Initial Business Response /* (1000, 6, 2016/03/07) */
Re: Above All Construction, Inc.
Case: [redacted]
Dear Ms. [redacted]:
This letter is written in response to the complaint against Above All Construction, Inc.
The complainant's statements are not true. there was a contract between...
Above All Construction, Inc. "Above All" and the complainant that laid out a very specific scope of work. Above All was not responsible for HVAC in its cope of work. Complainant had difficulties finding an HVAC company to handle that portion of the work. There was never a change order and the work was not "turned over" to Above All to handle. There were no instructions to Above All about the HVAC. They city of St. Paul had required that plans be submitted.
Above All at all times was prepared to carry out its obligations under the contract. Above All assisted complainant by referring him to an HVAC company. Complainant dealt directly with that company. The HVAC company apparently had difficulties dealing with complainant and his unreasonable position and demands. The HVAC company set up the engineer and plans were drawn up. Plans were provided to complainant and he paid the down payment to Above All and paid the fee for the engineer's plans.
After receiving the engineering plans (which were submitted to the city of St. Paul), complainant was not in agreement with the system that the HVAC company and engineer felt was necessary for the space in question. The engineer and HVAC company were emphatic that the space would require the system that was set forth in the plans as the existing facilities would result in a space that was too cold in the winter and too hot in the summer. They were not willing to do substandard work.
Complainant decided to blame Above All for issues that were outside of Above All's control and breached the contract with Above All. Above All is entitled to damages and the matter is being handled by the attorneys.
Sincerely,
Robert A. [redacted]
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (2000, 8, 2016/03/17) */
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 6, 2016/03/07) */
Re: Above All Construction, Inc.
Case: [redacted]
Dear Ms. [redacted]:
This letter is written in response to the complaint against Above All Construction, Inc.
The complainant's statements are not true. there was a contract between...
Above All Construction, Inc. "Above All" and the complainant that laid out a very specific scope of work. Above All was not responsible for HVAC in its cope of work. Complainant had difficulties finding an HVAC company to handle that portion of the work. There was never a change order and the work was not "turned over" to Above All to handle. There were no instructions to Above All about the HVAC. They city of St. Paul had required that plans be submitted.
Above All at all times was prepared to carry out its obligations under the contract. Above All assisted complainant by referring him to an HVAC company. Complainant dealt directly with that company. The HVAC company apparently had difficulties dealing with complainant and his unreasonable position and demands. The HVAC company set up the engineer and plans were drawn up. Plans were provided to complainant and he paid the down payment to Above All and paid the fee for the engineer's plans.
After receiving the engineering plans (which were submitted to the city of St. Paul), complainant was not in agreement with the system that the HVAC company and engineer felt was necessary for the space in question. The engineer and HVAC company were emphatic that the space would require the system that was set forth in the plans as the existing facilities would result in a space that was too cold in the winter and too hot in the summer. They were not willing to do substandard work.
Complainant decided to blame Above All for issues that were outside of Above All's control and breached the contract with Above All. Above All is entitled to damages and the matter is being handled by the attorneys.
Sincerely,
Robert A. [redacted]
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (2000, 8, 2016/03/17) */