Sign in

Creative Earthscapes, Inc.

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Creative Earthscapes, Inc.? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Creative Earthscapes, Inc.

Creative Earthscapes, Inc. Reviews (3)

Creative Earthscapes is rejecting you response as well. It is an inaccurate representation of this situation.If this client had presented a clear idea of the project they wanted and signed a contract that reflectedthat, we wouldn't be in this situation. When we are hired for a project, it is described in the quote- that'show we decide what materials to order and how long the job will take. It wouldn't have been possiblefor us to be on the same page as them, they weren't on the same page as each other and argued aboutwhat they wanted over and over again on the site while our workers waited idly by. As professionals, wedon't have time to go back and forth about these inconsistencies in their story and their unbelievableclaim about the way they were talked to. Perhaps they should reflect as well on the way they behaved.They absolutely tried to solicit work from our employees- referenced it as "on the side" by her.Obviously this is not okay, but whatever, CEI can't prove your intentions, convey the tone in your voiceor require you to be honest about your actions. Our employees are loyal, honest, hardworking peoplethat have been members of our team for many years. This customer and this situation won't change anyof that. If anything, we will move forward and use this experience to better ourselves and our service.This seems to me to be a case of I don't want to pay for It. I have the documentation for theiracceptance of the charges. I regret that this client has used the Revdex.com to try and bully us into letting themnot pay the balance due for the project we installed for them. We would be happy to fix the couple ofsanding issues they are concerned with -once the balance is paid in full, they never brought them to ourattention until this complaint was filed. Nothing this client did led us to believe that they were unhappywith our project until they got the bill- if you haven't already, please review the emails to us from theclient about their satisfaction of our work.Creative Earthscapes has a great reputation and many repeat, loyal clients with whom relationshipscontinue on through the years. Our staff is professional, kind and goes out of the way to please ourclients. We have a great relationship with our vendors- [redacted], [redacted], [redacted],and [redacted]. We have hundreds of references all over the city and in 13 years in business havenever had a complaint on the Revdex.com. We are highly recommended by [redacted] as Authorized Contractors<[redacted]> and by [redacted] as Silver level contractors<[redacted]>

Creative Earthscapes visited the clients’ home on 3/24 for a
deck quote. On 4/6 the quote for the "basic" deck they requested was
submitted to them and on 4/7 the quote was accepted, signed and returned to us
for project start.  Please see attachment
#1 "Client original quote" The basic...

deck was to be 190 sq ft with a
9' angled bench. This bench was supposed to be a basic bench as stated in the
signed contract.  The final product was 3
deck boards wide with a 4 deck board backing, 18' long with an extra floor area
and skirting on both sides.
On 4/15 We picked up the deposit check and work was started.
Two days into the job production, the client wanted to start making changes
when the deck was almost complete. Client wanted to add skirting, a planter box
pavers to the walkway and increase size of patio and eventually deck too. The
client sent multiple plans and pictures of benches she liked from Pinterest by
email on 4/19 with multiple pics and the new plans they wanted us to build
after the deck was nearly completed. Please see attached email from 4/19 noting
the changes she wanted to make and her reference to one of our many meetings
that occurred with little notice or consideration for our time.
Multiple times, they would request to meet with us with less
than 24 hours’ notice and at 7:30 or 8am and we, the foreman and myself both,
made time for them each and every time as we built this custom piece of
furniture for them. During all these extra meetings and adjustments we made for
them, they weren't complaining when we were going the extra mile to give them
exactly what they wanted. They also requested that we call them to come home
when we were building certain parts of the bench, the clients would expect our crew to sit by idly
while we waited for them to arrive and critique the work we were doing,
like exact placement, which is fine- but having us move it several times until
she got it just where she wanted it. That is not us being able to use the plans
they submitted. Although this is not a standard, we graciously complied and
changed every aspect of the job whenever they requested. This includes
construction and placement of the bench, planter boxes and size of deck and
patio. Myself and the crew foreman, or both of us, were there to meet with them
multiple times to figure out exactly what they wanted. Client would bring new
pictures from Pinterest showing us pics of benches that were way different than
the original design we were provided and quoted. One of the first meetings we
met and she showed pics. I told her that would cost more and she agreed. Just
like she agreed to the added cost of the planter box, extra pavers, skirting
around the deck, and pavers along the walkway.
They agreed that they would pay for the extras and did;
except for the bench. I had more hours in the bench than we did in the entire
rest of the deck, including the add-ons- skirting, planter, privacy rail and
handrail. They modified this bench so much from the original "plans"
they submitted. Each and every board used was sanded to the exact dimensions
for their custom bench to fit the table that was never mentioned before when
the planning was in progress. If they didn't know what they wanted- how could
we possibly know how much it would cost? All the extra trips to their home for
meetings, to vendors for extra materials and the time put into changing the
original plan over and over again wasn't even billed to them. Only the
materials and labor are included in the $1255 added to the contract that this
client signed and accepted. The full breakdown of costs charged is as follows:
Materials: $350
Foreman: $23/hr @ 24 hours = $552
Labor 1: $16/hr @ 16 hours = $256
Labor 2: $13/hr @ 6 hours = $78
The total of these costs is $1236.00. We aren't out to make
money on this project aspect- just cover the costs of the job.
On 4/29- the construction for this project was completed. I
met with the client again to discuss the bench. He informed me that he didn't
have time to discuss it, he signed the contract for the bench, accepted the
charges and later in the day, submitted an email to me stating that they
were still "hesitant" to pay us the full amount for the bench. Please
review email from client on 4/29. In this email, he even verifies settlement will
be made within 30 days. They never attempted to negotiate with us
in person or by email.
Since having problems with this client, we have requested
bids for building this same bench from two other construction professionals.
Their bids came in at $4000 and $2500 for just the bench part of the project.
They both agreed that our price to these clients is a bargain.
During this process, both clients went back and forth about
their level of expertise in the construction field. If it was convenient for
them to have "knowledge" of the "industry standards" then
they had it. If I had a questions like "how much do YOU think this should
cost?" Their answer was, you're the expert. When each of them was asked
what they thought this bench should cost, neither of them could make a suggestion.
This was as close to negotiating with them as I came. I wanted to open the
conversation to them and justify my charges. Both parties were dismissive of my
requests before the invoice was signed and accepted.
To address other matters about the overall workmanship is
simply this client trying to add conflict to their complaint. This client sent
an email on 4/22 stating how great the deck looked, I've submitted this as an
attachment for review as well. The client also told the foreman that he was very
pleased with the bench; saying that he "Nailed it". We installed a
fence for these clients a few years ago- this was an existing customer and the
foreman on this job was the main laborer on the fence installed before. We had
a relationship with them before this. If they thought so little of our
workmanship why would they have hired us again? If our workmanship was so poor,
how could we possibly use the picture of their job as a feature in our
portfolio- another benefit they claim should lower the cost of their project.
They tried to solicit work on the side from my crew that was
installing their deck. This is unacceptable practice in any form of business,
most people know that without saying. The clients wanted a pergola quoted with
their original project. When the project was quoted, the pergola was too costly
for their budget so they took it out. This is the same project that the approached
our crew to do "on the side". Why would they try to hire our crew on
the side if they did such poor workmanship?
Overall, this client was given excellent service, service
that would be common for a much larger scope of work and overall project price.
I'm happy to point out another example of their expertise in construction: they
stated that all wood items are "custom." That's a gross
understatement if you don't add any consideration for the type of project and
specs requested by this client and that's more than a little insulting for the
scope of their expected finished product which changed the whole way. I'm so
glad that they could help us make this point by mentioning that each and every
board was sanded. This is indicative of their attitude about the whole project.
They've expected custom, top quality work and service but simply don't want to
pay for it. Yes all wood decks are "custom" however sanding each
board before installation isn't a normal practice in deck building. These extra
steps in the process this client added and changed is called "customizing".
Extra sanding, expanding the deck, and changing things on the spot was the way
the this client wanted to have their deck built. It's impossible to go off a
plan (even if it had been a professional one) when this happens.
The client claims that our plan was lacking professional
plan- I agree, but they asked us to use their plans. So he's right, they
weren't professional, they were simple geometrical shapes put on top of each
other without consideration of the dimensions of the materials that would be
used to construct the bench. Once the bench construction started, the clients
provided the table they'd purchased and asked that we build the bench around
it. The existence of the table were never mentioned before that, but building a
bench around a persons’ table also makes it custom. Only 9' bench, angled as
mentioned in the original quote. The client wants to say that I didn't ask
enough questions. Maybe they didn't give enough info, I priced a basic bench-
she gave us pics to change bench after the job had started also adding sq ft to
the deck- which we didn't even really add onto the invoice. If client had asked
for a picture example of the bench I quoted, I would have given her many or
offered to look on our website for the basic bench we install on a deck.
I understand that the invoice may be more than they expected
but without knowing with they wanted until halfway into the job there was no
way of knowing what to charge them for what they wanted until the end. They
agreed to the extra charges. We offered them to take as much time as they
needed to pay the bill. The client and I agreed to 30 days when he paid the
second installment and signed the invoice for the bench and other add-ons. The
client told me in person that he didn't need that much time. $1255 is a more
than fair price just like all the other prices. 
Why would we charge a fair price for everything but the bench? $1255 is
a fair price for creating this item. It was considerate of us not to charge
these clients for each change they made to the contract. That is an industry
standard. Creative Earthscapes is not just an Industry standard. We offer exceptional
service. We've been in business for 13 years and have never had a complaint
with the Revdex.com and have several positive reviews. We appreciate the professional
assistance from the Revdex.com and are proud to be Accredited Members. We take pride
in our service and don't take complaints lightly. We have a great reputation
and are disappointed that this client would bring this complaint against us
after accepting, agreeing and signing off on the invoiced charges due. We
expect that the client’s would hold up their end of the agreed upon amount
$1255 that is due 30 days from the last contract signed by the client.
Items attached include:
1.      
3 different plans submitted by client that
revise the original quote.
2.      
3 Pinterest pictures of the example benches
clients wanted us to use as a guide for their bench- provided after original
quote
3.      
The original signed quote for the
"basic" deck
4.      
Revised signed and accepted invoice by client
after job was done, assuming responsibility for add ons.
5.      
All emails between us and the client that
changed the scope of the project or required meetings and changes to the
original plan.
6.      
3 Pictures of the final deck/bench project that
show the high quality craftsmanship this project required and the professional
customization these clients wanted for every aspect of the project. These
pictures don't represent a basic deck and bench that the clients asked for in
the beginning.

I am rejecting this response because the response is full of factual errors and inconstancies with the truth. The original email correspondence between Creative Earthscapes Inc., and us, is attached in PDF format. The first email correspondence was sent on 3/27 with an idea of what we wanted utilizing SketchUp, software that allowed us to give Chad the most realistic dimensions so that he could make an accurate quote.  CEI followed up with an email on the same day requiring clarification on what part of the sketch would be deck and what part would be pavers. On 3/29, a revised version of a plan on SketchUp was sent to CEI. As requested, this version clearly distinguished the patio and decking using colors. In addition to three images of the design, the email included other details. It clearly stated that we would like a planter, and that we would like a backing on the bench (please see highlighted portions on the Email Sequence pdf). On 3/31, Chad followed up with an email stating that he would get us a quote based on the plans that we sent him via email. It is unclear how Chad came to some of the conclusions in his statement to Revdex.com. In order not to miss any faulty accusations, we will contest each point in his statement:“This bench was supposed to be a basic bench as stated in the signed contract.  The final product was 3 deck boards wide with a 4 deck board backing, 18' long with an extra floor area and skirting on both sides.” CEI states that the quote was for a “basic bench”. We, the client, do not understand what a basic bench is supposed to mean, and since we clearly outlined what we wanted in the emails to Chad before receiving the quote, we did not see the use of “basic bench” in his quote as out of the ordinary. Chad does not clarify what a basic bench is in the quote or in the Revdex.com statements, so we still do not know what his original expectations or quote was based on. “On 4/15 We picked up the deposit check and work was started. Two days into the job production, the client wanted to start making changes when the deck was almost complete. Client wanted to add skirting, a planter box pavers to the walkway and increase size of patio and eventually deck too. The client sent multiple plans and pictures of benches she liked from Pinterest by email on 4/19 with multiple pics and the new plans they wanted us to build after the deck was nearly completed." As stated by CEI, work started on 4/15. Two days into the job, we realized that they had built the flooring for the deck, but not the flooring of the area where the bench was going to be (see Email Sequence pdf). Since we do not build decks, we did not want to assume that they did not know what they were doing, but we wanted to avoid a mistake, so we asked to meet with them. We did not ADD a planter box, as that was clearly stated in the email before the quote was given (see Email Sequence pdf). We did add space to the patio, which was paid for and not contested. (The patio contractors were beyond unprofessional. They admitted to me that they took my dirt and topsoil to their own home because it was “so great”, with out asking for permission, and still charging me for the removal [I saw no mention on the quote stating otherwise]. They deposited patio debris into our trashcans in the back alley, left piles of gravel and debris in front of our garage door, stepped on and ruined a rhododendron plant [see Detail Photos pdf], and left behind two-foot-long roots). The skirting we inquired about was minimal (16 square feet on the left side of the deck). It was only added, because we realized though a conversation with the Crew Foreman that it was not included (even tough our original SketchUp shows skirting, see Sketch vs Actual pdf). Since it looked incredibly tacky with exposed cut concrete and support beams, we were surprised. The additional skirting surrounding the bench is there because they had to hide the incomplete flooring that they added on to the deck, after the fact. The Crew Foreman told me this himself when I inquired as to whether or not it was needed. We sent photos of possible benches to Chad via Pinterest because we were starting to get the feeling that he did not really understand what we wanted, and we wanted to provide him with as much detail as possible. We expected him to ask more questions throughout the process if he did not understand, but he did not. “Please see attached email from 4/19 noting the changes she wanted to make and her reference to one of our many meetings that occurred with little notice or consideration for our time.” The drawings sent to Chad (see 4/19 Email pdf) utilizing SketchUp were only intended to provide extra details. It was clear by this point that CEI did not know what they were doing. While we had told them that we wanted the bench to have an inner diameter of 48 inches, it seemed they were having difficultly trying to make the angles work. The sketch with the back was just another example to help CEI visualize what the backing should look like. These drawings did not make any changes to the description we provided in the original email before the quote was given. They only helped to clarify what we had already stated we wanted.  “Multiple times, they would request to meet with us with less than 24 hours’ notice and at 7:30 or 8am and we, the foreman and myself both, made time for them each and every time as we built this custom piece of furniture for them. During all these extra meetings and adjustments we made for them, they weren't complaining when we were going the extra mile to give them exactly what they wanted.” We did request to meet with them a handful of times, but this was due to the fact that they were moving forward at an alarming pace without clarifying any details. When they showed up to begin the work, they had OUR SketchUp drawing in their hands. They did not initiate a conversation about any details, which were clearly not in the SketchUp (such as, should the boards run horizontally or vertically for the wall and the flower box). They were not asking for these details before making decisions, so we chose to become involved in the process to prevent us from being unhappy or having them re-do something. “They also requested that we call them to come home when we were building certain parts of the bench, the clients would expect our crew to sit by idly while we waited for them to arrive and critique the work we were doing, like exact placement, which is fine- but having us move it several times until she got it just where she wanted it. That is not us being able to use the plans they submitted.” We requested CEI to come home during certain parts of the bench, because as they began building it, it was clear that they did not have the same vision as us despite our best efforts at communication via email description and SketchUp drawings. [redacted] works 15 minutes away, so there was not much idle time, if any. The workers always appeared to be busy with something when she arrived. [redacted] had them shift the bench twice, taking no more than 5 minutes. It is disappointing that Chad is choosing to exaggerate the facts, just because he is frustrated that we wanted to be involved. At one point, Bill stated that he almost never even meets the clients, so it became clear why Chad was becoming so agitated at this point. We were upset with having to take time out of our day to watch them, because we could not trust that they would get clarification before making a big decision. Chad leans on the fact that they should have just been able to “use the plans they (meaning the clients) submitted”. However, we told them when they arrived with OUR plans in hand, that we had never build a deck before and that they may need to tweak it to work with deck dimensions (See highlighted part of conversations in Email Sequence pdf). We expected to be consulted on any changes. If this was going to be a problem, Chad should have drafted his own professional plan (It states on his website that this is a service they provide for their clients). If he had his own plan in hand, we could have looked it over and gone over any details then. “Although this is not a standard, we graciously complied and changed every aspect of the job whenever they requested.” We were not aware that attending to a customer’s needs was not standard. The fact that Chad considers this as gracious, speaks to his business model. Especially since his idea of gracious includes speaking to his clients with a condescending tone. “They agreed that they would pay for the extras and did; except for the bench. I had more hours in the bench than we did in the entire rest of the deck, including the add-ons- skirting, planter, privacy rail and handrail.” In addition to the planter being in the email before the original quote, so was the handrail. Not realizing all of this information was provided to him ahead of time, speaks to Chad’s severe lack of detail and that he clearly tried to proceed before he was ready (See Email Sequence pdf). “They modified this bench so much from the original "plans" they submitted. Each and every board used was sanded to the exact dimensions for their custom bench to fit the table that was never mentioned before when the planning was in progress. If they didn't know what they wanted- how could we possibly know how much it would cost? All the extra trips to their home for meetings, to vendors for extra materials and the time put into changing the original plan over and over again wasn't even billed to them. Only the materials and labor are included in the $1255 added to the contract that this client signed and accepted.” As proven by the original dimensions of our SketchUp, the bench seat was to be at least 18 inches in width and the inside diameter of the bench was to be 48 inches, leaving the outside diameter to be approximately 66 inches. These details in the SketchUp were added to account for the 48-inch table we were planning on adding. So while the actual table was not mentioned in the original email, the correct dimensions to account for it were. When we came home on Friday evening, 4/17, when we came home from work the bench they had begun to build was sitting on our deck. The seat was less than 12 inches wide (not at all comfortable for anyone), and the inner diameter was almost 60 inches. We were really upset, so we decided to go ahead and buy a 48-inch table to help them visualize why the dimensions they used were not going to work. It became clear during this conversation that neither CEI nor the crew foreman had ever built anything like this before. Since they advertise themselves as being able to DESIGN decks, we were surprised. Chad was not upfront about not having experience in this until much later when confronted with the cost.  It is clear that “all the extra trips to their home for meetings, to vendors for extra materials and the time put into changing the original plan over and over again” was due to a gross lack of experience and professionalism. When Chad realized that what we were asking for was something he had never done before, he should have revised a quote and gotten confirmation before continuing the process. If he was unsure of how much it would cost, then he should have stopped and asked the appropriate questions. We were not aware that he was so clueless about what we were trying to build; otherwise we would have stopped the process ourselves. Being able to look back at all of the interactions as a whole has made it clear, and we wished we had seen it sooner. “On 4/29- the construction for this project was completed. I met with the client again to discuss the bench. He informed me that he didn't have time to discuss it, he signed the contract for the bench, accepted the charges and later in the day, submitted an email to me stating that they were still "hesitant" to pay us the full amount for the bench. Please review email from client on 4/29. In this email, he even verifies settlement will be made within 30 days. They never attempted to negotiate with us in person or by email.” [redacted] did not have time to discuss the payment of the bench with Chad on 4/29 due to a work engagement. However, he did make it clear that we were displeased with the price that he charged us for. [redacted] attempted to have a civil conversation with Chad on 4/28 (while the crew was attempting to fix admitted mistakes that we had pointed out) about the pricing of the deck. Chad responded by speaking down to [redacted] in a condescending way. Just a reminder that the original quote priced the bench at $120, and the new quote priced the bench at $1255. The quote he sent us via EMAIL was the FIRST time that we saw or discussed that price. [redacted] did not sign the contract, accepting the charges for the bench. He paid the contract in full with the exception of the bench, and then was asked firmly by Chad to INITIAL the contract. [redacted] did so, assuming this was to confirm the payment that he made, not to accept the charges for the bench. It is made clear in the follow up email (attached by CEI) that [redacted] did not accept the charges. In his email, [redacted] asks Chad to follow up with [redacted], as he would not be available that day. Chad text and called [redacted] later that day (ignoring [redacted]’s request to follow up with [redacted]) and left a voicemail, saying that he preferred to handle the dispute via phone. I am sure this was so that there would not be anything in writing. [redacted] called Chad later that day to follow up with him. That conversation will be addressed later in the email. We made several attempts over the phone asking for a compromise, Chad held firm on the price, mentioning that he “already wasn’t charging us for all of the extra time” that his crew put in. After this phone conversation, due to a lack of professionalism on Chad’s part, all communication ceased. “Since having problems with this client, we have requested bids for building this same bench from two other construction professionals. Their bids came in at $4000 and $2500 for just the bench part of the project. They both agreed that our price to these clients is a bargain.” When we were given the overall quote for the entire deck, including the bench, we decided that the total cost was within our budget. We did not research the cost of a bench like this before the project. We relied on CEI to give us an accurate quote within reason, and to follow up with us if it was going to change (which they did not). As far as benches from other construction professionals go, I am sure they would not want to claim this bench as a product of their own. The bench has many flaws and issues and would never be able to be sold “as is” (see Detail Photos pdf). From afar, the bench looks good, and I would imagine that CEI plans to put it on their website. The Crew Forman took pictures and insinuated as much. However, up close it is clear that this was the first time that the crew ever had to make angled cuts, or build anything like this. We should not have to pay for Chad’s gross miscalculations on this project, in addition to the fact that he underestimated his ability to complete the project within the time frame and budget he allotted himself. “If I had a questions like "how much do YOU think this should cost?" Their answer was, you're the expert. When each of them was asked what they thought this bench should cost, neither of them could make a suggestion. This was as close to negotiating with them as I came. I wanted to open the conversation to them and justify my charges. Both parties were dismissive of my requests before the invoice was signed and accepted." Chad made no effort to negotiate. He attempted to get us to state what we thought the bench was worth, only to us it to bolster his case on the price he was charging us. He makes this clear in his statement “I wanted to open the conversation to them and justify my charges”. His tone did not indicate he was interested in negotiating, and he was very condescending.  He made it clear he would not accept less, so we did not make an official offer. “To address other matters about the overall workmanship is simply this client trying to add conflict to their complaint. This client sent an email on 4/22 stating how great the deck looked, I've submitted this as an attachment for review as well. The client also told the foreman that he was very pleased with the bench; saying that he "Nailed it". We installed a fence for these clients a few years ago- this was an existing customer and the foreman on this job was the main laborer on the fence installed before. We had a relationship with them before this. If they thought so little of our workmanship why would they have hired us again? If our workmanship was so poor, how could we possibly use the picture of their job as a feature in our portfolio- another benefit they claim should lower the cost of their project.” We are not addressing “other matters about the overall workmanship” to add conflict to our complaint. It is quite the opposite. We withheld complaint about workmanship to the crew to avoid conflict, so that the deck would be finished and the situation resolved. As stated earlier, they were clearly frustrated with our efforts to be involved and it made interactions uncomfortable. We feel that the lack of workmanship should now be included to give an accurate picture to our side of the situation. We did hire them before to install our fence. It was simple and quick, and only lasted two days. We had no issues with them to speak of, and very little interaction, as it was not needed. This is why we chose to use them for our deck. The experiences could not be further from each other. “They tried to solicit work on the side from my crew that was installing their deck. This is unacceptable practice in any form of business, most people know that without saying. The clients wanted a pergola quoted with their original project. When the project was quoted, the pergola was too costly for their budget so they took it out. This is the same project that the approached our crew to do "on the side". Why would they try to hire our crew on the side if they did such poor workmanship?” This specific issue is why all conversations with Chad ceased and we chose to go through Revdex.com. During the phone conversation that [redacted] had with Chad, it was clear that both parties were becoming frustrated. Near the end of the call, out of anger, Chad accused [redacted] of trying to poach one of his crewmembers and trying to get him fired. When [redacted] expressed that there must have been some misunderstanding and that she was sorry, Chad called her a LIAR. Due to Chad’s incredible unprofessionalism at attacking [redacted]’s character, he helped us to realize that we were not going to be able to resolve this ourselves. As far as trying to solicit work, [redacted] was having a casual conversation with the crew foreman regarding the types of side projects that he does for his neighbors. [redacted] mentioned that she was thinking of doing a partial pergola down the road, and asked if he did small projects like that. The crew foreman responded with a nod and said “it’s a possibility”, nothing else. She did not realize that this was inappropriate. She had recently spoken with her parents about some work that they had done, where one of the workers came back to do a side project. If it was such a problem, why didn’t Bill just mention that he was not allowed to do that? Why would he have been talking about other side projects that he had done? If he had, that would have been the end of the conversation. As it is, the subject was never brought up again. [redacted] apologized for her naivety to Chad, and was called a liar in response. We did not ask Chad for a quote for a pergola, nor were we given a quote for a pergola. It is clearly not there on either quote, and there was not a “first draft” quote where we decided it was too much. Before we started having communication problems with Chad, [redacted] emailed about possibly getting other work done. We had a conversation about the work in person, and Chad followed up with a quote via text. That text did not include a pergola either, as it was never discussed.  “Overall, this client was given excellent service, service that would be common for a much larger scope of work and overall project price. I'm happy to point out another example of their expertise in construction: they stated that all wood items are "custom." That's a gross understatement if you don't add any consideration for the type of project and specs requested by this client and that's more than a little insulting for the scope of their expected finished product which changed the whole way. I'm so glad that they could help us make this point by mentioning that each and every board was sanded. This is indicative of their attitude about the whole project. They've expected custom, top quality work and service but simply don't want to pay for it. Yes all wood decks are "custom" however sanding each board before installation isn't a normal practice in deck building. These extra steps in the process this client added and changed is called "customizing". Extra sanding, expanding the deck, and changing things on the spot was the way the this client wanted to have their deck built. It's impossible to go off a plan (even if it had been a professional one) when this happens.” This entire paragraph is a clear example of Chad’s attitude towards his customers. He uses sarcasm and belittlement until you concede. We never claimed to be experts in deck building, and we were up front about that (See highlighted portions of Email Sequence pdf). We naively assumed that “top quality work and service” was their business model, as indicated in their website. It is unbelievable that they reserve their “top quality work” for higher paying customers, which is an option that was not offered to us.  We encourage future customers to take this in to consideration when receiving a quote from Chad. We are still surprised that it is an extra charge to not have boards that give you splinters by touching them (See Detail Photos pdf). However, this issue is just a detail of our disappointment, and is far from the real issue being discussed. “The client claims that our plan was lacking professional plan- I agree, but they asked us to use their plans. So he's right, they weren't professional, they were simple geometrical shapes put on top of each other without consideration of the dimensions of the materials that would be used to construct the bench.” As stated earlier, we were very clear with Chad that the plans we submitted were only to give him the most detail possible so that he would have a clear idea of what we were looking for, and so that he could give us an accurate quote (See Email Sequence pdf). If Chad really felt that our plan was only “simple geometrical shapes put on top of each other”, then he should have come up with his own plan. When convenient, Chad refers to our plan to support his case, and when it is not convenient he refers to our plan as “geometric shapes.”  “Once the bench construction started, the clients provided the table they'd purchased and asked that we build the bench around it. The existence of the table were never mentioned before that, but building a bench around a persons’ table also makes it custom.” We printed off a picture of the table with the dimensions, and presented it to Bill the day that they showed up to start on the deck. While the actual table was not in the plans, the correct dimensions of the bench (48 inches) were. How is building a bench around a table different than building a deck around a house? We do not understand what makes certain parts of the deck more “custom” than other parts, but this issue is not worth arguing about. “The client wants to say that I didn't ask enough questions. Maybe they didn't give enough info, I priced a basic bench- she gave us pics to change bench after the job had started also adding sq ft to the deck- which we didn't even really add onto the invoice.” As the client, who had never been through the process of building a deck, we do not understand how we could have provided Chad with MORE information of what we wanted. We drew our own plan instead of just trying to explain it verbally, providing him with three different angled images as well offering him the source file of the drawing (SketchUp is a free program). We believe that as the contractor, he should have had the professional experience to ask the appropriate questions at the appropriate time. Also, in all of the drawings, it is clear that the bench is extended out from the deck. Chad seems to think that we extended the deck after the fact to accommodate our bench. We do not understand where he was planning on putting his version of an angled basic bench, with out extending the deck (See Sketch vs Actual pdf)? A bench was not going to fit any other way, and this just shows his poor planning. Anyone who takes a top view of the drawing can clearly see that the bench area extends out from a rectangular deck. “If client had asked for a picture example of the bench I quoted, I would have given her many or offered to look on our website for the basic bench we install on a deck.” Why would we, as the client, even think to ask what HIS idea of a basic bench is, when we provided him with many explanations of what we wanted? The only reason that we continued to send him emails of new pictures and drawings was because it was becoming clear that he did not understand. Also, when looking at the pictures on CEI’s website (after the fact), most of the benches are at least three planks wide. “I understand that the invoice may be more than they expected but without knowing with they wanted until halfway into the job there was no way of knowing what to charge them for what they wanted until the end." As stated before, we did not change anything on the deck. The fact is that Chad did not UNDERSTAND what we wanted until halfway through the job (due to his lack of attention to detail on the original plans provided before the contract, see Email Sequence pdf). At no point did he stop and reassess the situation. As a professional, he is the ONLY one who could have known what to charge us, and it is his responsibility to let us know how much something is going to cost so that we can make an informed decision as to whether or not we want to move forward. “We have a great reputation and are disappointed that this client would bring this complaint against us after accepting, agreeing and signing off on the invoiced charges due. We expect that the client’s would hold up their end of the agreed upon amount $1255 that is due 30 days from the last contract signed by the client.”  We would like to make it clear that we did not accept, agree, or sign off on the invoiced charges due. When we made our final payment to Chad for everything excluding the bench, we made it clear that we did not agree with the charges on the bench. The invoice is in [redacted]’s name, and she did not sign it. At the time of payment, [redacted] initialed the invoice to indicate that he had made the full payment excluding the bench. If we had accepted the cost of the bench we both would have signed and dated the invoice, as we did the initial contract. We told Chad that we would like to settle in 30 days, but this was under the hopes that he would be willing to negotiate, which he clearly is not. We request arbitration/mediation through Revdex.com, and we request that Creative Earthscapes extend the time allotted until the matter is resolved.  This dispute has become regretfully petty; however it is important to us that we addressed each of CEI’s claims to show that this process was very difficult and stressful from the day that work began.  The true point of debate is that CEI was given a set of dimensioned drawings and a description from which to quote a price for construction, but failed to take the time to pay attention to details, prepare their own plans, and confirm that they truly understood what it was that we were asking for.  We gave them drawings and CEI provided a quote, without asking questions.  They showed up with our drawings in hand without their own structural plans, without asking questions. They began building the deck, without asking questions.  We came home to find that they failed to plan for the bench as we described it in the quote process and we got very concerned.  In an effort to get the crew back on track, we provided more detail, which CEI interprets as us changing the deck, changing the bench, and adding a flower box, rail, and skirting.  All of these things were included in our drawings and underscore the fact the Chad failed to note them when he offered a quote (See Email Sequence pdf). In all of our email correspondences, we attempted to be polite and even positively reinforced Chad in order to avoid conflict, as it was clear he was becoming agitated. In hindsight, we regret that we chose this course of action.Regards,[redacted]

Check fields!

Write a review of Creative Earthscapes, Inc.

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Creative Earthscapes, Inc. Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Add contact information for Creative Earthscapes, Inc.

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated