A Carpenter & A Gentleman Construction Company Ltd

[redacted] is charged with sales tax liability from a liquor store managed by her former husband.? [redacted] is a full time employee and she did not manage the store.? The sales tax liability was incurred by her former husband, although [redacted] did come into the store periodically and had managerial authority over her former husband.? I am sure that her former husband was the primary reason for the failure to pay the sales tax.In order to open a store and collect sales taxes, [redacted] had to sign NY DTF-17-ATT which makes her responsible for the sales tax.I agreed to represent [redacted] to get the sales tax debt reduced or eliminated for a fixed fee of $3,500.? I charge $per hour.? The fixe fee is a ceiling on my fees.? I have put in weeks of time working on this case.? I have dealt with the "responsible person" issue under federal law.? That issue comes up when payroll taxes are collected and not paid to the IRS.? Under federal law, the IRS can assess the "responsible person" for the unpaid payroll taxes.? Under federal law, this is a factual and legal issue and I have worked that issue for the past years.? Under federal law, I can challenge a "liability" issue on an Offer in Compromise (OIC) "no liability Form 656-L.? Unfortunately, NY does not have a similar form.? NY does have an Offer in Compromise Form to settle a tax debt for "inability to pay."? I used the NY OIC form twice but each time it was returned because NY wants personal financial data submitted with that form; that data is not relevant to the "liability" issue.? In shore NY does not have a procedure to challenge a pure liability issue.? They only deal with "inability to pay."I work NY OIC cases but NY case workers say the [redacted] is stuck with the liability since she signed the DTF-17-ATT and accepted responsibility for the sales tax.? Form my experience with similar "responsiblle person" issues, I still believe there should be a way to challenge the sales tax liability of [redacted] when it was her former husband who kept the sales taxes collected and did not pay that amount to NY.? He ruined her business.I have not given up on this matter.? I believe that [redacted] should not be charged with the sales tax liaiblity when it was her former husband to collected those funds and did not pay them to NY.? I am a tax attorney with years experience with the IRS Chief Counsel in Washington DC.? I spent two years as a tax lobbyist and I have been representing taxpayers before the IRS and all of the states for the past years.? I am a highly skilled tax attorney.I believe I have been a member of the NY Revdex.com since and this is the first complaint.? I can document a "ton of time" I have put into this case on behalf of [redacted] ***.? I do believe presently that she should not be chared with the sales tax debt incurred by her former husband.? But I have yet to find a NY vehicle to get NY to address this issue.? I have worked on NY sales tax examinations and have been successful in negotiating a reduced sales tax debt.? Those were examination.? My problem is that I have not yet found a way to get the James matter reopened with the NY sales tax examiners.? Alvin SB***? ?

[redacted] is charged with sales tax liability from a liquor store managed by her former husband [redacted] is a full time employee and she did not manage the store The sales tax liability was incurred by her former husband, although [redacted] did come into the store periodically and had managerial authority over her former husband I am sure that her former husband was the primary reason for the failure to pay the sales tax.In order to open a store and collect sales taxes, [redacted] had to sign NY DTF-17-ATT which makes her responsible for the sales tax.I agreed to represent [redacted] to get the sales tax debt reduced or eliminated for a fixed fee of $3, I charge $per hour The fixe fee is a ceiling on my fees I have put in weeks of time working on this caseI have dealt with the "responsible person" issue under federal law That issue comes up when payroll taxes are collected and not paid to the IRS Under federal law, the IRS can assess the "responsible person" for the unpaid payroll taxes Under federal law, this is a factual and legal issue and I have worked that issue for the past yearsUnder federal law, I can challenge a "liability" issue on an Offer in Compromise (OIC) "no liability Form 656-L Unfortunately, NY does not have a similar form NY does have an Offer in Compromise Form to settle a tax debt for "inability to pay." I used the NY OIC form twice but each time it was returned because NY wants personal financial data submitted with that form; that data is not relevant to the "liability" issue In shore NY does not have a procedure to challenge a pure liability issue They only deal with "inability to pay."I work NY OIC cases but NY case workers say the [redacted] is stuck with the liability since she signed the DTF-17-ATT and accepted responsibility for the sales tax Form my experience with similar "responsiblle person" issues, I still believe there should be a way to challenge the sales tax liability of [redacted] when it was her former husband who kept the sales taxes collected and did not pay that amount to NY He ruined her business.I have not given up on this matter I believe that [redacted] should not be charged with the sales tax liaiblity when it was her former husband to collected those funds and did not pay them to NYI am a tax attorney with years experience with the IRS Chief Counsel in Washington DC I spent two years as a tax lobbyist and I have been representing taxpayers before the IRS and all of the states for the past years I am a highly skilled tax attorney.I believe I have been a member of the NY Revdex.com since and this is the first complaint I can document a "ton of time" I have put into this case on behalf of [redacted] *** I do believe presently that she should not be chared with the sales tax debt incurred by her former husband But I have yet to find a NY vehicle to get NY to address this issueI have worked on NY sales tax examinations and have been successful in negotiating a reduced sales tax debt Those were examination My problem is that I have not yet found a way to get the James matter reopened with the NY sales tax examinersAlvin SB***

*** *** is charged with sales tax liability from a liquor store managed by her former husband. *** *** is a full time employee and she did not manage the store. The sales tax liability was incurred by her former husband, although *** *** did come into the store periodically and
had managerial authority over her former husband. I am sure that her former husband was the primary reason for the failure to pay the sales tax.In order to open a store and collect sales taxes, *** *** had to sign NY DTF-17-ATT which makes her responsible for the sales tax.I agreed to represent *** *** to get the sales tax debt reduced or eliminated for a fixed fee of $3,500. I charge $per hour. The fixe fee is a ceiling on my fees. I have put in weeks of time working on this case. I have dealt with the "responsible person" issue under federal law. That issue comes up when payroll taxes are collected and not paid to the IRS. Under federal law, the IRS can assess the "responsible person" for the unpaid payroll taxes. Under federal law, this is a factual and legal issue and I have worked that issue for the past years. Under federal law, I can challenge a "liability" issue on an Offer in Compromise (OIC) "no liability Form 656-L. Unfortunately, NY does not have a similar form. NY does have an Offer in Compromise Form to settle a tax debt for "inability to pay." I used the NY OIC form twice but each time it was returned because NY wants personal financial data submitted with that form; that data is not relevant to the "liability" issue. In shore NY does not have a procedure to challenge a pure liability issue. They only deal with "inability to pay."I work NY OIC cases but NY case workers say the *** *** is stuck with the liability since she signed the DTF-17-ATT and accepted responsibility for the sales tax. Form my experience with similar "responsiblle person" issues, I still believe there should be a way to challenge the sales tax liability of *** *** when it was her former husband who kept the sales taxes collected and did not pay that amount to NY. He ruined her business.I have not given up on this matter. I believe that *** *** should not be charged with the sales tax liaiblity when it was her former husband to collected those funds and did not pay them to NY. I am a tax attorney with years experience with the IRS Chief Counsel in Washington DC. I spent two years as a tax lobbyist and I have been representing taxpayers before the IRS and all of the states for the past years. I am a highly skilled tax attorney.I believe I have been a member of the NY Revdex.com since and this is the first complaint. I can document a "ton of time" I have put into this case on behalf of *** ***. I do believe presently that she should not be chared with the sales tax debt incurred by her former husband. But I have yet to find a NY vehicle to get NY to address this issue. I have worked on NY sales tax examinations and have been successful in negotiating a reduced sales tax debt. Those were examination. My problem is that I have not yet found a way to get the James matter reopened with the NY sales tax examiners. Alvin SB***

[redacted] is charged with sales tax liability from a liquor store managed by her former husband.  [redacted] is a full time employee and she did not manage the store.  The sales tax liability was incurred by her former husband, although [redacted] did come into the store periodically and...

had managerial authority over her former husband.  I am sure that her former husband was the primary reason for the failure to pay the sales tax.In order to open a store and collect sales taxes, [redacted] had to sign NY DTF-17-ATT which makes her responsible for the sales tax.I agreed to represent [redacted] to get the sales tax debt reduced or eliminated for a fixed fee of $3,500.  I charge $400 per hour.  The fixe fee is a ceiling on my fees.  I have put in weeks of time working on this case. I have dealt with the "responsible person" issue under federal law.  That issue comes up when payroll taxes are collected and not paid to the IRS.  Under federal law, the IRS can assess the "responsible person" for the unpaid payroll taxes.  Under federal law, this is a factual and legal issue and I have worked that issue for the past 20 years. Under federal law, I can challenge a "liability" issue on an Offer in Compromise (OIC) "no liability Form 656-L.  Unfortunately, NY does not have a similar form.  NY does have an Offer in Compromise Form to settle a tax debt for "inability to pay."  I used the NY OIC form twice but each time it was returned because NY wants personal financial data submitted with that form; that data is not relevant to the "liability" issue.  In shore NY does not have a procedure to challenge a pure liability issue.  They only deal with "inability to pay."I work NY OIC cases but NY case workers say the [redacted] is stuck with the liability since she signed the DTF-17-ATT and accepted responsibility for the sales tax.  Form my experience with similar "responsiblle person" issues, I still believe there should be a way to challenge the sales tax liability of [redacted] when it was her former husband who kept the sales taxes collected and did not pay that amount to NY.  He ruined her business.I have not given up on this matter.  I believe that [redacted] should not be charged with the sales tax liaiblity when it was her former husband to collected those funds and did not pay them to NY. I am a tax attorney with 27 years experience with the IRS Chief Counsel in Washington DC.  I spent two years as a tax lobbyist and I have been representing taxpayers before the IRS and all of the states for the past 20 years.  I am a highly skilled tax attorney.I believe I have been a member of the NY Revdex.com since 2012 and this is the first complaint.  I can document a "ton of time" I have put into this case on behalf of [redacted].  I do believe presently that she should not be chared with the sales tax debt incurred by her former husband.  But I have yet to find a NY vehicle to get NY to address this issue. I have worked on NY sales tax examinations and have been successful in negotiating a reduced sales tax debt.  Those were examination.  My problem is that I have not yet found a way to get the James matter reopened with the NY sales tax examiners. Alvin S. B[redacted]