CoreLogic

CoreLogic Tax Services has confirmed with the Town of [redacted] that [redacted] refund check was never sent to CoreLogic Tax ServicesPer the Town of [redacted] , refund check number [redacted] was sent to [redacted] Mortgage, but was never was delivered [redacted] Mortgage sent a letter to the Town of [redacted] on March requesting a new check The new refund check, number [redacted] , was issued and sent directly to [redacted] Mortgage

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below The business response was unclear All I would like to know is whether the inquiry made by [redacted] that he made on 07/15/be deleted? It shouldn't be on my credit report because I did not authorize anyone to run my credit report on that date Regards, [redacted] ***

We are unaware of any provision within the Fair Credit Reporting Act that sets forth time limits on the reporting of inquiries If Ms [redacted] is aware of any such provision, please let us know

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below They have had plenty of time to respond to my complaint To ask for additional time is really to avoid the issue at handThey should have been able to fulfill my request over the phone as offered in the letter Regards, [redacted]

In her complaint, Ms [redacted] requests that CoreLogic SafeRent (“SafeRent”), a tenant screening company, remove certain inquiries from her consumer file on the ground that they are “outdated.” Ms [redacted] states that the inquiries are dated April 6, 2011, and alleges that SafeRent’s failure to remove these inquiries is a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) The FCRA does not require SafeRent to remove the inquiries that Ms [redacted] has identified Section of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) governs the time limits beyond which a consumer reporting agency, like SafeRent, cannot include certain negative information in consumer reports In general, the FCRA establishes a seven year time limit for negative information, with a longer time limit for bankruptcies Criminal convictions are not subject to a time limitation Similarly, there is no time limit imposed on positive or neutral information The inquiries that Ms [redacted] has identified are not considered “negative” information under the FCRA and are not subject to the seven-year limitation Further, even if the seven-year limitation did apply, the inquiries identified by Ms [redacted] are within that time frame Therefore, SafeRent declines Ms [redacted] ’s request to remove the identified inquiries SafeRent apologizes for any inconvenience caused Ms [redacted] by any lack of clarity in its responses to her dispute We hope that this letter provides Ms [redacted] with a sufficient explanation as to why her dispute was denied If she would like further information, however, Ms [redacted] can contact our Consumer Services Department at 1-888-333-and ask for Mr [redacted] , Supervisor Please note that SafeRent is a tenant screening company and does not offer consumer financial products or services as defined by the Dodd-Frank Act

This email is in response to the correspondence we received from your office regarding the complaint filed by Mr*** In his complaint, Mr [redacted] states that SafeRent is reporting incorrect information about him and he desires to have such information corrected Please note that CoreLogic SafeRent ("SafeRent") is a consumer reporting agency as defined in the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA") SafeRent maintains public landlord/tenant and criminal court records, which it provides to its clients who are typically property management companies and landlords in the multi-family housing industry for the purposes of determining housing eligibility of an applicant We have conducted a search of our records and have been unable to locate any file on Mr*** In order to better assist Mr***, we request that he call our Consumer Services Department at 1-888-333-2413, or write to us at: CoreLogic SafeRent, Attn: Consumer Disputes Dept., P.OBox 509124, San Diego, California,

Our initial position has not changed We have mailed a more detailed response directly to the consumer that we believe will address his concerns If, after he has received our response, he has additional questions, he can contact our consumer services department at 1-800-637-

We stand by our original response to the consumer We suggest that the consumer work directly with [redacted] to resolve any outstanding issues We previously provided the consumer with contact information for [redacted]

We are still in the process of researching this matter As such, we respectfully request an extension until April 15th to provide a definitive response Thank you

In her complaint, the consumer questions a Loan Depot inquiry that is appearing on her credit report.Please be advised that CoreLogic Credco (“Credco”) is not a credit grantorRather, it is a reseller of the credit information provided by the three national consumer reporting agencies (Equifax, Experian, Trans Union, collectively, the "NCRAs")Each time Credco prepares a new credit report for its clients (who are typically lenders or other qualified end users), it orders such credit information from one or more of the three NCRAsIn order to obtain a credit report from Credco, our clients certify that they have a permissible purpose under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA") to do so Since the consumer's complaint centers around the handling and disclosure of sensitive, non-public personal information, we will send her a more thorough response, directly, that addresses her concerns.If you have any further questions, please contact our customer service department at 1-800-637-

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below first of all they put the wrong address on the package and it was returned to them incomplete address even though they had the right address and their information is whats keeping me from rentingthey say I failed criminal background check and the info they has supposedly on me says i'm in federal prison doing years to life for drugs and weapons charges.the person that they say is me still has years minimum in jail and it would make it hard to buy a mobile home to live in 2037? they do not check to see if the info is correct or not and i'm automatically guilty regardless till I prove otherwise[redacted] is the most common name there is and they are too stupid to realize that they're making me homeless until they decide if I can live inside or not the longer they delay the more lawyers will get involved Regards, [redacted] ***