Bark Creek Corgis

I have been been a part-time hobby breeder of the Pembroke Welsh Corgi since in the state of Ohio, until November 2014, which was my last activity as a hobbyist breeder.? Due to health complications and due to a difficult decision regarding my bloodlines, I arranged for my breeding stock to be spayed and placed in very loving and forever homes, while I retained my favorite pet corgis (3) plus (1) owned by a family member.? At that time, my online community was notified that my page would be at inactive status until further notification and indeed my status on that Facebook page was changed from "pet service" to "just for fun" which it still remains.I therefore am not a business in the state of Ohio, nor have I operated the breeding of my corgis for profit, but rather for the continuation of my highly prized bloodlines.Thus I oppose any rating or any listing made currently by the Revdex.com with regard to this matter in question.Furthermore, I do have the desire to continue my beloved bloodline and would do so at the appropriate time if I could get my health to stabilize not to mention the health of my very eldery and very health-compromised parents.? This is a well known fact among my online friends and has been publicly posted numerous times.This relates to the content of the complaint the Revdex.com received, but yet again, I question the validity of the Revdex.com inquiry into my situation since I do not presently operate a business.With regard to my present health status, and until I am able to recover enough to get my affairs in order, I have attempted to inform all of the owners of puppies from my last breeding in of the status of my situation, including the originator of this Revdex.com complaint -- that in effect I am unable to complete many tasks I would ordinarily accomplish responsibly.? I have received dis-crediting remarks, unfair timeline demands, and legal threats from this person, who believes that even though the bill of sale does not state a specific time that any paperwork would be provided, that in effect, I was legally bound by that person's timeline rather than my own, and that therefore, I was breaking some law and an attorney would be contacted.? That was a year ago.? My response then was the same as my response now.The bill of sale states that at some point in the future a document will be provided but it does not state "when".? I have broken no law and I have mis-represented no information to the person who has made this complaint.? I have, in good faith, attempted every day to rectify the present status of my deteriorating health so that I might complete my other activities and therefore present the document requested by this person.? However, I am under no legal obligation to do so.Moreover, and although it is unnecessary to the intent of your inquiry at the Revdex.com, I would like to add that as the breeder, I make recommendations to the future owners of my beloved corgis.? This particular owner did blatantly ignore every suggestion I had made as the breeder, over-riding my judgment at every turn, and then later, threatening me when the outcome of the situation was something less than I would have wanted for my puppy, and certainly, something less than what this new owner could have predicted.My concern for the well-being of my corgis includes ongoing optimum health once they leave my care.? Although I do not have a legal basis for controlling new owners.? I challenge the authority of this new owner to demand a document from me which would represent my breeding program if indeed all of the guidelines I had strongly suggested had indeed been followed for this corgi, when, in reality, they were not.If my registration organization cannot back up what is the best health for the purebred I represent, then I may well have to dissociate with that organization, for I will never be ordered by an individual who may not have my corgi's best interest at heart to produce a document that signifies quality if that quality was compromised by the said individual.? Nor did my bill of sale give this person the right to demand such a thing from me until I am able to present it.? I did tell this person that I am not sure of the position of my registration organization, and sadly, I have continued to be too ill to handle the matter appropriately.I will indeed contact the registry and voice my concern about this person and the manner in which the health of my corgi was tossed aside lightly, when I had made thorough and well-research recommendations, and best "next-step" practices from over years of breeding experience.I will also, after contacting my registry to indeed determine if my concerns can neutralize my bill of sale, proceed accordingly.? But, I repeat, there is no time stipulation in my bill of sale and I have broken no laws or gone back on my word to fulfill my contract

I have been been a part-time hobby breeder of the Pembroke Welsh Corgi since in the state of Ohio, until November 2014, which was my last activity as a hobbyist breeder Due to health complications and due to a difficult decision regarding my bloodlines, I arranged for my breeding stock to be spayed and placed in very loving and forever homes, while I retained my favorite pet corgis (3) plus (1) owned by a family member At that time, my online community was notified that my page would be at inactive status until further notification and indeed my status on that Facebook page was changed from "pet service" to "just for fun" which it still remains.I therefore am not a business in the state of Ohio, nor have I operated the breeding of my corgis for profit, but rather for the continuation of my highly prized bloodlines.Thus I oppose any rating or any listing made currently by the Revdex.com with regard to this matter in question.Furthermore, I do have the desire to continue my beloved bloodline and would do so at the appropriate time if I could get my health to stabilize not to mention the health of my very eldery and very health-compromised parents This is a well known fact among my online friends and has been publicly posted numerous times.This relates to the content of the complaint the Revdex.com received, but yet again, I question the validity of the Revdex.com inquiry into my situation since I do not presently operate a business.With regard to my present health status, and until I am able to recover enough to get my affairs in order, I have attempted to inform all of the owners of puppies from my last breeding in of the status of my situation, including the originator of this Revdex.com complaint -- that in effect I am unable to complete many tasks I would ordinarily accomplish responsibly I have received dis-crediting remarks, unfair timeline demands, and legal threats from this person, who believes that even though the bill of sale does not state a specific time that any paperwork would be provided, that in effect, I was legally bound by that person's timeline rather than my own, and that therefore, I was breaking some law and an attorney would be contacted That was a year ago My response then was the same as my response now.The bill of sale states that at some point in the future a document will be provided but it does not state "when" I have broken no law and I have mis-represented no information to the person who has made this complaint I have, in good faith, attempted every day to rectify the present status of my deteriorating health so that I might complete my other activities and therefore present the document requested by this person However, I am under no legal obligation to do so.Moreover, and although it is unnecessary to the intent of your inquiry at the Revdex.com, I would like to add that as the breeder, I make recommendations to the future owners of my beloved corgis This particular owner did blatantly ignore every suggestion I had made as the breeder, over-riding my judgment at every turn, and then later, threatening me when the outcome of the situation was something less than I would have wanted for my puppy, and certainly, something less than what this new owner could have predicted.My concern for the well-being of my corgis includes ongoing optimum health once they leave my care Although I do not have a legal basis for controlling new owners I challenge the authority of this new owner to demand a document from me which would represent my breeding program if indeed all of the guidelines I had strongly suggested had indeed been followed for this corgi, when, in reality, they were not.If my registration organization cannot back up what is the best health for the purebred I represent, then I may well have to dissociate with that organization, for I will never be ordered by an individual who may not have my corgi's best interest at heart to produce a document that signifies quality if that quality was compromised by the said individual Nor did my bill of sale give this person the right to demand such a thing from me until I am able to present it I did tell this person that I am not sure of the position of my registration organization, and sadly, I have continued to be too ill to handle the matter appropriately.I will indeed contact the registry and voice my concern about this person and the manner in which the health of my corgi was tossed aside lightly, when I had made thorough and well-research recommendations, and best "next-step" practices from over years of breeding experience.I will also, after contacting my registry to indeed determine if my concerns can neutralize my bill of sale, proceed accordingly But, I repeat, there is no time stipulation in my bill of sale and I have broken no laws or gone back on my word to fulfill my contract

Dear Revdex.com The response from Beth C [redacted] is what I expected I initiated this complaint because she has refused for over a year to provide the registration that was promised at the time of purchase and it is clearly stated on the bill of sale The consumer would never assume that it means whenever the seller gets around to everBy her terms stated to the Revdex.com it would be acceptable to do so twenty years from now after the dog has long passed I have been able to locate past customers of Bark Creek Corgis that got the same run around and never received registration There was one who located the sire’s owner and received registration through them I am not so lucky because Beth C [redacted] owned both the male and female According to her statement I did not follow her vaccination and spaying guidelines I challenge her to provide them There are none and never was The only mention of any guidelines was after I asked where my registration was and I have complete documentation of this off our instant message feedI even offered to pay for her registration fees if money was the issue I have serious doubts that she has the legal right to the registration of the dog I can also provide documentation that my dog was vaccinated and spayed within the AKC and American Veterinary Associations guidelines What I did refuse to do was some of her off the wall recommendations like using goat de-wormer on a dog and yes I have documentation including a picture of her showing me the goat de-wormer While I didn’t want to touch on her health issues I’m sure some may be valid and I can sympathize with her for that, others like being allergic to WIFI and cell phone towers seems to be stretching it She also had the energy to move three times in the last year It is pretty obvious to most reasonable people why someone moves every few months and it’s not because they are too ill to fill out a little paperwork The inability to spend ten minutes on a computer to fill out the paper work because of health reasons is laughable She has expended more time on her response than required to fill out the AKC form I filed this complaint the day after she posted on her Bark Creek Corgis page that she was getting ready to breed again She has deleted that and the lengthy conversations around it Don’t let the Revdex.com be fooled that she doesn’t deserve a bad rating and she is never going to breed again, she has every intention in doing so She has a negative track record that reaches beyond me and she has heavily censored all negative comments from her Facebook page from others I have never posted anything publicly to Facebook about my registration woes, all has been direct through private messages I strongly feel Bark Creek Corgis has no grounds to deny my AKC registration If she fails to do the registration or has deceptively claimed to have AKC stock and can’t do the registration she needs to be stopped from deceiving future unsuspecting buyers Isn’t that the purpose of the Revdex.com? I also seriously question if she claimed the income from the 12+ pups she sold in to the IRS, maybe that is where I need to go to stop her from deceiving anyone else.See attached bill of sale

There are no negative complaints about me that have ever been removed from my hobby page for my corgis.Basically, I have a rating out of stars on my Facebook page and there have only been two comments ever posted that took it down from a star rating.One of those complaints was made by someone who never met me and who knows nothing about corgis, or anything about my practice as a year hobby breeder; rather, she was an aunt of my daughter's ex-husband who decided to rate my corgi page although she had no knowledge. It was odd.The other person who rated my Facebook page that gave me all good marks with the exception of one small thing, completed the survey with a statement that had nothing to do with rating me as a breeder of her corgi because, in effect, I was not the breeder of her corgi. Thus, both of those two, single remarks would be discounted in a fair rating.Besides, in these years since the page was established in 2013, I have consistently held a out of star rating, which, few businesses can accomplish on Facebook (if you could call "hobby breeding" a bonified business) wherein countless hours go into a project for which those hours can never be repaid through the price of the puppies[redacted] has made several statements in this complaint process.Many of them truly disappoint me in him.But of the most concerning, he is denying that he knew what my recommendations were for the best health of his puppy.He certainly did know, and told me that he would override my recommendations as he was the owner of the puppy.The question on the table is whether I am obligated to carry out further action in a bill of sale when a puppy owner violates the good faith contract between us as to what is best for that puppy.This is a key issue for this reason.Mr [redacted] became confrontational not long after he received his puppy, stating that I did not do certain things as a breeder, according to his veterinarian.I consulted with my long-time friend who has been in dogs professionally for years and who follows the same best practice guidelines that I follow.Upon consultation with this person, it was once again confirmed that I upheld a regiment for my puppies above reproach.I then passed that information along to Mr [redacted] .At that time Mr [redacted] was noticeably hostile with me for several reasons and very accusatory. There was nothing I could do about his point of view.I felt very disappointed for my puppy and for the choices I knew he was about to make, which were not in the best interest of my puppy, but instead, were going to be executed because it was an inconvenience to him to follow my suggestions.In addition, his puppy did not measure up to his expectations.Since it is my guarantee to replace a puppy in the situation, and since I did not believe he would be able to give my puppy the optimum devotion, I offered to present him with the choice puppy in the litter, which I had reserved for myself.That is my guarantee and that is what I offered. As for any other possible choices for the good of this puppy in his possession, I could do nothing. I felt at that juncture that our contract was null and void.I still believe that.He was making accusations toward me that were unfounded and which I refused to capitulate to, and I ended the relationship, mostly because of the surgical procedure he had done on my puppy at the completely improper time for what was best for my puppy.Eventually he demanded paperwork for the puppy which he was not entitled to receive because he had chosen to override what I felt was the best health measures for my puppy.This is my position on this issue and it will not change.I make my position very, very clear on this issue.If a person who takes one of my puppies chooses to override my best health practices once they are aware of them, I believe that nullifies the contract.Not to mention that as a breeder for years, I take serious pride in my corgis and that this particular corgi was forced to grow differently than would have been the proper growth pattern because of untimely spaying.There are definitive time frames that are in the best interest of the animal and they are written differently by various professionals, but as a consensus, there are best practices. Mr [redacted] was advised of these time frames and chose to ignore them.I believe, in order to protect the integrity of my program and the blood, sweat, and tears that go into my program, I have a right to protect my reputation.Mr [redacted] corgi grew rapidly in some ways as a result of this untimely procedure.To be honest, she resembles something other than a well-bred corgi.This is not a good reflection on my program, or my investment in my program.Mr [redacted] does not have the right to attempt to soil my reputation as he has certainly attempted to do.Mr [redacted] wanted to keep his puppy, refused to accept an even higher quality of puppy and preferred to expect me to reimburse him for his puppy.He did not believe she was "worth" $1,200.00.Then, why did he not accept a different puppy of even higher quality?For, the puppy he would have received is still in my possession. She is a show quality girl, very much embodies the breed standard, and a puppy of which he could have been rightly proud.Instead, Mr [redacted] decided he would keep his puppy, and continue to not consult with me, but rather brandish me for the result of his own choices as he followed the advice of his vet, who was a former German Shepherd breeder.These two breeds are very different and did not give this vet the authority to condemn me as a breeder, which is exactly what the vet and Mr [redacted] were doing.The question is, how much damage did the affect on my reputation for unfounded and unverified and bogus reasons?Mr [redacted] has acted in such a manner as to purposefully and with calculation do great harm to my ability to continue my bloodlines in a program of more than years with a top rating that entire time.I do not believe I have to honor anything when he broke our agreement, not the other way around.However, to the specific circumstance of my personal situation, all of the information I have provided for this complaint is true and verifiable in all accounts.What Mr [redacted] is using your Revdex.com rating for is to attempt to soil my personal and professional life because he found out he could not take me to court for bogus charges.I would surely hope you would not allow your rating service to be used in this manner.But, for the record, I have been as transparent as I can be, for there is nothing to hide

I have been been a part-time hobby breeder of the Pembroke Welsh Corgi since in the state of Ohio, until November 2014, which was my last activity as a hobbyist breeder. Due to health complications and due to a difficult decision regarding my bloodlines, I arranged for my breeding stock
to be spayed and placed in very loving and forever homes, while I retained my favorite pet corgis (3) plus (1) owned by a family member. At that time, my online community was notified that my page would be at inactive status until further notification and indeed my status on that Facebook page was changed from "pet service" to "just for fun" which it still remains.I therefore am not a business in the state of Ohio, nor have I operated the breeding of my corgis for profit, but rather for the continuation of my highly prized bloodlines.Thus I oppose any rating or any listing made currently by the Revdex.com with regard to this matter in question.Furthermore, I do have the desire to continue my beloved bloodline and would do so at the appropriate time if I could get my health to stabilize not to mention the health of my very eldery and very health-compromised parents. This is a well known fact among my online friends and has been publicly posted numerous times.This relates to the content of the complaint the Revdex.com received, but yet again, I question the validity of the Revdex.com inquiry into my situation since I do not presently operate a business.With regard to my present health status, and until I am able to recover enough to get my affairs in order, I have attempted to inform all of the owners of puppies from my last breeding in of the status of my situation, including the originator of this Revdex.com complaint -- that in effect I am unable to complete many tasks I would ordinarily accomplish responsibly. I have received dis-crediting remarks, unfair timeline demands, and legal threats from this person, who believes that even though the bill of sale does not state a specific time that any paperwork would be provided, that in effect, I was legally bound by that person's timeline rather than my own, and that therefore, I was breaking some law and an attorney would be contacted. That was a year ago. My response then was the same as my response now.The bill of sale states that at some point in the future a document will be provided but it does not state "when". I have broken no law and I have mis-represented no information to the person who has made this complaint. I have, in good faith, attempted every day to rectify the present status of my deteriorating health so that I might complete my other activities and therefore present the document requested by this person. However, I am under no legal obligation to do so.Moreover, and although it is unnecessary to the intent of your inquiry at the Revdex.com, I would like to add that as the breeder, I make recommendations to the future owners of my beloved corgis. This particular owner did blatantly ignore every suggestion I had made as the breeder, over-riding my judgment at every turn, and then later, threatening me when the outcome of the situation was something less than I would have wanted for my puppy, and certainly, something less than what this new owner could have predicted.My concern for the well-being of my corgis includes ongoing optimum health once they leave my care. Although I do not have a legal basis for controlling new owners. I challenge the authority of this new owner to demand a document from me which would represent my breeding program if indeed all of the guidelines I had strongly suggested had indeed been followed for this corgi, when, in reality, they were not.If my registration organization cannot back up what is the best health for the purebred I represent, then I may well have to dissociate with that organization, for I will never be ordered by an individual who may not have my corgi's best interest at heart to produce a document that signifies quality if that quality was compromised by the said individual. Nor did my bill of sale give this person the right to demand such a thing from me until I am able to present it. I did tell this person that I am not sure of the position of my registration organization, and sadly, I have continued to be too ill to handle the matter appropriately.I will indeed contact the registry and voice my concern about this person and the manner in which the health of my corgi was tossed aside lightly, when I had made thorough and well-research recommendations, and best "next-step" practices from over years of breeding experience.I will also, after contacting my registry to indeed determine if my concerns can neutralize my bill of sale, proceed accordingly. But, I repeat, there is no time stipulation in my bill of sale and I have broken no laws or gone back on my word to fulfill my contract

Please note that I have indeed sent out a limited registration for my AKC puppy in the hands of this man. I have the tracking number for the document if you so require it for proof that indeed this document was sent. Thank you for your support of Ohio businesses

There are no negative complaints about me that have ever been removed from my hobby page for my corgis.Basically, I have a rating out of stars on my Facebook page and there have only been two comments ever posted that took it down from a star rating.One of those complaints was made by someone who never met me and who knows nothing about corgis, or anything about my practice as a year hobby breeder; rather, she was an aunt of my daughter's ex-husband who decided to rate my corgi page although she had no knowledge. It was odd.The other person who rated my Facebook page that gave me all good marks with the exception of one small thing, completed the survey with a statement that had nothing to do with rating me as a breeder of her corgi because, in effect, I was not the breeder of her corgi. Thus, both of those two, single remarks would be discounted in a fair rating.Besides, in these years since the page was established in 2013, I have consistently held a out of star rating, which, few businesses can accomplish on Facebook (if you could call "hobby breeding" a bonified business) wherein countless hours go into a project for which those hours can never be repaid through the price of the puppies.*** *** has made several statements in this complaint process.Many of them truly disappoint me in him.But of the most concerning, he is denying that he knew what my recommendations were for the best health of his puppy.He certainly did know, and told me that he would override my recommendations as he was the owner of the puppy.The question on the table is whether I am obligated to carry out further action in a bill of sale when a puppy owner violates the good faith contract between us as to what is best for that puppy.This is a key issue for this reason.Mr*** became confrontational not long after he received his puppy, stating that I did not do certain things as a breeder, according to his veterinarian.I consulted with my long-time friend who has been in dogs professionally for years and who follows the same best practice guidelines that I follow.Upon consultation with this person, it was once again confirmed that I upheld a regiment for my puppies above reproach.I then passed that information along to Mr***.At that time Mr*** was noticeably hostile with me for several reasons and very accusatory. There was nothing I could do about his point of view.I felt very disappointed for my puppy and for the choices I knew he was about to make, which were not in the best interest of my puppy, but instead, were going to be executed because it was an inconvenience to him to follow my suggestions.In addition, his puppy did not measure up to his expectations.Since it is my guarantee to replace a puppy in the situation, and since I did not believe he would be able to give my puppy the optimum devotion, I offered to present him with the choice puppy in the litter, which I had reserved for myself.That is my guarantee and that is what I offered. As for any other possible choices for the good of this puppy in his possession, I could do nothing. I felt at that juncture that our contract was null and void.I still believe that.He was making accusations toward me that were unfounded and which I refused to capitulate to, and I ended the relationship, mostly because of the surgical procedure he had done on my puppy at the completely improper time for what was best for my puppy.Eventually he demanded paperwork for the puppy which he was not entitled to receive because he had chosen to override what I felt was the best health measures for my puppy.This is my position on this issue and it will not change.I make my position very, very clear on this issue.If a person who takes one of my puppies chooses to override my best health practices once they are aware of them, I believe that nullifies the contract.Not to mention that as a breeder for years, I take serious pride in my corgis and that this particular corgi was forced to grow differently than would have been the proper growth pattern because of untimely spaying.There are definitive time frames that are in the best interest of the animal and they are written differently by various professionals, but as a consensus, there are best practices. Mr*** was advised of these time frames and chose to ignore them.I believe, in order to protect the integrity of my program and the blood, sweat, and tears that go into my program, I have a right to protect my reputation.Mr*** corgi grew rapidly in some ways as a result of this untimely procedure.To be honest, she resembles something other than a well-bred corgi.This is not a good reflection on my program, or my investment in my program.Mr*** does not have the right to attempt to soil my reputation as he has certainly attempted to do.Mr*** wanted to keep his puppy, refused to accept an even higher quality of puppy and preferred to expect me to reimburse him for his puppy.He did not believe she was "worth" $1,200.00.Then, why did he not accept a different puppy of even higher quality?For, the puppy he would have received is still in my possession. She is a show quality girl, very much embodies the breed standard, and a puppy of which he could have been rightly proud.Instead, Mr*** decided he would keep his puppy, and continue to not consult with me, but rather brandish me for the result of his own choices as he followed the advice of his vet, who was a former German Shepherd breeder.These two breeds are very different and did not give this vet the authority to condemn me as a breeder, which is exactly what the vet and Mr*** were doing.The question is, how much damage did the affect on my reputation for unfounded and unverified and bogus reasons?Mr*** has acted in such a manner as to purposefully and with calculation do great harm to my ability to continue my bloodlines in a program of more than years with a top rating that entire time.I do not believe I have to honor anything when he broke our agreement, not the other way around.However, to the specific circumstance of my personal situation, all of the information I have provided for this complaint is true and verifiable in all accounts.What Mr*** is using your Revdex.com rating for is to attempt to soil my personal and professional life because he found out he could not take me to court for bogus charges.I would surely hope you would not allow your rating service to be used in this manner.But, for the record, I have been as transparent as I can be, for there is nothing to hide

I did receive in the mail the AKC registration paper work last week while I was away on vacation and have since registered my dog. I will note that I also received a phone call from the AKC assuring me that they stepped in to insure that Beth C*** would get the paper work to me, she did not do it on her own free will. When I first filed my complaint with the Revdex.com and the AKC Beth C*** tried to bully me by placing the Revdex.com complaint with all my personal information including name, phone numbers, e-mail address, home address on the internet and made claims that I was also asking for all my money back You have my complaint and know that was a blatant lie made up to slander my reputationWhat she didn’t realized was that several former customers from across the country saw her post and then contacted me relating similar stories of how they bought pups and struggled to get registration and were bullied when they pressed her to perform her obligations. It also revealed that this has been an ongoing issue with some customers going back many years. The AKC also has received other complaintsIt took action by my counsel contacting Facebook to have my personal information removed. Beth C*** was warned by Facebook that she was violating their terms of use and was forced to clean personal information from her pages or risk having her page shut downWhile I realize the scope of the Revdex.com is limited I feel that if you truly want to live up to your mission statement:
“Revdex.com’s mission is to be the leader in advancing marketplace trustVision: An ethical marketplace where buyers and sellers trust each other” , you must leave the record of the complaint intact so that future buyers who do seek out the Revdex.com will know that they will have a difficult time getting, or may never receive an AKC registration from Beth C***
Unlike Beth C***, I can provide documentation to back up all my claims

Please note that I have indeed sent out a limited registration for my AKC puppy in the hands of this man. I have the tracking number for the document if you so require it for proof that indeed this document was sent. Thank you for your support of Ohio businesses

Dear Revdex.com
The response from Beth C*** is what I expected. I initiated this complaint because she has
refused for over a year to provide the registration that was promised at the
time of purchase and it is clearly stated on the bill of sale. The consumer would never assume that
it means whenever the seller gets around to everBy her terms stated to
the Revdex.com it would be acceptable to do so twenty years from now after the dog has
long passed I have been able to locate
past customers of Bark Creek Corgis that got the same run around and never received
registration. There was one who located
the sire’s owner and received registration through them. I am
not so lucky because Beth C*** owned both the male and female
According to her statement I did not follow her vaccination and
spaying guidelines. I challenge her to
provide them. There are none and never
was. The only mention of any guidelines
was after I asked where my registration was and I have complete documentation
of this off our instant message feedI even offered to pay for her
registration fees if money was the issue.
I have serious doubts that she has the legal right to the registration
of the dog I can also provide
documentation that my dog was vaccinated and spayed within the AKC and American
Veterinary Associations guidelines. What
I did refuse to do was some of her off the wall recommendations like using goat
de-wormer on a dog and yes I have documentation including a picture of her
showing me the goat de-wormer
While I didn’t want to touch on her health issues I’m sure
some may be valid and I can sympathize with her for that, others like being allergic
to WIFI and cell phone towers seems to be stretching it. She also had the energy to move three times
in the last year. It is pretty obvious
to most reasonable people why someone moves every few months and it’s not because
they are too ill to fill out a little paperwork. The inability to spend ten minutes on a
computer to fill out the paper work because of health reasons is
laughable. She has expended more time on
her response than required to fill out the AKC form
I filed this complaint the day after she posted on her Bark
Creek Corgis page that she was getting ready to breed again. She has deleted that and the lengthy
conversations around it. Don’t let the
Revdex.com be fooled that she doesn’t deserve a bad rating and she is never going to
breed again, she has every intention in doing so. She has a negative track record that reaches
beyond me and she has heavily censored all negative comments from her Facebook
page from others. I have never posted
anything publicly to Facebook about my registration woes, all has been direct
through private messages
I strongly feel Bark Creek Corgis has no grounds to deny my
AKC registration. If she fails to do the
registration or has deceptively claimed to have AKC stock and can’t do the registration
she needs to be stopped from deceiving future unsuspecting buyers. Isn’t that the purpose of the Revdex.com?
I also seriously question if she claimed the income from the
12+ pups she sold in to the IRS, maybe that is where I need to go to stop
her from deceiving anyone else.See attached bill of sale

There are no negative complaints about me that have ever been removed from my hobby page for my corgis.Basically, I have a rating out of stars on my Facebook page and there have only been two comments ever posted that took it down from a star rating.One of those complaints was made by someone who never met me and who knows nothing about corgis, or anything about my practice as a year hobby breeder; rather, she was an aunt of my daughter's ex-husband who decided to rate my corgi page although she had no knowledge.? It was odd.The other person who rated my Facebook page that gave me all good marks with the exception of one small thing, completed the survey with a statement that had nothing to do with rating me as a breeder of her corgi because, in effect, I was not the breeder of her corgi.? Thus, both of those two, single remarks would be discounted in a fair rating.Besides, in these years since the page was established in 2013, I have consistently held a out of star rating, which, few businesses can accomplish on Facebook (if you could call "hobby breeding" a bonified business) wherein countless hours go into a project for which those hours can never be repaid through the price of the puppies.*** *** has made several statements in this complaint process.Many of them truly disappoint me in him.But of the most concerning, he is denying that he knew what my recommendations were for the best health of his puppy.He certainly did know, and told me that he would override my recommendations as he was the owner of the puppy.The question on the table is whether I am obligated to carry out further action in a bill of sale when a puppy owner violates the good faith contract between us as to what is best for that puppy.This is a key issue for this reason.Mr*** became confrontational not long after he received his puppy, stating that I did not do certain things as a breeder, according to his veterinarian.I consulted with my long-time friend who has been in dogs professionally for years and who follows the same best practice guidelines that I follow.Upon consultation with this person, it was once again confirmed that I upheld a regiment for my puppies above reproach.I then passed that information along to Mr***.At that time Mr*** was noticeably hostile with me for several reasons and very accusatory.? There was nothing I could do about his point of view.I felt very disappointed for my puppy and for the choices I knew he was about to make, which were not in the best interest of my puppy, but instead, were going to be executed because it was an inconvenience to him to follow my suggestions.In addition, his puppy did not measure up to his expectations.Since it is my guarantee to replace a puppy in the situation, and since I did not believe he would be able to give my puppy the optimum devotion, I offered to present him with the choice puppy in the litter, which I had reserved for myself.That is my guarantee and that is what I offered.? As for any other possible choices for the good of this puppy in his possession, I could do nothing.? I felt at that juncture that our contract was null and void.I still believe that.He was making accusations toward me that were unfounded and which I refused to capitulate to, and I ended the relationship, mostly because of the surgical procedure he had done on my puppy at the completely improper time for what was best for my puppy.Eventually he demanded paperwork for the puppy which he was not entitled to receive because he had chosen to override what I felt was the best health measures for my puppy.This is my position on this issue and it will not change.I make my position very, very clear on this issue.If a person who takes one of my puppies chooses to override my best health practices once they are aware of them, I believe that nullifies the contract.Not to mention that as a breeder for years, I take serious pride in my corgis and that this particular corgi was forced to grow differently than would have been the proper growth pattern because of untimely spaying.There are definitive time frames that are in the best interest of the animal and they are written differently by various professionals, but as a consensus, there are best practices.? Mr*** was advised of these time frames and chose to ignore them.I believe, in order to protect the integrity of my program and the blood, sweat, and tears that go into my program, I have a right to protect my reputation.Mr*** corgi grew rapidly in some ways as a result of this untimely procedure.To be honest, she resembles something other than a well-bred corgi.This is not a good reflection on my program, or my investment in my program.Mr*** does not have the right to attempt to soil my reputation as he has certainly attempted to do.Mr*** wanted to keep his puppy, refused to accept an even higher quality of puppy and preferred to expect me to reimburse him for his puppy.He did not believe she was "worth" $1,200.00.Then, why did he not accept a different puppy of even higher quality?For, the puppy he would have received is still in my possession.? She is a show quality girl, very much embodies the breed standard, and a puppy of which he could have been rightly proud.Instead, Mr*** decided he would keep his puppy, and continue to not consult with me, but rather brandish me for the result of his own choices as he followed the advice of his vet, who was a former German Shepherd breeder.These two breeds are very different and did not give this vet the authority to condemn me as a breeder, which is exactly what the vet and Mr*** were doing.The question is, how much damage did the affect on my reputation for unfounded and unverified and bogus reasons?Mr*** has acted in such a manner as to purposefully and with calculation do great harm to my ability to continue my bloodlines in a program of more than years with a top rating that entire time.I do not believe I have to honor anything when he broke our agreement, not the other way around.However, to the specific circumstance of my personal situation, all of the information I have provided for this complaint is true and verifiable in all accounts.What Mr*** is using your Revdex.com rating for is to attempt to soil my personal and professional life because he found out he could not take me to court for bogus charges.I would surely hope you would not allow your rating service to be used in this manner.But, for the record, I have been as transparent as I can be, for there is nothing to hide

I did receive in the mail the AKC registration paper work last week while I was away on vacation and have since registered my dog.? ? I will note that I also received a phone call from the AKC assuring me that they stepped in to insure that Beth C*** would get the paper work to me, she did not do it on her own free will.? When I first filed my complaint with the Revdex.com and the AKC Beth C*** tried to bully me by placing the Revdex.com complaint with all my personal information including name, phone numbers, e-mail address, home address on the internet and made claims that I was also asking for all my money back? You have my complaint and know that was a blatant lie made up to slander my reputation.What she didn’t realized was that several former customers from across the country saw her post and then contacted me relating similar stories of how they bought pups and struggled to get registration and were bullied when they pressed her to perform her obligations.? It also revealed that this has been an ongoing issue with some customers going back many years.? The AKC also has received other complaints.It took action by my counsel contacting Facebook to have my personal information removed.? Beth C*** was warned by Facebook? ? that she was violating their terms of use and was forced to clean personal information from her pages or risk having her page shut down.While I realize the scope of the Revdex.com is limited I feel that if you truly want to live up to your mission statement: “Revdex.com’s mission is to be the leader in advancing marketplace trust.Vision: An ethical marketplace where buyers and sellers trust each other” , you must leave the record of the complaint intact so that future buyers who do seek out the Revdex.com will know that they will have a difficult time getting, or may never? receive? an AKC registration from Beth C***Unlike Beth C***, I can provide documentation to back up all my claims.?

Dear Revdex.com.
The response from Beth C[redacted] is what I expected.  I initiated this complaint because she has
refused for over a year to provide the registration that was promised at the
time of purchase and it is clearly stated on the bill of sale.  The normal consumer would never assume that
it means whenever the seller gets around to it-if ever. By her terms stated to
the Revdex.com it would be acceptable to do so twenty years from now after the dog has
long passed.  I have been able to locate
past customers of Bark Creek Corgis that got the same run around and never received
registration.  There was one who located
the sire’s owner and received registration through them.   I am
not so lucky because Beth C[redacted] owned both the male and female.
According to her statement I did not follow her vaccination and
spaying guidelines.  I challenge her to
provide them.  There are none and never
was.  The only mention of any guidelines
was after I asked where my registration was and I have complete documentation
of this off our instant message feed. I even offered to pay for her
registration fees if money was the issue. 
I have serious doubts that she has the legal right to the registration
of the dog.  I can also provide
documentation that my dog was vaccinated and spayed within the AKC and American
Veterinary Associations guidelines.  What
I did refuse to do was some of her off the wall recommendations like using goat
de-wormer on a dog and yes I have documentation including a picture of her
showing me the goat de-wormer.
While I didn’t want to touch on her health issues I’m sure
some may be valid and I can sympathize with her for that, others like being allergic
to WIFI and cell phone towers seems to be stretching it.  She also had the energy to move three times
in the last year.  It is pretty obvious
to most reasonable people why someone moves every few months and it’s not because
they are too ill to fill out a little paperwork.  The inability to spend ten minutes on a
computer to fill out the paper work because of health reasons is
laughable.  She has expended more time on
her response than required to fill out the AKC form.
I filed this complaint the day after she posted on her Bark
Creek Corgis page that she was getting ready to breed again.  She has deleted that and the lengthy
conversations around it.  Don’t let the
Revdex.com be fooled that she doesn’t deserve a bad rating and she is never going to
breed again, she has every intention in doing so.  She has a negative track record that reaches
beyond me and she has heavily censored all negative comments from her Facebook
page from others.  I have never posted
anything publicly to Facebook about my registration woes, all has been direct
through private messages.
I strongly feel Bark Creek Corgis has no grounds to deny my
AKC registration.  If she fails to do the
registration or has deceptively claimed to have AKC stock and can’t do the registration
she needs to be stopped from deceiving future unsuspecting buyers.  Isn’t that the purpose of the Revdex.com?
I also seriously question if she claimed the income from the
12+ pups she sold in 2014 to the IRS, maybe that is where I need to go to stop
her from deceiving anyone else.See attached bill of sale.

Dear Revdex.com.
The response from Beth C[redacted] is what I expected.  I initiated this complaint because she has
refused for over a year to provide the registration that was promised at the
time of purchase and it is clearly stated on the bill of sale.  The normal consumer would never assume that
it means whenever the seller gets around to it-if ever. By her terms stated to
the Revdex.com it would be acceptable to do so twenty years from now after the dog has
long passed.  I have been able to locate
past customers of Bark Creek Corgis that got the same run around and never received
registration.  There was one who located
the sire’s owner and received registration through them.   I am
not so lucky because Beth C[redacted] owned both the male and female.
According to her statement I did not follow her vaccination and
spaying guidelines.  I challenge her to
provide them.  There are none and never
was.  The only mention of any guidelines
was after I asked where my registration was and I have complete documentation
of this off our instant message feed. I even offered to pay for her
registration fees if money was the issue. 
I have serious doubts that she has the legal right to the registration
of the dog.  I can also provide
documentation that my dog was vaccinated and spayed within the AKC and American
Veterinary Associations guidelines.  What
I did refuse to do was some of her off the wall recommendations like using goat
de-wormer on a dog and yes I have documentation including a picture of her
showing me the goat de-wormer.
While I didn’t want to touch on her health issues I’m sure
some may be valid and I can sympathize with her for that, others like being allergic
to WIFI and cell phone towers seems to be stretching it.  She also had the energy to move three times
in the last year.  It is pretty obvious
to most reasonable people why someone moves every few months and it’s not because
they are too ill to fill out a little paperwork.  The inability to spend ten minutes on a
computer to fill out the paper work because of health reasons is
laughable.  She has expended more time on
her response than required to fill out the AKC form.
I filed this complaint the day after she posted on her Bark
Creek Corgis page that she was getting ready to breed again.  She has deleted that and the lengthy
conversations around it.  Don’t let the
Revdex.com be fooled that she doesn’t deserve a bad rating and she is never going to
breed again, she has every intention in doing so.  She has a negative track record that reaches
beyond me and she has heavily censored all negative comments from her Facebook
page from others.  I have never posted
anything publicly to Facebook about my registration woes, all has been direct
through private messages.
I strongly feel Bark Creek Corgis has no grounds to deny my
AKC registration.  If she fails to do the
registration or has deceptively claimed to have AKC stock and can’t do the registration
she needs to be stopped from deceiving future unsuspecting buyers.  Isn’t that the purpose of the Revdex.com?
I also seriously question if she claimed the income from the
12+ pups she sold in 2014 to the IRS, maybe that is where I need to go to stop
her from deceiving anyone else.
See attached bill of sale.

I have been been a part-time hobby breeder of the Pembroke Welsh Corgi since 1991 in the state of Ohio, until November 2014, which was my last activity as a hobbyist breeder.  Due to health complications and due to a difficult decision regarding my bloodlines, I arranged for my breeding stock...

to be spayed and placed in very loving and forever homes, while I retained my favorite pet corgis (3) plus (1) owned by a family member.  At that time, my online community was notified that my page would be at inactive status until further notification and indeed my status on that Facebook page was changed from "pet service" to "just for fun" which it still remains.I therefore am not a business in the state of Ohio, nor have I operated the breeding of my corgis for profit, but rather for the continuation of my highly prized bloodlines.Thus I oppose any rating or any listing made currently by the Revdex.com with regard to this matter in question.Furthermore, I do have the desire to continue my beloved bloodline and would do so at the appropriate time if I could get my health to stabilize not to mention the health of my very eldery and very health-compromised parents.  This is a well known fact among my online friends and has been publicly posted numerous times.This relates to the content of the complaint the Revdex.com received, but yet again, I question the validity of the Revdex.com inquiry into my situation since I do not presently operate a business.With regard to my present health status, and until I am able to recover enough to get my affairs in order, I have attempted to inform all of the owners of puppies from my last breeding in 2014 of the status of my situation, including the originator of this Revdex.com complaint -- that in effect I am unable to complete many tasks I would ordinarily accomplish responsibly.  I have received dis-crediting remarks, unfair timeline demands, and legal threats from this person, who believes that even though the bill of sale does not state a specific time that any paperwork would be provided, that in effect, I was legally bound by that person's timeline rather than my own, and that therefore, I was breaking some law and an attorney would be contacted.  That was a year ago.  My response then was the same as my response now.The bill of sale states that at some point in the future a document will be provided but it does not state "when".  I have broken no law and I have mis-represented no information to the person who has made this complaint.  I have, in good faith, attempted every day to rectify the present status of my deteriorating health so that I might complete my other activities and therefore present the document requested by this person.  However, I am under no legal obligation to do so.Moreover, and although it is unnecessary to the intent of your inquiry at the Revdex.com, I would like to add that as the breeder, I make recommendations to the future owners of my beloved corgis.  This particular owner did blatantly ignore every suggestion I had made as the breeder, over-riding my judgment at every turn, and then later, threatening me when the outcome of the situation was something less than I would have wanted for my puppy, and certainly, something less than what this new owner could have predicted.My concern for the well-being of my corgis includes ongoing optimum health once they leave my care.  Although I do not have a legal basis for controlling new owners.  I challenge the authority of this new owner to demand a document from me which would represent my breeding program if indeed all of the guidelines I had strongly suggested had indeed been followed for this corgi, when, in reality, they were not.If my registration organization cannot back up what is the best health for the purebred I represent, then I may well have to dissociate with that organization, for I will never be ordered by an individual who may not have my corgi's best interest at heart to produce a document that signifies quality if that quality was compromised by the said individual.  Nor did my bill of sale give this person the right to demand such a thing from me until I am able to present it.  I did tell this person that I am not sure of the position of my registration organization, and sadly, I have continued to be too ill to handle the matter appropriately.I will indeed contact the registry and voice my concern about this person and the manner in which the health of my corgi was tossed aside lightly, when I had made thorough and well-research recommendations, and best "next-step" practices from over 25 years of breeding experience.I will also, after contacting my registry to indeed determine if my concerns can neutralize my bill of sale, proceed accordingly.  But, I repeat, there is no time stipulation in my bill of sale and I have broken no laws or gone back on my word to fulfill my contract.

I did receive in the mail the AKC registration paper work last week while I was away on vacation and have since registered my dog.   I will note that I also received a phone call from the AKC assuring me that they stepped in to insure that Beth C[redacted] would get the paper work to me, she did not do it on her own free will.  When I first filed my complaint with the Revdex.com and the AKC Beth C[redacted] tried to bully me by placing the Revdex.com complaint with all my personal information including name, phone numbers, e-mail address, home address on the internet and made false claims that I was also asking for all my money back.  You have my complaint and know that was a blatant lie made up to slander my reputation.What she didn’t realized was that several former customers from across the country saw her post and then contacted me relating similar stories of how they bought pups and struggled to get registration and were bullied when they pressed her to perform her obligations.  It also revealed that this has been an ongoing issue with some customers going back many years.  The AKC also has received other complaints.It took action by my counsel contacting Facebook to have my personal information removed.  Beth C[redacted] was warned by Facebook  that she was violating their terms of use and was forced to clean personal information from her pages or risk having her page shut down.While I realize the scope of the Revdex.com is limited I feel that if you truly want to live up to your mission statement: “Revdex.com’s mission is to be the leader in advancing marketplace trust.Vision: An ethical marketplace where buyers and sellers trust each other” , you must leave the record of the complaint intact so that future buyers who do seek out the Revdex.com will know that they will have a difficult time getting, or may never receive an AKC registration from Beth C[redacted]. Unlike Beth C[redacted], I can provide documentation to back up all my claims.