Cnchanted Gifts and Collectaables

Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because: *** *** has a poor memory of the events that took place. The statement from *** *** is completely emotion based & fictional & she provides absolutely no actual evidence to support her claims because there isn’t any."You have no actual evidence either, and for the now 3rd time we never had a contract. "I didn’t log in to her GoDaddy account. I contacted GoDaddy support. After they verified that I had, in fact, paid for the domain & was therefore the rightful owner of the domain they gave me access."I'm sorry, but this is not true."This image shows when I paid for domain. https://***" No, that link shows that SOMEONE paid for itThat was then and is now on my *** *** credit cardThat link doesn't have your name or cc number or anything on itI still contend that you knew the password b.c you were changing our site and you just went in to Go Daddy and changed itAnd if you did "call customer support" then they mistakenly gave you access. "This never happened.It absolutely did.In regards to my claim that she had cloned the website I built she states, “THIS IS WHOLLY UNTRUEI paid another party to totally re-design the site, there was no "cloning" of anythingWe used some previous text that I myself composed, but nothing was "cloned"That is absolutely untrue.”After that she claims, “My associate Dr *** designed and wcomposed that site from scratchNOTHING on it has anything to do with you or anything you've ever written or designed, and therefore does not violate your imaginary copyright.”For starters, there’s nothing imaginary about my copyright. It’s very real & until I am paid for my work I will not release the rights to anything done by Big Draw Marketing. More disturbing is the fact that she lies so much that she can’t even remember which lie she’s telling from one sentence to the next. First she claims that she hired another party to totally redesign the site, but then a few sentences later she says that her associate Dr *** designed & composed it. Apparently *** *** has memory loss or reading comprehension problems like he did when he ran Aggieland Learning Center and Burger Boy. 1) site *** *** designed2) site 3rd party designed2) site Dr *** designed There were sites, see? I know its hard to follow, but try.Here is an image of the code that was behind her site on 1/5/6. Line clearly shows that it was copied on 12/30/at 12:04am.https://***That crap doesn't prove anything.These are images of the site I built. Every word of content, every graphic, every edited image, as well as the SEO, code, etc on this was created by, & is the property of, Big Draw Marketing.https://*** okExactly zero of those images are used on either site (3rd party) or site (Dr Prince)So where are the alleged infringements? Besides in Ken's head?https://***NopeNone used from that list on either site or 3. "This is an image of her current site where she’s still using a graphic button that we created."https://***That was up for about a day while Dr *** was still working on the site and it was changed before this complaint was madeIt is apparent that ** is watching us build this site every minute, since he probably doesn't have a lot to do, since he probably doesn't have much business, since he's probably not a great businessmanNor is he personable, nor is he ethical."This is an image of her current site where she’s still using text that we created."https://*** *I* wrote ALL of that text and submitted it to **Just because he has a screenshot of it does not mean he wrote it."It’s very clear to see that not only was her site on 1/5/a clone, but her current site is still using a number of elements from the site that we built."That is *NOT* clearThat is UNTRUE, as is most of ** statements so farAnd he called *me* a "liar"

Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:"I have presented a mountain of evidence to support my stance."All pretty much worthless "evidence"The image you presented for "proof" of payment did not prove anything except that someone (me) paidThe images you submitted as your "copyright" have not been used and therefore your claim of "copyright infringement" is totally baseless."She simply continues to claim that my evidence doesn’t prove anything while not actually addressing it or providing any evidence of her own."I don't need "evidence" to dispute the terms of our verbal agreement, which is what we are discussingI do NOT owe you any money and therefore your hijacking of my site is illegalWhat, exactly, do I need to "address"? How about you provide proof of a contract? Oh wait you don't have thatHow about you provide "proof" that the verbal agreement is as you say it is? Oh right you can't do that eitherYour "evidence" does not prove your pointI have proof that the credit card that paid for the domain is in my name, and I have proof that you illegally redirected it. The bottom line is that I own the domain & I will not release it until I’ve been paid for the work that was done at her request
Regards,
*** ***

I don’t feel the need to dignify these personal attac** with a response.  Unlike [redacted], I have presented a mountain of evidence to support my stance.  She simply continues to claim that my evidence doesn’t prove anything while not actually addressing it or providing any evidence of her own. The bottom line is that I own the domain & I will not release it until I’ve been paid for the work that was done at her request.

The statement from [redacted] is completely emotion based & fictional & she provides absolutely no actual evidence to support her claims because there isn’t any. I didn’t log in to her GoDaddy account.  I contacted GoDaddy support.  After they verified that I had, in fact, paid...

for the domain & was therefore the rightful owner of the domain they gave me access.  This image shows when I paid for domain. https://[redacted] She can’t even keep her story straight.  While falsely claiming that she was unaware of the billing procedure she states, “I understood it to mean that I was paying for the previous month's work.” She claims, “Yes and I handed him a check and said the words "THIS IS OUR FINAL PAYMENT, CONSIDER OUR BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP TERMINATED." & then later says “Our last payment was understood by myself and by Mr. [redacted] on the day that he accepted it as being our last payment and making our account balance be zero. When he took the check and understood the statement "THIS IS OUR FINAL PAYMENT, CONSIDER OUR BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP TERMINATED", and he did not say anything about future charges or really reply in any meaningful way, that proves that he understood we were square at that time.”  – This never happened.  The last check I received was on 11/30/15 for work done 10/25-11/24/15.  She told me the relationship was terminated over text on 12/8. Here are 2 emails I got from her after the last payment was received on 11/30 & before she ended the relationship on 12/8. https://[redacted] https://[redacted] Here is an email from her acknowledging that she informed me on 12/8. https://[redacted] She claims, “The invoice was for work completed AFTER we terminated our relationship.”  This is simply not true.  Within 5 minutes of receiving her text I had emailed my team to immediately stop working on her account.  The only work that was done after that was providing the detailed reports she requested, but she was not charged for that.  Here is the email I sent her with the final invoice on 12/9, less than 24 hours after she sent the original text ending the relationship. https://[redacted] In regards to my claim that she had cloned the website I built she states, “THIS IS WHOLLY UNTRUE. I paid another party to totally re-design the site, there was no "cloning" of anything. We used some previous text that I myself composed, but nothing was "cloned". That is absolutely untrue.” After that she claims, “My associate Dr [redacted] designed and wcomposed that site from scratch. NOTHING on it has anything to do with you or anything you've ever written or designed, and therefore does not violate your imaginary copyright.” For starters, there’s nothing imaginary about my copyright.  It’s very real & until I am paid for my work I will not release the rights to anything done by Big Draw Marketing.  More disturbing is the fact that she lies so much that she can’t even remember which lie she’s telling from one sentence to the next.  First she claims that she hired another party to totally redesign the site, but then a few sentences later she says that her associate Dr [redacted] designed & composed it. Here’s the truth….with proof. Here is an image of the code that was behind her site on 1/5/6.  Line 4 clearly shows that it was copied on 12/30/15 at 12:04am. https://[redacted] These are images of the site I built.  Every word of content, every graphic, every edited image, as well as the SEO, code, etc on this was created by, & is the property of, Big Draw Marketing. https://[redacted] These are images of the copied site from 1/5/16. https://[redacted] This is an image of her current site where she’s still using a graphic button that we created. https://[redacted] This is an image of her current site where she’s still using text that we created. https://[redacted] It’s very clear to see that not only was her site on 1/5/16 a clone, but her current site is still using a number of elements from the site that we built.