Item 1: The business name on the dispute is wrong, Catholic Today Magazine is not, never has been involved with this dispute in any way, shape or formPlease remove Catholic Today Magazine from anything related to this caseItem 2: [redacted] asked me to help with [redacted] [redacted] project in terms of setting up manufacturing and productI was very clear that it would take a great deal of time, effort and costOver the course of when we first talked I have put far more time and resources than he has paid forThe reason I did not [redacted] for that time is because we agreed that I would receive 7% of the company earnings once it hit the market [redacted] received vital information on the market, where he should target sales, production options and much moreThis advice and knowledge was shared with the trust that I would benefit from the 7%, for if that agreement was not in place I would have charged him at least $15,for my time and information sharedI can say with all certainty that [redacted] would never had found a US manufacture or a market plan to sell to the educational market without meOver the time spend on the this project I contacted a great number of people and programs, sharing some of that knowledge with [redacted] however never did I say we have a deal with one group or the anotherI did ask and received a set amount of funds (that had a cap on it ) which I told [redacted] would be used for tooling or would roll into first product ordersThis is needed to get factory’s to work with your without a huge amount of upfront cashI am also looking after [redacted] best interest in saving him a great deal of cash to manufacture this productIt is very common to spend over $60,to get a product to market [redacted] will tell you he has nothing in the manufacturing side and his retail sales target would have been a disasterHis patent is weak and any company could pop out a copy-cat product [redacted] had no idea about the private label market, why made in USA is so important and also the OEM ability to make this product for other companies – all this came from me alone, of which I need to paid forThere is no scam here and I really like the product (and ***), the shuttle concept has a marketIf [redacted] wants $back I will agree, however I need to paid for my time and knowledgeThere also must be a NDC signed and I want the ability to finish production with a percentage of the companyI like [redacted] and understand his concerns, would like to continue working with him under a formal agreement Thank you, [redacted]
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
[redacted] is entitled to no more than the $2,500 he invoiced me for consulting. He did not deliver what was expected of him. Non-performance warrants at minimum a $5,280 refund. In addition, he asked for a NDA from me. In retrospect, the person who should be asking for an NDA is me. I'm the one with the intellectual property. As a paying customer, any discussions shared between myself and [redacted] contractually belong to me. I informed [redacted] that I would consider allowing him to act as a territorial sales representative once I am able to resolve the mass production challenge that [redacted] promised to develop but failed in all respects. I offered him a chance to settle today for a discounted rate of $4,800 if the check is mailed with a postmark date of 3/20/15. He responded that he would like have this matter settled by next week - which I take as a solid refusal of acceptance. I look forward to a peaceful resolution but if that outcome cannot be reached, it is my civic duty to seek an open and comprehensive disclosure of the full facts and circumstances of Mr. [redacted]'s actions. I will have more evidence against [redacted] in the coming days as I learn more about his wrongdoings with myself and other individuals with whom he is currently providing a consulting "service" to in the sporting goods industry. He should not be allowed to operate with impunity.
Regards,[redacted]
Thank you for your time today. In terms of taking take of [redacted], here is what I am willing to do As [redacted] had agreed on before, I will pay him $3480 on the following terms. 1. A signed non-discourser2. That he will not use any of my contacts moving forward3. Statement that we are 100% finished and done working on this project4. List of everyone he has contacted to slander my name, plus the content – emails and such5. An apology to my wife and myself for the viral language, verbal and written abuseIf this not agreeable than I will retain a lawyer and sue him for his false and slanderous actions. Thank you,[redacted]
Item 1: The business name on the dispute is wrong, Catholic Today Magazine is not, never has been involved with this dispute in any way, shape or form. Please remove Catholic Today Magazine from anything related to this case. Item 2: [redacted] asked me to help with [redacted]...
[redacted] project in terms of setting up manufacturing and product. I was very clear that it would take a great deal of time, effort and cost. Over the course of when we first talked I have put far more time and resources than he has paid for. The reason I did not [redacted] for that time is because we agreed that I would receive 7% of the company earnings once it hit the market. [redacted] received vital information on the market, where he should target sales, production options and much more. This advice and knowledge was shared with the trust that I would benefit from the 7%, for if that agreement was not in place I would have charged him at least $15,000 for my time and information shared. I can say with all certainty that [redacted] would never had found a US manufacture or a market plan to sell to the educational market without me. Over the time spend on the this project I contacted a great number of people and programs, sharing some of that knowledge with [redacted] however never did I say we have a deal with one group or the another. I did ask and received a set amount of funds (that had a cap on it ) which I told [redacted] would be used for tooling or would roll into first product orders. This is needed to get factory’s to work with your without a huge amount of upfront cash. I am also looking after [redacted] best interest in saving him a great deal of cash to manufacture this product. It is very common to spend over $60,000 to get a product to market. [redacted] will tell you he has nothing in the manufacturing side and his retail sales target would have been a disaster. His patent is weak and any company could pop out a copy-cat product. [redacted] had no idea about the private label market, why made in USA is so important and also the OEM ability to make this product for other companies – all this came from me alone, of which I need to paid for. There is no scam here and I really like the product (and [redacted]), the shuttle concept has a market. If [redacted] wants $5280 back I will agree, however I need to paid for my time and knowledge. There also must be a NDC signed and I want the ability to finish production with a percentage of the company. I like [redacted] and understand his concerns, would like to continue working with him under a formal agreement. Thank you,[redacted]
Item 1: The business name on the dispute is wrong, Catholic Today Magazine is not, never has been involved with this dispute in any way, shape or form. Please remove Catholic Today Magazine from anything related to this case. Item 2: [redacted] asked me to help with [redacted]...
[redacted] project in terms of setting up manufacturing and product. I was very clear that it would take a great deal of time, effort and cost. Over the course of when we first talked I have put far more time and resources than he has paid for. The reason I did not [redacted] for that time is because we agreed that I would receive 7% of the company earnings once it hit the market. [redacted] received vital information on the market, where he should target sales, production options and much more. This advice and knowledge was shared with the trust that I would benefit from the 7%, for if that agreement was not in place I would have charged him at least $15,000 for my time and information shared. I can say with all certainty that [redacted] would never had found a US manufacture or a market plan to sell to the educational market without me. Over the time spend on the this project I contacted a great number of people and programs, sharing some of that knowledge with [redacted] however never did I say we have a deal with one group or the another. I did ask and received a set amount of funds (that had a cap on it ) which I told [redacted] would be used for tooling or would roll into first product orders. This is needed to get factory’s to work with your without a huge amount of upfront cash. I am also looking after [redacted] best interest in saving him a great deal of cash to manufacture this product. It is very common to spend over $60,000 to get a product to market. [redacted] will tell you he has nothing in the manufacturing side and his retail sales target would have been a disaster. His patent is weak and any company could pop out a copy-cat product. [redacted] had no idea about the private label market, why made in USA is so important and also the OEM ability to make this product for other companies – all this came from me alone, of which I need to paid for. There is no scam here and I really like the product (and [redacted]), the shuttle concept has a market. If [redacted] wants $5280 back I will agree, however I need to paid for my time and knowledge. There also must be a NDC signed and I want the ability to finish production with a percentage of the company. I like [redacted] and understand his concerns, would like to continue working with him under a formal agreement. Thank you,[redacted]
Thank you for your time today. In terms of taking take of [redacted], here is what I am willing to do As [redacted] had agreed on before, I will pay him $3480 on the following terms. 1. A signed non-discourser2. That he will not use any of my contacts moving forward3. Statement that we are 100% finished and done working on this project4. List of everyone he has contacted to slander my name, plus the content – emails and such5. An apology to my wife and myself for the viral language, verbal and written abuseIf this not agreeable than I will retain a lawyer and sue him for his false and slanderous actions. Thank you,[redacted]
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
[redacted] is entitled to no more than the $2,500 he invoiced me for consulting. He did not deliver what was expected of him. Non-performance warrants at minimum a $5,280 refund. In addition, he asked for a NDA from me. In retrospect, the person who should be asking for an NDA is me. I'm the one with the intellectual property. As a paying customer, any discussions shared between myself and [redacted] contractually belong to me. I informed [redacted] that I would consider allowing him to act as a territorial sales representative once I am able to resolve the mass production challenge that [redacted] promised to develop but failed in all respects. I offered him a chance to settle today for a discounted rate of $4,800 if the check is mailed with a postmark date of 3/20/15. He responded that he would like have this matter settled by next week - which I take as a solid refusal of acceptance. I look forward to a peaceful resolution but if that outcome cannot be reached, it is my civic duty to seek an open and comprehensive disclosure of the full facts and circumstances of Mr. [redacted]'s actions. I will have more evidence against [redacted] in the coming days as I learn more about his wrongdoings with myself and other individuals with whom he is currently providing a consulting "service" to in the sporting goods industry. He should not be allowed to operate with impunity.
Item 1: The business name on the dispute is wrong, Catholic Today Magazine is not, never has been involved with this dispute in any way, shape or formPlease remove Catholic Today Magazine from anything related to this caseItem 2: [redacted] asked me to help with [redacted] [redacted] project in terms of setting up manufacturing and productI was very clear that it would take a great deal of time, effort and costOver the course of when we first talked I have put far more time and resources than he has paid forThe reason I did not [redacted] for that time is because we agreed that I would receive 7% of the company earnings once it hit the market [redacted] received vital information on the market, where he should target sales, production options and much moreThis advice and knowledge was shared with the trust that I would benefit from the 7%, for if that agreement was not in place I would have charged him at least $15,for my time and information sharedI can say with all certainty that [redacted] would never had found a US manufacture or a market plan to sell to the educational market without meOver the time spend on the this project I contacted a great number of people and programs, sharing some of that knowledge with [redacted] however never did I say we have a deal with one group or the anotherI did ask and received a set amount of funds (that had a cap on it ) which I told [redacted] would be used for tooling or would roll into first product ordersThis is needed to get factory’s to work with your without a huge amount of upfront cashI am also looking after [redacted] best interest in saving him a great deal of cash to manufacture this productIt is very common to spend over $60,to get a product to market [redacted] will tell you he has nothing in the manufacturing side and his retail sales target would have been a disasterHis patent is weak and any company could pop out a copy-cat product [redacted] had no idea about the private label market, why made in USA is so important and also the OEM ability to make this product for other companies – all this came from me alone, of which I need to paid forThere is no scam here and I really like the product (and ***), the shuttle concept has a marketIf [redacted] wants $back I will agree, however I need to paid for my time and knowledgeThere also must be a NDC signed and I want the ability to finish production with a percentage of the companyI like [redacted] and understand his concerns, would like to continue working with him under a formal agreement Thank you, [redacted]
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
[redacted] is entitled to no more than the $2,500 he invoiced me for consulting. He did not deliver what was expected of him. Non-performance warrants at minimum a $5,280 refund. In addition, he asked for a NDA from me. In retrospect, the person who should be asking for an NDA is me. I'm the one with the intellectual property. As a paying customer, any discussions shared between myself and [redacted] contractually belong to me. I informed [redacted] that I would consider allowing him to act as a territorial sales representative once I am able to resolve the mass production challenge that [redacted] promised to develop but failed in all respects. I offered him a chance to settle today for a discounted rate of $4,800 if the check is mailed with a postmark date of 3/20/15. He responded that he would like have this matter settled by next week - which I take as a solid refusal of acceptance. I look forward to a peaceful resolution but if that outcome cannot be reached, it is my civic duty to seek an open and comprehensive disclosure of the full facts and circumstances of Mr. [redacted]'s actions. I will have more evidence against [redacted] in the coming days as I learn more about his wrongdoings with myself and other individuals with whom he is currently providing a consulting "service" to in the sporting goods industry. He should not be allowed to operate with impunity.
Regards,[redacted]
Thank you for your time today. In terms of taking take of [redacted], here is what I am willing to do As [redacted] had agreed on before, I will pay him $3480 on the following terms. 1. A signed non-discourser2. That he will not use any of my contacts moving forward3. Statement that we are 100% finished and done working on this project4. List of everyone he has contacted to slander my name, plus the content – emails and such5. An apology to my wife and myself for the viral language, verbal and written abuseIf this not agreeable than I will retain a lawyer and sue him for his false and slanderous actions. Thank you,[redacted]
Item 1: The business name on the dispute is wrong, Catholic Today Magazine is not, never has been involved with this dispute in any way, shape or form. Please remove Catholic Today Magazine from anything related to this case. Item 2: [redacted] asked me to help with [redacted]...
[redacted] project in terms of setting up manufacturing and product. I was very clear that it would take a great deal of time, effort and cost. Over the course of when we first talked I have put far more time and resources than he has paid for. The reason I did not [redacted] for that time is because we agreed that I would receive 7% of the company earnings once it hit the market. [redacted] received vital information on the market, where he should target sales, production options and much more. This advice and knowledge was shared with the trust that I would benefit from the 7%, for if that agreement was not in place I would have charged him at least $15,000 for my time and information shared. I can say with all certainty that [redacted] would never had found a US manufacture or a market plan to sell to the educational market without me. Over the time spend on the this project I contacted a great number of people and programs, sharing some of that knowledge with [redacted] however never did I say we have a deal with one group or the another. I did ask and received a set amount of funds (that had a cap on it ) which I told [redacted] would be used for tooling or would roll into first product orders. This is needed to get factory’s to work with your without a huge amount of upfront cash. I am also looking after [redacted] best interest in saving him a great deal of cash to manufacture this product. It is very common to spend over $60,000 to get a product to market. [redacted] will tell you he has nothing in the manufacturing side and his retail sales target would have been a disaster. His patent is weak and any company could pop out a copy-cat product. [redacted] had no idea about the private label market, why made in USA is so important and also the OEM ability to make this product for other companies – all this came from me alone, of which I need to paid for. There is no scam here and I really like the product (and [redacted]), the shuttle concept has a market. If [redacted] wants $5280 back I will agree, however I need to paid for my time and knowledge. There also must be a NDC signed and I want the ability to finish production with a percentage of the company. I like [redacted] and understand his concerns, would like to continue working with him under a formal agreement. Thank you,[redacted]
Item 1: The business name on the dispute is wrong, Catholic Today Magazine is not, never has been involved with this dispute in any way, shape or form. Please remove Catholic Today Magazine from anything related to this case. Item 2: [redacted] asked me to help with [redacted]...
[redacted] project in terms of setting up manufacturing and product. I was very clear that it would take a great deal of time, effort and cost. Over the course of when we first talked I have put far more time and resources than he has paid for. The reason I did not [redacted] for that time is because we agreed that I would receive 7% of the company earnings once it hit the market. [redacted] received vital information on the market, where he should target sales, production options and much more. This advice and knowledge was shared with the trust that I would benefit from the 7%, for if that agreement was not in place I would have charged him at least $15,000 for my time and information shared. I can say with all certainty that [redacted] would never had found a US manufacture or a market plan to sell to the educational market without me. Over the time spend on the this project I contacted a great number of people and programs, sharing some of that knowledge with [redacted] however never did I say we have a deal with one group or the another. I did ask and received a set amount of funds (that had a cap on it ) which I told [redacted] would be used for tooling or would roll into first product orders. This is needed to get factory’s to work with your without a huge amount of upfront cash. I am also looking after [redacted] best interest in saving him a great deal of cash to manufacture this product. It is very common to spend over $60,000 to get a product to market. [redacted] will tell you he has nothing in the manufacturing side and his retail sales target would have been a disaster. His patent is weak and any company could pop out a copy-cat product. [redacted] had no idea about the private label market, why made in USA is so important and also the OEM ability to make this product for other companies – all this came from me alone, of which I need to paid for. There is no scam here and I really like the product (and [redacted]), the shuttle concept has a market. If [redacted] wants $5280 back I will agree, however I need to paid for my time and knowledge. There also must be a NDC signed and I want the ability to finish production with a percentage of the company. I like [redacted] and understand his concerns, would like to continue working with him under a formal agreement. Thank you,[redacted]
Thank you for your time today. In terms of taking take of [redacted], here is what I am willing to do As [redacted] had agreed on before, I will pay him $3480 on the following terms. 1. A signed non-discourser2. That he will not use any of my contacts moving forward3. Statement that we are 100% finished and done working on this project4. List of everyone he has contacted to slander my name, plus the content – emails and such5. An apology to my wife and myself for the viral language, verbal and written abuseIf this not agreeable than I will retain a lawyer and sue him for his false and slanderous actions. Thank you,[redacted]
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
[redacted] is entitled to no more than the $2,500 he invoiced me for consulting. He did not deliver what was expected of him. Non-performance warrants at minimum a $5,280 refund. In addition, he asked for a NDA from me. In retrospect, the person who should be asking for an NDA is me. I'm the one with the intellectual property. As a paying customer, any discussions shared between myself and [redacted] contractually belong to me. I informed [redacted] that I would consider allowing him to act as a territorial sales representative once I am able to resolve the mass production challenge that [redacted] promised to develop but failed in all respects. I offered him a chance to settle today for a discounted rate of $4,800 if the check is mailed with a postmark date of 3/20/15. He responded that he would like have this matter settled by next week - which I take as a solid refusal of acceptance. I look forward to a peaceful resolution but if that outcome cannot be reached, it is my civic duty to seek an open and comprehensive disclosure of the full facts and circumstances of Mr. [redacted]'s actions. I will have more evidence against [redacted] in the coming days as I learn more about his wrongdoings with myself and other individuals with whom he is currently providing a consulting "service" to in the sporting goods industry. He should not be allowed to operate with impunity.
Regards,[redacted]