On 7/at 1:p.mon my caller ID I spoke with [redacted] for minutes and seconds at Clear fork - at that time an apology was made by [redacted] to me he realized this was very wrong and upsetting for me after years of trying to have closure for my father -- [redacted] promised on many occasions for years that it was all taken care of and the checks are being sent out and I had faith ----- the remedy [redacted] and I spoke of on 7/was he promised to put the property in remaining Heirs names - [redacted] excluding mine at my request --- [redacted] said give me two weeks the agreement was made on 7/and the deal was done --- note contrary to your statements I have the cover letters from Clear Fork Royalty addressed to me and my p.o box specifying sir names and akas clearly stating Their proposal to pay me $the letter was dated October 3rd the Heirs were to be paid in proportional amounts from Clear Fork as stated in the letter which I am in possession of -- signed by [redacted] -- I am also in possession of other document sent to me by Clear Fork -- I don't understand why you did not recite the agreement between me and [redacted] on 7/at 1:p.m -- your letter to me was so wrong in so many ways --- can your keep to your and your partners agreement on 7/--------- can I please have closure for my father?
Are you stating you sent [redacted] $first time I heard this do you have proof you can send me? [redacted] stated [redacted] was sent 510.04no mention of ta [redacted] four years to disclose that you do not have the deed to sell as [redacted] stated over and over - no mention of your apology made by [redacted] no mention of [redacted] ***s promises over and over during the last years all was taken care of the checks are being sent -- the fact is [redacted] did make a promise to me to put the property and [redacted] Your confusion with mine name is yous and is a deflection --- your insinuations are inflammatory slanderous and derogatory to name a few -- I have documents from you that clearly state the names and you were clearly in understanding I do not appreciate your verbal attacks because I was named after my father I am insulted by your words you are clearly deflecting the fact that [redacted] promised me many times that the check was being sent for $-- you are contrary to your statement saying that the Heirs were not going to be paid by your firm and yes indeed they were Many things you are saying just don't add up as to the documents I have -- clearly [redacted] and I had a deal on 7/ otherwise the conversation wouldn't have lasted over a half an hour why don't you just put the properties in the name as [redacted] had promised me on 7/what is the problem -- why can I not just have closure and have you keep the deal with [redacted] made or keep the deal with [redacted] made I noticed you didn't mention < [redacted] ***'s > name once in your response I wonder why? Finally this has been cruel to me all these years dealing with your firm -- I have suffered the duress stress anxiety and the reminder of the loss of my father from this - - -
Are you stating you sent [redacted] $1000 first time I heard this do you have proof you can send me? [redacted] stated [redacted] was sent 510.04no mention of ta[redacted] four years to disclose that you do not have the
deed to sell as [redacted] stated over and over - no mention of your
apology made by [redacted] no mention of [redacted]s promises over and over
during the last 4 years all was taken care of the
checks are being sent -- the fact is [redacted] did make a promise to me to put
the property and [redacted] Your confusion with mine name is yous and is a deflection --- your insinuations are inflammatory
slanderous and derogatory to name a few -- I have documents from you that clearly state
the names and you were clearly in understanding I do not appreciate your verbal attacks because I was named after my father I am insulted by your words you are clearly deflecting the fact that [redacted] promised me many times that the
check was being sent for $510.04 -- you are contrary to
your statement saying that the Heirs were not going to be paid by your
firm and yes indeed they were Many things you are saying
just don't add up as to the documents I have -- clearly [redacted] and I had a deal on 7/23
otherwise the conversation wouldn't have lasted over a half an hour why
don't you just put the properties in the name as [redacted] had promised me on
7/23 what is the problem -- why can I not just have closure and have you
keep the deal with [redacted] made or keep the deal with [redacted] made
I noticed you didn't mention < [redacted]'s > name once in your response I
wonder why? Finally this has been cruel to me all these years dealing with your firm -- I have suffered the duress stress anxiety and the reminder of the loss of my father from this - - -
Mr[redacted] continues to miss a few important points:
1) - Contracts are established when there is an on
offer an acceptanceIn real estate law (the law that governs the sale of real
property including mineral and royalty interests) contracts must adhere to the
Statute of Fraudsi.ethey must be in writingThere is no deed signed by Mr[redacted] to
Clear Fork Minerals, LLCNo property has been conveyed to usThus, we do not
owe him money for anythingWritten offers are sent all of the timeIf they are
not accepted and a deed is not signed and consideration is not passed between both
parties, there is no deal
2) - We did pay consideration of $1,for a signed
contract to a trust that presumably bore the name of his Father with a [redacted] as trusteeThe result of this transaction was a breach of contract and
warranty by the trust, as they represented to sell us property that they did not ownWe currently have a damage claim against the trustWe
have chosen not to pursue said claim because of the small sizeIf Mr[redacted]
would like $that he mentions, and he is one of the beneficiaries of the trust, I would
suggest he contact the trustee to remit payment to him
3) - Aside from the fact that Mr[redacted] does not know
whether he is a Sr., Jror the III, and presuming he is indeed [redacted]
III, it could be presumed that Mr[redacted] does indeed own some property that he
inherited intestate through his father, presuming he was indeed [redacted]
JrHowever, there would be no way to clear up this title confusion with a
document filed of recordEVERY conversation Mr[redacted] had with [redacted]
was regarding an Affidavit of Heirship and [redacted] going out of his way to walk Mr
[redacted] through the type of evidence our firm would need to see of record before
we purchased real propertyA quote from [redacted] regarding these conversations: "I
explained that we did not get any property from our transaction with the trust,
that we do not owe him money, and that he might still own a portion the property
He asked what options we had moving forward and I said since property is in his
fathers name (since there was no probated will) he or an attorney of
theirs could do an Affidavit of Heirship and that would provide us
with evidence of ownership in the heirs names and they could do whatever they
wanted with the property, sell it or otherwiseI basically let him speak after
that (he did not seem rational enough to listen to anything I had to say
anyway)This whole conversation was me letting him rantI did not promise to
fix anything and I certainly did not promise to pay anythingI just told him
that an option he had was to do an AofHI did not say we would provide one or
send him one or anything, I left that up to him to pursueThis was the same
conversation he told me he did not even know his own name."
4) - Clear Fork does not have the power or legal
ability to "put property in peoples names" Mr[redacted] could request this all he
wants, but it simply is not something we could doClear Fork buys mineral
rights and royalties, we don't practice law and we certainly can't bind someone
else to a contract on their behalfThis is an obvious fact of real estate law
and has evidently escaped Mr[redacted] as he has tried to do that through his multiple impersonations of others in contracts
Mr[redacted]' continual fabricated accusations are unmerited,
unwarranted and a frivolous waste of timeHe is ma[redacted] demands that there is
simply no way that we could accomplish for him, even if we wanted toIF he
owns some of the property personally, he needs to conduct the title work and
diligence to get it straightened out on his own, and quit blaming us as there
is nothing we can do for himWe do not provide legal services and we have no
desire to pursue an acquisition of whatever property he may or may not own. He will see no money from usWe do not pay
people when there was no deed signed conveying property to usWe buy real property;
we are not a charity that hands out moneyThis nonsense needs to end
On
7/23 at 1:17 p.m. on my caller ID I spoke with [redacted] for 34
minutes and 24 seconds at Clear fork - at that time an apology was made by [redacted] to me he
realized this was very wrong and upsetting for me after 4 years of trying to have
closure for my father -- [redacted] promised on many occasions for years that it was
all taken care of and the checks are being sent out and I had faith ----- the remedy [redacted] and
I spoke of on 7/23 was he promised to put the property in remaining Heirs names - [redacted] excluding mine at my request --- [redacted] said
give me two weeks the agreement was made on 7/23 and the deal was done --- note contrary to your statements I have the cover letters from Clear Fork Royalty addressed to me and my p.o box specifying sir names and akas clearly stating Their proposal
to pay me $510.04 the letter was dated October 3rd 2011 the Heirs
were to be paid in proportional amounts from Clear Fork as stated in the
letter which I am in possession of -- signed by [redacted] -- I am also in
possession of other document sent to me by Clear Fork -- I don't understand why you did not recite the agreement between me
and [redacted] on 7/23 at 1:17 p.m --
your letter to me was so wrong in so many ways --- can your keep to your and your partners
agreement on 7/23 --------- can I please have closure for my
father?
On 7/at 1:p.mon my caller ID I spoke with [redacted] for minutes and seconds at Clear fork - at that time an apology was made by [redacted] to me he realized this was very wrong and upsetting for me after years of trying to have closure for my father -- [redacted] promised on many occasions for years that it was all taken care of and the checks are being sent out and I had faith ----- the remedy [redacted] and I spoke of on 7/was he promised to put the property in remaining Heirs names - [redacted] excluding mine at my request --- [redacted] said give me two weeks the agreement was made on 7/and the deal was done --- note contrary to your statements I have the cover letters from Clear Fork Royalty addressed to me and my p.o box specifying sir names and akas clearly stating Their proposal to pay me $the letter was dated October 3rd the Heirs were to be paid in proportional amounts from Clear Fork as stated in the letter which I am in possession of -- signed by [redacted] -- I am also in possession of other document sent to me by Clear Fork -- I don't understand why you did not recite the agreement between me and [redacted] on 7/at 1:p.m -- your letter to me was so wrong in so many ways --- can your keep to your and your partners agreement on 7/--------- can I please have closure for my father?
Are you stating you sent [redacted] $first time I heard this do you have proof you can send me? [redacted] stated [redacted] was sent 510.04no mention of ta [redacted] four years to disclose that you do not have the deed to sell as [redacted] stated over and over - no mention of your apology made by [redacted] no mention of [redacted] ***s promises over and over during the last years all was taken care of the checks are being sent -- the fact is [redacted] did make a promise to me to put the property and [redacted] Your confusion with mine name is yous and is a deflection --- your insinuations are inflammatory slanderous and derogatory to name a few -- I have documents from you that clearly state the names and you were clearly in understanding I do not appreciate your verbal attacks because I was named after my father I am insulted by your words you are clearly deflecting the fact that [redacted] promised me many times that the check was being sent for $-- you are contrary to your statement saying that the Heirs were not going to be paid by your firm and yes indeed they were Many things you are saying just don't add up as to the documents I have -- clearly [redacted] and I had a deal on 7/ otherwise the conversation wouldn't have lasted over a half an hour why don't you just put the properties in the name as [redacted] had promised me on 7/what is the problem -- why can I not just have closure and have you keep the deal with [redacted] made or keep the deal with [redacted] made I noticed you didn't mention < [redacted] ***'s > name once in your response I wonder why? Finally this has been cruel to me all these years dealing with your firm -- I have suffered the duress stress anxiety and the reminder of the loss of my father from this - - -
Are you stating you sent [redacted] $1000 first time I heard this do you have proof you can send me? [redacted] stated [redacted] was sent 510.04no mention of ta[redacted] four years to disclose that you do not have the
deed to sell as [redacted] stated over and over - no mention of your
apology made by [redacted] no mention of [redacted]s promises over and over
during the last 4 years all was taken care of the
checks are being sent -- the fact is [redacted] did make a promise to me to put
the property and [redacted] Your confusion with mine name is yous and is a deflection --- your insinuations are inflammatory
slanderous and derogatory to name a few -- I have documents from you that clearly state
the names and you were clearly in understanding I do not appreciate your verbal attacks because I was named after my father I am insulted by your words you are clearly deflecting the fact that [redacted] promised me many times that the
check was being sent for $510.04 -- you are contrary to
your statement saying that the Heirs were not going to be paid by your
firm and yes indeed they were Many things you are saying
just don't add up as to the documents I have -- clearly [redacted] and I had a deal on 7/23
otherwise the conversation wouldn't have lasted over a half an hour why
don't you just put the properties in the name as [redacted] had promised me on
7/23 what is the problem -- why can I not just have closure and have you
keep the deal with [redacted] made or keep the deal with [redacted] made
I noticed you didn't mention < [redacted]'s > name once in your response I
wonder why? Finally this has been cruel to me all these years dealing with your firm -- I have suffered the duress stress anxiety and the reminder of the loss of my father from this - - -
Mr[redacted] continues to miss a few important points:
1) - Contracts are established when there is an on
offer an acceptanceIn real estate law (the law that governs the sale of real
property including mineral and royalty interests) contracts must adhere to the
Statute of Fraudsi.ethey must be in writingThere is no deed signed by Mr[redacted] to
Clear Fork Minerals, LLCNo property has been conveyed to usThus, we do not
owe him money for anythingWritten offers are sent all of the timeIf they are
not accepted and a deed is not signed and consideration is not passed between both
parties, there is no deal
2) - We did pay consideration of $1,for a signed
contract to a trust that presumably bore the name of his Father with a [redacted] as trusteeThe result of this transaction was a breach of contract and
warranty by the trust, as they represented to sell us property that they did not ownWe currently have a damage claim against the trustWe
have chosen not to pursue said claim because of the small sizeIf Mr[redacted]
would like $that he mentions, and he is one of the beneficiaries of the trust, I would
suggest he contact the trustee to remit payment to him
3) - Aside from the fact that Mr[redacted] does not know
whether he is a Sr., Jror the III, and presuming he is indeed [redacted]
III, it could be presumed that Mr[redacted] does indeed own some property that he
inherited intestate through his father, presuming he was indeed [redacted]
JrHowever, there would be no way to clear up this title confusion with a
document filed of recordEVERY conversation Mr[redacted] had with [redacted]
was regarding an Affidavit of Heirship and [redacted] going out of his way to walk Mr
[redacted] through the type of evidence our firm would need to see of record before
we purchased real propertyA quote from [redacted] regarding these conversations: "I
explained that we did not get any property from our transaction with the trust,
that we do not owe him money, and that he might still own a portion the property
He asked what options we had moving forward and I said since property is in his
fathers name (since there was no probated will) he or an attorney of
theirs could do an Affidavit of Heirship and that would provide us
with evidence of ownership in the heirs names and they could do whatever they
wanted with the property, sell it or otherwiseI basically let him speak after
that (he did not seem rational enough to listen to anything I had to say
anyway)This whole conversation was me letting him rantI did not promise to
fix anything and I certainly did not promise to pay anythingI just told him
that an option he had was to do an AofHI did not say we would provide one or
send him one or anything, I left that up to him to pursueThis was the same
conversation he told me he did not even know his own name."
4) - Clear Fork does not have the power or legal
ability to "put property in peoples names" Mr[redacted] could request this all he
wants, but it simply is not something we could doClear Fork buys mineral
rights and royalties, we don't practice law and we certainly can't bind someone
else to a contract on their behalfThis is an obvious fact of real estate law
and has evidently escaped Mr[redacted] as he has tried to do that through his multiple impersonations of others in contracts
Mr[redacted]' continual fabricated accusations are unmerited,
unwarranted and a frivolous waste of timeHe is ma[redacted] demands that there is
simply no way that we could accomplish for him, even if we wanted toIF he
owns some of the property personally, he needs to conduct the title work and
diligence to get it straightened out on his own, and quit blaming us as there
is nothing we can do for himWe do not provide legal services and we have no
desire to pursue an acquisition of whatever property he may or may not own. He will see no money from usWe do not pay
people when there was no deed signed conveying property to usWe buy real property;
we are not a charity that hands out moneyThis nonsense needs to end
On
7/23 at 1:17 p.m. on my caller ID I spoke with [redacted] for 34
minutes and 24 seconds at Clear fork - at that time an apology was made by [redacted] to me he
realized this was very wrong and upsetting for me after 4 years of trying to have
closure for my father -- [redacted] promised on many occasions for years that it was
all taken care of and the checks are being sent out and I had faith ----- the remedy [redacted] and
I spoke of on 7/23 was he promised to put the property in remaining Heirs names - [redacted] excluding mine at my request --- [redacted] said
give me two weeks the agreement was made on 7/23 and the deal was done --- note contrary to your statements I have the cover letters from Clear Fork Royalty addressed to me and my p.o box specifying sir names and akas clearly stating Their proposal
to pay me $510.04 the letter was dated October 3rd 2011 the Heirs
were to be paid in proportional amounts from Clear Fork as stated in the
letter which I am in possession of -- signed by [redacted] -- I am also in
possession of other document sent to me by Clear Fork -- I don't understand why you did not recite the agreement between me
and [redacted] on 7/23 at 1:17 p.m --
your letter to me was so wrong in so many ways --- can your keep to your and your partners
agreement on 7/23 --------- can I please have closure for my
father?