A D T Security Services

prior to the new television season [redacted] "On Demand" allowed us to view CBS programs at a later date In fact on August *, [redacted] and CBS signed a year agreement regarding CBS programs viewed through [redacted] This later viewing seems unavailable for CBS shows from the new fall season and only prior season episodes are somewhat available

CBS allow freelance writers to do work for them even when the writes make insensitive jokes about mass killings and terrorist attacksMrDavid L [redacted] writes for CBS and on Monday, May **, MrL [redacted] make a joke about the Manchester bombing saying that “MULTIPLE CONFIRMED FATALITIES at Manchester ArenaThe last time I listened to Ariana Grande I almost died too.” MrL [redacted] list CBS in his online profileCBS has not said that they will not allow this disgraceful individual write for them againThis must only mean that they agree with the insensitive remarks that he has made and his views reflect the views of CBS

This has to do with your Star Trek Online game for the Xbox One Basically its a buggy, laggy, non working piece of steamy junk...Arc blames it on lags on the server since its one place, which to me is itic, but its because of severe bugs in the game code that they are too lazy to fix I have seen a plethora of complaints in the chat during the game and Arc does nothing to fix them....Ive complained as well to no avail...Since your company name is attached to this, you all need to straighten those people out Im not willing to spend my money on that game

This is a review of CBS procedures for Televised Courtroom Programs The reviewer went on a 'Judge Judy' (JJ) program, filmed on April 24, The following serious errors were made by the JJ staff: Lost evidence Overlooked Court Costs Unauthorized withholding of tax on Judgement for damagesDetails: These items are not covered by a contract, but are separate errors caused by CBS operating procedures The settlement of a court case was the main service provided The complaint is not about that, but about customer service Items 1- were not covered by the agreement signed by both parties I turned over my exhibits at the end of the show to a CBS clerk upon request (to be returned to me after an interview), including exhibit D, and also blank sheets of paper Exhibit D , and one of the blank sheets of paper, WERE NOT RETURNED TO MEExhibit D was clearly tabbed as exhibit D with a yellow post it The item is a $Citation issued by Altamonte Springs Code Enforcement (ASCE) to Co-Defendant Hall for cutting down treesSomething like not paying court costs should be disclosed to a plaintiff well BEFORE bringing them to Los Angeles I NEVER waived my right to court costs, and in fact discussed the issue with associate, MsSmith, while I was in Altamonte Springs, FL before the hearing I carefully perused the Arbitration Agreement regarding this issue before signing Paragraph of the Arbitration Agreement states "...the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive an award of its actual attorney's fees and costs..." I was not awarded my court costs, $ I have already provided a photocopy of the receipts to MsSmithI did not consent to having $TAX WITHHELD on the damages I was awarded Issuing me 1099's is a different matter, and the taxability of an appearance fee is different than the taxability of a reimbursement of Calif taxes, and the taxability of an award for damages (An award for damages is not taxable, in that it makes the recipient whole again This is a well accepted principal of taxation.) No insurance company that I know of issues 1099s for damages awards, nor does a court issue 1099s for damages awards In fact, an award for damages, paid for by a third party, is taxable to the Defendant! A third party paid his obligation, which is taxable income to himCBS should not have withheld taxes, nor should it issue 1099s to a damages recipient