Cardinal Plumbing & Construction LLC

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 10, 2015/11/18) */ We were hired to do a project for Mr***, which entailed repairing a wall and cleaning up the debrisThe insurance company didn't give him money to fix the job, but to tear the building downHe wanted to fix it anywayHe was referred to me from a different customerAt that time, he explained to me that he wanted to save the building and I explained this was an unusual circumstance, but we would try to find someone to help himWe had blueprints drawn up and cleaned the areaThere were two payments made - the reimbursement for the blueprint and the initial cleaning for the site and the second payment was a down payment for the brick layer who was going to do the workThere was a delay getting the second draw, and at that point, the brick layer decided to not do the workAt that time, the people in the area were starting to steal the bricks from the buildingThe job continued to grow, so no one was willing to do it for the priceI have offered to give Mr [redacted] the remainder of the money that was used to tear the building down - $2,for the materials we would have usedHe wants the full $8,back, which I am not willing to give, considering we did do some work for him and we both know the insurance company and bank both wanted the building tore downI'm still willing to give the $2,material money backI want a written statement from him saying he will accept that to refund him Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (3000, 17, 2015/12/03) */ This is my rebuttal to [redacted] (***) [redacted] of Cardinal Plumbing & Construction responseMr [redacted] signed the contract making him contractually responsible for completing the work and received and cashed checks supposedly to that endMr***, my insurance company, my business associate, and I were the only entities involved in the discussion involving the structural damage claim on this propertyThe checks were issued for repairs and restoration of the buildingMr [redacted] did neither The contract was to restore the wall and once the contract was signed there was never any discussion about more moneyI trusted Mr [redacted] was capable and going to perform the needed work once he signed the contract and especially when he cashed my checks The first check given was the standard 1/down on the contract's totalWithin weeks, Mr [redacted] requested a second check to acquire the material and the scaffolding to start the wall replacement During a Channel TV interview on October 29, Mr [redacted] claimed he spent $4,for a blueprint necessary for the projectMr [redacted] agreed to produce the initial invoice for the blue print and materials in business daysSo far, he has made no attempt to contact me, my business associate, or channel [redacted] Bank is the mortgage lender of this propertyNo bank would ever suggest destroying a property that they have a vested interest inTheir only role was the holding source for the insurance funds and the distributors of two checks totaling $8,Mr [redacted] cashed these under pretensesThis is why I am demanding full refundIT IS NOT NEGOTIABLE!

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 10, 2015/11/18) */
We were hired to do a project for Mr***, which entailed repairing a wall and cleaning up the debrisThe insurance company didn't give him money to fix the job, but to tear the building downHe wanted to fix it anywayHe was referred
to me from a different customerAt that time, he explained to me that he wanted to save the building and I explained this was an unusual circumstance, but we would try to find someone to help himWe had blueprints drawn up and cleaned the areaThere were two payments made - the reimbursement for the blueprint and the initial cleaning for the site and the second payment was a down payment for the brick layer who was going to do the workThere was a delay getting the second draw, and at that point, the brick layer decided to not do the workAt that time, the people in the area were starting to steal the bricks from the buildingThe job continued to grow, so no one was willing to do it for the priceI have offered to give Mr*** the remainder of the money that was used to tear the building down - $2,for the materials we would have usedHe wants the full $8,back, which I am not willing to give, considering we did do some work for him and we both know the insurance company and bank both wanted the building tore downI'm still willing to give the $2,material money backI want a written statement from him saying he will accept that to refund him
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 17, 2015/12/03) */
This is my rebuttal to *** (***) *** of Cardinal Plumbing & Construction responseMr*** signed the contract making him contractually responsible for completing the work and received and cashed checks supposedly to that endMr***, my insurance company, my business associate, and I were the only entities involved in the discussion involving the structural damage claim on this propertyThe checks were issued for repairs and restoration of the buildingMr*** did neither
The contract was to restore the wall and once the contract was signed there was never any discussion about more moneyI trusted Mr*** was capable and going to perform the needed work once he signed the contract and especially when he cashed my checks
The first check given was the standard 1/down on the contract's totalWithin weeks, Mr*** requested a second check to acquire the material and the scaffolding to start the wall replacement
During a Channel TV interview on October 29, Mr*** claimed he spent $4,for a blueprint necessary for the projectMr*** agreed to produce the initial invoice for the blue print and materials in business daysSo far, he has made no attempt to contact me, my business associate, or channel
** *** Bank is the mortgage lender of this propertyNo bank would ever suggest destroying a property that they have a vested interest inTheir only role was the holding source for the insurance funds and the distributors of two checks totaling $8,Mr*** cashed these under pretensesThis is why I am demanding full refundIT IS NOT NEGOTIABLE!

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 10, 2015/11/18) */
We were hired to do a project for Mr***, which entailed repairing a wall and cleaning up the debris The insurance company didn't give him money to fix the job, but to tear the building down He wanted to fix it anyway He was referred
to me from a different customer At that time, he explained to me that he wanted to save the building and I explained this was an unusual circumstance, but we would try to find someone to help him We had blueprints drawn up and cleaned the area There were two payments made - the reimbursement for the blueprint and the initial cleaning for the site and the second payment was a down payment for the brick layer who was going to do the work There was a delay getting the second draw, and at that point, the brick layer decided to not do the work At that time, the people in the area were starting to steal the bricks from the building The job continued to grow, so no one was willing to do it for the price I have offered to give Mr*** the remainder of the money that was used to tear the building down - $2,for the materials we would have used He wants the full $8,back, which I am not willing to give, considering we did do some work for him and we both know the insurance company and bank both wanted the building tore down I'm still willing to give the $2,material money back I want a written statement from him saying he will accept that to refund him
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 17, 2015/12/03) */
This is my rebuttal to *** (***) *** of Cardinal Plumbing & Construction response Mr*** signed the contract making him contractually responsible for completing the work and received and cashed checks supposedly to that end Mr***, my insurance company, my business associate, and I were the only entities involved in the discussion involving the structural damage claim on this property The checks were issued for repairs and restoration of the building Mr*** did neither
The contract was to restore the wall and once the contract was signed there was never any discussion about more money I trusted Mr*** was capable and going to perform the needed work once he signed the contract and especially when he cashed my checks
The first check given was the standard 1/down on the contract's total Within weeks, Mr*** requested a second check to acquire the material and the scaffolding to start the wall replacement
During a Channel TV interview on October 29, Mr*** claimed he spent $4,for a blueprint necessary for the project Mr*** agreed to produce the initial invoice for the blue print and materials in business days So far, he has made no attempt to contact me, my business associate, or channel
** *** Bank is the mortgage lender of this property No bank would ever suggest destroying a property that they have a vested interest in Their only role was the holding source for the insurance funds and the distributors of two checks totaling $8, Mr*** cashed these under pretenses This is why I am demanding full refund IT IS NOT NEGOTIABLE!