[redacted] ***’s complaint is not about a consumer transaction, and thus outside the scope of the Revdex.com ***’s complaint is over a business dispute between a property owner and the entity she hired to manage that property under a contract This is a largely a dispute about the terms of a contract which is not really what the Revdex.com concerns itself with.There was no "conflict of interest" in leasing Mr [redacted] another property as he had been given a day notice to vacate at the instruction of Mrs*** He paid rent to the end of his lease and paid damages in excess of his deposit within days as required by Ohio statutes.Mrs [redacted] had previously sent this complaint through her attorney and here is our attorney's response: [redacted] XPerezMetro Place South, Suite 100Dublin, OH Re: Fenton Street Columbus, OH Dear MrPerez: Please be advised that I represent C.RO’Neil & Co(“CRO”) with regard to this matterThis letter is in response to your correspondence dated February 1, The lease agreement and Columbus City Code Section place the onus on the occupant to eliminate any pests within the Property [redacted] indicated to CRO that he hired a pest control company to treat for bed bugs at the PropertyCRO did not receive any subsequent notice from [redacted] that the pest control company failed to eliminate the bed bugs Gerry O’Neil, a trained real estate/property management professional, inspected the Property after [redacted] vacatedCRO’s procedure is for a vacated property to additionally be inspected by a home inspector and pest exterminator, if necessary [redacted] instructed CRO to bypass the procedures and spend no money on inspections or preparation of the vacated PropertyThus, per Ms***’s instruction, CRO did not have the Property inspected by a home inspector or an exterminatorIt is untenable for Ms [redacted] to prevent CRO from performing its duties under the contract and then seek consequential damages allegedly resulting from non-performance of those duties CRO denies Ms***’s allegation that CRO collected $1,in rent each month from ***CRO’s internal ledger plainly shows that the monthly rent amount collected from [redacted] was $850, which was the rent amount under the lease agreementIt is confounding to imagine that [redacted] paid an additional $in rent each month, without protest, and only notified Ms [redacted] about the nearly 50% increase in rent after paying twelve months, or $4,800, of increased rent Neither the cash flow statements nor the ledger indicate that [redacted] paid $1,in rent each month, as opposed to $If you possess any evidence of Ms***’s that [redacted] paid $1,in rent each month to CRO, please provide such evidence for my review CRO is not amenable to paying Ms [redacted] for loss of personal property and extermination fees that were incurred in November 2016, since Ms [redacted] prevented CRO from having an exterminator inspect the Property several months earlier in or around June Please address further correspondence and communication regarding this matter to the undersigned Sincerely, Collin BShowe cc: C.RO’Neil & Co
This complaint is not about a consumer transaction, and thus outside the scope of the Revdex.com. ***’s complaint is over a business dispute between a property owner and the entity she hired to manage that property under a contract. This is a largely a dispute about the terms of a contract which is not really what the Revdex.com concerns itself with Bedbugs are not a disclosure issue under State or local statutes or ordinances and are considered household pests (same as roaches, ants, etc.) and are the landlord's responsibility to exterminate As stated in the reply, Mrs*** directed C.RO'Neil and Coto not have the unit professionally inspected by a licensed home inspector or exterminator, so it is untenable to hold C.RO'Neil and Coaccountable
Mr*** is a current property owner we manage for We have fulfilled our contract and obligation to lease and manage his property as laid out in the property management agreement We secured a qualified tenant for the property within days of marketing We collected their
deposit, and the tenant paid last month's rent and pro-rated rent upon move in The last month's rent check did not clear their account, the tenant contacted us prior to us receiving notice from our bank, the tenant brought in certified funds and paid the NSF fees They have since made their rental payments on time Please see that attached tenant ledger.Mr*** receives a monthly statement and check from us in the same month the rents are collected showing rents received, maintenance performed, and his net receipt for the month There are no monies owed to him beyond the rents paid
Good morning,My name is *** ***I had taken the necessary steps to file a complaint against the property management company I am under contract with I just received an email this morning stating the complaint had been closed and unresolved but, I did not get any information in regards to the next steps that needed to be done to get my complaint fully taken care ofThanks in advance for your help
I no longer have the attorney due to a limited budget. CR' ONeil is not attempting to compromise. I am a State employee and have a limited budget. My next step is to contact our Attorney General for the State of Ohio to investigate the business practices of CR'ONeil regarding the bed bug issue.
[redacted]’s complaint is not about a consumer transaction, and thus outside the scope of the Revdex.com. [redacted]’s complaint is over a business dispute between a property owner and the entity she hired to manage that property under a contract. This is a largely a dispute about the terms of a...
contract which is not really what the Revdex.com concerns itself with.There was no "conflict of interest" in leasing Mr. [redacted] another property as he had been given a 30 day notice to vacate at the instruction of Mrs. [redacted]. He paid rent to the end of his lease and paid damages in excess of his deposit within 30 days as required by Ohio statutes.Mrs. [redacted] had previously sent this complaint through her attorney and here is our attorney's response: [redacted] X. Perez545 Metro Place South, Suite 100Dublin, OH 43017 Re: 2311 Fenton Street Columbus, OH 43224 Dear Mr. Perez: Please be advised that I represent C.R. O’Neil & Co. (“CRO”) with regard to this matter. This letter is in response to your correspondence dated February 1, 2017. The lease agreement and Columbus City Code Section 4551.02 place the onus on the occupant to eliminate any pests within the Property. [redacted] indicated to CRO that he hired a pest control company to treat for bed bugs at the Property. CRO did not receive any subsequent notice from [redacted] that the pest control company failed to eliminate the bed bugs. Gerry O’Neil, a trained real estate/property management professional, inspected the Property after [redacted] vacated. CRO’s normal procedure is for a vacated property to additionally be inspected by a home inspector and pest exterminator, if necessary. [redacted] instructed CRO to bypass the normal procedures and spend no money on inspections or preparation of the vacated Property. Thus, per Ms. [redacted]’s instruction, CRO did not have the Property inspected by a home inspector or an exterminator. It is untenable for Ms. [redacted] to prevent CRO from performing its duties under the contract and then seek consequential damages allegedly resulting from non-performance of those duties. CRO denies Ms. [redacted]’s allegation that CRO collected $1,250 in rent each month from [redacted]. CRO’s internal ledger plainly shows that the monthly rent amount collected from [redacted] was $850, which was the rent amount under the lease agreement. It is confounding to imagine that [redacted] paid an additional $400 in rent each month, without protest, and only notified Ms. [redacted] about the nearly 50% increase in rent after paying twelve months, or $4,800, of increased rent. Neither the cash flow statements nor the ledger indicate that [redacted] paid $1,250 in rent each month, as opposed to $850. If you possess any evidence of Ms. [redacted]’s that [redacted] paid $1,250 in rent each month to CRO, please provide such evidence for my review. CRO is not amenable to paying Ms. [redacted] for loss of personal property and extermination fees that were incurred in November 2016, since Ms. [redacted] prevented CRO from having an exterminator inspect the Property several months earlier in or around June 2016. Please address further correspondence and communication regarding this matter to the undersigned. Sincerely, Collin B. Showe cc: C.R. O’Neil & Co.
[redacted] ***’s complaint is not about a consumer transaction, and thus outside the scope of the Revdex.com ***’s complaint is over a business dispute between a property owner and the entity she hired to manage that property under a contract This is a largely a dispute about the terms of a contract which is not really what the Revdex.com concerns itself with.There was no "conflict of interest" in leasing Mr [redacted] another property as he had been given a day notice to vacate at the instruction of Mrs*** He paid rent to the end of his lease and paid damages in excess of his deposit within days as required by Ohio statutes.Mrs [redacted] had previously sent this complaint through her attorney and here is our attorney's response: [redacted] XPerezMetro Place South, Suite 100Dublin, OH Re: Fenton Street Columbus, OH Dear MrPerez: Please be advised that I represent C.RO’Neil & Co(“CRO”) with regard to this matterThis letter is in response to your correspondence dated February 1, The lease agreement and Columbus City Code Section place the onus on the occupant to eliminate any pests within the Property [redacted] indicated to CRO that he hired a pest control company to treat for bed bugs at the PropertyCRO did not receive any subsequent notice from [redacted] that the pest control company failed to eliminate the bed bugs Gerry O’Neil, a trained real estate/property management professional, inspected the Property after [redacted] vacatedCRO’s procedure is for a vacated property to additionally be inspected by a home inspector and pest exterminator, if necessary [redacted] instructed CRO to bypass the procedures and spend no money on inspections or preparation of the vacated PropertyThus, per Ms***’s instruction, CRO did not have the Property inspected by a home inspector or an exterminatorIt is untenable for Ms [redacted] to prevent CRO from performing its duties under the contract and then seek consequential damages allegedly resulting from non-performance of those duties CRO denies Ms***’s allegation that CRO collected $1,in rent each month from ***CRO’s internal ledger plainly shows that the monthly rent amount collected from [redacted] was $850, which was the rent amount under the lease agreementIt is confounding to imagine that [redacted] paid an additional $in rent each month, without protest, and only notified Ms [redacted] about the nearly 50% increase in rent after paying twelve months, or $4,800, of increased rent Neither the cash flow statements nor the ledger indicate that [redacted] paid $1,in rent each month, as opposed to $If you possess any evidence of Ms***’s that [redacted] paid $1,in rent each month to CRO, please provide such evidence for my review CRO is not amenable to paying Ms [redacted] for loss of personal property and extermination fees that were incurred in November 2016, since Ms [redacted] prevented CRO from having an exterminator inspect the Property several months earlier in or around June Please address further correspondence and communication regarding this matter to the undersigned Sincerely, Collin BShowe cc: C.RO’Neil & Co
This complaint is not about a consumer transaction, and thus outside the scope of the Revdex.com. ***’s complaint is over a business dispute between a property owner and the entity she hired to manage that property under a contract. This is a largely a dispute about the terms of a contract which is not really what the Revdex.com concerns itself with Bedbugs are not a disclosure issue under State or local statutes or ordinances and are considered household pests (same as roaches, ants, etc.) and are the landlord's responsibility to exterminate As stated in the reply, Mrs*** directed C.RO'Neil and Coto not have the unit professionally inspected by a licensed home inspector or exterminator, so it is untenable to hold C.RO'Neil and Coaccountable
Mr*** is a current property owner we manage for We have fulfilled our contract and obligation to lease and manage his property as laid out in the property management agreement We secured a qualified tenant for the property within days of marketing We collected their
deposit, and the tenant paid last month's rent and pro-rated rent upon move in The last month's rent check did not clear their account, the tenant contacted us prior to us receiving notice from our bank, the tenant brought in certified funds and paid the NSF fees They have since made their rental payments on time Please see that attached tenant ledger.Mr*** receives a monthly statement and check from us in the same month the rents are collected showing rents received, maintenance performed, and his net receipt for the month There are no monies owed to him beyond the rents paid
Good morning,My name is *** ***I had taken the necessary steps to file a complaint against the property management company I am under contract with I just received an email this morning stating the complaint had been closed and unresolved but, I did not get any information in regards to the next steps that needed to be done to get my complaint fully taken care ofThanks in advance for your help
I no longer have the attorney due to a limited budget. CR' ONeil is not attempting to compromise. I am a State employee and have a limited budget. My next step is to contact our Attorney General for the State of Ohio to investigate the business practices of CR'ONeil regarding the bed bug issue.
[redacted]’s complaint is not about a consumer transaction, and thus outside the scope of the Revdex.com. [redacted]’s complaint is over a business dispute between a property owner and the entity she hired to manage that property under a contract. This is a largely a dispute about the terms of a...
contract which is not really what the Revdex.com concerns itself with.There was no "conflict of interest" in leasing Mr. [redacted] another property as he had been given a 30 day notice to vacate at the instruction of Mrs. [redacted]. He paid rent to the end of his lease and paid damages in excess of his deposit within 30 days as required by Ohio statutes.Mrs. [redacted] had previously sent this complaint through her attorney and here is our attorney's response: [redacted] X. Perez545 Metro Place South, Suite 100Dublin, OH 43017 Re: 2311 Fenton Street Columbus, OH 43224 Dear Mr. Perez: Please be advised that I represent C.R. O’Neil & Co. (“CRO”) with regard to this matter. This letter is in response to your correspondence dated February 1, 2017. The lease agreement and Columbus City Code Section 4551.02 place the onus on the occupant to eliminate any pests within the Property. [redacted] indicated to CRO that he hired a pest control company to treat for bed bugs at the Property. CRO did not receive any subsequent notice from [redacted] that the pest control company failed to eliminate the bed bugs. Gerry O’Neil, a trained real estate/property management professional, inspected the Property after [redacted] vacated. CRO’s normal procedure is for a vacated property to additionally be inspected by a home inspector and pest exterminator, if necessary. [redacted] instructed CRO to bypass the normal procedures and spend no money on inspections or preparation of the vacated Property. Thus, per Ms. [redacted]’s instruction, CRO did not have the Property inspected by a home inspector or an exterminator. It is untenable for Ms. [redacted] to prevent CRO from performing its duties under the contract and then seek consequential damages allegedly resulting from non-performance of those duties. CRO denies Ms. [redacted]’s allegation that CRO collected $1,250 in rent each month from [redacted]. CRO’s internal ledger plainly shows that the monthly rent amount collected from [redacted] was $850, which was the rent amount under the lease agreement. It is confounding to imagine that [redacted] paid an additional $400 in rent each month, without protest, and only notified Ms. [redacted] about the nearly 50% increase in rent after paying twelve months, or $4,800, of increased rent. Neither the cash flow statements nor the ledger indicate that [redacted] paid $1,250 in rent each month, as opposed to $850. If you possess any evidence of Ms. [redacted]’s that [redacted] paid $1,250 in rent each month to CRO, please provide such evidence for my review. CRO is not amenable to paying Ms. [redacted] for loss of personal property and extermination fees that were incurred in November 2016, since Ms. [redacted] prevented CRO from having an exterminator inspect the Property several months earlier in or around June 2016. Please address further correspondence and communication regarding this matter to the undersigned. Sincerely, Collin B. Showe cc: C.R. O’Neil & Co.