Ibsen Bellevue, LLC

8/25/16Attn: [redacted] Revdex.comRE: ID of [redacted] Dear [redacted] ,Vehicle impounding in Washington State is regulated by state lawImpounding is essentially involuntary towing, meaning the customer does not voluntarily utilize our serviceOn August 19th, at 12:pm the Washington State Patrol dispatched Ibsen Towing to northbound I-and SE 8th in Bellevue WashingtonWe responded to that location, then at the direction of the Washington State Patrol pursuant to RCW (Revised Code of Washington), we impounded a Honda Accord registered to Mr***In response to Mr***’s complaint “that A) the amount is unreasonable” Ibsen Towing A) charged the appropriate fees for an impound provided at the direction of Washington State Patrol, B) released the vehicle to Mr [redacted] at a discounted rate, C) successfully jumpstarted Mr***’s vehicle at no additional charge, and D) provided him with the documents necessary to contest the validity of the impound and/or the rates charged in a court of lawMr***’s further complaint “and B) this is the problem of the police officer as they should be well-versed on all sorts of medical matters the general public may face.” is seemingly an issue Mr [redacted] has with the Washington State Patrol, has nothing to do with Ibsen Towing, and is entirely beyond our controlAll Washington State Registered Tow Truck Operators using class A trucks use the same fee schedule of $per hour for the impoundment and $per day for the vehicle storageThese fees are set by the Washington State Patrol and regulated by the Washington State Patrol and the Washington State Department of LicensingThe fees for the service provided were charged accordingly, see RCW “(1) An operator shall file a fee schedule with the departmentAll filed fees must be adequate to cover the costs of service providedNo fees may exceed those filed with the departmentAt least ten days before the effective date of any change in an operator's fee schedule, the registered tow truck operator shall file the revised fee schedule with the department(2) Towing contracts with private property owners shall be in written form and state the hours of authorization to impound, the persons empowered to authorize the impounds, and the present charge of a private impound for the classes of tow trucks to be used in the impound, and must be retained in the files of the registered tow truck operator for three years(3) A fee that is charged for tow truck service must be calculated on an hourly basis, and after the first hour must be charged to the nearest quarter hour(4) Fees that are charged for the storage of a vehicle, or for other items of personal property registered or titled with the department, must be calculated on a twenty-four hour basis and must be charged to the nearest half day from the time the vehicle arrived at the secure storage areaHowever, items of personal property registered or titled with the department that are wholly contained within an impounded vehicle are not subject to additional storage fees; they are, however, subject to satisfying the underlying lien for towing and storage of the vehicle in which they are contained(5) All billing invoices that are provided to the redeemer of the vehicle, or other items of personal property registered or titled with the department, must be itemized so that the individual fees are clearly discernable.” At the time of vehicle redemption Mr [redacted] signed the “Right of Redemption and Opportunity for a Hearing Notice” (see attachment) and was issued an itemized invoice (see attachment) clearly showing all individual fees pursuant to RCW (5) as well as a completed “Hearing Request Form”, see RCW 46.55.120(2)(b) Any person seeking to redeem an impounded vehicle under this section has a right to a hearing in the district or municipal court for the jurisdiction in which the vehicle was impounded to contest the validity of the impoundment or the amount of towing and storage chargesThe district court has jurisdiction to determine the issues involving all impoundments including those authorized by the state or its agentsThe municipal court has jurisdiction to determine the issues involving impoundments authorized by agents of the municipalityAny request for a hearing shall be made in writing on the form provided for that purpose and must be received by the appropriate court within ten days of the date the opportunity was provided for in (a) of this subsection and more than five days before the date of the auctionAt the time of the filing of the hearing request, the petitioner shall pay to the court clerk a filing fee in the same amount required for the filing of a suit in district courtIf the hearing request is not received by the court within the ten-day period, the right to a hearing is waived and the registered owner is liable for any towing, storage, or other impoundment charges permitted under this chapterUpon receipt of a timely hearing request, the court shall proceed to hear and determine the validity of the impoundmentI have spoken several times with Mr [redacted] in regards to his right to an impound hearing and the court filing fee of $83.00, which is a fee the court requires, not Ibsen TowingMr [redacted] stated to me that “I disagree with the process.” and “It’s very ridiculous.” While I understand Mr***’s frustration at having his vehicle impounded Ibsen Towing did provide a service which has a cost associated with it which Mr [redacted] was properly charged for, thus we will not be refunding any amount to Mr***We do suggest that Mr [redacted] consider utilizing his right to an impound hearing which is the proper arena to resolve a dispute with a Washington State Registered Tow Truck Operator as outlined by Washington State lawSincerely, Diane L [redacted] Ibsen Towing AdministratorSE 30th St# B6Bellevue, WA 98005425-644-

Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because: The jump-start referenced in C was actually necessitated by Ibsen leaving the lights flashing during and after the towing I have had other vehicles towed which did not require $ But fine, the towing distance was also not one hour It was less than miles Ibsen contracts with the WSP and should share some of the responsibility in my opinion Besides, had Ibsen requested the police run further tests on the spot, it would have quickly ruled out any towing It was clear Ibsen was hungry for profits first and questions later Any signatures provided for release were given under duress, as the vehicle was needed both for my own personal use and further to attend the court hearings for both the traffic issue and this matter Ibsen towing did not "provide a service", as I was sober and able to drive the vehicle and/or call my private insurance to tow the vehicle away from any obstruction of the highway, for a much lower amount I have also offered to settle with Ibsen in the middle but apparently they would prefer to go to court and risk the entire amount and waste everyone's time, including taxpayer funded court time which could be better used to go after murderers, rapists, real drunk drivers, etc Sincerely, [redacted] ***

Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because: Thank you, but I feel Ibsen showed an utter lack of common sense.? I also understand there are other individuals, especially those suffering from Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), who may not have the funds to recover their vehicle in such an unfortunate incident.? My? motivation for this complaint? is not purely self-oriented, but for the autism community at large.? We shall meet in court Sincerely, [redacted] ***?

Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because: Thank you, but I feel Ibsen showed an utter lack of common sense I also understand there are other individuals, especially those suffering from Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), who may not have the funds to recover their vehicle in such an unfortunate incident My motivation for this complaint is not purely self-oriented, but for the autism community at large We shall meet in court Sincerely, [redacted] ***

8/29/
Dear *** ***,
Thank you for forwarding on the additional information in regards to complaint ***I have inserted my responses in italics into Mr***’s rejection message so as to address each individuallyMy final response is at the conclusion of Mr***’s message
MESSAGE:Complaint: ***I am rejecting this response because:
1. The jump-start referenced in C was actually necessitated by Ibsen leaving the lights flashing during and after the towing
Ibsen Towing response to 1.: We believe our customers have a reasonable right to privacy, for this reason, as well as our own safety, we do not enter a customer’s vehicles unless a matter of public safety is present or the customer has specifically requested us to
2. I have had other vehicles towed which did not require $179. But fine, the towing distance was also not one hour. It was less than miles
Ibsen Towing response to 2.: As previously stated the fees charged are in accordance with RCW (3) “A fee that is charged for tow truck service must be calculated on an hourly basis, and after the first hour must be charged to the nearest quarter hour.”
3. Ibsen contracts with the WSP and should share some of the responsibility in my opinion. Besides, had Ibsen requested the police run further tests on the spot, it would have quickly ruled out any towing. It was clear Ibsen was hungry for profits first and questions later
Ibsen Towing response to 3.: Ibsen Towing has no legal standing to advise the Washington State Patrol in matters of law enforcement nor would we consider impeding any law enforcement agency at any time
Any signatures provided for release were given under duress, as the vehicle was needed both for my own personal use and further to attend the court hearings for both the traffic issue and this matter
Ibsen Towing response to 4.: The “Right of Redemption and Opportunity for a Hearing Notice” was provided to Mr*** as required by state lawThis document’s primary function is to advise our customers of their rights
Ibsen towing did not "provide a service", as I was sober and able to drive the vehicle and/or call my private insurance to tow the vehicle away from any obstruction of the highway, for a much lower amount
Ibsen Towing response to 5.: As previously stated the service provided was a vehicle impound at the direction of law enforcement and the fees associated with it are in accordance with RCW
6. I have also offered to settle with Ibsen in the middle but apparently they would prefer to go to court and risk the entire amount and waste everyone's time, including taxpayer funded court time which could be better used to go after murderers, rapists, real drunk drivers, etc
Ibsen Towing response to 6.: As previously stated RCW provides due process by a district court of appropriate jurisdiction for customers that believe that their vehicle was improperly impounded and/or to contest the fees chargedIbsen Towing does not believe that due process is a waste of anyone’s time
Sincerely,*** ***
In conclusion Ibsen Towing respectfully declines to mediate with Mr*** in regards to the fees charged for the service provided at the direction of law enforcementThe service provided and the fees charged have nothing to do with a hunger for profit but everything to do with our right to charge an appropriate fee as outlined by state law for services provided under RCW as well as our commitment to assisting law enforcement and the public they serveThe majority of our customers recognize and respect that we are simply doing our job as outlined by state law, on the occasions they do not we, along with the state, expect them to utilize their right to due process
Sincerely,
Diane L***
Ibsen Towing Administrator

Complaint: ***I am rejecting this response because:
Thank you, but I feel Ibsen showed an utter lack of common sense. I also understand there are other individuals, especially those suffering from Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), who may not have the funds to recover their vehicle in such an unfortunate incident. My motivation for this complaint is not purely self-oriented, but for the autism community at large. We shall meet in court
Sincerely,*** ***

Complaint: ***I am rejecting this response because:
1. The jump-start referenced in C was actually necessitated by Ibsen leaving the lights flashing during and after the towing
2. I have had other vehicles towed which did not require $179. But fine, the towing distance was also not one hour. It was less than miles
3. Ibsen contracts with the WSP and should share some of the responsibility in my opinion. Besides, had Ibsen requested the police run further tests on the spot, it would have quickly ruled out any towing. It was clear Ibsen was hungry for profits first and questions later
Any signatures provided for release were given under duress, as the vehicle was needed both for my own personal use and further to attend the court hearings for both the traffic issue and this matter
Ibsen towing did not "provide a service", as I was sober and able to drive the vehicle and/or call my private insurance to tow the vehicle away from any obstruction of the highway, for a much lower amount
6. I have also offered to settle with Ibsen in the middle but apparently they would prefer to go to court and risk the entire amount and waste everyone's time, including taxpayer funded court time which could be better used to go after murderers, rapists, real drunk drivers, etc. Sincerely,*** ***

Ibsen apparently has a contract with the Washington State Patrol (WSP) for impounding vehicles involved in DUII was wrongfully accused of DUI due to an unrelated medical condition that does not impair my drivingMy car was impounded for hours while the officer questioned me, and I ultimately was not charged with any wrongdoingIbsen charged me $for the towingI believe that A) the amount is unreasonable and B) this is the problem of the police officer as they should be well-versed on all sorts of medical matters the general public may faceSo Ibsen should charge the police department if they wish to be compensated for the towI can understand WSP may have legal immunity from such liability, but as a private company, Ibsen can choose to or not to do business with WSPWhen I pointed this out to the business while picking up my car, they informed me I could file an action in court but it would cost $to file, and I would not get this amount back even if I winI believe th

8/25/16Attn: *** ***Revdex.comRE: ID of ***.? Dear *** ***,Vehicle impounding in Washington State is regulated by state lawImpounding is essentially involuntary towing, meaning the customer does not voluntarily utilize our serviceOn August 19th, at 12:pm
the Washington State Patrol dispatched Ibsen Towing to northbound I-and SE 8th in Bellevue WashingtonWe responded to that location, then at the direction of the Washington State Patrol pursuant to RCW (Revised Code of Washington), we impounded a Honda Accord registered to Mr***.? In response to Mr***’s complaint “that A) the amount is unreasonable”… Ibsen Towing A) charged the appropriate fees for an impound provided at the direction of Washington State Patrol, B) released the vehicle to Mr*** at a discounted rate, C) successfully jumpstarted Mr***’s vehicle at no additional charge, and D) provided him with the documents necessary to contest the validity of the impound and/or the rates charged in a court of lawMr***’s further complaint “and B) this is the problem of the police officer as they should be well-versed on all sorts of medical matters the general public may face.”… ? is seemingly an issue Mr*** has with the Washington State Patrol, has nothing to do with Ibsen Towing, and is entirely beyond our control.? All Washington State Registered Tow Truck Operators using class A trucks use the same fee schedule of $per hour for the impoundment and $per day for the vehicle storageThese fees are set by the Washington State Patrol and regulated by the Washington State Patrol and the Washington State Department of Licensing.? The fees for the service provided were charged accordingly, see RCW “(1) An operator shall file a fee schedule with the departmentAll filed fees must be adequate to cover the costs of service providedNo fees may exceed those filed with the departmentAt least ten days before the effective date of any change in an operator's fee schedule, the registered tow truck operator shall file the revised fee schedule with the department(2) Towing contracts with private property owners shall be in written form and state the hours of authorization to impound, the persons empowered to authorize the impounds, and the present charge of a private impound for the classes of tow trucks to be used in the impound, and must be retained in the files of the registered tow truck operator for three years(3) A fee that is charged for tow truck service must be calculated on an hourly basis, and after the first hour must be charged to the nearest quarter hour(4) Fees that are charged for the storage of a vehicle, or for other items of personal property registered or titled with the department, must be calculated on a twenty-four hour basis and must be charged to the nearest half day from the time the vehicle arrived at the secure storage areaHowever, items of personal property registered or titled with the department that are wholly contained within an impounded vehicle are not subject to additional storage fees; they are, however, subject to satisfying the underlying lien for towing and storage of the vehicle in which they are contained(5) All billing invoices that are provided to the redeemer of the vehicle, or other items of personal property registered or titled with the department, must be itemized so that the individual fees are clearly discernable.”? At the time of vehicle redemption Mr*** signed the “Right of Redemption and Opportunity for a Hearing Notice” (see attachment) and was issued an itemized invoice (see attachment) clearly showing all individual fees pursuant to RCW (5) as well as a completed “Hearing Request Form”, see RCW 46.55.120(2)(b) Any person seeking to redeem an impounded vehicle under this section has a right to a hearing in the district or municipal court for the jurisdiction in which the vehicle was impounded to contest the validity of the impoundment or the amount of towing and storage chargesThe district court has jurisdiction to determine the issues involving all impoundments including those authorized by the state or its agentsThe municipal court has jurisdiction to determine the issues involving impoundments authorized by agents of the municipalityAny request for a hearing shall be made in writing on the form provided for that purpose and must be received by the appropriate court within ten days of the date the opportunity was provided for in (a) of this subsection and more than five days before the date of the auctionAt the time of the filing of the hearing request, the petitioner shall pay to the court clerk a filing fee in the same amount required for the filing of a suit in district courtIf the hearing request is not received by the court within the ten-day period, the right to a hearing is waived and the registered owner is liable for any towing, storage, or other impoundment charges permitted under this chapterUpon receipt of a timely hearing request, the court shall proceed to hear and determine the validity of the impoundment.? I have spoken several times with Mr*** in regards to his right to an impound hearing and the court filing fee of $83.00, which is a fee the court requires, not Ibsen TowingMr*** stated to me that “I disagree with the process.” and “It’s very ridiculous.” While I understand Mr***’s frustration at having his vehicle impounded Ibsen Towing did provide a service which has a cost associated with it which Mr*** was properly charged for, thus we will not be refunding any amount to Mr***We do suggest that Mr*** consider utilizing his right to an impound hearing which is the proper arena to resolve a dispute with a Washington State Registered Tow Truck Operator as outlined by Washington State law.? Sincerely,? Diane L***Ibsen Towing AdministratorSE 30th St# B6Bellevue, WA 98005425-644-2575?

Complaint: [redacted]I am rejecting this response because:
Thank you, but I feel Ibsen showed an utter lack of common sense.  I also understand there are other individuals, especially those suffering from Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), who may not have the funds to recover their vehicle in such an unfortunate incident.  My motivation for this complaint is not purely self-oriented, but for the autism community at large.  We shall meet in court.
Sincerely,[redacted]

8/25/16Attn: [redacted]Revdex.comRE: ID of [redacted]. Dear [redacted],Vehicle impounding in Washington State is regulated by state law. Impounding is essentially involuntary towing, meaning the customer does not voluntarily utilize our service. On August 19th, 2016 at 12:33 pm...

the Washington State Patrol dispatched Ibsen Towing to northbound I-405 and SE 8th in Bellevue Washington. We responded to that location, then at the direction of the Washington State Patrol pursuant to RCW 46.55 (Revised Code of Washington), we impounded a 2000 Honda Accord registered to Mr. [redacted]. In response to Mr. [redacted]’s complaint “that A) the amount is unreasonable”… Ibsen Towing A) charged the appropriate fees for an impound provided at the direction of Washington State Patrol, B) released the vehicle to Mr. [redacted] at a discounted rate, C) successfully jumpstarted Mr. [redacted]’s vehicle at no additional charge, and D) provided him with the documents necessary to contest the validity of the impound and/or the rates charged in a court of law. Mr. [redacted]’s further complaint “and B) this is the problem of the police officer as they should be well-versed on all sorts of medical matters the general public may face.”…  is seemingly an issue Mr. [redacted] has with the Washington State Patrol, has nothing to do with Ibsen Towing, and is entirely beyond our control. All Washington State Registered Tow Truck Operators using class A trucks use the same fee schedule of $179.00 per hour for the impoundment and $45.00 per day for the vehicle storage. These fees are set by the Washington State Patrol and regulated by the Washington State Patrol and the Washington State Department of Licensing. The fees for the service provided were charged accordingly, see RCW 46.55.063 “(1) An operator shall file a fee schedule with the department. All filed fees must be adequate to cover the costs of service provided. No fees may exceed those filed with the department. At least ten days before the effective date of any change in an operator's fee schedule, the registered tow truck operator shall file the revised fee schedule with the department. (2) Towing contracts with private property owners shall be in written form and state the hours of authorization to impound, the persons empowered to authorize the impounds, and the present charge of a private impound for the classes of tow trucks to be used in the impound, and must be retained in the files of the registered tow truck operator for three years. (3) A fee that is charged for tow truck service must be calculated on an hourly basis, and after the first hour must be charged to the nearest quarter hour. (4) Fees that are charged for the storage of a vehicle, or for other items of personal property registered or titled with the department, must be calculated on a twenty-four hour basis and must be charged to the nearest half day from the time the vehicle arrived at the secure storage area. However, items of personal property registered or titled with the department that are wholly contained within an impounded vehicle are not subject to additional storage fees; they are, however, subject to satisfying the underlying lien for towing and storage of the vehicle in which they are contained. (5) All billing invoices that are provided to the redeemer of the vehicle, or other items of personal property registered or titled with the department, must be itemized so that the individual fees are clearly discernable.” At the time of vehicle redemption Mr. [redacted] signed the “Right of Redemption and Opportunity for a Hearing Notice” (see attachment) and was issued an itemized invoice (see attachment) clearly showing all individual fees pursuant to RCW 46.55.063 (5) as well as a completed “Hearing Request Form”, see RCW 46.55.120(2)(b) Any person seeking to redeem an impounded vehicle under this section has a right to a hearing in the district or municipal court for the jurisdiction in which the vehicle was impounded to contest the validity of the impoundment or the amount of towing and storage charges. The district court has jurisdiction to determine the issues involving all impoundments including those authorized by the state or its agents. The municipal court has jurisdiction to determine the issues involving impoundments authorized by agents of the municipality. Any request for a hearing shall be made in writing on the form provided for that purpose and must be received by the appropriate court within ten days of the date the opportunity was provided for in (a) of this subsection and more than five days before the date of the auction. At the time of the filing of the hearing request, the petitioner shall pay to the court clerk a filing fee in the same amount required for the filing of a suit in district court. If the hearing request is not received by the court within the ten-day period, the right to a hearing is waived and the registered owner is liable for any towing, storage, or other impoundment charges permitted under this chapter. Upon receipt of a timely hearing request, the court shall proceed to hear and determine the validity of the impoundment. I have spoken several times with Mr. [redacted] in regards to his right to an impound hearing and the court filing fee of $83.00, which is a fee the court requires, not Ibsen Towing. Mr. [redacted] stated to me that “I disagree with the process.” and “It’s very ridiculous.” While I understand Mr. [redacted]’s frustration at having his vehicle impounded Ibsen Towing did provide a service which has a cost associated with it which Mr. [redacted] was properly charged for, thus we will not be refunding any amount to Mr. [redacted]. We do suggest that Mr. [redacted] consider utilizing his right to an impound hearing which is the proper arena to resolve a dispute with a Washington State Registered Tow Truck Operator as outlined by Washington State law. Sincerely, Diane L[redacted]Ibsen Towing Administrator13226 SE 30th St# B6Bellevue, WA 98005425-644-2575

8/29/16
 
Dear [redacted],  
 
Thank you for forwarding on the additional information in regards to complaint [redacted]. I have inserted my responses in italics into Mr. [redacted]’s rejection message so as to address each individually. My final response is at the conclusion of Mr. [redacted]’s message.
MESSAGE:Complaint: [redacted]I am rejecting this response because:
1.  The jump-start referenced in C was actually necessitated by Ibsen leaving the lights flashing during and after the towing
Ibsen Towing response to 1.: We believe our customers have a reasonable right to privacy, for this reason, as well as our own safety, we do not enter a customer’s vehicles unless a matter of public safety is present or the customer has specifically requested us to.
2.  I have had other vehicles towed which did not require $179.  But fine, the towing distance was also not one hour.  It was less than 5 miles.
Ibsen Towing response to 2.: As previously stated the fees charged are in accordance with RCW 46.55.063 (3) “A fee that is charged for tow truck service must be calculated on an hourly basis, and after the first hour must be charged to the nearest quarter hour.”
3.  Ibsen contracts with the WSP and should share some of the responsibility in my opinion.  Besides, had Ibsen requested the police run further tests on the spot, it would have quickly ruled out any towing.  It was clear Ibsen was hungry for profits first and questions later.
Ibsen Towing response to 3.: Ibsen Towing has no legal standing to advise the Washington State Patrol in matters of law enforcement nor would we consider impeding any law enforcement agency at any time.
4. Any signatures provided for release were given under duress, as the vehicle was needed both for my own personal use and further to attend the court hearings for both the traffic issue and this matter.
Ibsen Towing response to 4.: The “Right of Redemption and Opportunity for a Hearing Notice” was provided to Mr. [redacted] as required by state law. This document’s primary function is to advise our customers of their rights.
5. Ibsen towing did not "provide a service", as I was sober and able to drive the vehicle and/or call my private insurance to tow the vehicle away from any obstruction of the highway, for a much lower amount.
Ibsen Towing response to 5.: As previously stated the service provided was a vehicle impound at the direction of law enforcement and the fees associated with it are in accordance with RCW 46.55.063.
6. I have also offered to settle with Ibsen in the middle but apparently they would prefer to go to court and risk the entire amount and waste everyone's time, including taxpayer funded court time which could be better used to go after murderers, rapists, real drunk drivers, etc.
Ibsen Towing response to 6.: As previously stated RCW 46.55 provides due process by a district court of appropriate jurisdiction for customers that believe that their vehicle was improperly impounded and/or to contest the fees charged. Ibsen Towing does not believe that due process is a waste of anyone’s time.
Sincerely,[redacted]
In conclusion Ibsen Towing respectfully declines to mediate with Mr. [redacted] in regards to the fees charged for the service provided at the direction of law enforcement. The service provided and the fees charged have nothing to do with a hunger for profit but everything to do with our right to charge an appropriate fee as outlined by state law for services provided under RCW 46.55 as well as our commitment to assisting law enforcement and the public they serve. The majority of our customers recognize and respect that we are simply doing our job as outlined by state law, on the occasions they do not we, along with the state, expect them to utilize their right to due process.
Sincerely,
Diane L[redacted]
Ibsen Towing Administrator

Complaint: [redacted]I am rejecting this response because:
1.  The jump-start referenced in C was actually necessitated by Ibsen leaving the lights flashing during and after the towing
2.  I have had other vehicles towed which did not require $179.  But fine, the towing distance was also not one hour.  It was less than 5 miles.
3.  Ibsen contracts with the WSP and should share some of the responsibility in my opinion.  Besides, had Ibsen requested the police run further tests on the spot, it would have quickly ruled out any towing.  It was clear Ibsen was hungry for profits first and questions later.
 
4. Any signatures provided for release were given under duress, as the vehicle was needed both for my own personal use and further to attend the court hearings for both the traffic issue and this matter.
5. Ibsen towing did not "provide a service", as I was sober and able to drive the vehicle and/or call my private insurance to tow the vehicle away from any obstruction of the highway, for a much lower amount.
6. I have also offered to settle with Ibsen in the middle but apparently they would prefer to go to court and risk the entire amount and waste everyone's time, including taxpayer funded court time which could be better used to go after murderers, rapists, real drunk drivers, etc.   Sincerely,[redacted]