Dr. [redacted] purchased a home from Saide and Assoc. pursuant to a written contract. Pursuant to that contract, paragraph 22, he is required to mediate any disputes and then arbitrate them if mediation is not fruitful. The written contract has very clear mandates for dispute resolution and prohibits...
any others not set forth in the contract. By filing this complaint, he has breached paragraph 22 of the purchase contract. Dr. [redacted]'s Revdex.com complaint is further flawed because he did not purchase construction services from the Seller. He purchased a house in "as is" condition as set forth in paragraph 11 of the contract. He therefore has no right to demand repairs or punch list items. He claims to have consulted the building plans, but has not consulted any of the revision sheets, and clearly does not understand the concept of discretionary items such as interior door handles, screens and stucco colors. Nor does he understand that such things as landscape weed barriers are not part of the building plans at all. Regardless, Dr. [redacted] signed a written contract that controls this dispute and we shall hold him to it.
I am rejecting this response because:We did not purchase this house in an "as is" condition. The author of this response (lawyer representing Saide and Associates) does not seem to be completely knowledgeable about this situation. We have been actively participating in the construction of this house since November 2014 (i.e. selecting flooring styles, choosing upgrades, tiles etc.). We have been exchanging emails with the the Building Project Manager on a near daily basis for several months. We paid for all the construction and upgrade items... we expect these to be in satisfactory condition for a new construction. Mismatched door handles, mismatched stucco and the overwhelming number of building flaws are unacceptable.I have reviewed all the building plans and revisions that have been approved (housed at the Sacramento County Department of Community Development). Items such as the CRAWL SPACE/ACCESS WELL and the backyard drainage are part of the building code and cannot be eliminated by revision.We want the company to complete/fix the construction problems. Also, we want reimbursement for any and all non-rendered services.
Dr. [redacted] purchased a home from Saide and Assoc. pursuant to a written contract. Pursuant to that contract, paragraph 22, he is required to mediate any disputes and then arbitrate them if mediation is not fruitful. The written contract has very clear mandates for dispute resolution and prohibits...
any others not set forth in the contract. By filing this complaint, he has breached paragraph 22 of the purchase contract. Dr. [redacted]'s Revdex.com complaint is further flawed because he did not purchase construction services from the Seller. He purchased a house in "as is" condition as set forth in paragraph 11 of the contract. He therefore has no right to demand repairs or punch list items. He claims to have consulted the building plans, but has not consulted any of the revision sheets, and clearly does not understand the concept of discretionary items such as interior door handles, screens and stucco colors. Nor does he understand that such things as landscape weed barriers are not part of the building plans at all. Regardless, Dr. [redacted] signed a written contract that controls this dispute and we shall hold him to it.
I am rejecting this response because:We did not purchase this house in an "as is" condition. The author of this response (lawyer representing Saide and Associates) does not seem to be completely knowledgeable about this situation. We have been actively participating in the construction of this house since November 2014 (i.e. selecting flooring styles, choosing upgrades, tiles etc.). We have been exchanging emails with the the Building Project Manager on a near daily basis for several months. We paid for all the construction and upgrade items... we expect these to be in satisfactory condition for a new construction. Mismatched door handles, mismatched stucco and the overwhelming number of building flaws are unacceptable.I have reviewed all the building plans and revisions that have been approved (housed at the Sacramento County Department of Community Development). Items such as the CRAWL SPACE/ACCESS WELL and the backyard drainage are part of the building code and cannot be eliminated by revision.We want the company to complete/fix the construction problems. Also, we want reimbursement for any and all non-rendered services.