C. BROUGHTON SHEDLICK, PLLC

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the responseIf no reason is received your complaint will be closed as Answered] ? Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because: Everything he explained and keep repeat from the previous email and now is a liar, we don't know the law and the process that why we paid them to do their job if we got their advice and warning what's going on why we didn't follow, the only explanation is they're lying and didn't do their job, and until now still didn't want to take any responsibility.Once again if they are professional they will not told their client is stupid, after what what happened at the court we went to their office face to face talking to [redacted] and Campbell and both of them give us a funny answer our case is successful and we don't have to paid anything elseThat is the only answer we get and I ask who had the authority to solve this problem Nancy said Chris is the boss so wait for him, but at that time he not in the office so we left and call back talk to him then we got the answer from him we deserved that? because we are Stupid.If we don't open this case and I believe even a simple apologize from the last email we never heard from him.The only thing we feel relief is this go to public so a lot other people will be aware of this office, because with the results is lying and didn't take any responsibility and all they know taking money from other who need their professional acknowledged, soon or later the business is going out of business.? We understand sometime things is not work out as we wish but the way this law firm solved the problem that they created no one is stupid enough to keep quiet Regards, [redacted]

Dear *** ***,In response to the complaint sent in by *** ***.Prior to the court date, MrPeter N*** (who was working for us at the time) drafted a lease agreement for the tenantThis was NOT a sales contract but a lease with an option to buyThe landlord was the prior owner who then lost
the property through foreclosure to a new owner who purchased the property at a foreclosure sale.The subsequent eviction action was scheduled for a date on which both myself (*** ***) and *** *** (my colleague) were already booked for existing clientsFortunately, both our cases were in the same courthouse as *** ***'s caseWe instructed her that if the case was called before *** *** could arrive, to ask the judge to pass the case to the end of the docket*** *** called MsB*** at our office, who repeated the same advice.I finished my case and immediately went to where *** *** wasI found *** *** there already, negotiating with the new owner's lawyer, MsF*For his part, *** ***'s arrival had been delayed through no fault of his ownAfter his prior case was done, he tied going to this one, only to determine that the docket had incorrectly identified the courtroom *** ***'s case was supposed to be heard inEven so, he tracked down the clientI arrived shortly after he didBoth of us made diligent efforts to take care of this matter despite the fact that both of us already had existing cases to handle, again fortunately in the same courthouse.I know the landlord's lawyer to be honest, that is, a lawyer faced with an opposing party represented by counsel will avoid direct communication in the absence of the client's attorneyThe client should have told MsF* that *** *** would be representing her, in which case MsF* would have waited until *** *** (or myself) showed upIgnoring all this advice, *** *** went ahead and spoke directly to MsF*, negotiating a lease extension or new lease without the benefit of our advice or representation, despite having hired *** *** and knowing he would be coming after finishing his existing client's matter.Her options in renegotiating the lease with the new owner are limited, but we would be willing to help herto the extent possibleTo the extent any confusion or inconvenience was caused by us, we heartly apologize.CBroughton S

In response to *** ***'s denial of our response, we have to repeat certain itemsApparently ***
*** chooses to ignore them or simply prefers to outright deny themShe insisted that we handle a case for her on a date on which BOTH lawyers already had existing mattersWe advised her of this before the court date.Fortunately both matters were in the same court as hersFor that reason we also advised her that if her case was called before either myself or Mr C*** could finish our other mattersshe should advise the court of this andthe judge Would pass the matter Over to the end of the docket.When her case was called, *** *** was on his way to the courtroomFor my part, I also went after my prior matter was finishedEach of us did our best to arrive there in time to help her.In addition to myself and *** ***, MsB*** also told her that if the Case was called before thejudge and/or opposing counsel (MsF*) that she had a lawyer and thecase should be passed overFor some reason she did not do soWe cannot understand why a client who has hired an attorney and is expecting that attorney to show up at court to represent her would not relay this to the court or the other lawyerEven without any specific advice from us, she should have known to disclose this anywayThis is simple common senseHer failure to do so is a curious but substantial lapse of judgment and the proximate cause of any of her current problems.As it was, despite the client having negotiated directly with MsF* on the lease, *** *** persuaded MsF* to give the client another month to pay up the money to satisfy the lease terms, so there was in fact a concession won by MrC*** and a benefit to the client.CBroughton S***

Dear *** ***,In response to the complaint sent in by *** ***.Prior to the court date, MrPeter N*** (who was working for us at the time) drafted a lease agreement for the tenantThis was NOT a sales contract but a lease with an option to buyThe landlord was the prior owner who then lost
the property through foreclosure to a new owner who purchased the property at a foreclosure sale.The subsequent eviction action was scheduled for a date on which both myself (*** ***) and *** *** (my colleague) were already booked for existing clientsFortunately, both our cases were in the same courthouse as *** ***'s caseWe instructed her that if the case was called before *** *** could arrive, to ask the judge to pass the case to the end of the docket*** *** called MsB*** at our office, who repeated the same advice.I finished my case and immediately went to where *** *** wasI found *** *** there already, negotiating with the new owner's lawyer, MsF*For his part, *** ***'s arrival had been delayed through no fault of his ownAfter his prior case was done, he tied going to this one, only to determine that the docket had incorrectly identified the courtroom *** ***'s case was supposed to be heard inEven so, he tracked down the clientI arrived shortly after he didBoth of us made diligent efforts to take care of this matter despite the fact that both of us already had existing cases to handle, again fortunately in the same courthouse.I know the landlord's lawyer to be honest, that is, a lawyer faced with an opposing party represented by counsel will avoid direct communication in the absence of the client's attorneyThe client should have told MsF* that *** *** would be representing her, in which case MsF* would have waited until *** *** (or myself) showed upIgnoring all this advice, *** *** went ahead and spoke directly to MsF*, negotiating a lease extension or new lease without the benefit of our advice or representation, despite having hired *** *** and knowing he would be coming after finishing his existing client's matter.Her options in renegotiating the lease with the new owner are limited, but we would be willing to help herto the extent possibleTo the extent any confusion or inconvenience was caused by us, we heartly apologize.CBroughton S

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the responseIf no reason is received your complaint will be closed as Answered]
? Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:
Everything he explained and keep repeat from the previous email and now is a liar, we don't know the law and the process that why we paid them to do their job if we got their advice and warning what's going on why we didn't follow, the only explanation is they're lying and didn't do their job, and until now still didn't want to take any responsibility.Once again if they are professional they will not told their client is stupid, after what what happened at the court we went to their office face to face talking to *** *** and Campbell and both of them give us a funny answer our case is successful and we don't have to paid anything elseThat is the only answer we get and I ask who had the authority to solve this problem Nancy said Chris is the boss so wait for him, but at that time he not in the office so we left and call back talk to him then we got the answer from him we deserved that? because we are Stupid.If we don't open this case and I believe even a simple apologize from the last email we never heard from him.The only thing we feel relief is this go to public so a lot other people will be aware of this office, because with the results is lying and didn't take any responsibility and all they know taking money from other who need their professional acknowledged, soon or later the business is going out of business.? We understand sometime things is not work out as we wish but the way this law firm solved the problem that they created no one is stupid enough to keep quiet
Regards,
*** ***

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed as Answered]
 Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because:
Everything he explained and keep repeat from the previous email and now is a liar, we don't know the law and the process that why we paid them to do their job if we got their advice and warning what's going on why we didn't follow, the only explanation is they're lying and didn't do their job, and until now still didn't want to take any responsibility.Once again if they are professional they will not told their client is stupid, after what what happened at the court we went to their office face to face talking to [redacted] and Campbell and both of them give us a funny answer our case is successful and we don't have to paid anything else. That is the only answer we get and I ask who had the authority to solve this problem Nancy said Chris is the boss so wait for him, but at that time he not in the office so we left and call back talk to him then we got the answer from him we deserved that because we are Stupid.If we don't open this case and I believe even a simple apologize from the last email we never heard from him.The only thing we feel relief is this go to public so a lot other people will be aware of this office, because with the results is lying and didn't take any responsibility and all they know taking money from other who need their professional acknowledged, soon or later the business is going out of business. We understand sometime things is not work out as we wish but the way this law firm solved the problem that they created no one is stupid enough to keep quiet.
Regards,
[redacted]

In response to [redacted]'s denial of our response, we have to repeat certain items. Apparently [redacted] chooses to ignore them or simply prefers to outright deny them. She insisted that we handle a case for her on a date on which BOTH lawyers already had existing matters. We advised her of this before the court date.Fortunately both matters were in the same court as hers. For that reason we also advised her that if her case was called before either myself or Mr C[redacted] could finish our other matters. she should advise the court of this andthe judge Would pass the matter Over to the end of the docket.When her case was called, [redacted] was on his way to the courtroom. For my part, I also went after my prior matter was finished. Each of us did our best to arrive there in time to help her.In addition to myself and [redacted], Ms. B[redacted] also told her that if the Case was called before thejudge and/or opposing counsel (Ms. F[redacted]) that she had a lawyer and thecase should be passed over. For some reason she did not do so. We cannot understand why a client who has hired an attorney and is expecting that attorney to show up at court to represent her would not relay this to the court or the other lawyer. Even without any specific advice from us, she should have known to disclose this anyway. This is simple common sense. Her failure to do so is a curious but substantial lapse of judgment and the proximate cause of any of her current problems.As it was, despite the client having negotiated directly with Ms. F[redacted] on the lease, [redacted] persuaded Ms. F[redacted] to give the client another month to pay up the money to satisfy the lease terms, so there was in fact a concession won by Mr. C[redacted] and a benefit to the client.C. Broughton S[redacted]