Blevins Auto Sales, Inc.

On February 29, 2016, *** and *** ***, hereinafter “the Clients”, entered into a Moving Agreement with Pryco Movers Inc., a corporation organized under the Corporation Law of the State of Florida (***)Under the terms of the contract, Pryco was to move furniture and a motor
vehicle belonging to the clients from West Palm Beach Flato Isabela, PRThe agreement was that the move could take anywhere between to weeks, or until April 25, After the client’s property arrived in Puerto Rico, and on March 24, 2016, a rack at the warehouse collapsed and the vehicle suffered damages consisting on a broken windshield and several scratches on its bodyAt the time the client’s property arrived March 22, 2016, **and *** *** had been unable to arrive in Puerto Rico because of an unexpected health condition of *** ***As a matter of fact, they did not arrive in Puerto Rico until the week of the April 28, Our understanding is that his health condition required hospitalizationBecause of the delay in the clients’ arrival and some initial problems in communications with them, Pryco decided to go ahead with the repairs to the vehicleThis was done at the cost and expense of Pryco, without any charge to the clients and with the sole purpose of avoiding deterioration of the vehicle due to lack of repairBy March 29, 2016, well within the to weeks agreed upon, the clients were notified that their furniture and vehicle were ready to be deliveredShortly after the clients were informed, they secured the services of attorney Edgardo *** RiveraAttorney *** notified Pryco that they were initiating a complaint proceeding at the Federal Trade CommissionAt that time Pryco referred the matter to attorney *** ** *** *** and informed attorney *** that all communication was to be done through each party’s counselAfter several conversations between attorneys in early April, 2016, on April 18, 2016, our attorney wrote a letter to the clients’ attorney stating that they had allegedly filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission and that a copy of the same should be sent to notify PrycoIt further stated the location of the vehicle and the telephone number to call to arrange an inspectionFinally, the letter requested a statement as to the nature of the complaint and the remedies that the clients were seekingOn April 22, attorney *** responded without any specific description of damages and requesting a compensation of $20,On April 25, Pryco’s attorney answered restating that were still waiting for the FTC Claim, that no specific claim for damages had been sent and as a result we had no way to assess the amount requested as compensationOn April 28, another letter from attorney *** was received stating that the Clients had just arrived in P.Rand would comply with the agreement between the partiesThe letter requested that their Property be delivered at a specific address When Pryco contacted the clients they agreed to receive the furniture and arranged for the delivery, the client notified Pryco that as far as the vehicle was concerned, their lawyer would make the arrangementsOn May 3, attorney Agrait sent attorney *** a letter requesting information as to where the documentation for the vehicle should be sentAs of this date no answer has been receivedAt this time all documentation regarding the vehicle has been delivered to attorney Cardona’s known physical address for him to pay taxes assessed on the vehicle and take possession of the same Pryco has fully complied with its obligations under the contract, has been paid in full and the only reason that the vehicle has not been released is that it is pending the payment of taxes

------- Forwarded message ----------From: Revdex.com of Metro Washington DC Date: Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:39 PMSubject: Fwd: [redacted]-PRYCO Movers - Complaint #[redacted]To: [redacted]@myRevdex.com.org---------- Forwarded message ----------From: [redacted] Date: Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:26 PMSubject: [redacted]-PRYCO Movers - Complaint #[redacted]To: "[email protected]" Dear [redacted]:I would like to add more information to my complaint against the company PRYCO Movers in Pennsylvania . On Monday May 23, 2016, I went to the PR Department of the Treasury to paid for my car taxes. A representative from this agency, told me that other containers were damaged in the transport  company ( [redacted] # [redacted]) from Jacksonville FL to Puerto Rico. He also stated that there were other complaints, including car dealers due to damages in their cars.  I understand that accidents happens. My complaint is about the way PRYCO handled the situation and tried to cover up the accident .  On Thursday May 26th 2016, I went to PRAYCO Movers warehouse in Caguas Puerto Rico, to get my car. I'm not happy the way it looks. They did not use original parts (use cheap one  and windshield  is not tinted) the rubber gaskets  is missing around the windshield (means not support to the windshield),  the car paint doesn't match. I'm  very concern about safety issues because there is not warranty about how the car was fixed . PRAYCO 's attorney stated that the entire car was painted. This is not true.   I do not agree with PRAYCO Movers about the  abusive way they handled this situation. I spend a lot of money on renting a car  ( I got the receipts) because I didn't have access to my property,  or any information about what happened. Even now, I still waiting for my car accident  report and explanation I got nothing. Customers that make contracts with this company, are not aware of their  unethical practices and the potential risks of making business with them. Please alert customers and the public about this bad, bad business!