In oureffort to maintain this on a professional level it is not our desire to resortto name calling, finger pointing or blame placing.In order toaddress the conflict of interest mentioned in the rejection response, theperceived conflict of interest was brought up by owner after the tenants hadbrought forth a list of perceived problemsAfter discussion and emails between owner and contractor the situationwas apparently resolved.Prior toowners’ acceptance of contractor for either the initial painting project or forthe repairs to the kitchen there was full transparency/disclosure as to therelationship between broker and the licensed bonded contractorOwner hadspoken directly with contractor discussing the repairs to the kitchen from thewater leakOwner had authorized said repairs in conjunction with his insurancecompany.As far asinvoices the insurance company had specific procedures that were adhered to.Owner received in email attachments the invoices which can be attached to thisresponse or any further correspondence if necessary.Thesuggestion of tenants “using” their own renters insurance was meant for them tohave a case opened so that they would be able to receive adequaterepresentation by their insurance agent during the process.The owner’slack of consideration for his own involvement in the decision making and sequenceof events brings his own ethics and principled behavior into question in thismatter.The onlyitem left on this project to do is install some quarter round but to this dateit has never been made clear whether the contractor would be allowed back in tofinish upThe lack of response to this question indicates that all the owneris interested in doing is blaming the property managerIf he were reallyinterested in resolving this he would indicate one way or the other aboutinstalling the quarter round
In oureffort to maintain this on a professional level it is not our desire to resortto name calling, finger pointing or blame placing.In order toaddress the conflict of interest mentioned in the rejection response, theperceived conflict of interest was brought up by owner after the tenants hadbrought forth a list of perceived problemsAfter discussion and emails between owner and contractor the situationwas apparently resolved.Prior toowners’ acceptance of contractor for either the initial painting project or forthe repairs to the kitchen there was full transparency/disclosure as to therelationship between broker and the licensed bonded contractorOwner hadspoken directly with contractor discussing the repairs to the kitchen from thewater leakOwner had authorized said repairs in conjunction with his insurancecompany.As far asinvoices the insurance company had specific procedures that were adhered to.Owner received in email attachments the invoices which can be attached to thisresponse or any further correspondence if necessary.Thesuggestion of tenants “using” their own renters insurance was meant for them tohave a case opened so that they would be able to receive adequaterepresentation by their insurance agent during the process.The owner’slack of consideration for his own involvement in the decision making and sequenceof events brings his own ethics and principled behavior into question in thismatter.The onlyitem left on this project to do is install some quarter round but to this dateit has never been made clear whether the contractor would be allowed back in tofinish upThe lack of response to this question indicates that all the owneris interested in doing is blaming the property managerIf he were reallyinterested in resolving this he would indicate one way or the other aboutinstalling the quarter round