Corporate Ladder Search Partners Inc

MHM Roofing did in fact inspect this roof in August and informed the homeowner the they had damage that they should report to their insurance carrierWe met with the insured's adjuster and agreed on all damagesThe client at that time agreed to allow MHM to help out with the
repairs and signed a
contractThere was no intention on installing the system without addingthe deckingThe code requires a certain thickness for the decking and
our client's, did notmeetThe
concern was that the insured was under the impression
that we were going to be tearing off what was existing and installing newInstead what MHM and the adjuster had agreed upon was an
overlayThe decking was not dropped off from the distributor on the original truck and was loaded onto a second which came shortly thereafterThe crew reported that after several racial remarks were made, they went out of their way to avoid the homeownerThe
roof was completed and several calls were made to collect on the roofing
portion on the projectThe contract was written for all to be completed per insurance scope of loss for thereplacement cost value (RCV)A gentleman agreement that was in place
for the deductible to be absorbed for an advertising
expense to the use of the property to display a company yardsignTalking to the crew that did the installation, the sign had been removedI did converse with the client and explain the fencing part of the project was paid out as actual cash value, and based on out contract, there would be an "out of pocket" for the nonrecoverable depreciation.The client got irate and in order to
appease, I haphazardly agreed to help on the
fencingThe gentleman I sent out to repair/replace the privacy fence was on
property for days, and has completed more than 60% of the workAfter a few racial
comments were made on their behalf, he was
demanded to leave the propertyI received no phone call as to any
dissatisfaction or towhyThe sub-contractor did report to me that he overheard a comment the nature of "going tohave to sue if they want to get paid." I made several attempts and left
messages with both husband and wifeAfter pre-lien notice was sent out certified, Iin return received an e-mail with no body just picturesThese attached pictures were of gaps in the planks on the fencing, which looked to be very fewThere were also or of nail laying on the ground that
looked to be from different angles, and a mailboxAfter replying that I didn't understand why the lack of communication, I received a few more e-mails some with body, some withoutWe have not asked for any payment on the fencing, which has not been
completedWe are refusing any further work on the property, have filed a lien, demanding full payment for the roof installation, and will exclude any restitution for documented
"actual damages" (claiming the mailbox has been scarrednot visible to me in the email.)