Regarding complaint # [redacted] , customer complaint of leaking roof & damage to interior ceilingFirst of all customer contacted me in regards to a leak & stain on her ceilingShe had stated she contacted another roofing company which said they needed to tear off area install ice guard, valley & re-shingle for the amount of $1,I told her we had installed ice guard above & beyond code & manufacturers specificationsCustomer did not believe me & wanted proof it was installedI told her that the only way possible would be to tear off shingles in area at my cost of $1,She agreed to do this with her husband present so he may see it (also took pictures as proof of installation, enclosed)We then installed new ice guard which must be installed over existing because of nail holes, recut valley & then re-shingledShe paid $of the $1,then refused to pay anymoreThis area also has a hidden room with a knee-wall that hampers the correct ventilation which is very important in ice dams! This roof leaked one time in years in the winter of 2014-due to an ice dam, never during heavy rains2014-was one of the worst winters we have had since I explain to her that the leak was caused by an ice dam I have met with owner of the home on several occasions to solve this problemIt was only after legal advice I received from my attorney that I no longer made contact with her after completion of redoing the areaThe customer was very irate when trying to speak with herShe would not be reasonable & began making abusive remarks I used [redacted] ***products & it was installed beyond manufactures specifications, 12’ up from gutter past porch-main roof union & in valley (code is 2‘ beyond inner wallI have contacted [redacted] ***on this matter & they have said ice back dams are an act of God & they do not warrant against them We have been in business for years & are licensed in cities across northern OhioWe do not subcontract our roofs all work is done by our trained employeesI personally inspect every aspect of the jobWe have a 25year A+ rating with the Revdex.com This passed inspection by the City of [redacted] back in (I have enclosed original permit for thisI have contacted ***s [redacted] ***twice on this ice dam issue with the same answer it is an act of God & is not covered under warranty My possible solution to the problem would be to forfeit the $owed to Kaminski Roofing for work completed and allow custom to use it toward ceiling repair Gary Kaminski Kaminski Roofing, Inc
From: *** *** Date: Wed, Sep 28, at 5:PMSubject: Re: Fw: #***To: *** Land ***, We can pay the balance of $as soon as MrKaminski has the roof inspected by a neutral roofing inspector that results in no citationsThen we will expect $1,from Kaminski Roofing for ceiling repair.Thanks,***From: *** *** Date: Wed, Sep 28, at 5:PMSubject: Re: Fw: #***To: *** *** ***,It was verbal It was someone from *** *** who MrKaminski suggested we have come out I think his name is Paul When 'Paul' came out my husband and I and 'Paul' weren't exactly sure why he was here My husband and I thought MrKaminski wanted 'Paul' to come out to discuss insulation So we started talking about that and then Paul told us he represented the roofing supplies He looked at the interior damage from the leak He indicated the fault was not in the roofing materials MrKaminski knows that someone from *** *** was previously contacted as he indicated in the note he sent with the check that he would contact them again. *** *** is closed for the dayI will call them first thing in the morning to see about getting something in writing about what Paul said about the roofing materials.Thanks,***From: *** *** Date: Thu, Sep 29, at 7:AMSubject: Re: Fw: #***To: *** *** Per *** Dept of Building it's no permit no inspection Kaminski Roofing did not file for a permit.Thank you, ***Sent from *** *** ** ***On Wed, Sep 28, at 10:pm, *** *** wrote: Not having the proposal signed is the responsibility of the business Very questionable and poor business practice And an inspection should have been conducted both times the business worked on our roof We feel the business should at keast pay half for the inspection.Thanks, ***From: *** *** Date: Wed, Sep 28, at 3:PMSubject: Re: Fw: #***To: *** *** ***,The biggest thing we would like is to know that our roof is not inferior Having the roof checked by a neutral third party roofing inspector would be a start But not at our expense We do not know why the roofing company owner (MrKaminski) thought an inspection would be automatic leading to no inspection in We do not know why a permit was not filed for work done in and thus no inspection possible by city We would have a hard time selling our home in good faith with the roof situation the way it is now.We are also seeking the funds to repair our living room ceiling The estimate provided is $1,200.Thank you,***
From: [redacted] <[redacted]@yahoo.com>Date: Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:52 PMSubject: Fw: #[redacted]To: [redacted] <[redacted]@cleveland.Revdex.com.org>[redacted],My husband and I did not decline anything with Kaminski Roofing. We need to know what Mr. Kaminski is talking about.Thank you,[redacted] [redacted]From: [redacted] <[redacted]@yahoo.com>Date: Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:15 PMSubject: Re: #[redacted]To: [redacted] <[redacted]@cleveland.Revdex.com.org>[redacted],My husband wants to add that if Mr. Kaminski is indicating that we decided against the gable vents it was actually Mr. Kaminski who made that decision. My husband adds that Mr. Kaminski wanted us to talk with another insulator about insulating the attic the day Kaminski worked on the roof in 12.2015. Gary gave my husband the insulator's number. My husband left a message for the insulator. He made one call to us and we weren't home. He did not return any further calls from my husband. Thanks,[redacted]
Regarding complaint #[redacted], customer complaint of leaking roof & damage to interior ceiling. First of all customer contacted me in regards to a leak & stain on her ceiling. She had stated she contacted another roofing company which said they needed to tear off area install ice guard,...
valley & re-shingle for the amount of $1,600. I told her we had installed ice guard above & beyond code & manufacturers specifications. Customer did not believe me & wanted proof it was installed. I told her that the only way possible would be to tear off shingles in area at my cost of $1,000. She agreed to do this with her husband present so he may see it (also took pictures as proof of installation, enclosed). We then installed new ice guard which must be installed over existing because of nail holes, recut valley & then re-shingled. She paid $200 of the $1,000 then refused to pay anymore. This area also has a hidden room with a knee-wall that hampers the correct ventilation which is very important in ice dams!
This roof leaked one time in 6 years in the winter of 2014-15 due to an ice dam, never during heavy rains. 2014-15 was one of the worst winters we have had since 1979. I explain to her that the leak was caused by an ice dam.
I have met with owner of the home on several occasions to solve this problem. It was only after legal advice I received from my attorney that I no longer made contact with her after completion of redoing the area. The customer was very irate when trying to speak with her. She would not be reasonable & began making abusive remarks.
I used [redacted]. products & it was installed beyond manufactures specifications, 12’ up from gutter past porch-main roof union & in valley (code is 2‘ beyond inner wall. I have contacted [redacted]. on this matter & they have said ice back dams are an act of God & they do not warrant against them.
We have been in business for 37 years & are licensed in cities across northern Ohio. We do not subcontract our roofs all work is done by our trained employees. I personally inspect every aspect of the job. We have a 25year A+ rating with the Revdex.com.
This passed inspection by the City of [redacted] back in 2010 (I have enclosed original permit for this. I have contacted [redacted]s [redacted]. twice on this ice dam issue with the same answer it is an act of God & is not covered under warranty.
My possible solution to the problem would be to forfeit the $800.00 owed to Kaminski Roofing for work completed and allow custom to use it toward ceiling repair. ...⇄Kaminski ...⇄ Roofing, Inc.
Business response taken over the phone by Revdex.com staff (**)
Kaminski Roofing has already stated the job performed, recommendations to the consumer were provided prior to repair work and consumer declined (see proposal) and business has clarified the remaining warranty due to the consumer.
Regarding complaint # [redacted] , customer complaint of leaking roof & damage to interior ceilingFirst of all customer contacted me in regards to a leak & stain on her ceilingShe had stated she contacted another roofing company which said they needed to tear off area install ice guard, valley & re-shingle for the amount of $1,I told her we had installed ice guard above & beyond code & manufacturers specificationsCustomer did not believe me & wanted proof it was installedI told her that the only way possible would be to tear off shingles in area at my cost of $1,She agreed to do this with her husband present so he may see it (also took pictures as proof of installation, enclosed)We then installed new ice guard which must be installed over existing because of nail holes, recut valley & then re-shingledShe paid $of the $1,then refused to pay anymoreThis area also has a hidden room with a knee-wall that hampers the correct ventilation which is very important in ice dams! This roof leaked one time in years in the winter of 2014-due to an ice dam, never during heavy rains2014-was one of the worst winters we have had since I explain to her that the leak was caused by an ice dam I have met with owner of the home on several occasions to solve this problemIt was only after legal advice I received from my attorney that I no longer made contact with her after completion of redoing the areaThe customer was very irate when trying to speak with herShe would not be reasonable & began making abusive remarks I used [redacted] ***products & it was installed beyond manufactures specifications, 12’ up from gutter past porch-main roof union & in valley (code is 2‘ beyond inner wallI have contacted [redacted] ***on this matter & they have said ice back dams are an act of God & they do not warrant against them We have been in business for years & are licensed in cities across northern OhioWe do not subcontract our roofs all work is done by our trained employeesI personally inspect every aspect of the jobWe have a 25year A+ rating with the Revdex.com This passed inspection by the City of [redacted] back in (I have enclosed original permit for thisI have contacted ***s [redacted] ***twice on this ice dam issue with the same answer it is an act of God & is not covered under warranty My possible solution to the problem would be to forfeit the $owed to Kaminski Roofing for work completed and allow custom to use it toward ceiling repair Gary Kaminski Kaminski Roofing, Inc
From: *** *** Date: Wed, Sep 28, at 5:PMSubject: Re: Fw: #***To: *** Land ***, We can pay the balance of $as soon as MrKaminski has the roof inspected by a neutral roofing inspector that results in no citationsThen we will expect $1,from Kaminski Roofing for ceiling repair.Thanks,***From: *** *** Date: Wed, Sep 28, at 5:PMSubject: Re: Fw: #***To: *** *** ***,It was verbal It was someone from *** *** who MrKaminski suggested we have come out I think his name is Paul When 'Paul' came out my husband and I and 'Paul' weren't exactly sure why he was here My husband and I thought MrKaminski wanted 'Paul' to come out to discuss insulation So we started talking about that and then Paul told us he represented the roofing supplies He looked at the interior damage from the leak He indicated the fault was not in the roofing materials MrKaminski knows that someone from *** *** was previously contacted as he indicated in the note he sent with the check that he would contact them again. *** *** is closed for the dayI will call them first thing in the morning to see about getting something in writing about what Paul said about the roofing materials.Thanks,***From: *** *** Date: Thu, Sep 29, at 7:AMSubject: Re: Fw: #***To: *** *** Per *** Dept of Building it's no permit no inspection Kaminski Roofing did not file for a permit.Thank you, ***Sent from *** *** ** ***On Wed, Sep 28, at 10:pm, *** *** wrote: Not having the proposal signed is the responsibility of the business Very questionable and poor business practice And an inspection should have been conducted both times the business worked on our roof We feel the business should at keast pay half for the inspection.Thanks, ***From: *** *** Date: Wed, Sep 28, at 3:PMSubject: Re: Fw: #***To: *** *** ***,The biggest thing we would like is to know that our roof is not inferior Having the roof checked by a neutral third party roofing inspector would be a start But not at our expense We do not know why the roofing company owner (MrKaminski) thought an inspection would be automatic leading to no inspection in We do not know why a permit was not filed for work done in and thus no inspection possible by city We would have a hard time selling our home in good faith with the roof situation the way it is now.We are also seeking the funds to repair our living room ceiling The estimate provided is $1,200.Thank you,***
From: [redacted] <[redacted]@yahoo.com>Date: Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:52 PMSubject: Fw: #[redacted]To: [redacted] <[redacted]@cleveland.Revdex.com.org>[redacted],My husband and I did not decline anything with Kaminski Roofing. We need to know what Mr. Kaminski is talking about.Thank you,[redacted] [redacted]From: [redacted] <[redacted]@yahoo.com>Date: Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:15 PMSubject: Re: #[redacted]To: [redacted] <[redacted]@cleveland.Revdex.com.org>[redacted],My husband wants to add that if Mr. Kaminski is indicating that we decided against the gable vents it was actually Mr. Kaminski who made that decision. My husband adds that Mr. Kaminski wanted us to talk with another insulator about insulating the attic the day Kaminski worked on the roof in 12.2015. Gary gave my husband the insulator's number. My husband left a message for the insulator. He made one call to us and we weren't home. He did not return any further calls from my husband. Thanks,[redacted]
Regarding complaint #[redacted], customer complaint of leaking roof & damage to interior ceiling. First of all customer contacted me in regards to a leak & stain on her ceiling. She had stated she contacted another roofing company which said they needed to tear off area install ice guard,...
valley & re-shingle for the amount of $1,600. I told her we had installed ice guard above & beyond code & manufacturers specifications. Customer did not believe me & wanted proof it was installed. I told her that the only way possible would be to tear off shingles in area at my cost of $1,000. She agreed to do this with her husband present so he may see it (also took pictures as proof of installation, enclosed). We then installed new ice guard which must be installed over existing because of nail holes, recut valley & then re-shingled. She paid $200 of the $1,000 then refused to pay anymore. This area also has a hidden room with a knee-wall that hampers the correct ventilation which is very important in ice dams!
This roof leaked one time in 6 years in the winter of 2014-15 due to an ice dam, never during heavy rains. 2014-15 was one of the worst winters we have had since 1979. I explain to her that the leak was caused by an ice dam.
I have met with owner of the home on several occasions to solve this problem. It was only after legal advice I received from my attorney that I no longer made contact with her after completion of redoing the area. The customer was very irate when trying to speak with her. She would not be reasonable & began making abusive remarks.
I used [redacted]. products & it was installed beyond manufactures specifications, 12’ up from gutter past porch-main roof union & in valley (code is 2‘ beyond inner wall. I have contacted [redacted]. on this matter & they have said ice back dams are an act of God & they do not warrant against them.
We have been in business for 37 years & are licensed in cities across northern Ohio. We do not subcontract our roofs all work is done by our trained employees. I personally inspect every aspect of the job. We have a 25year A+ rating with the Revdex.com.
This passed inspection by the City of [redacted] back in 2010 (I have enclosed original permit for this. I have contacted [redacted]s [redacted]. twice on this ice dam issue with the same answer it is an act of God & is not covered under warranty.
My possible solution to the problem would be to forfeit the $800.00 owed to Kaminski Roofing for work completed and allow custom to use it toward ceiling repair.
...⇄ Kaminski ...⇄ Roofing, Inc.
Business response taken over the phone by Revdex.com staff (**)
Kaminski Roofing has already stated the job performed, recommendations to the consumer were provided prior to repair work and consumer declined (see proposal) and business has clarified the remaining warranty due to the consumer.