CrushBrew.com

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.Payment was received after the Revdex.com complaint was filed and after the terms of the work for hire agreement were brought to the attention of CrushBrew.comWhile payment has now been received for articles and there is no further resolution required, please note that the conditions described in the business's response are dishonest, and the documentation previously provided indicates the terms of the contract, the terms of articles to be submitted, and all communicationsNo concerns regarding plagiarism were raised until after formal complaint was filed against the business, and after payment was received, all work that had been previously accepted and published was removed from the CrushBrew website Please note that no further action is required from Revdex.com in regards to payment, but it should be noted that the business response is dishonest and malicious Regards, [redacted] ***

To Whom it May Concern:We are writing to respond to a recent letter we received from your organization regarding a complaint filed by *** ***The complaint ID reference in your letter is #***.*** *** was contracted as a Freelance writer to provide articles for
CrushBrew.comKitty did receive payment for all articles submitted, however articles were found to contain issues and were not published.We accept pitches for story ideas from writers two times monthlyOnce a pitch receives a green light, the writer is instructed to space out the delivery of the articles over a day window - submitting no more than one article per weekAll articles submitted to CrushBrew.com are required to be written excluSively by the writer we've engaged and must be original workThe material can also only be sold to CrushBrew.com.*** *** received a greenlight for four articles which were to be submitted per week over a day windowThis policy is in place to allow the writers sufficient time to research and write the article and to ensure Crush Brew.com is receiving original material.On the day *** *** received a green light, she submitted all four articles that same dayThis immediately raised a red flagShe was asked about this and responded saying she had pre-written the articles.We did not publish the articlesWe run all articles through several platforms scoring the articles writing quality and plagiarismThe articles *** *** submitted were found to have issues.*** *** was paid for all of the articles she submitted and we have since updated our Work for Hire agreement to address issues with quality and plagiarism in a more direct manner.Thank you,*** ***CrushBrew.com

To Whom it May Concern:We are writing to respond to a recent letter we received from your organization regarding a complaint filed by [redacted]. The complaint ID reference in your letter is #[redacted].[redacted] was contracted as a Freelance writer to provide articles for CrushBrew.com. Kitty did...

receive payment for all articles submitted, however articles were found to contain issues and were not published.We accept pitches for story ideas from writers two times monthly. Once a pitch receives a green light, the writer is instructed to space out the delivery of the articles over a 30 day window - submitting no more than one article per week. All articles submitted to CrushBrew.com are required to be written excluSively by the writer we've engaged and must be original work. The material can also only be sold to CrushBrew.com.[redacted] received a greenlight for four articles which were to be submitted 1 per week over a 30 day window. This policy is in place to allow the writers sufficient time to research and write the article and to ensure Crush Brew.com is receiving original material.On the day [redacted] received a green light, she submitted all four articles that same day. This immediately raised a red flag. She was asked about this and responded saying she had pre-written the articles.We did not publish the articles. We run all articles through several platforms scoring the articles writing quality and plagiarism. The articles [redacted] submitted were found to have issues.[redacted] was paid for all of the articles she submitted and we have since updated our Work for Hire agreement to address issues with quality and plagiarism in a more direct manner.Thank you,[redacted]CrushBrew.com

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
Payment was received after the Revdex.com complaint was filed and after the terms of the work for hire agreement were brought to the attention of CrushBrew.com. While payment has now been received for articles and there is no further resolution required, please note that the conditions described in the business's response are dishonest, and the documentation previously provided indicates the terms of the contract, the terms of articles to be submitted, and all communications. No concerns regarding plagiarism were raised until after formal complaint was filed against the business, and after payment was received, all work that had been previously accepted and published was removed from the CrushBrew website.  Please note that no further action is required from Revdex.com in regards to payment, but it should be noted that the business response is dishonest and malicious.
Regards,
[redacted]

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.Payment was received after the Revdex.com complaint was filed and after the terms of the work for hire agreement were brought to the attention of CrushBrew.com. While payment has now been received for articles and there is no further resolution required, please note that the conditions described in the business's response are dishonest, and the documentation previously provided indicates the terms of the contract, the terms of articles to be submitted, and all communications. No concerns regarding plagiarism were raised until after formal complaint was filed against the business, and after payment was received, all work that had been previously accepted and published was removed from the CrushBrew website. 
 
Please note that no further action is required from Revdex.com in regards to payment, but it should be noted that the business response is dishonest and malicious.
Regards,
[redacted]

To Whom it May Concern:We are writing to respond to a recent letter we received from your organization regarding a complaint filed by [redacted]. The complaint ID reference in your letter is #[redacted].[redacted] was contracted as a Freelance writer to provide articles for...

CrushBrew.com. Kitty did receive payment for all articles submitted, however articles were found to contain issues and were not published.We accept pitches for story ideas from writers two times monthly. Once a pitch receives a green light, the writer is instructed to space out the delivery of the articles over a 30 day window - submitting no more than one article per week. All articles submitted to CrushBrew.com are required to be written excluSively by the writer we've engaged and must be original work. The material can also only be sold to CrushBrew.com.[redacted] received a greenlight for four articles which were to be submitted 1 per week over a 30 day window. This policy is in place to allow the writers sufficient time to research and write the article and to ensure Crush Brew.com is receiving original material.On the day [redacted] received a green light, she submitted all four articles that same day. This immediately raised a red flag. She was asked about this and responded saying she had pre-written the articles.We did not publish the articles. We run all articles through several platforms scoring the articles writing quality and plagiarism. The articles [redacted] submitted were found to have issues.[redacted] was paid for all of the articles she submitted and we have since updated our Work for Hire agreement to address issues with quality and plagiarism in a more direct manner.Thank you,[redacted]CrushBrew.com

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.Payment was received after the Revdex.com complaint was filed and after the terms of the work for hire agreement were brought to the attention of CrushBrew.com. While payment has now been received for articles and there is no further resolution required, please note that the conditions described in the business's response are dishonest, and the documentation previously provided indicates the terms of the contract, the terms of articles to be submitted, and all communications. No concerns regarding plagiarism were raised until after formal complaint was filed against the business, and after payment was received, all work that had been previously accepted and published was removed from the CrushBrew website. 
 
Please note that no further action is required from Revdex.com in regards to payment, but it should be noted that the business response is dishonest and malicious.

Regards,