Botnick Realty Company

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2016/02/11) */ We are in contact with [redacted] regarding the situation in her apartment and she is aware that we are working towards a mutual agreement for compensation with the ownersI'm not sure if Mr [redacted] is aware of this as [redacted] is the resident and lease holder and he is not Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (2000, 7, 2016/02/17) */ (Consumer emailed Revdex.com) Dispute with Botnick Reality over a heating issue with [redacted] ***'s apartmentThis has been resolved thank you [redacted] ***

Here is the response from our Denver office:The City of Littleton requires that all of the vehicles in our parking lots are operable and have current tagsWe use a licensed tow company, Maxx Auto Recovery, to make sure that we are in compliance with the City of Littleton's regulationsWe do not
receive any money from the tow company everThere is no “scam”It is simply to comply with Littleton's rules.With the contract that we have with the towing company, they do not tow vehicles without a 48-hour warning, unless they are parked in a handicap spot and do not have the proper registration for itHe was ticketed because his plates were expired, which you can clearly see in the picturesThey had been expired for over two monthsHe was not ticketed/towed for anything relating to a parking pass.If you look at the pictures, you can see adhesive marks on the driver's windowThe tow company said that is from the ticket that was removed, which they put on the driver's side window.The reason his car was ticketed/towed was valid.Other vehicles have been ticketed and towed for the same issueYou are welcome to speak to the tow company as well

I am rejecting this response because:Residue on window is not from a tagThey never gave a noticeThis is a 100% claim by botnic or maxx towingAgain no where in the lease does it say tags must be up to dateI don't feel comfortable parking my car in lot even with new updated tags since they just steal cars out of the lot

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2016/02/11) */
We are in contact with [redacted] regarding the situation in her apartment and she is aware that we are working towards a mutual agreement for compensation with the owners. I'm not sure if Mr. [redacted] is aware of this as [redacted] is the resident and...

lease holder and he is not.
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (2000, 7, 2016/02/17) */
(Consumer emailed Revdex.com)
Dispute with Botnick Reality over a heating issue with [redacted]'s apartment. This has been resolved thank you. [redacted]

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 11, 2016/02/10) */
[redacted] gave notice on December 14, 2015 that she would be moving out of her apartment at the end of December, and breaking her lease. Her lease term went through February 2016. The lease requires 30 days' notice to break the lease, in addition...

to a termination fee, one month's rent. [redacted] had a domestic dispute with her neighbor in September 2015. In September, in order to resolve the dispute, we told her we would waive the termination fee. In December, when [redacted] broke her lease, I agreed to honor the offer made in September, although the neighbor had already moved out. [redacted] gave 18 days' notice, and was charged for 12 days of rent, $300. The termination fee was waived. If the termination fee had not been waived, she would have been charged for an additional month. [redacted] was also charged $31.81 for utilities. Utilities are billed in arrears. Residents do not pay utilities for their first month, and owe for their final month at move out. I spoke to [redacted] on January 6, 2016 and explained this to her. We returned $443.19 of her $775 deposit.