Sign in

A-1 Radiator Battery & Muffler

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about A-1 Radiator Battery & Muffler? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews A-1 Radiator Battery & Muffler

A-1 Radiator Battery & Muffler Reviews (12)

Revdex.com:At this time, my complaint, ID [redacted] regarding Vanguard-healthcare-products has been resolved (By clicking "OK", your complaint will be closed as Resolved.) Sincerely, [redacted]

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me and the matter has been resolved Sincerely, [redacted]

Revdex.com:At this time, I have not been contacted by Vanguard Healthcare Products, Inc. regarding complaint ID ***.Sincerely,** ***

Revdex.com:At this time, I have not been contacted by Vanguard Healthcare Products, Inc. regarding complaint ID ***.Sincerely,** ***

Revdex.com:At this time, my complaint, ID *** regarding Vanguard-healthcare-products has been resolved
(By clicking "OK", your complaint will be closed as Resolved.)
Sincerely,*** ***

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ***, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me and the matter has been resolved
Sincerely,
*** ***

The business has responded Please see below:In regards to Complaint ***, we are deeply and sincerely sorry that *** *** is dissatisfied with our product, NailClenZ, and has had a poor experience with itHowever, we will be defending ourselves against the complaint filed by *** ***, as
we feel it prudent to make the Revdex.com aware that her complaint is dishonest and is misrepresenting the order she is using as the basis of her complaint *** ***’s order was incredibly difficult to track down in our system archives, as she used three different variations of her name throughout the duration of time we have record of her as one of our customersThe names she has used are *** ** ***, which appears on her official Revdex.com complaint, Candace Reed, which appears in our customer support email archives, and *** *** *., which is the name under which she ordered our productFor simplicity’s sake, I will refer to her hereafter as *** *** to ensure that our defense and dispute of her complaint is coherent, cohesive, and readily understandable To begin, I will quote the complaint that *** *** filed with the Revdex.com on October *, 2015, verbatim and in full: “I ordered this company’s anti-fungal nail treatment earlier this year, The cost for three bottles was $plus change($99+tax) Used for months without successI e-mailed them asking for a refund at the listed *** and *** ***I was called back and told that the refund was within the first thirty days of use onlyGive Me A Break! Nails do not grow out that fastSuccess and noticeable improvement did not show within daysThe company’s website advertising does not state day resultsof my toenails are fungalRemoval did not help, even with the use of OTC creamsThis product did not help when used as directed for monthsI am on a limited income and $is a lot of my monthly income.” (sic) In an email sent to our customer support team that same day, she stated the following: “I, carol reed, ordered and used your product over a month period this year, The bottles cost me $+ tax($and change)It did not help to reduce or prevent fungus nails from re-occurring where the nail previously was manually removed by meThe nails became easier to cut, but even though I continued to treat the nail bed with your product after the nail was removed, it grew back fungalI do not have any product to mail back to youIn desperation I used it to the last drop You may also see in your records that I attempted to re-order your productWhen I denied joining your automatic refill list my order was canceled and card reimbursedI am on a limited income, and $is a lot of money to meCould you please refund my money? Please e-mail me about the refundI am sure you can refund to my pay pal account or my debit cardI don't remember how I paidThank you so much.” (sic) The way that *** *** has presented her complaint is misleading and false, as our records of her transaction with us (order ID #***) unanimously disprove her statements and the details thereinAs I have previously stated, *** ***’s order (#***) was very difficult to find in our system to corroborate with her Revdex.com complaint; this is because she ordered our NailClenZ product, but emailed the customer support team for a different product of ours, PurNail; she also references PurNail in her Revdex.com complaint, as quoted aboveThese products, though they were formulated to treat the same condition (onychomycosis, or nail fungus) are not the same and have different websites, marketing, packaging, customer support teams, and return periods *** ***’s order, #***, was for a three-pack of NailClenZ, and cost her $plus tax and shipping, which totaled $She claims in her complaint that “the company’s website does not state day results”, which is true--we do not promise results in daysHowever, we do clearly state that NailClenZ has a day return policy, which appears on the bottom of the NailClenZ official site’s main pages and also here: *** When she ordered NailClenZ, she agreed to the terms stated on the website’s return policy page, which specifies a day return period Regarding *** ***’s October email, she requested a refund for the full amount of her purchase, order #***Our digital shopping cart records, which we can provide screenshots for, clearly and explicitly state that she was refunded, in full, including her cost of shipping, for the total amount of $106.85, on September **, As such, because she has already been refunded for more than the amount she requested in her complaint as her desired settlement, we will not be amenable to settling with her for $She already has her desired settlement, and had the funds returned to her accounts weeks before she emailed ***, which was not the proper support team to reach out to in the first place, and filed her Revdex.com complaint Our digital shopping cart also shows that *** *** is falsifying when her order was placed on her Revdex.com complaintNote how she does not use a date when referring to her original order in both the body of her complaint and her October * email--this is because she claims to have had NailClenz for six months prior to seeking a refund from us (February *, according to her complaint background), when our first and only record of her placing an order with us is on September **, 2015, mere days before she received both her order in the mail and was refunded Further, in her October * email to ***, *** *** claims to have attempted to subscribe to a renewal system for NailClenZ for automatic replacement shipments on a regular basisWe do not offer such a service for any of our productsWe charge each time a new order is placed with us, including those placed by returning customers, as we do not have a desire to offer subscription or automatic renewal services for our products We are concerned by the nature of this dispute, as *** *** appears to be attempting to mislead and “double dip” from us by filing a complaint with the Revdex.comIn an effort to resolve this matter quickly, honestly, and cooperatively, I can and will provide screenshots of our websites, *** ***’s October * email, her order in our digital shopping cart for NailClenZ, among other documentation or resources that the Revdex.com may find beneficial in the ruling of this dispute

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ***, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me and the matter has been resolved
Sincerely,
*** ***

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me and the matter has been resolved.
Sincerely,
[redacted]

The business has responded.  Please see below:In regards to Complaint [redacted], we are deeply and sincerely sorry that [redacted] is dissatisfied with our product, NailClenZ, and has had a poor experience with it. However, we will be defending ourselves against the complaint filed by [redacted], as...

we feel it prudent to make the Revdex.com aware that her complaint is dishonest and is misrepresenting the order she is using as the basis of her complaint. [redacted]’s order was incredibly difficult to track down in our system archives, as she used three different variations of her name throughout the duration of time we have record of her as one of our customers. The names she has used are [redacted], which appears on her official Revdex.com complaint, Candace Reed, which appears in our customer support email archives, and [redacted]., which is the name under which she ordered our product. For simplicity’s sake, I will refer to her hereafter as [redacted] to ensure that our defense and dispute of her complaint is coherent, cohesive, and readily understandable. To begin, I will quote the complaint that [redacted] filed with the Revdex.com on October *, 2015, verbatim and in full: “I ordered this company’s anti-fungal nail treatment earlier this year, 2015. The cost for three bottles was $106.00 plus change. ($99+tax) Used for 6 months without success. I e-mailed them asking for a refund at the listed [redacted] and [redacted]. I was called back and told that the refund was within the first thirty days of use only. Give Me A Break! Nails do not grow out that fast. Success and noticeable improvement did not show within 30 days. The company’s website advertising does not state 30 day results. 8 of my toenails are fungal. Removal did not help, even with the use of OTC creams. This product did not help when used as directed for 6 months. I am on a limited income and $106.00 is a lot of my monthly income.” (sic) In an email sent to our customer support team that same day, she stated the following: “I, carol reed, ordered and used your product over a 6 month period this year, 2015. The 3 bottles cost me $99.00 + tax($106.00 and change). It did not help to reduce or prevent fungus nails from re-occurring where the nail previously was manually removed by me. The nails became easier to cut, but even though I continued to treat the nail bed with your product after the nail was removed, it grew back fungal. I do not have any product to mail back to you. In desperation I used it to the last drop. You may also see in your records that I attempted to re-order your product. When I denied joining your automatic refill list my order was canceled and card reimbursed. I am on a limited income, and $106.00 is a lot of money to me. Could you please refund my money? Please e-mail me about the refund. I am sure you can refund to my pay pal account or my debit card. I don't remember how I paid. Thank you so much.” (sic) The way that [redacted] has presented her complaint is misleading and false, as our records of her transaction with us (order ID #[redacted]) unanimously disprove her statements and the details therein. As I have previously stated, [redacted]’s order (#[redacted]) was very difficult to find in our system to corroborate with her Revdex.com complaint; this is because she ordered our NailClenZ product, but emailed the customer support team for a different product of ours, PurNail; she also references PurNail in her Revdex.com complaint, as quoted above. These products, though they were formulated to treat the same condition (onychomycosis, or nail fungus) are not the same and have different websites, marketing, packaging, customer support teams, and return periods. [redacted]’s order, #[redacted], was for a three-pack of NailClenZ, and cost her $99.90 plus tax and shipping, which totaled $106.85. She claims in her complaint that “the company’s website does not state 30 day results”, which is true--we do not promise results in 30 days. However, we do clearly state that NailClenZ has a 30 day return policy, which appears on the bottom of the NailClenZ official site’s main pages and also here: [redacted] When she ordered NailClenZ, she agreed to the terms stated on the website’s return policy page, which specifies a 30 day return period. Regarding [redacted]’s October 2 email, she requested a refund for the full amount of her purchase, order #[redacted]. Our digital shopping cart records, which we can provide screenshots for, clearly and explicitly state that she was refunded, in full, including her cost of shipping, for the total amount of $106.85, on September **, 2015. As such, because she has already been refunded for more than the amount she requested in her complaint as her desired settlement, we will not be amenable to settling with her for $106.00. She already has her desired settlement, and had the funds returned to her accounts weeks before she emailed [redacted], which was not the proper support team to reach out to in the first place, and filed her Revdex.com complaint. Our digital shopping cart also shows that [redacted] is falsifying when her order was placed on her Revdex.com complaint. Note how she does not use a date when referring to her original order in both the body of her complaint and her October * email--this is because she claims to have had NailClenz for six months prior to seeking a refund from us (February *, 2015 according to her complaint background), when our first and only record of her placing an order with us is on September **, 2015, mere days before she received both her order in the mail and was refunded. Further, in her October * email to [redacted], [redacted] claims to have attempted to subscribe to a renewal system for NailClenZ for automatic replacement shipments on a regular basis. We do not offer such a service for any of our products. We charge each time a new order is placed with us, including those placed by returning customers, as we do not have a desire to offer subscription or automatic renewal services for our products. We are concerned by the nature of this dispute, as [redacted] appears to be attempting to mislead and “double dip” from us by filing a complaint with the Revdex.com. In an effort to resolve this matter quickly, honestly, and cooperatively, I can and will provide screenshots of our websites, [redacted]’s October * email, her order in our digital shopping cart for NailClenZ, among other documentation or resources that the Revdex.com may find beneficial in the ruling of this dispute.

Revdex.com:At this time, my complaint, ID [redacted] regarding Vanguard-healthcare-products has been resolved.
(By clicking "OK", your complaint will be closed as Resolved.)
Sincerely,[redacted]

Revdex.com:At this time, I have not been contacted by Vanguard-healthcare-products regarding complaint ID [redacted].Sincerely,[redacted]

Check fields!

Write a review of A-1 Radiator Battery & Muffler

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

A-1 Radiator Battery & Muffler Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Address: 592 S Fortuna Blvd, Fortuna, California, United States, 95540-3003

Phone:

Show more...

Web:

purnail.com

This site can’t be reached

Shady, yet now dead: once upon a time this website was reported to be associated with A-1 Radiator Battery & Muffler, but after several inspections we’ve come to the conclusion that this domain is no longer active.



Add contact information for A-1 Radiator Battery & Muffler

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated