of both these individuals and we obtained exactly the information we were able to get from these third parties who had limited understanding and knowledge of the facts surrounding the issues. As I told the client in an email on June 30,2013:          "[Capper & Filo via Optum] stated in their license agreement that they were making No representation          about the protection they could claim to their concept AND they have valid basis for their idea being very          different from yours... AND they testify well..."     Failing to utilize a pertinent witness: Peter Pook     I flew to Florida and deposed a key Florida witness, and the clients stated that another witness "Peter Pook" could have been helpful.  As stated in my June 30,2013 email to the clients, "First, remember that Peter Pook is in Canada and is not likely to be found". My clients never presented any evidence to the contrary that Mr. Pook would be easily found or what key evidence he would have that merited additional expenditures of time and money.     Failing to file an amended complaint     It is true that we made a final effort to amend our complaint to add other patent claims to our complaint when the court ruled our patent to be invalid AND not infringed by defendant, however none of this mattered. Within his discretion, Judge O'Neil denied our request to file an amended complaint. This is largely since Judge O'Neil denied our request to file an amended complaint. This is largely since Judge O'Neil not only declared our client's patent to be invalid, but Judge O'Neil also determined that the defendants patent did not infringe on our client's patent.     Please contact myself directly via email or written correspondence should you have any questions regarding the foregoing. Very truly yours, [redacted] F. Webb, Esq.WEBB LAW GROUP, APC LFW:enc: Documents Numbered "Webb 501-Webb 629" (exhibits sent via hardcopy)