February 8, [redacted] The Revdex.com K StNW, 10" Floor Washington, DC 20005Dear [redacted] .In response to complaint ID [redacted] we submit the following:The construction in question was completed by a contractor performing Work for an office tenant as allowed under the provisions of their lease agreementThroughout the duration of the project the Landlord took all measures possible to limit potential disturbance to all parties, but we had a limited ability to Control the Contractor's Work Schedule.Due to unforeseen circumstances the construction took longer to complete than initially communicated to us and subsequently communicated to the residents of [redacted] ***During the delay we continued to take all measures reasonably possible to limit the work hours including barring the contractors from the buildingFurther, we communicated all information provided to us to our residential tenants to the extent We Were made aware of changes.While we understand the concerns brought forth by [redacted] we do not agree with his proposed settlementWe are, of course, available and Willing to discuss further.Regards,Benjamin U
March 31, [redacted] The Revdex.comK StNW, 10th FloorWashington, DC 20005Dear [redacted] :In our second response to complaint ID [redacted] we submit the following:We stand by our original response that the construction in question was completed by a contractor performing work for an office tenant as allowed under the provisions of their lease agreement Throughout the duration of the project the Landlord took all measures possible to limit potential disturbance to all parties, but we had a limited ability to control the contractor’s work schedule Due to unforeseen circumstances the construction took longer to complete than initially communicated to us and subsequently communicated to the residents of [redacted] *** During the delay we continued to take all measures reasonably possible to limit the work hours including barring the contractors from the building Further, we communicated all information provided to us to our residential tenants to the extent we were made aware of changes.We continue to understand [redacted] ***s concerns and have been in communication with him directly offering compensation up to one month’s rent in hopes that that will alleviate his concerns Further, [redacted] will be moving out at the end of his lease term This offer will continue to be available to him until his move out date There is no additional remedy that we can offer Regards,Benjamin U [redacted] Vice President
February 8, 2017[redacted] The Revdex.com 1411 K St. NW, 10" Floor Washington, DC 20005Dear [redacted].In response to complaint ID [redacted] we submit the following:The construction in question was completed by a contractor performing Work for an office tenant as allowed under the...
provisions of their lease agreement. Throughout the duration of the project the Landlord took all measures possible to limit potential disturbance to all parties, but we had a limited ability to Control the Contractor's Work Schedule.Due to unforeseen circumstances the construction took longer to complete than initially communicated to us and subsequently communicated to the residents of [redacted]. During the delay we continued to take all measures reasonably possible to limit the work hours including barring the contractors from the building. Further, we communicated all information provided to us to our residential tenants to the extent We Were made aware of changes.While we understand the concerns brought forth by [redacted] we do not agree with his proposed settlement. We are, of course, available and Willing to discuss further.Regards,Benjamin U
[A default letter is provided here which indicates your acceptance of the business's response. If you wish, you may update it before sending it.]
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that the settlement offer of one month rent ($3580) is satisfactory to me. Please send me a check or credit my account before my scheduled move out date (May 10, 2017) to avoid complications with a new address.For the record, the two parties have not been in settlement talks until today.
Regards,
[redacted]
March 31, 2017[redacted]The Revdex.com1411 K St. NW, 10th FloorWashington, DC 20005Dear [redacted]:In our second response to complaint ID [redacted] we submit the following:We stand by our original response that the construction in question was completed by a contractor performing work for an office tenant as allowed under the provisions of their lease agreement. Throughout the duration of the project the Landlord took all measures possible to limit potential disturbance to all parties, but we had a limited ability to control the contractor’s work schedule. Due to unforeseen circumstances the construction took longer to complete than initially communicated to us and subsequently communicated to the residents of [redacted]. During the delay we continued to take all measures reasonably possible to limit the work hours including barring the contractors from the building. Further, we communicated all information provided to us to our residential tenants to the extent we were made aware of changes.We continue to understand [redacted]s concerns and have been in communication with him directly offering compensation up to one month’s rent in hopes that that will alleviate his concerns. Further, [redacted] will be moving out at the end of his lease term. This offer will continue to be available to him until his move out date. There is no additional remedy that we can offer. Regards,Benjamin U[redacted]Vice President
February 8, [redacted] The Revdex.com K StNW, 10" Floor Washington, DC 20005Dear [redacted] .In response to complaint ID [redacted] we submit the following:The construction in question was completed by a contractor performing Work for an office tenant as allowed under the provisions of their lease agreementThroughout the duration of the project the Landlord took all measures possible to limit potential disturbance to all parties, but we had a limited ability to Control the Contractor's Work Schedule.Due to unforeseen circumstances the construction took longer to complete than initially communicated to us and subsequently communicated to the residents of [redacted] ***During the delay we continued to take all measures reasonably possible to limit the work hours including barring the contractors from the buildingFurther, we communicated all information provided to us to our residential tenants to the extent We Were made aware of changes.While we understand the concerns brought forth by [redacted] we do not agree with his proposed settlementWe are, of course, available and Willing to discuss further.Regards,Benjamin U
March 31, [redacted] The Revdex.comK StNW, 10th FloorWashington, DC 20005Dear [redacted] :In our second response to complaint ID [redacted] we submit the following:We stand by our original response that the construction in question was completed by a contractor performing work for an office tenant as allowed under the provisions of their lease agreement Throughout the duration of the project the Landlord took all measures possible to limit potential disturbance to all parties, but we had a limited ability to control the contractor’s work schedule Due to unforeseen circumstances the construction took longer to complete than initially communicated to us and subsequently communicated to the residents of [redacted] *** During the delay we continued to take all measures reasonably possible to limit the work hours including barring the contractors from the building Further, we communicated all information provided to us to our residential tenants to the extent we were made aware of changes.We continue to understand [redacted] ***s concerns and have been in communication with him directly offering compensation up to one month’s rent in hopes that that will alleviate his concerns Further, [redacted] will be moving out at the end of his lease term This offer will continue to be available to him until his move out date There is no additional remedy that we can offer Regards,Benjamin U [redacted] Vice President
February 8, 2017[redacted] The Revdex.com 1411 K St. NW, 10" Floor Washington, DC 20005Dear [redacted].In response to complaint ID [redacted] we submit the following:The construction in question was completed by a contractor performing Work for an office tenant as allowed under the...
provisions of their lease agreement. Throughout the duration of the project the Landlord took all measures possible to limit potential disturbance to all parties, but we had a limited ability to Control the Contractor's Work Schedule.Due to unforeseen circumstances the construction took longer to complete than initially communicated to us and subsequently communicated to the residents of [redacted]. During the delay we continued to take all measures reasonably possible to limit the work hours including barring the contractors from the building. Further, we communicated all information provided to us to our residential tenants to the extent We Were made aware of changes.While we understand the concerns brought forth by [redacted] we do not agree with his proposed settlement. We are, of course, available and Willing to discuss further.Regards,Benjamin U
[A default letter is provided here which indicates your acceptance of the business's response. If you wish, you may update it before sending it.]
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that the settlement offer of one month rent ($3580) is satisfactory to me. Please send me a check or credit my account before my scheduled move out date (May 10, 2017) to avoid complications with a new address.For the record, the two parties have not been in settlement talks until today.
Regards,
[redacted]
March 31, 2017[redacted]The Revdex.com1411 K St. NW, 10th FloorWashington, DC 20005Dear [redacted]:In our second response to complaint ID [redacted] we submit the following:We stand by our original response that the construction in question was completed by a contractor performing work for an office tenant as allowed under the provisions of their lease agreement. Throughout the duration of the project the Landlord took all measures possible to limit potential disturbance to all parties, but we had a limited ability to control the contractor’s work schedule. Due to unforeseen circumstances the construction took longer to complete than initially communicated to us and subsequently communicated to the residents of [redacted]. During the delay we continued to take all measures reasonably possible to limit the work hours including barring the contractors from the building. Further, we communicated all information provided to us to our residential tenants to the extent we were made aware of changes.We continue to understand [redacted]s concerns and have been in communication with him directly offering compensation up to one month’s rent in hopes that that will alleviate his concerns. Further, [redacted] will be moving out at the end of his lease term. This offer will continue to be available to him until his move out date. There is no additional remedy that we can offer. Regards,Benjamin U[redacted]Vice President