Revdex.com:I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.Cincinnati Insurance has agreed that debris from one of their insured trucks has hit my car and damaged it They are contending that because "an inspection" was completed they are not liable I have spoken to both my insurance company and an attorney and they both agree that merely documenting "an inspection" should not absolve the insurance company from their obligation to pay If one inspects his breaks and they are deemed to be performing and shortly thereafter the brakes malfunction and it hits another car is the motorist not liable because an inspection was done - of course not! It is clear that their property damaged mine and they are liable regardless of some "inspection".Furthermore, when I tried to challenge Cincinnati Insurance on the phone they refused to give me a copy of said "inspection" Finally, when I mentioned that the driver of the truck was driving above the speed limit and that likely caused the blow out they said they "don't care".Cincinnati Insurance is clearly trying to take advantage of the situation knowing that the damage to my car was not too substantial and that I wont hire a lawyer due to the cost or put the claim through my own insurance which will increase my rates Thus they are strong-arming me to let this go when they are clearly liable.I am hoping with the involvement of the Cincinnati Revdex.com that they would reconsider and pay for the damages to my vehicle.Thank you very much for your help! [redacted]
Revdex.com:I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.Cincinnati Insurance has agreed that debris from one of their insured trucks has hit my car and damaged it They are contending that because "an inspection" was completed they are not liable I have spoken to both my insurance company and an attorney and they both agree that merely documenting "an inspection" should not absolve the insurance company from their obligation to pay If one inspects his breaks and they are deemed to be performing and shortly thereafter the brakes malfunction and it hits another car is the motorist not liable because an inspection was done - of course not! It is clear that their property damaged mine and they are liable regardless of some "inspection".Furthermore, when I tried to challenge Cincinnati Insurance on the phone they refused to give me a copy of said "inspection" Finally, when I mentioned that the driver of the truck was driving above the speed limit and that likely caused the blow out they said they "don't care".Cincinnati Insurance is clearly trying to take advantage of the situation knowing that the damage to my car was not too substantial and that I wont hire a lawyer due to the cost or put the claim through my own insurance which will increase my rates Thus they are strong-arming me to let this go when they are clearly liable.I am hoping with the involvement of the Cincinnati Revdex.com that they would reconsider and pay for the damages to my vehicle.Thank you very much for your help! [redacted]