SACOR Financial

I am rejecting this response because:They are saying I am lyingThe calls they made hours a day every minutes were robo callsA machine made those calls.The original debt was $12,and that has been paid plus $8,dollars because they have a judgement they can continue to collect the payments and threaten to garnish my wages if I do not make the payments on timeThey keep adding interest on the original amount by 24%If my payments are late he is calling me saying "Do I need to take you back to court"That is why I contacted an attorney.They need to be reasonableWhen my daughter died he was still calling me.They have gotten $20,from me on an original debt of $12,Greedy people...Why can you not settle? I agreed to make payments until it was paid and then they kept adding interestIt will never be paid.The original amount has been paid

We have received and reviewed BBB consumer complaint case # [redacted] . Thank you for your time in addressing this matter. We do appreciate the economic difficulties faced by many consumers presently and it is our goal to reach a mutually agreeable resolution whenever... feasible. We now understand the consumer involved has concerns regarding the speed at which we responded to her inquiry regarding the payments remitted to our company. We understood the consumer's concerns were addressed during telephone conversations with our staff in February of this year and the consumer did not require additional information or further response.

We have received and reviewed Revdex.com consumer complaint case # [redacted] Thank you for your time in addressing this matter and allowing us to respond We understand the complaint in question involves two issues: the application of payments and the speed at which the complainant received a return call from a supervisor We understand that the complainant initially believed she did not receive credit for a $payment made 11/28/11, as the payment was not noted on the written payment history we provided to her on 9/24/14, and was unhappy that the representative did not correct the perceived error or agree to correct the perceived error but instead attempted to explain the payment on 11/28/11, was returned unpaid from the complainant's bank and, thus, credit could not be given for a dishonored check returned unpaid Our goal is to return requested telephone messages promptlyIn this case, the complainant requested to speak with a supervisorThe supervisor received the request on a Thursday and did return the call and responded in writing the following Monday We supplied the complaint with a copy of the dishonored payment from 11/28/Although a dishonored payment would typically be a breach of any agreement to discount the balance owing, we waived return payment fees charged to us by our bank and allowed complainant to continue on with her discounted installment agreement despite the breached agreement Complainant indicated verbally she accepted the reasoning (check returned unpaid from her bank) behind the representative's inability to provide her with immediate credit for the dishonored 11/28/payment of $Complainant indicated she accepted the balance provided to her in writing 9/24/did not contain errors and that she had received credit for all payments madeWe apologize for the delay in returning the telephone call she requested Please feel free to contact Sacor Financial, Incshould your office have further questions

I am rejecting this response because: I want to know what kind of enforcement did sacor financial did also to issue paper works concerning about the loan, the amount of money sacor financial sold [redacted] Toyota 4runner what percentage of the loan it does cover; plus according to [redacted] who said my Honda Odyssey is been sold, I wanted Sacor financial to prove all those paper works Prove, prove all those paper works let's see