Sign in

American Kennel Club

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about American Kennel Club? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews American Kennel Club

American Kennel Club Reviews (20)

AKC puppy sold with missing kidney, and liver issues
Susan Salamacha in Conn. is a puppy mill. She has another litter listed on the AKC marketplace. Please do not let this woman breed any more Shih Tzu puppies. She sold us an unhealthy puppy. She refuses to refund any cost due to her poor health conditions. She is untruthful, unethical, and should not be able to continue this animal abuse. Our puppy is missing a kidney, has liver issues, and neurological problems because of this. I went to the AKC site thinking this would not happen, we were wrong. I am still waiting for AKC to respond to this important matter.

Rottweiler Scammer
I am beyond frustrated that AKC allowed a women to stay with in AKC even after multiple violation to their ethical breeding code, and bylaws. When are they going to do something about this woman.
Here is my story: We were approached by Chandra Klem-Haluczak in January 2020 regarding pups we had for sale. Much like other breeders throughout the US, she came to us with the story about Rodsden Rottweilers and getting her own line started. That day she bought a male puppy and the very next day came back to buy a second one. Lori Janik (Chandra’s mother) claimed it was for her. Within the next two weeks, Chandra and I kept in contact . She expressed that she was considering another female we had and that her soon to be son-in-law wanted one as well, to surprise her daughter as a wedding gift. Two more puppies were bought the following week. Chandra kept in touch for the most part claiming they were all starting obedience class together and how great the pups are. About a month down the road I was contacted by a gentleman claiming he had tracked me down through a picture Chandra had shared and that he believed he bought one of our pups. You could imagine my shock when we have contracts that clearly state no resales of our pups. He also claimed that the pup was claimed to be out of a Rodsden line and that he was having issues getting paperwork from Chandra. Upon investigation we came to find out Chandra did indeed re-sell the puppy price for almost twice as much as she bought it. She did claim it was a Rodsden line and that she sent pictures taken from my home claiming my female was a Rodsden dog. We have been lucky enough to find 3 of the pups however 1 is still missing... AKC has done very little to help in this matter.. I have sent copies of our contract and requested Chandras name be removed from the pups...
Below is a letter I have mailed to AKC:
Compliance Support Department
8051 Arco Corporate Dr.
Raleigh NC 27617
June 19, 2021

I am writing to officially complain and request that the American Kennel Club (hereafter referred to as AKC) initiate an investigation against Chandra Klem Haluczak.
I charge that she has broken the American Kennel Club’s Code of Sportsmanship conduct, specifically:
Mrs. Klem Haluczak is not committed to “honesty” in any of her behavior, especially when dealing with people who are interested in purebred dogs and the acquiring of a purebred puppy.
Mrs. Klem Haluczak injects “personal advantage” into her behavior by advertising and standing on the reputation of her grandmother’s work, AKC judge and Ms. Joan Klem of Rodsens Rottweilers, as her own. It is my understanding that Mrs. Joan Klem is unwell and has nothing to do with Mrs. Klem Haluczak’s business dealings in dogs.
Mrs. Klem Haluczak rejects the AKC Bylaws, rules, regulations and policies by committing multiple acts of deception and fraud across the United States and is still actively doing so.
Mrs. Klem Haluczak does not “deal fairly” with puppy-buyers: she takes deposits of money on non-existent litters, brokers puppies without informing the breeder from whom she buys or the buyer of the resultant pup, lies about the original breeder of any puppies supplied, switches puppies to a different or lower quality than promised, commits deceit and sleight of hand upon naïve puppy-buyers on a continual basis.
Mrs. Klem Haluczak is unable to “share honest and open appraisals of breeding stock” because she buys puppies for resale from anyone who will sell to her and has no personal knowledge of the dogs involved. In addition, the original breeders of the puppies are not advised or cognizant of her intent to immediately resell for profit.
Mrs. Klem Haluczak does not consider the health and welfare of the puppies; she merely buys and resells for a profit and has no concern for the object of trade.
Mrs. Klem Haluczak has embarrassed the sport of pure dog dogs as well as the American Kennel Club with her actions of fraud and deceit upon multiple unsuspecting parties who are frustrated that they have lost their deposits on non-existent litters or are receiving puppies from unknown sources. Their complaints to the AKC are not acted upon due to AKC being a registry and not being responsible for their situations. Nonetheless, this leaves a very bitter aftertaste with people who are often dealing with the pure-bred dog world for the first time.
There is a Facebook group of defrauded people, Rodsens Rottweilers Reviews Group.
(https://www.facebook.com/groups/2306481369655081)
Mrs. Klem was also on the TV show Judge Judy where she lost:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPbTpIYPFi0&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR3q6oPTFulU4... /> Wronged people have also created and post on the website www.rodsensrottweilers.com
Mrs. Klem Haluczak has been and is being sued by multiple people for fraud. Many of them have also filed complaints with the Illinois Attorney General.
I am requesting the American Kennel Club to open an investigation against Mrs. Chandra Klem for the grievances listed, and any others as deemed suitable by the AKC.

When will they do something? Do they even care? Or are they like her and only care about how much money they can make? If you are going to claim you dont allow people like her in AKC them by all means should you take steps to change this?

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me however the matter has not been resolved Sincerely, [redacted]

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted] , and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because: [Your Answer Here] I have provided the AKC with explanation more than sufficient to explain lack of the sales documentation requested and referred AKC to its own, online database and online registration system/process, designed and promoted by AKC to bypass the need for paper documentationAKC refuses to acknowledge (1) That its online registration (using a pin code vice paper product) is not accepted by AKC as valid registration in that it continues to use and advertise its online systems as complete and adequate; and (2) AKC has not addressed the legal issue that the owner transferred all rights to the dog (including registration) to me; and that follow up four months later to complain that the owner did not "intend" for the transfer of the dog to me to include registation rights (after providing me the registration pin) is insufficient for AKC to then delete my dog's full registrationIf the owner's complaint had been registered within a reasonable amount of time (say days) and had been submitted BEFORE AKC accepted my online registration using the pin, and BEFORE AKC had sent me final and full registration documentation (which precipitated my disposal of original sale paperwork), and had the owner offered (within days) a refund of the purchase price; then I would concede to the owner's perogative to delete my dog's full registrationThe facts, however, go undisputed by either the seller or AKC that (1) I purchased the dog in good faith believing the price included full registration; (2) I received AKC's full registration paperwork from the seller, including the full registration pin - verifying the seller was transferring the dog with full registration; (3) AKC accepted the online registration (using the pin provided by the seller); (4) AKC entered my dog into its database as fully registered; and (4) AKC sent me "documented proof" that AKC had fully registered my dog; and (5) upon receipt of the "fully registered certificated" from AKC, and after checking that the online database showed my dog as fully registered - I disposed of the original purchase paperworkNo where, in any of the correspondence has either AKC or the seller indicated which step (required by AKC's online registration process) I did NOT follow to the letterHaving followed AKC online registration process to the letter, and having received from AKC legal and full registration documentation, AKC cannot then retract the full registration of my dog on the grounds that the SELLER "didn't follow the AKC process" and the SELLER "didn't intend to sell full registration"It is the SELLER that did not follow AKC processes in that the SELLER did not fill out the AKC paperwork in the way required to indicate that full registration was being withheldAnd it is the SELLER that did not object until four months following the transfer of funds and product, and full registration by AKCAKC response continues to be non sequitor, without legal groundscontrary to its own established processes, and showing extreme prejudice in behalf of breeders who frequent its services In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above Sincerely, [redacted]

RevDex.com: At this time, I have not been contacted by American Kennel Club regarding complaint ID [redacted] . Sincerely, [redacted] ***

[redacted] submitted payment on behalf of a club for recording servicesPayment was accepted by the American Kennel Club on 415.On 415, a duplicate payment was erroneously taken by American Kennel ClubAmerican Kennel Club had no way of knowing the error was made.On [redacted] brought the error to the attention of the American Kennel Club.On the refund had been generated and credited to the customer’s card.Thank You Manager Performance Events

The AKC just did an inspection on Van-M Collies in Millville, NJ in January 2019 and they passed. The Humane Law Enforcement officer did an inspections and they failed and were given a warning for animal cruelty violations which have not been completely fixed. How can the AKC support turn a blind eye to this?

Thank you for your inquiry
Chapter XI Limited Registration of AKC Procedures for Registration Matters states that the decision as to the registration status of a dog is the responsibility of the litter ownerAlthough the AKC would hope that the litter owner would discuss the limited
status prior to the sale of the dogWe do not license or endorse breeders and therefore, have no control over their business practices.
If *** *** is unable to resolve the matter with the seller, she may wish to seek legal counsel and determine if she can gain relief through civil channels
We hope you will find this information helpfulShould you have any further questions, please advise our office further

My mini-schnauzer pup, was registered with AKC with all if the paper work done, and fee's paid. Several months later, they send me a letter stating that one of his great, great grandfather was registered TWICE, as a Shepard and a Mini-schnauzer, so therefore, now he is NOT registered! So with him being a stud, their are alot of people that demand answers. As this is a business, alot of money is involved. Now there will be an attorney to get this fixed.

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me and the matter has been resolved.
Sincerely,
[redacted]

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me however the matter has not been resolved.
Sincerely,
[redacted]

+1

[redacted] submitted payment on behalf of a club for recording services. Payment was accepted by the American Kennel Club on 4/**/15.On 4/**/15, a duplicate payment was erroneously taken by American Kennel Club. American Kennel Club had no way of knowing the error was...

made.On 8/**/15 [redacted] brought the error to the attention of the American Kennel Club.On 9/**/15 the refund had been generated and credited to the customer’s card.Thank You
Manager Performance Events

Revdex.com:
At this time, I have not been contacted by American Kennel Club regarding complaint ID [redacted].
Sincerely,
[redacted]

The American Kennel Club originally received a complaint from litter owners Christine B[redacted] and Rachel B[redacted] which indicated the pup registered to [redacted] should have been...

registered with limited registration status. The litter owners provided us with a copy of their litter records which indicated all pups from the litter should be registered with limited status. According to Chapter 3 Section 4 of the AKC Rules Applying to Registration and Discipline, the litter owner may choose limited or full registration for the pups from the litter at their discretion. Based on the information provided by the litter owners, we contacted [redacted] for his comments and the original Dog Registration application he received from the litter owners which would provide us information regarding the registration status the litter owners gave his pup. [redacted] did not provide us with the original application or any other documents relating to the registration status of the dog. Please note, in order to register his dog online, [redacted] had to certify the following: I (we) apply to the American Kennel Club to have a Registration Certificate for this dog issued in my (our) name(s). I (we) certify that I (we) acquired this dog directly on the date stated above from the Litter Owner(s) or the Former Owner(s) and if applicable, that I (we) have complete written authority from the other owner(s) to submit this application to register this dog in all our name(s). I (we) understand that upon request I (we) will be required to provide to the AKC any such written authorization. I (we) certify that if this dog was transferred from the Litter Owner to another person(s) that I have entered that information at the appropriate place and will maintain the original applications, certificates and/or supplemental transfers and provide them to the AKC upon request. Unfortunately, as [redacted] did not provide us with the requested documentation, we were unable to assist him and we corrected the registration of his dog per our rules and policies. Should we receive the requested documentation from [redacted] in the future, we will review the matter accordingly.

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:

[Your Answer Here]
 I have provided the AKC with explanation more than sufficient to explain lack of the sales documentation requested and referred AKC to its own, online database and online registration system/process, designed and promoted by AKC to bypass the need for paper documentation. AKC refuses to acknowledge (1) That its online registration (using a pin code vice paper product) is not accepted by AKC as valid registration in that it continues to use and advertise its online systems as complete and adequate; and (2) AKC has not addressed the legal issue that the owner transferred all rights to the dog (including registration) to me; and that follow up four months later to complain that the owner did not "intend" for the transfer of the dog to me to include registation rights (after providing me the registration pin) is insufficient for AKC to then delete my dog's full registration. If the owner's complaint had been registered within a reasonable amount of time (say 30 days) and had been submitted BEFORE AKC accepted my online registration using the pin, and BEFORE AKC had sent me final and full registration documentation (which precipitated my disposal of original sale paperwork), and had the owner offered (within 30 days) a refund of the purchase price; then I would concede to the owner's perogative to delete my dog's full registration. The facts, however, go undisputed by either the seller or AKC that (1) I purchased the dog in good faith believing the price included full registration; (2) I received AKC's full registration paperwork from the seller, including the full registration pin - verifying the seller was transferring the dog with full registration; (3) AKC accepted the online registration (using the pin provided by the seller); (4) AKC entered my dog into its database as fully registered; and (4) AKC sent me "documented proof" that AKC had fully registered my dog; and (5) upon receipt of the "fully registered certificated" from AKC, and after checking that the online database showed my dog as fully registered - I disposed of the original purchase paperwork. No where, in any of the correspondence has either AKC or the seller indicated which step (required by AKC's online registration process) I did NOT follow to the letter. Having followed AKC online registration process to the letter, and having received from AKC legal and full registration documentation, AKC cannot then retract the full registration of my dog on the grounds that the SELLER "didn't follow the AKC process" and the SELLER "didn't intend to sell full registration". It is the SELLER that did not follow AKC processes in that the SELLER did not fill out the AKC paperwork in the way required to indicate that full registration was being withheld. And it is the SELLER that did not object until four months following the transfer of funds and product, and full registration by AKC. AKC response continues to be non sequitor, without legal grounds. contrary to its own established processes, and showing extreme prejudice in behalf of breeders who frequent its services.
 
 
 
 
 
In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above.
Sincerely,
[redacted]

Ordered pet poison helpline. Tried to use it two weeks later and they couldn’t find me in the system. They sent me to customer support to correct. They looked into it and said they’d fix it tomorrow. . . Worst support organization ever.

Review: I was charged twice for the same service. I was charged on $248.50 on my credit card on April **, 2015 and then again on April **, 2015 for $248.50. Susan F[redacted] and her manager both admit this happened and I was charged twice for the same service. I call them up and they would not give me a definite date when it would be resolved and it would take several weeks. I then talked to the supervisor (Karen) and she said it would do the best she could and she did not know when it will get done because she had other duties to take care of. This is totally unacceptable. I asked her to get back to me in week and let me know what was going on and she said she would not commit to a time table but do the best she could. She also admitted, I was not the only one doubled charged on their credit card. I cannot believe an organization as large as AKC operates like this.Desired Settlement: I want the to be reimbursed the amount of $248.50 they over charged me in double billing.

Business

Response:

[redacted] submitted payment on behalf of a club for recording services. Payment was accepted by the American Kennel Club on 4/**/15.On 4/**/15, a duplicate payment was erroneously taken by American Kennel Club. American Kennel Club had no way of knowing the error was made.On 8/**/15 [redacted] brought the error to the attention of the American Kennel Club.On 9/**/15 the refund had been generated and credited to the customer’s card.Thank YouManager Performance Events

Review: I suppose that blitzing me with spam comes under the heading of "unauthorized service," if you consider delivering advertising a "service." I purchased a purebred corgi puppy from a local breeder, and at the time she asked me for my contact information by way of registering the pup and the litter. My e-mail address was then forwarded to the AKC. Since then advertising from AKC and its affiliates and companies that it sells private information to has poured into my e-mail in-box EVERY DAY.

I have asked these people repeatedly to take me off their mailing lists and to stop sharing my private information. They simply ignore these requests. The e-mail address that they're flooding with unwanted advertising is used for business, and so this nuisance interferes with productivity. To disregard requests from the target of these marketing campaigns is unethical. It needs to stop.Desired Settlement: I would like the American Kennel Club a) to cease selling or giving away my contact information; b) to have its affiliates cease contacting me by e-mail or by any other means; and c) itself to cease contacting me by e-mail or any other means.

Consumer

Response:

At this time, I have not been contacted by American Kennel Club regarding complaint ID [redacted].

Sincerely,

Review: I purchased a Boxer Female pupply, for $1000 usd, from [redacted], address: [redacted], and asked if the puppy were AKC Registered. As anyone, whom purchases a puppy for $1000. would. She responded yes, however failed to mention that the puppy would have "Limited Registration". Upon my trying to register the puppy on the AKC web site, I noticed that [redacted] had removed the code on the litter paperwork, so I contacted the AKC, as it clearly reads, under "Registration Type" "In order to request limited registration, please completely darken this box", the same box that [redacted] had removed the code from by cutting it out of the form. The AKC responded to my email pertaining to this, by telephone, and told me that I needed to send in the form, with payment but that they would not confirm that I would or would not get a Full Registration. I told them that no one in their right mind would pay to register their dog, to get a "Limited" registration, thus the only conclusion could be that the AKC is backing this type of deception?Desired Settlement: In response to my email directly informing me that the puppies registration will in fact be Full Registration, so that upon my payment for registration the received pedigree would be full registration.

Business

Response:

Thank you for your inquiry.

Chapter XI Limited Registration of AKC Procedures for Registration Matters states that the decision as to the registration status of a dog is the responsibility of the litter owner. Although the AKC would hope that the litter owner would discuss the limited status prior to the sale of the dog. We do not license or endorse breeders and therefore, have no control over their business practices.

If [redacted] is unable to resolve the matter with the seller, she may wish to seek legal counsel and determine if she can gain relief through civil channels.

We hope you will find this information helpful. Should you have any further questions, please advise our office further.

Consumer

Response:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me however the matter has not been resolved.

Sincerely,

Review: After paying my fee, and completing all required documentation online (including the passcode that I could only have received from the breeder), and receiving official certification documentation of FULL registration for my Papillon puppy from AKC; AKC retracted the full registration status of my puppy on a breeder's claim that as far as AKC has represented it to me, is unsubstantiated.

Unless the breeder can produce original documentation, my online registration documentation -- including the "FULL registration passcode" that I could only have received from the breeder -- should be the determining factor.Desired Settlement: I want AKC to restore the FULL registration status of my puppy.

Business

Response:

The American Kennel Club originally received a complaint from litter owners Christine B[redacted] and Rachel B[redacted] which indicated the pup registered to [redacted] should have been registered with limited registration status. The litter owners provided us with a copy of their litter records which indicated all pups from the litter should be registered with limited status. According to Chapter 3 Section 4 of the AKC Rules Applying to Registration and Discipline, the litter owner may choose limited or full registration for the pups from the litter at their discretion. Based on the information provided by the litter owners, we contacted [redacted] for his comments and the original Dog Registration application he received from the litter owners which would provide us information regarding the registration status the litter owners gave his pup. [redacted] did not provide us with the original application or any other documents relating to the registration status of the dog. Please note, in order to register his dog online, [redacted] had to certify the following: I (we) apply to the American Kennel Club to have a Registration Certificate for this dog issued in my (our) name(s). I (we) certify that I (we) acquired this dog directly on the date stated above from the Litter Owner(s) or the Former Owner(s) and if applicable, that I (we) have complete written authority from the other owner(s) to submit this application to register this dog in all our name(s). I (we) understand that upon request I (we) will be required to provide to the AKC any such written authorization. I (we) certify that if this dog was transferred from the Litter Owner to another person(s) that I have entered that information at the appropriate place and will maintain the original applications, certificates and/or supplemental transfers and provide them to the AKC upon request. Unfortunately, as [redacted] did not provide us with the requested documentation, we were unable to assist him and we corrected the registration of his dog per our rules and policies. Should we receive the requested documentation from [redacted] in the future, we will review the matter accordingly.

Consumer

Response:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:

[Your Answer Here]Every year the State of Utah mails me paperwork to registermy car. The paperwork includes identification information and a pin. I use theid info and the pin to register my car. Once I receive the paper copy of thenew registration through the mail I dispose of the id info and pin paperwork becausethe printed registration from the DMV is now the source document for myregistration. AKC runs nearly the identical process. I received from thebreeder documents containing id info and a unique pin. Using the id info andpin I registered my puppy on line. After receiving a printed certificate offull registration through the mail from AKC, I discarded the id info and paperwith the pin. The certificate of registration issuedf by AKC becoming thesource document.Four months later AKC told me they had un-registered mypuppy based on a complaint from the previous owner that they had not meant forme to have full registration. (A ploy used by breeders to reduce free marketcompetition.) Please note, the AKC did NOT ask me for the original id info andpin prior to un-registering my puppy. They simply informed me that it hadalready occurred. AKC stated that their policy was that the breeder/previousowner could decide unilaterally the level of registration my puppy would begranted, even months after the breeder sold their interest in the puppy to me. Idid not have a receipt as I was not provided one by the breeder, thinking theAKC registration id info and pin were sufficient – which they were until thebreeder objected, indicating they had not “intended” for me to have fullregistration, even though the AKC paper work provided me included the full idinfo and pin intended by AKC to provide full registration. (The breeder controlsdistribution of the pin. They now claim – months after the sale – they didn’tmean to give me the pin.)The AKC’s assertion that the breeder has indicated the litter to belimited registered is irrelevant and misleading. The breeder can sell eachpuppy in the litter as fully registered or limited registered as they see fit.The only guide for the buyer is the AKC paperwork received. If the pin is onthe paperwork, the puppy can be fully registered. AKC accepted the id info and pin I provided online for mypuppy’s registration, just like the State of Utah accepts my car registration.AKC issued me a certificate of registration as a new source document, “proof”that AKC had fully registered my puppy just like the State of Utah providesregistration work for my car. Four months after the breeder sold their interestin the puppy to me, the AKC unregistered my puppy on request from the breeder.This is unacceptable. The breeder lost all legal interest in the puppy when itwas sold to me and registered by me with the AKC. I do not accept AKC’sassertion that the breeder retains a legal interest in the puppy they sold mefour months after the sale is complete.

In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above.

Sincerely,

Business

Response:

To whom it may concern, This email is the American Kennel Club (“AKC®”) response to Complaint #[redacted] regarding the matter concerning [redacted] Unlike many organizations, The AKC requires registrants to maintain the original Dog Registration Application and the registrants must check a certification box agreeing to this condition in order to register a dog online. Unfortunately, as [redacted] did not provide us with the requested documentation (original Dog Registration Application), we were unable to assist him and we corrected the registration of his dog per our rules and policies. Should we receive the requested documentation from [redacted] in the future, we will review the matter accordingly. Yours truly, [redacted] Customer Registration Support

Consumer

Response:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:

[Your Answer Here]

I have provided the AKC with explanation more than sufficient to explain lack of the sales documentation requested and referred AKC to its own, online database and online registration system/process, designed and promoted by AKC to bypass the need for paper documentation. AKC refuses to acknowledge (1) That its online registration (using a pin code vice paper product) is not accepted by AKC as valid registration in that it continues to use and advertise its online systems as complete and adequate; and (2) AKC has not addressed the legal issue that the owner transferred all rights to the dog (including registration) to me; and that follow up four months later to complain that the owner did not "intend" for the transfer of the dog to me to include registation rights (after providing me the registration pin) is insufficient for AKC to then delete my dog's full registration. If the owner's complaint had been registered within a reasonable amount of time (say 30 days) and had been submitted BEFORE AKC accepted my online registration using the pin, and BEFORE AKC had sent me final and full registration documentation (which precipitated my disposal of original sale paperwork), and had the owner offered (within 30 days) a refund of the purchase price; then I would concede to the owner's perogative to delete my dog's full registration. The facts, however, go undisputed by either the seller or AKC that (1) I purchased the dog in good faith believing the price included full registration; (2) I received AKC's full registration paperwork from the seller, including the full registration pin - verifying the seller was transferring the dog with full registration; (3) AKC accepted the online registration (using the pin provided by the seller); (4) AKC entered my dog into its database as fully registered; and (4) AKC sent me "documented proof" that AKC had fully registered my dog; and (5) upon receipt of the "fully registered certificated" from AKC, and after checking that the online database showed my dog as fully registered - I disposed of the original purchase paperwork. No where, in any of the correspondence has either AKC or the seller indicated which step (required by AKC's online registration process) I did NOT follow to the letter. Having followed AKC online registration process to the letter, and having received from AKC legal and full registration documentation, AKC cannot then retract the full registration of my dog on the grounds that the SELLER "didn't follow the AKC process" and the SELLER "didn't intend to sell full registration". It is the SELLER that did not follow AKC processes in that the SELLER did not fill out the AKC paperwork in the way required to indicate that full registration was being withheld. And it is the SELLER that did not object until four months following the transfer of funds and product, and full registration by AKC. AKC response continues to be non sequitor, without legal grounds. contrary to its own established processes, and showing extreme prejudice in behalf of breeders who frequent its services.

In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above.

Sincerely,

Check fields!

Write a review of American Kennel Club

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

American Kennel Club Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Add contact information for American Kennel Club

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated