Initial Business Response /* (1000, 10, 2017/04/17) */
In response concerning this matter:
This matter has already been dealt with through the court system. The judge made her decision on Oct. 17,2013. She specifically stated in her decision that the flooding was caused by excessive rainfall and...
not the workmanship of the company in question.
She also stated that the client failed to prove that our workmanship did not meet the standard of care owed to her. The judge stated in her decision that the standard of care owed to the plaintiff was met and flooding was caused by excessive rainfall and not the defendants workmanship.
The judges decision in this matter also states that we are not liable for her damages or the personal items that were lost.
Though we felt sorry for her unfortunate situation, we feel the decision has been made through the court system and we are in no way responsible for her situation.
As for a proposed resolution: There is none.
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 10, 2017/04/17) */
In response concerning this matter:
This matter has already been dealt with through the court system. The judge made her decision on Oct. 17,2013. She specifically stated in her decision that the flooding was caused by excessive rainfall and...
not the workmanship of the company in question.
She also stated that the client failed to prove that our workmanship did not meet the standard of care owed to her. The judge stated in her decision that the standard of care owed to the plaintiff was met and flooding was caused by excessive rainfall and not the defendants workmanship.
The judges decision in this matter also states that we are not liable for her damages or the personal items that were lost.
Though we felt sorry for her unfortunate situation, we feel the decision has been made through the court system and we are in no way responsible for her situation.
As for a proposed resolution: There is none.