Davison Design & Development, Inc.

Review: I sent in my idea and monies. They created what I thought was a portfolio which they stated they submitted to various companies. Each time I would then get a letter saying my idea was rejected and asking for more money. I did this for a while and then realized this was a scam. I also did not like the way they presented my product and they refused to listen. This was a domestic product and they kept sending (I thought) to the wrong venues. I have more paperwork and emails I could send along. Desired Settlement: I would like my money back. All of it with interest.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Ms. [redacted]

against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 06/12/2014. Ms. [redacted]

has been a valued client since first contacting us in 2009. As will be detailed, we provided our

services with Ms. [redacted]’s express written approval and authorization, and to her documented

satisfaction. It bears noting that our last contact with Ms. [redacted] was on 07/18/2011. The fact

that she waited nearly three years to file a complaint bears on the credibility of her position.

We understand that customer service is vital in all businesses and is imperative when

operating a successful business. Customer concerns upset everyone and our staff works very hard

to troubleshoot them so communication errors are kept to a minimum. From the time of an initial

contact, through the research and development of a new product idea, to the presentation of a

client’s idea, we try to maintain an open channel of communication, disclosing our services and

fees upfront and securing our clients’ approval and authorization throughout the process.

Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, clients are occasionally dissatisfied, particularly when

their product ideas are not licensed. That appears to be the simple truth with Ms. [redacted]. In her

complaint, Ms. [redacted] alleges the presentations of her product sample were made “to the wrong

venues”. However, each of the presentation was specifically authorized by Ms. [redacted].

The new product development process is a high risk venture. There is no guarantee that a

particular product idea will be licensed and no guarantee of a financial gain. All of our

disclosures and contracts have numerous, explicit statements on that point. We first disclosed to

Ms. [redacted] our services and fees, and the historical success rate for our clients at the time she

submitted her idea. The electronic system we utilize makes it impossible for a person to submit

an idea without first receiving two disclosure statements, in a printable and savable format, and

the person acknowledging that they received and read the disclosures. A brief summary of the

services provided to Ms. [redacted], and her documented approval, authorizations, and stated

satisfaction follows;

1. 07/09/2009 she entered into the New Product Sample Agreement. A proposed

design was submitted to her. On 09/04/2009 she approved the design and

completed a questionnaire about the design giving positive feedback.

2. Based upon her approval, the physical product sample and presentation materials

were created. An Executive Briefing, which included a photograph of the

physical product sample, was submitted to her. On or about 12/07/2009, she

approved, in writing, the presentation and completed yet another

questionnaire about the Executive Briefing, providing positive feedback

3. The presentation was made; unfortunately the corporation chose not to license

her idea.

4. From 03/03/2010 to 04/19/2011, she authorized the presentation to four

additional corporations. Unfortunately, no corporation chose to license her

product.

5. On 07/18/2011, she was offered an additional presentation which she has

declined. We have had no further contact with Ms. [redacted], until the current

complaint.

Copies of the referenced documents are enclosed (note the actual approved design has

been redacted for confidentiality purposes). As stated, the design, construction, and presentation

of her product sample have been performed with her express written approval and authorization,

and to her documented satisfaction. There is no basis to warrant a refund for services rendered.

The simple fact is; the product development process provides no guarantees of financial gain.

Our contracts and disclosures are explicit in this regard. While this is of little comfort to a client

who has expended considerable time, money, effort and emotion into a project, the fact that a

particular project does not bring financial gain to the client does not invalidate the services that

were provided.

Consumer

Response:

I would like to provide more documentation to support my claim. I will work on this since I kept records of the communication. When I recently researched the company on line I realized that I was not the only one who had a negative experience with this company. I am somewhat offended that my credibility is being questioned. Not good business practice to alienate someone who is questioning your ethics. Yes, it has been 3 years since last communication but I had resigned myself that things just didn't work out and accepted my loss and embarrassment. Yes, Davison was always supportive, but always asked for more money at the same time. Thank you for your time. I await your advice. [redacted]

Review: I gave almost $1,000 over four months for a patent search and staring drawings for my invention. When it was time for prototypes to be made, the guy I was working with, [redacted], told me the next step was to give $10,00 plus 20% of my company, or$10,000 and 20% of my company. These numbers were not mentioned before and without the money nothing more would be done.Desired Settlement: I would like a refund of the money I sent to Davison.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted] against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 01/17/2014. Customer concerns upset everyone and our staff works very hard to troubleshoot them so communication errors are kept to a minimum. From the time of an initial contact, to the presentation of a client’s product sample, we try to maintain an open channel of communication. Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, clients are occasionally dissatisfied. In his statement, Mr. [redacted] mischaracterizes his project. He alleges he paid “almost $1,000”, he implies the project took “over four months” and he alleges the fees for additional development services were “not mentioned before”. As will be detailed below, Mr. [redacted] was provided a complete disclosure of the types of services offered and their related fees BEFORE any contract was entered, Davison provided its services for the contract that Mr. [redacted] entered in less than a months time, and the fee for this service was significantly less than $1,000. Mr. [redacted] contacted Davison about a new product idea through Davison’s website. The system Davison utilizes for electronic submissions makes it impossible for a person to submit an idea without first having two separate disclosures displayed in a printable and savable format, and the person electronically acknowledging the disclosures. On 01/31/2013, Mr. [redacted] acknowledged, via an electronic signature, that he received and read the two disclosure statements. It is important to note that the disclosures are made BEFORE the Client makes any payment to Davison. Among the disclosures is the statement that “It is Davison’s normal practice to seek more than one contract in connection with a submitted idea.” The disclosure then provides a listing the various services and related fees. Enclosed, please find a copy of the disclosure as it was presented to Mr. [redacted]. Following his acknowledgment of the disclosures, on 02/27/20 13, Mr. [redacted] entered into an agreement for Pre-Development services which obligated Davison to compile research data related to his product idea. Mr. [redacted] made payment of the $795 fee and Davison completed the Pre-Development services on 03/20/20 13. The Pre-Development Agreement states in relevant part (emphasis added); “Section II B. Product Samples; Approvals. Client is responsible for obtaining a product sample and relevant information about the product in a professional format for presentation to a Licensee, at Clients sole expense. Davison, at its option, will offer to provide further development services, under a separate contract for a separate fee, to assist in obtaining or creating the sample and presentation material for the targeted Licensee. Client is aware that he or she is free to obtain such materials elsewhere or not to obtain them” Following the completion of the services under the Pre-Development Agreement, on 04/23/2013, Davison provided to Mr. [redacted] a proposed agreement for further development work. This proposal is consistent with our disclosures and the terms of the Pre-Development Agreement. To date, Mr. [redacted] has not engaged these additional services which is his prerogative. As stated, Mr. [redacted] was fully informed of all services and their related fees offered by Davison, BEFORE he entered into any contract. The services for which there existed a contract have been performed, in a timely manner, for the agreed fee of less than $1,000. No additional contracts have been entered and no additional payments have been received. There is no basis to warrant a refund for services rendered. Sincer [redacted]. [redacted] Associate Counsel Davison Design and Development, Inc.

Review: Upon our contacting the DAVISON CORP.on the internet, their website was full of promises that led me to believe our needs could be met, provided we pay the 10,000 required for them to produce a pro-totype of our product design idea we have for the BOWLING INDUSTRY. Their promises has not yet been fulfilled according to all the sales pitches we listened to. Yet they have our $11,500dollars. We seek to be whole once again!Desired Settlement: Either refund our investment or fulfill what was promised via their website.

Business

Response:

July 09, 2013

Re: [redacted].

Your ID#: [redacted]

Dear Mr. [redacted];

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted]

against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 06/27/2013. Mr. [redacted]

asserts he contracted with Davison to “produce a pro-totype of our product design idea... ” The

basis of his complaint is that he has not received said “pro-totype”. As will be detailed below,

Mr. [redacted] did not contract for the construction of a physical product sample. He contracted

for the creation of an Integrated Product Rendering, which has been provided to him and has met

with his documented satisfaction. There is no basis to warrant a refund for services rendered.

Davison offers several types of services to our clients. One service is the design and

construction of a physical product sample. This service is provided under a New Product Sample

Agreement. Such an agreement was offered to Mr. [redacted] who declined this service. Another

service is the creation of a full color print of a product and packaging design. This is offered

under an Integrated Product Rendering agreement. That is the service for which Mr. [redacted]

contracted.

Davison completed its services pursuant the contract and provide Mr. [redacted] an

Integrated Product Rendering and presentation materials. The presentation materials were

contained in an Executive Briefing. Mr. [redacted] completed a questionnaire about both the

Integrated Product Rendering and the Executive Briefing in which he provided positive feedback.

Copies of these two signed questionnaires are attached. Mr. [redacted] also authorized the

presentation of his product idea. A copy if his authorization is enclosed. The presentation of his

product idea was made in accordance with his authorization.

His complaint provides no basis to warrant a refund.

Associate Counsel

Davison Design and Development, Inc.

Enclosures

Consumer

Response:

Review: Two years ago I had an idea. I was told by Davison rep that they would research the idea, find a company interested then they would decide whether it was worth pursuing. After a few weeks I am told is a great idea, they found a furniture Co interested. They mail the contract $9,800 I am called every other week to make sure I pay the balance I borrowed from credit cards because the rep kept saying [redacted] it s a great idea.. over and over I am reassured by phone. once I paid the balance, the calls stop. I get one call from the person to pitch the idea to that one specific furniture store. and then it begins, oh they have not responded, I don't want to push them store because they will back off I will call you in a few days. Two months later I call to complain, and then it begins They are not interested now, if you pay another $300.00 we can try and find another company interested. Then the rudeness, I sent several emails, one specifically to the second person I dealt with telling him well I guess i'm out $9,000 well I guess this is it. I wanted to see if in good faith he would respond with, i;m sorry I will see what I can do. I won't lose all my money. We trust this man Davison, he said he was dooped and that he would never do that to anyone. well it seems there are two hundred people out there that he did exactly that.. They make you sign a contract and you trust them because they say hay, " I got your back you have a great product. they tell you they check to see if anyone has that same product out there. I looked on amazon and found a very similar product. I work hard everyday, I could not afford to put up $9,000 other wise so not my credit is shot and no one in Davison cared they take our money, and who fights for the adverage Joe. Who believes they are legitimate and they don't take advantage. If they are honest I want 60% of my money back. How can you help me, I can't afford a lawyer how do we get together and get a large group to sue. please helpDesired Settlement: I believe that the people who are in contact with us, are not being honest they take advantage of people like myself. They lie so that we put the money up, then they get paid and you don't here from them unless you call- I believe that they spent money but they did not do what they promised, I have learned a valuable lesson. I want 60% of my money back its fair I f I could get a full refund that would satisfy me, but I am honest and believe that they are entitled to the cost of their paper.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Ms. [redacted] Sub

against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 09/30/20 14. We

understand that customer service is vital in all businesses and is imperative when operating a

successful business. Customer concerns upset everyone and our staff works very hard to

troubleshoot them so communication errors are kept to a minimum. From the time of an initial

contact, through the research and development of a new product idea, to the presentation of a

client’s idea, we try to maintain an open channel of communication, disclosing our services and

fees upfront and securing our clients’ approval and authorization throughout the process.

Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, clients are occasionally dissatisfied, particularly when

their product ideas are not licensed. That appears to be the simple truth with Ms. [redacted]

In her complaint, Ms. [redacted] mischaracterizes the services provided by Davison. She

asserts that Davison “would decide if it was worth pursuing” and that Davison would “check to

see if anyone has the same product”. Also, she raises a concern over the cost of subsequent

presentations. As will be detailed, Ms. [redacted] was apprised on multiple occasions, including

BEFORE any contract was entered, that Davison does not evaluate ides submitted to it and of the

additional costs associated with additional presentations. The services provided by Davison were

with her express written approval and authorization. Further, they were completed to her

documented satisfaction.

Ms. [redacted] first contacted Davison in September of 2011. At that time she was provided

with, and acknowledged that she received and read, two disclosures. The disclosure statements set

forth, among other details, the following statement; “Davison does not offer evaluations of idea

submissions for commercial potential”. The disclosure also details the various services and their related

fees, including the repackaging service. Following her acknowledgement of the disclosures, she entered

into the Pre-Development Agreement for research services. This contract contains the following

disclaimer; “Client acknowledges that Davison has not made any representations concerning the potential

of Client’s Product to be marketed, licensed, patented or to make a profit for Client. Davison has not

evaluated the Product This service was completed and the research material related to existing

similar products was provided to her.

Following receipt of this research, she entered into an agreement for the design and

construction of a product sample and presentation materials. The contract terms include the

following; “Client acknowledges that Davison has not and will not evaluate the commercial potential of the

Idea.. .there is no way of knowing at this time if the targeted corporation will license, buy or pay royalties

for the idea. . client acknowledges that Davison has made no representations concerning the likelihood of

licensing, marketing, royalty payments or profitability The contract also provides a disclosure of

the repackaging service and its related fee. We provided a proposed design and she approved the

design, in writing, and completed a questionnaire about the rendering providing positive

feedback. A copy of her signed approval and completed questionnaire are enclosed. (The actual

design has been redacted for confidentiality purposes.)

In reliance upon her approval, the physical product sample and presentation material

were created. An Executive Briefing, which included a photograph of the physical product

sample, was sent to Ms. [redacted] She authorized the presentation of her product idea and completed

a second questionnaire providing positive feedback about the Executive Briefing. A copy of her

authorization and completed questionnaire are enclosed. Her product idea was presented;

unfortunately, the corporation chose not to license the product idea. Additional presentation

services were offered, though Ms. [redacted] has declined to engage these services.

As stated, Ms. [redacted] was fully informed of all services and their related fees offered by

Davison, BEFORE she entered into any contract. She was provided with detailed research

information on similar products BEFORE engaging the services to design and construct a product

sample. The design, construction, and presentation of her product sample have been performed

with her express written approval and authorization, and to her documented satisfaction. No

additional contracts have been entered and no additional payments have been received. There is

no basis to warrant a refund for services rendered. The simple fact is; the product development

process provides no guarantees of financial gain. Our contracts and disclosures are explicit in this

regard. While this is of little comfort to a client who has expended considerable time, money,

effort and emotion into a project, the fact that a particular project does not bring financial gain to

the client does not invalidate the services that were provided.

Davison has no obligation, legal or otherwise, to refund any monies paid by Ms. [redacted] for

services rendered to her documented satisfaction. However, in the interest of customer

satisfaction, we will offer two additional presentations at no cost to her. If she chooses to accept

this offer, she need only contact our Licensing Department who will proceed with the necessary

paperwork.

Consumer

Response:

Review: I worked with a man named [redacted] and for a year was told how great my idea was and kept after me to raise almost $6,000 to fund patent and promoting this idea. As time was going on it was suggested to mpove quickly before someone else wanted to do the same, he said to just put it on a credit card. I did not have one so I said my mother could use hers and they charged her. It was then turned over to another department to someone else whom will no answer my calls or questions.

[redacted] has crawled into the woodwork and has disappeared some where. I have been trying to get an answer for years yet no response and they have devastated my mothers credit limit we are having to repay.Desired Settlement: Just give my mother back what you had me ask for from her.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted]against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 03/23/2015. Customerconcerns upset everyone and our staff works very hard to troubleshoot them so communicationerrors are kept to a minimum. In his complaint, Mr. [redacted] fails to mention any of the serviceswhich were provided with his express written approval and authorization. Further, he does notmention that he completed questionnaires about the services, in which he provided positivefeedback. Rather he fabricates a claim that he has been “trying to get an answer for years” abouthis project, and demands a refund. As will be detailed, Davison has provided its services withMr. [redacted]’s approval, authorization and to his satisfaction. Davison has continuallyprovided updates to Mr. [redacted] about his project. Unfortunately, despite best efforts, clientsare occasionally dissatisfied, particularly when their product ideas are not licensed. That appearsto be the simple truth with Mr. [redacted].In his complaint Mr. [redacted] states the payments he made to Davison were in part to“fund [a] patent At the outset, it should be clarified that Davison does not provide patentservices. Davison is not a law firm and does not advertise that it provides intellectual propertyservices or any other legal services. The contracts for services do not include patent filingservices or any other legal services. The contracts are explicitly clear that the Client is solelyresponsible for securing any and all intellectual property protections. The Pre-Developmentcontract, which Mr. Swine ford entered, states in Section II.B.: “Davison is not responsible forapplying for or obtaining any intellectual property protections on the Product or Design, includingbut not limited to patents, trademarks and trade names.” To the extent Mr. [redacted] believesDavison provides patent services, he is mistaken.Mr. [redacted] contacted Davison about a new product idea through Davison’s website.The system Davison utilizes for electronic submissions makes it impossible for a person to submitan idea without first having two separate disclosures displayed in a printable and savable format,and the person electronically acknowledging the disclosures. Mr. [redacted] acknowledged, viaan electronic signature, that he received and read the two disclosure statements. It is important tonote that the disclosures are made BEFORE the Client enters any service contract or makes anypayment to Davison. Among the disclosures is the statement that “It is Davison’s normal practiceto seek more than one contract in connection with a submitted idea.” The disclosure thenprovides a listing the various services and related fees. This information is also freely availableon the company website. Following his acknowledgment of the disclosures, Mr. [redacted] entered into twoservice contracts. The first was the Pre-Development Agreement which was for the compilationof custom research relevant to his submitted idea. This research was provided to him on or about09/04/2012. Following completion the pre-development services, on 12/13/2012, Mr. [redacted]entered into a contract for the design and creation of an integrated product rendering andpresentation material, illustrating his idea. In May 2013, Davison submitted a proposed designwhich Mr. [redacted] approved, and for which he completed a questionnaire providing positivefeedback. A copy of his signed approval and completed questionnaire are enclosed; note theactual design has been redacted for confidentiality purposes. In reliance upon his writtenapproval, the presentation materials were created. The presentation materials, in the form ofExecutive Briefing, were provided to Mr. [redacted]; he authorized the presentation of hisproduct idea to the targeted corporation and completed a second questionnaire about theExecutive Briefing, again providing nothing but positive feedback. A copy of his signedauthorization and completed questionnaire, dated 06/11/2013, are enclosed. The presentation ofhis product idea was made on 08/09/2013. Davison provided monthly updates to Mr. [redacted].Unfortunately, on or about 11/20/2013, the company chose not to proceed with his idea. Asecond corporation was identified and the offer of the additional service of presenting to the newtargeted corporation was presented to Mr. [redacted]. He has not engaged this service or anyother additional services.Mr. [redacted] was informed in June 2014, and again in November 2014, that by notengaging additional services, his project would be presented to a corporation only if a corporationwere to make a request of Davison for product ideas similar to his. Absent such a request, therewould be no affirmative presentations of his new product idea. Further, he was informed that hewould be updated only if his product idea was presented. His claim of a lack of communicationoccurring “for years” is simply unjustified.As stated, all services have been performed with Mr. [redacted]’s express writtenapproval and authorization and to his documented satisfaction. While it is unfortunate that thetargeted corporation chose not to pursue his product idea, that fact does not negate the providedservices. The simple fact is; the product development process provides no guarantees offinancial gain. Our contracts and disclosures are explicit in this regard. While this is of littlecomfort to a client who has expended considerable time, money, effort and emotion into a project,the fact that a particular project does not bring financial gain to the client does not invalidate theservices that were provided. However, in the interest of customer satisfaction, we will offer twoadditional presentations at no cost to Mr. [redacted]. If he chooses to accept this offer, he needonly contact our Licensing Department who will coordinate the necessary paperwork to authorizethe presentations.Sincerely yours,[redacted]Associate CounselDavison Design and Development, Inc.

Review: I paid Davison $6000.00 to design a product that would make a firearm useless if that firearm were being handled by someone other than the registered owner. I believe they have been intentionally dragging me along until the provisional patent expires so they can cut me out of any payments.Desired Settlement: I want them to refund me my money.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted]against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 03/30/2015. Customerconcerns upset everyone and our staff works very hard to troubleshoot them so communicationerrors are kept to a minimum. From the time of an initial contact, to the presentation of a client’sproduct idea, we try to maintain an open channel of communication. In his statement, Mr.[redacted] raises a concern over Davison’s use of his idea and the promptness of the services. Aswill be detailed, Davison has adhered, and continues to adhere, to its obligations ofconfidentiality. Further, all services have been provided in a professional, prompt manner andwith Mr. [redacted]’s express written approval.Mr. [redacted] first contacted Davison with his idea for a new product in February 2012. Aswith all clients, his idea was submitted pursuant to a Confidentiality Agreement. Davison hasmaintained, and continues to maintain, the confidentiality of his idea, as it does for all its clients’ideas. However, Davison can not account for similar, or the same, ideas that may be submittedby other clients, or that may be disclosed to the general public through other avenues. It is notuncommon for multiple people to conceive of the same, or similar, products independently.Because of this fact, Davison requires all clients to undergo the initial pre-development researchso that some level of knowledge may be secured as to what is in the prior art.On 04/22/2014, Mr. [redacted] entered a contract for the creation of a rendering of hisproduct idea and of presentation materials, in the form of an Executive Briefing. On 07/11/2014,he approved, in writing, the design of the rendering and completed a questionnaire about therendering, providing positive feedback. In reliance on his approval, the Executive Briefingmaterials were created. On 07/27/2014, Mr. [redacted] authorized the presentation of his productidea and completed a second questionnaire on the Executive Briefing, again providing positivefeedback. Copies of his signed documents are enclosed. (Note: the actual approved design hasbeen redacted for confidentiality purposes.)On 09/09/20 14, his product idea was presented to the designated corporation. Mr.[redacted] was provided with a status update call on 9/19/2014 and 10/28/2014. In addition, his fileindicates attempts to reach Mr. [redacted] on 12/02/20104, 12/03/2014, 12/30/2014, 01/12/2015 and01/30/2015. Mr. [redacted] was advised in a voice message Ofl 01/30/2015 that the designatedcorporation had decided to not pursue his product idea.As stated, all services have been performed with Mr. [redacted]’s express written approvaland authorization, and to his documented satisfaction. While it is unfortunate that the targetedcorporation chose not to pursue his product idea, that fact does not negate the services and doesnot provide a basis for a refund. The simple fact is; the product development process providesno guarantees of financial gain. While this is of little comfort to a client who has expendedconsiderable time, money, effort and emotion into a project, the fact that a particular project doesnot bring financial gain to the client does not invalidate the services that were provided. However,in the interest of customer satisfaction, Davison will offer two additional presentations at no costto Mr. [redacted]. If he chooses to accept this offer, he need only contact our Licensing Departmentwho will coordinate the necessary paperwork to authorize the presentations.Sincerej[redacted]Associate CounselDavison Design and Development, Inc.Turning ideas into productsDavison • RIDC Park 595 Alpha Drive • Pittsburgh PA 15238 2911 • wvAv,Davison com• Tell 866.Dav son • Fax 1,800.540 5490 • International 412.S99.1234 Fe 12967 794Enclosures

Review: I contacted this company with a idea I had. I was told the price, and set up a payment plan. I let the person I was dealing with that I am on SSI and had a limited income. He told me he understood and we proceeded. After a few conversations I was informed I had to pay over a thousand dollars to continue. This surprised me because I had told them in the beginning I had a limited income ! I feel like they took advantage of me, and I would like to get my original payment returned to me !Desired Settlement: I would like to get my money back !

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted]against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 12/26/20 14. In hisstatement, Mr. [redacted] implies he was not advised of the additional cost for additional servicesoffered. He is mistaken. As will be detailed below, he was fully apprised of the types of servicesoffered and their related fees BEFORE any contract was entered.Mr. [redacted] contacted Davison about a new product idea through Davison’s website.The system Davison utilizes for electronic submissions makes it impossible for a person to submitan idea without first having two separate disclosures displayed in a printable and savable format,and the person electronically acknowledging the disclosures. On 03/26/20 14, Mr. [redacted]acknowledged, via an electronic signature, that he received and read the two disclosurestatements. It is important to note that the disclosures are made BEFORE the Client makes anypayment to Davison. Among the disclosures is the statement that “It is Davison’s normal practiceto seek more than one contract in connection with a submitted idea.” The disclosure thenprovides a listing the various services and related fees. Enclosed, please find a copy of thedisclosure as it was presented to Mr. [redacted].Following his acknowledgment of the disclosures, on 04/08/20 14, Mr. [redacted] enteredinto an agreement for Pre-Development services which obligated Davison to compile researchdata related to his product idea. Davison completed the Pre-Development services and forwardedthe compiled research to Mr. [redacted] on or about 07/24/20 14. On 07/30/20 14, Mr. [redacted]completed a questionnaire about the Pre-Development service, in which he provided positivefeedback. A copy of his signed questionnaire is attached.The Pre-Development Agreement states in relevant part (emphasis added);“Section II B. Product Samples; Approvals. Client is responsible for obtaining a product sample, packagingand relevant information about the product in a professional format for presentation to a Licensee, at Client’ssole expense. Davison, at its option, will offer to provide further development services, under aseparate contract for a separate fee, to assist in obtaining or creating the sample and presentation materialfor the targeted Licensee. Client is aware that he or she is free to obtain such materials elsewhere or not toobtain them at all.”Following the completion of the services under the Pre-Development Agreement, on 08/05/2014,Davison provided to Mr. [redacted] a proposed agreement for further development work. Thisproposal is consistent with our disclosures and the terms of the Pre-Development Agreement. Todate, Mr. [redacted] has not engaged these additional services, which is his prerogative.As stated, Mr. [redacted] was fully informed of all services and their related fees offered byDavison, BEFORE he entered into any contract. The services for which there existed a contracthave been performed to his documented satisfaction. No additional contracts have been enteredand no additional payments have been received. There is no basis to warrant a refund for servicesrendered.Sincerely[redacted]Associate CounselDavison Design and Development, Inc.Enclosures

Consumer

Response:

[redacted] They Failed to mention that I was told to just sign the last page and Fax it back to them. Not only that but I told them I had a limited income, and not once did they mention I would have to pay more money. I felt trapped and used!

Review: GAVE MY idea of ___to Terrance Jackson (george davison) of davison inventions last Week. He sent me 3 PDFs of a contract I did not sign or return it but I have not heard from him since I TOLD HIM IM PRESENTING MATERIAL TO ATTORNEYS 1ST. Its been a week after requesting $795.00, dropped to $100.00 w/Payments, he hasnt called or emailed since. Nobody answers phones-All pre recorded Voicemails No one is answering the phones. I think they STOLEN MY IDEAS. I had many versions & extensions of my Idea, this was not 1 product. Terrance Jackson said my idea is an excitable one, of course & they wanted to move Forward THAT DAY w/EVERYTHING. He asked for me to Sign all pages & send in AND not to tell Anyone about my IDEAS or they could Steal the** Altho pleasant to speak to, Mr. Jackson was disappointed & (pressuring not to much but enough) that I had asked for a day to research & think about it. ITS been 7 days since I've heard of that company. I have my attorneys at [redacted] I signed one page of 11 had a horrible Intuition & gut feeling & didnt send it back (of course). There were more Pg's to sign, 11 in total. After sending 3 Emails today to both the Davison Co. & Terrance Jackson, I filed this complaint.Desired Settlement: WANT Satisfaction in WRITING that __ and __ are safe and they havent sold it or copycatted it. If they have started proceedings W/TRADEMARK/PATENT/COPYRIGHT, I want them brought to justice. Willing to go to Supreme Court, Altho I know thats not necessary.YES I'M REQUESTING SETTLEMENT of WHAT IVE LISTED. No monies have been exchanged.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Ms. [redacted] against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 11/25/2014. It should be noted that your office’s letter dated 12/12/2014 is the first notice we received regarding this complaint. Further, it should be made clear that Ms. [redacted] has not engaged any services with, nor has she made any payments to, Davison. Customer concerns upset everyone and our staff works very hard to troubleshoot them so communication errors are kept to a minimu** In her statement, Ms. [redacted] raises a concern over the confidentiality of her idea and makes numerous misrepresentations over the nature of services offered.Ms. [redacted] contacted Davison about a new product idea on November 15, 2014. She made this contact by entering a Confidentially Agreement. Under the express terms of the Agreement; “Davison will not use, disclose, license or sell this idea with out my [Ms. [redacted]] express written permission.” Davison takes the obligation of confidentiality seriously, and abides by the terms of the Agreement. As such, her concern over the confidence of her idea is unwarranted.Secondly, Ms. [redacted] make statements concerning the pursuit of intellectual property rights, i.e. patents, trademarks, copyright. Davison is not a law firm and we do not advertise that we provide intellectual property services or any other legal services. The contracts for services that we do offer do not include patent filing services or any other legal services. The contracts are explicitly clear that the Client is solely responsible for securing any and all intellectual property protections. To the extent she believes Davison offers such services, she is mistaken.Finally, Ms. [redacted] alleges a failure to contact her. Our records indicate that Davison has had no less then ten communications with Ms. [redacted] about her project, including an e-mail from her after the date of her complaint. Ms. [redacted] has simply chosen not to pursue any services, which is her prerogative. Should she decide to purse her project with Davison we would welcome an opportunity to work with her pursuant to the services which are offered.Sincerely,David ** D[redacted]Associate CounselDavison Design and Development, Inc.

Review: I've tried patiently working with Davison giving them all necessary information relevant to my idea. I'm requesting a complete refund of all money paid and the illustrations I also provided based on these simple facts that are stated within the contract. Under Davison's Obligations (first paragraph) A. Representation Services.B. Pre-Development Services 1.Product Related Data 2.Patent Review 3.Corporation Review 4.Product Planning Sessions 5.Portfolio I informed [redacted]; Director of New Projects from the very beginning I had experienced trying to get my idea on the market before and I told their was some hesitation on my part, he assured me that they Davison was/is a "reputable,respected companies doing this". I addimently remember asking are you an Accredited company he said yes. [redacted] became very defensive and confrontational when I asked him about Davison's obligations to me as a client. [redacted] and I only communicated by phone,fax and email, I've received "only one" piece of mail from Davison and that is a letter dated February 7,2014 stating he "wants to" show my idea to a company, but has not, my understanding from his letter to meaning (he was dangling a carrot in my face)?? able. He [redacted] representing Davison, by the contract he's obligated to do just that (present an idea to the right company.) I have to date yet to hear any form of corespondence regarding by idea. [redacted] was the only person I've ever had any contact. Davison/[redacted] has not preformed not even one of the contractual obligations as promised by our agreement. [redacted] has my phone and email address that has not changed, so what his reasoning is for not further communicating with me of the status of this agreement is unexceptable at the stage. He's long over due as far delivering what he promised.Desired Settlement: I'm requesting a complete refund of all money paid $615.00 and all drawings I provided pertaining to my idea the [redacted] ([redacted]), and binding agreement in writing stating that my idea won't be hi-jacked/stolen by any individual, company's, or Davison without prior notification of consent and approval from myself. I am "only" willing to continue this process (only if Davison) honors what they advertise without additional cost can we proceed.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted]

Review: I Mr [redacted] ask Davison if they could make a [redacted] for me and I sent them a blue print of what I wanted after waiting for a year they made a prototype and when I received the prototype one and 1/2 year later it was not what I had expected so I call the company back to let them know that the prototype was not acceptable. I called a manufacturer and they told me that they could not make a complete product out of what I show them from the prototype Davison did not have all the information on how they made the prototype. It was poorly made and the quality was unbelievable. The prototype is missing parts and files. this is so unprofessional that a manufacturer would not accept it. The manufacturer told me that I would have to start all over because Davison do not have the proper files and did not make the other parts to the [redacted] that I requested it only had a male adapter that is not movable to put a [redacted] and that was part of the contract I signed with Davison.Desired Settlement: I would like for Davison to refund my $8.000 that I paid them to invent a product for me which they invented what they wanted to invent and it was not up the part from the design which I sent them.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted] against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 02/04/2014. Customer concerns upset everyone and our staff works very hard to troubleshoot them so communication errors are kept to a minimum. From the time of an initial contact, to the presentation of a client’s product sample, we try to maintain an open channel of communication and secure our client’s approval throughout the process. Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, clients are occasionally dissatisfied, particularly when their product ideas are not licensed. Having reviewed Mr. [redacted]’ file, this appears to be the situation. Mr. [redacted] contracted with Davison for the design, construction, and presentation of a product sample. On or about 11/14/2011, he approved the design and completed a questionnaire about the Integrated Product Rendering in which he provided positive feedback. In reliance upon his approval, the physical product sample was constructed and presentation materials prepared. Mr. [redacted] authorized the presentation of his product sample and completed another questionnaire about the Executive Briefing presentation material in which he again provided positive feedback. The Executive Briefing material contained an actual photograph of the constructed product sample. His product idea was presented; unfortunately the target corporation chose not to license his idea. Additional presentation services were offered, though he has declined. Copies of the various approvals, authorizations, and signed questionnaires are attached (note the actual approved design has been redacted for confidentiality purposes). At his request, the product sample was shipped to his attention on 07/31/2013. In addition, all engineering and CAD drawings related to his project were sent to him through a series of e-mails on 01/16/2014, 01/22/2014 and 02/10/2014. Mr. [redacted]’ complaint alleges that the product sample “what not what I has expected”. This is in direct contradiction to his documented approval of the design and his documented satisfaction with the design and presentation materials. Mr. [redacted] claims the files provided to him were incomplete. It should be noted that his product sample incorporated OEM parts. The contract for the construction of the product sample explicitly states; “Davison is not required to produce production drawings, CAD drawings or G-Code files for OEM parts. ”All services have been provided with Mr. [redacted]’ express written approval and authorization. All services have met with his documented satisfaction. Additional services have been offered and Mr. [redacted] has declined such additional services. The product sample and all related engineering files have been forwarded to him. While it is unfortunate the targeted corporation did not license his product idea, there is no basis to support his complaint or to warrant a refund for services rendered.

Consumer

Response:

It was never bought to my knowledge that the product sample incorporated OEM parts It never said that I was not able to receive that information for the construction of the product sample on my contract. I am requesting the drawing and the size of the [redacted] that was use on my sample and was denied of any of the drawing or size for it and the material it was made out of. The manufacture said that they can not make the [redacted] for me without the 3D drawing and size. I need the information on the [redacted] in order to move on. I have all of the other drawing. Davison said they have no information on the Adapter. Which is part of my sample.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the supplemental comments submitted by Mr. [redacted] in regard to the above referenced complaint. He contends that he was not informed of the use of OEM parts in the construction of his product sample. Attached, please find a copy of the relevant section of his contract, with the applicable term highlighted. With specific reference to the adapter component of his product sample, it is an OEM part. Davison did not design the component, did not construct the component and does not have any CAD drawing of the component. The contract does not require Davison to create or provide drawings for such components and Davison can not supply to Mr. [redacted] information that it does not posses.

Review: To whom it may concernThis complaint is against The Davison Corporation Regarding a design patent, in which 9600 was paid to them. Davison said they would help my brother and I obtain the license for it, by working with their buyers. Davison claimed that they were working with [redacted], when in fact they did not have an agreement with them at all. The Davison Companied lied to us in order to for my brother in I to work with them. [redacted] was the product manager at the beginning when we presented our designs to her. In March of this year [redacted] sent us documents claiming to have a Corporation called [redacted] working with us, after we went to the licensing dept. The licensing dept. stated they were waiting for an answer from the corporation. Each time we attempted to get ahold of someone from licensing, we more or less got the run around. [redacted], who is the licensing charge person, after giving us a hard time my brother decided that he did not want to deal with [redacted]. He explained to her that we wanted to work with another buyer. [redacted] then stated that we must pay an additional 350.00 for each buyer if we wanted them to work with us. We feel that the Davison Corporation and their licensing dept. deceived us by telling us; we needed to pay them to work with us their buyers for our design. The deception and lies they have told to us, has made us decide to retrieve our design back from them, with all materials cd, drawings, proto- type of the design etc. We also are asking for half our money back for there deception of saying they can help us and have done nothing for us, except ask for more money. Since then we have applied for our own patent through the US Patent and are waiting to hear from them.Thank you very much [redacted]P.S. I look forward to hearing from you.Desired Settlement: all documentation, materials etc. Partial refund

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Ms. [redacted] against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 09/25/2013. At the outset, please be advised that Ms. [redacted] is a co-inventor with her brother, [redacted]. All approvals, authorizations and questionnaires referenced in this response were completed by [redacted]. In her statement, Ms. [redacted] alleges she was deceived as to the scope of services offered by Davison and their related fees. As will be detailed below, the [redacted]s were fully apprised of all services and fees BEFORE entering into any contract. Davison’s services have been performed with Mr. [redacted]’s express written approval and authorization and to his documented satisfaction. Her complaint provides no basis to warrant a refund. Initially, Ms. [redacted]’s complaint implies that Davison was hired to assist in securing patent protection for the submitted idea. This is incorrect. Davison is not a law firm and we do not advertise that we provide patent services or any other legal services. The contracts for services that we do offer do not include patent filing services or any other legal services. The contracts explicitly state that Davison is not responsible for applying for or obtaining any intellectual property protections on the Product or Design, including but not limited to patents, trademarks and trade names. To the extent Ms. [redacted] believes our services include patenting of product ideas, she is mistaken, through no fault of Davison. [redacted] contacted Davison about a new product idea through Davison’s website in 2011. The system Davison utilizes for electronic submissions makes it impossible for a person to submit an idea without first having two separate disclosures displayed in a printable and savable format, and the person electronically acknowledging the disclosures. Mr. [redacted] acknowledged, via an electronic signature, that he received and read the two disclosure statements. It is important to note that the disclosures are made BEFORE the Client makes any payment to Davison. Enclosed, please find a copy of the disclosure that provides detailed information about Davison’s services and related fees. Mr. [redacted] initially entered into an agreement for Pre-Development services which obligated Davison to compile research data related to the product idea. Davison completed the Pre-Development services and forwarded the compiled research to Mr. [redacted]. Subsequently, Mr. [redacted] entered into a New Product Sample Agreement which obligated Davison to design and construct a product sample addressing the problem identified by Mr. [redacted]. Davison performed these services with Mr. [redacted]’s approval, authorization and to his satisfaction. The presentation of the new product idea was made to the agreed target corporation on 01/11/2013. To date, the company has not completed its review. As stated in her complaint, Ms. [redacted] inquired about making a presentation to another corporation. Davison provided to her the contract documents for this additional service. Ms. [redacted] then filed this complaint. Enclosed, please find the following supporting documents; 1. A signed approval of the proposed design. (Note the actual design has been obscured for confidentiality purposes.) 2. A signed questionnaire providing positive feedback about the design (Integrated Product Rendering). 3. A signed authorization to make the presentation to the targeted corporation 4. A signed questionnaire providing positive feedback about the presentation material (Executive Briefing). The disclosure form referenced above clearly sets forth the fee for this additional service. Also, the New Product Sample Agreement states in relevant part; “4.L. The Client shall not be responsible for any additional expenses to Davison within the scope and term of this Agreement, with the possible exception being additional services to refurbish or repackage the sample, for which Davison currently charges $385.00....” Davison fully disclosed the scope of our services and fees BEFORE the [redacted]s entered into any contract. Davison has completed the contracted services with Mr. [redacted]’s express written approval and authorization and to his documented satisfaction. There is no valid basis to warrant a refund for services rendered.

Davison Design and Development, Inc.

Review: I signed a contract for Davison to develop and market a game for me. I paid a down payment and now $850.00. Balance is almost $10,000 left, decided I couldn't afford it. Was told I had a buyer some time back, but was also told by an agent that if I had a buyer, they would have purchased the rest of my balance. Now, since I've paid in so much, they say they have made a prototype and I want it. Last I heard, John K[redacted] said he had to weigh it and he'd let me know about sending it ot me. I have called and left messgaes countless times with him and presidential office to no answer. I want them to send me my prototype. I've paid for it.Desired Settlement: I want my prototype sent to me.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted] against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about09/24/2015. Customer concerns upset everyone and our staff works very hard totroubleshoot them so communication errors are kept to a minimum. Our contracts aresimply written, with no “fine print” provisions. In his statement, Mr. [redacted] alleges aproduct sample has been created and he demands that it be sent to him as he has “paid forit”. As will be detailed below, Mr. [redacted] has not paid the contract fee in full and noservices are due to be performed. Accordingly, there is no product sample to send to Mr.[redacted].On 11/12/2012, Mr. [redacted] entered into a New Product Sample Agreement, forthe design and construction of a product sample. This contract provided a seven dayrevocation period which he did not invoke. He selected a payment option and has madepartial payments toward the fee. The most recent payment was on 02/08/2013. As heacknowledges in his statement, there is a significant balance owed. The contract providesthat no services are due until full payment has been received. As such, no product samplehas been constructed.There are a number of additional misstatements in his complaint that needclarification. First, he alleges he hired Davison to “market” his new product idea. This isincorrect. Davison does not “market” its clients’ products to the general public, theydesign and develop product samples for presentation to corporations who in turn maymanufacture and market the product. Second, he alleges he was informed he “has abuyer”. This is incorrect. Davison did identil5’ a corporation to whom his new productidea would be presented, in the event a product sample and presentation materials wereavailable. As stated above, no product sample has been created, thus no presentation hasbeen made, much less a license agreement entered. Finally, he asserts the “buyer” wouldhave paid the balance of his contract fee. This is incorrect. As stated, there is no“buyer”.Davison is willing to proceed under the terms of the contract, provided Mr.[redacted] fulfill his payment obligation. In the event he decides to terminate his contract,which is his prerogative, the revocation period ended more than 2 years ago. There is nocontract provision for a refund if the contract is cancelled after expiration of therevocation period.Associate CounselDavison Design and Development, Inc.

Review: I paid thys company 795.00 to make my invention and was told thys was the only amount I needed to pay but once I paid thys amount they sent me some paperwork staing I needed to pay them a grip more plus a percentage of the royalities.. in all of thys info that has been sent to me none of it has been anythyng related to my product.it is always suone elses invention... so how is it that they have dun nothyng butmakea few phone calls to me telling me wut the next steps are. amd requesting more money.. so those calls have added up to 795.00 Desired Settlement: I just want my money back now thys is ridculous..........

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Ms. [redacted] against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about03/20/2015. Customer concerns upset everyone and our staff works very hard totroubleshoot them so communication errors are kept to a minimum. From the time of aninitial contact and throughout our process, we maintain an open channel ofcommunication, disclosing our services and fees upfront and securing our clients’approval and authorization throughout the process. Our contracts are simply written,with no “fine print” provisions. It is not possible to be more upfront with our clientsabout our services and fees. In her statement, Ms. [redacted] alleges she was misled aboutthe costs associated with the development of her project. As will be detailed below, Ms.[redacted] was provided explicit, clear disclosures of the relevant fees.Ms. [redacted] contacted Davison about a new product idea through Davison’swebsite. The system Davison utilizes for electronic submissions makes it impossible fora person to submit an idea without first having two separate disclosures displayed in aprintable and savable format, and the person electronically acknowledging thedisclosures. Ms. [redacted] acknowledged, via an electronic signature, that she receivedand read the two disclosure statements. It is important to note that the disclosures aremade BEFORE the Client enters any service contract or makes any payment to Davison.Among the disclosures is the statement that “It is Davison’s normal practice to seek morethan one contract in connection with a submitted idea.” The disclosure then provides alisting the various services and related fees. Enclosed, please find a copy of thedisclosure detailing our services.Following her acknowledgment of the disclosures, Ms. [redacted] entered into anagreement for Pre-Development services which obligated Davison to compile researchdata related to her product idea. Davison completed the Pre-Development services andforwarded the compiled research to Ms. [redacted] on 02/12/2015. The researchcomprised nine (9) U.S. patent documents and information on six (6) products currentlyin the market which are similar to her submitted idea. Ms. [redacted] acknowledgedreceipt of these materials on 02/20/2015 and again in her complaintThe Pre-Development Agreement states in relevant part (emphasis added);“Section II B. Product Samples; Approvals. Client is responsible for obtaininga product sample and relevant information about the product in aprofessional format for presentation to a Licensee, at Client’s sole expense.Davison, at its option, will offer to provide further development services,under a separate contract for a separate fee, to assist in obtaining or creatingthe sample and presentation material for the targeted Licensee. Client is awarethat he or she is free to obtain such materials elsewhere or not to obtain them.”Consistent with the terms of the Pre-Development Agreement and the disclosures thatMs. [redacted] acknowledged, Davison offered additional services for the development ofher project. She had declined these additional services, which is her prerogative.As stated, Ms. [redacted] was fully informed of all services and their related feesoffered by Davison, BEFORE she entered into any contract. The services for which thereexisted a contract have been performed. No additional contracts have been entered andno additional payments have been received. There is no basis to warrant a refund forservices rendered.[redacted]Associate CounselDavison Design and Development, Inc.

Review: Not told from the beginning the exact amount of money that would be needed, and then after giving info of my invention and money, was sent a contract that seems to have flaws. Then finding out that they have had problems with the Fare Trade Commission, looks like they where bugging me for a year and a half to finish paying the initial money then when I didn't sign contract they stopped calling.Desired Settlement: Would like my money back including a statement giving up all rights to my invention.

Business

Response:

Review: I am writing to you in Reference to Davison Invention, [redacted]

[redacted];

to follow up on the complaint I filed by Phone ,with **

[redacted],

on 5/27/2014 at 9:42 a.m., our phone call took Place.

I had explained to Ms [redacted], that I feel like I have been scammed BY

Davison. I started to work with them on 5/13/2013. How ever I had talk to the director

[redacted] about a month prior before I chose to do business with them. I did do

Research on them and called the better Business in Pittsburgh Pa. , and found out

that they did have over 260 complaints - When I confronted Mr. [redacted] about

it, he stated that it was not worthy of his time, because you had to be a member of

the Revdex.com, in order to have a good rating with them. He also

stated that all complaints were closed and satisfied. Then I did ask him is there any

thing else I should know about the company from the past that I should know about,

In order for me to make my decision whether to go forward with them in my invention,

of the “[redacted]” I also made it very clear “Do Not lie to me or try to

hide anything, be Honest and tell me and we can work around it as long as you are

Honest with me.”

Now time goes on, and Mr. [redacted]. Director of New Products, was very

convincing that things were moving forward, and things are going well. I question the

clause of Talking on the phone was not, any proof of any thing that could be proven,

and our conversation are not viable. I always questioned why to Mr. [redacted],

Director of New Products, and he assured me that he was taking notes of our

conversation, and that I should Trust him. I also asked about the patent application,

which he sent to me, and he advisedme not to do it, that he would handle it -

So after a Year of his callls, and stating things are moving forward, and me

paying 5,038 dollars later, when I asked about the Proto Type, he states that they have

not built it yet, and he needs 1,300 dollars more before they will build it, which

stunned me. For a year or more I have been told that they are moving forward

things are going well. MY last conversation was May 1,2014, From Mr. [redacted],

Director of New Products, as he asked for me to get the money to him as soon as

possible, as he was going to the Las Vegas Invention show, and ~he will be plugging

my invention to Toy companies. I always stated to him “if there are any changes or

any thing I need to know about , Please contact me right away.”

Now on May 7,2014, I get a call from

[redacted], stateing that he was taking over my

account, and Mr [redacted] is no longer with the company, - When I asked where

he was and what happened, all I was told is that he knows nothing and that he just was

not with the company any more. So now I start searching for Mr [redacted]

on Goggle, and Face Book, and up pops this article about the Federal Trade

commission , and how they sued Davison Invention As I read this article, “which is

attached to this letter, It sounds like a repeat and exactly the way they were handling

my invention, always asking for money but Have not done any thing yet after paying

them 5038 dollars, and fats promises if things are moving forward.

So at this Point I feel like Mr. [redacted], Director of New Products, Had lied to me

was not honest like I ADVISED HIM TO BE, AND did what he had to do just to get

more money from Me.

I also Feel like I was lead to believe from all our phone calls that they were working

on my Proto Type, and a year and a Hall later on May 2014, I am advised that Mr.

[redacted], is no longer with the company, and there is no Proto Type, until I pay

another 1,300 dollars more.

I feel like no one in this company was honest with me, and Mr. [redacted], Lied to

me, making me think that as he puts it , “things are moving forward,” . But in reality,

Nothing has been done and they want more money, more money, more money. I am

on 5.8.1 disability, and used my workers compensation settlement to get this going,

and , Now I know I was scammed. Even after you sued them, back in 2006, which I

did not know, and Mr. [redacted], Hid this from me, Davison is still doing the same

things to me. When I read this article, , It sounds like they are talking about me, and

what they are doing to me. All they did was give me false hopes and dreams, and

took my Money. I don’t know if I can Help Me Get MY money Back, but most

important, this company did not learn there lesson and is still doing the same old

thing, taking PEOPLES MONEY, WITH NO RESULTS. It also seems that they don’t

take you serious, and and they money they are getting Money from me and others is

so great that they keep the same old ways,and No results making me think they are

“moveing forward” doing nothing, scamming people and selling False dreams.

Attached are my copies on my money orders, some payments were made with

my Debit Card, If there is any thing else you may need feel free to email me

[redacted] or Call me at ###-###-####.Desired Settlement: I sure hope and pray I can get my money back and protect others!

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted]

[redacted] against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 06/18/2014.

We understand that customer service is vital in all businesses and is imperative when

operating a successful business. Customer concerns upset everyone and our staff works

very hard to troubleshoot them so communication errors are kept to a minimum. His

comments allege that Davison has not been forthright with him. This is simply false. It

is not possible to be more upfront and forthright with our disclosures. The full

disclosures about our services, fees and the high risk nature of new product development

are freely available on our website. Further, every client is provided a copy of the

disclosures and every client acknowledges that they received and read the disclosures.

Finally, our contracts are simply written and contain no “fine print”.

Following his acknowledgment of the disclosures, Mr. [redacted] entered into the

initial Pre-Development Agreement for custom research services, which were performed.

Following those initial services, Mr. [redacted] entered into a contract for the design and

construction of a physical product sample. The contract provides that no services are due

to be performed until full payment of the agreed fee is paid. Understanding that it may

take some time for a client to finalize full payment, Davison voluntarily agrees to begin

the design process when payment has reached the 60% level. However, the construction

of the physical product sample does not being until full payment has been received. In

Mr. [redacted]’ case, he has paid only 44% of the agreed fee, accordingly, the services are

not yet due to be performed.

Mr. [redacted]’ reliance on the FTC case as a basis for a complaint is completely

without merit. As you are aware, that case was initiated in 1997 and resolved via

settlement in 2008. In May 2013, when Mr. [redacted] first contacted Davison, the company

was, and has continued to be, in complete compliance with all requirements of the Court

and the FTC. Further, information concerning the case is readily available to the public.

Mr. [redacted]’ reference to the case establishes that fact. Thus, reliance on that sixteen year

old case as a basis for a complaint is unfounded.

Consumer

Response:

complaint ID [redacted], They make no mention that they are up to there old tricks again, Also that Mr. [redacted] , was advised about I knew of the 260 complaints, and I said to him on Tape:

is there any thing else I should Know about, tell me before I sign this contract, and Mr. [redacted], was not honest with me and he Failed to disclosed that his company was sued, and hid this Fact from me. Knowing this I would have never done business with Them, knowing that Fact, so they Scammed me and failed to disclose the truth when asked. ! I will sigh charges against [redacted], with in 30 days, for Fraud, and thief By deception.

Regards

[redacted],

Review: It has been almost three years this company has been giving me the run around about completing my invention. I was totally unsatisfied with the prototype they sent me. Every time I contact them I get the same results along with poor customer service. Every time they claim they present my product to a company I have to pay Davison. I always get told they will complete my product when a company wants it,I have no clue whether my product is being presented to companies or not. They will not complete my project as I request them to.Desired Settlement: I would prefer send my product back to be completed and sent back to me. If that is not possible I would like a full refund.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted] against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 01 03/20 14. At the outset, it should be noted that Mr. [redacted]’ project has been directed by two individuals, Mr. [redacted] and Ms. [redacted]. Mr. [redacted] initially contracted with Davison and on 02/11/2010 transferred the ownership of the project to Ms. [redacted]. Ms. [redacted] then directed the project until October 2013, when she transferred the project back to Mr. [redacted]. As will be detailed below, all services were disclosed to Mr. [redacted] in advance, the services were performed with his and/or Ms [redacted]’s express written approval and authorization. Finally, Mr. [redacted] has provided nothing but positive feedback regarding his project until such time as the target corporation chose not to license his product idea. While it is unfortunate that the corporation has not licensed his product idea, that fact does not invalidate the services provided and does not warrant a refund of monies paid for services rendered to his documented satisfaction. In September 2009, Mr. [redacted] contacted Davison about a new product idea through Davison’s website. The system Davison utilizes for electronic submissions makes it impossible for a person to submit an idea without first having two separate disclosures displayed in a printable and savable format. The disclosure statements set forth, among other details, that “It is Davisons normal practice to seek more than one contract in connection with a submitted idea”, and then details the types of contracts and their related fees, including the repackaging fee. It is important to note that the disclosures are made BEFORE the Client enters any contract or makes any payment to Davison. Further, not only are the fees disclosed, Davison requires that the client electronically sign an affirmative acknowledgement that they have received and read the disclosures. Mr. [redacted] signed such an acknowledgment on 09 11/2009. Following the submission of his idea, Mr. [redacted] engaged Davison for a number of services. A brief chronology of his project follows; 09/21/2009: Mr. [redacted] enters into a Pre-Development Agreement for the compilation of research relevant to his submitted idea. 10/28/2009: Following completion of the research services, Mr. [redacted] enters into a New Product Sample Agreement for the construction of a product sample and presentation materials. 01 14/2010: Mr. [redacted] approves the design of his product sample and completes a questionnaire in which he provides positive feedback. Copies of the approval and questionnaire are attached. Note the actual approved design has been redacted for confidentiality purposes. 02/11/2010: The physical product sample is constructed and presentation materials, in the form of an Executive Briefing, are prepared. The Executive Briefing materials contain an actual photograph of the constructed product sample. Mr. [redacted] authorizes the presentation of his product idea to the designated corporation and directs that Ms. [redacted] should be contacted for future reference. A copy of the presentation authorization is attached. 03/01/2010: The product idea is presented to the target corporation. Unfortunately, this corporation chose not to pursue his idea. 03 19/2010: Ms. [redacted] completes a questionnaire about the Executive Briefing, providing positive feedback. A copy of the completed questionnaire is attached. 09/22/2011: The product sample is shipped to Ms. [redacted]. 12/15/2011: Ms. [redacted] was offered additional services to present the product idea to a second corporation. She has declined this service and directed Davison to wait for a company to approach Davison seeking a product similar to the product idea. A copy of her signed directive is enclosed. 10/24/2013: Ms. [redacted] transfers the project back to Mr. [redacted] and Mr. [redacted] confirms the option of waiting for a corporation to approach Davison. As the chronology details, BEFORE Mr. [redacted] entered into any contract or paid any fee, he acknowledged that he received and read the disclosure detailing the various services and fees. Further, at each step of the process Davison has sought and secured the client’s approval and authorization. Finally, at each step he has provided nothing but positive feedback. The product sample is not “incomplete’. It was constructed pursuant Mr. [redacted]’ approval and to his documented satisfaction. There have been no additional presentations of his product idea as Mr. [redacted] has not contracted for this service and explicitly directed Davison to wait for a corporation to approach us. To date, no corporation has done so. Nothing in his complaint warrants a refund for services rendered to his satisfaction. [redacted]. [redacted] Associate Counsel Davison Design and Development, Inc.

Consumer

Response:

I asked them to complete the project and they wouldn't. I liked the progress of the design but not the full format of the product. Here is a letter I received from them. I was told my product was in the third stage, but I asked for it to be finished so I can market it myself.

Review: Davison Sales Rep. was misleading when it try to win my business. I was told and promised that they would help me get my idea/invention in front of a company for potential licensing and they have various programs to help people with low up front cost. As a result, I agreed to pay them $715.00 upfront. After several months of conversations, they told me my invention was entering the final product design stage and they gave me 4-options of which none are under $10K. I told the Sale Rep. reminded the Sale Rep. that I have an email from him that promise a low upfront cost and wanted to know more about that option. The Sales Rep. than told me they don't have any options that is less than $10K upfront cost. I reminded him again that when we first talked that he has promised me there will be no more upfront cost after I paid $715.00. He told me that they need $10,500 minimum from me in order to get my invention to design and make a sample. I told him I don't have that kind of money and the reason I agreed to them $715.00 was due to their promised of no additional cost until we have some kind of a license deal. The Rep. told me I have one week to make a decision or they will terminate my contract without any refund. Contract was terminated late September, 2013Desired Settlement: I would like to get my $715.00 refunded since I did not received I service I was promised by the Sale Rep. at Davison.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted]

against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 10/11/2013. In his

statement, Mr. [redacted] alleges he was advised that the payment of $715.00 would be the only “up

front” cost for his entire project. He further alleges he is in possession of e-mails that document

his claim. If he has such e-mails, I ask that he provide them to us and we will review his project

again. However, his statements are contrary to our business practices and our contract terms. As

will be detailed below, he was fully apprised of the types of services offered and their related fees

BEFORE any contract was entered.

Mr. [redacted] contacted Davison about a new product idea through Davison’s website. The

system Davison utilizes for electronic submissions makes it impossible for a person to submit an

idea without first having two separate disclosures displayed in a printable and savable format, and

the person electronically acknowledging the disclosures. On 10/04/2011, Mr. [redacted]

acknowledged, via an electronic signature, that he received and read the two disclosure

statements. it is important to note that the disclosures are made BEFORE the Client makes any

payment to Davison. Among the disclosures is the statement that “It is Davison’s normal practice

to seek more than one contract in connection with a submitted idea.” The disclosure then

provides a listing the various services and related fees. Enclosed, please find a copy of the

disclosure as it was presented to Mr. [redacted].

Following his acknowledgment of the disclosures, Mr. [redacted] entered into an agreement for

Pre-Development services which obligated Davison to compile research data related to his

product idea. Davison completed the Pre-Development services and forwarded the compiled

research to Mr. [redacted]. The Pre-Development Agreement states in relevant part (emphasis added);

“Section II B. Product Samples; Approvals. Client is responsible for obtaining a product sample and

relevant information about the product in a professional format for presentation to a Licensee, at Clients sole

expense. Davison, at its option, will offer to provide further development services, under a separate

contract for a separate fee, to assist in obtaining or creating the sample and presentation material for the

targeted Licensee. Client is aware that he or she is free to obtain such materials elsewhere or not to obtain

them.”

Following the completion of the services under the Pre-Development Agreement, on

09/11/2013, Davison provided to Mr. [redacted] a proposed agreement for further development work.

This proposal is consistent with our disclosures and the terms of the Pre-Development

Agreement. To date, Mr. [redacted] has not engaged these additional services, which is his

prerogative.

As stated, Mr. [redacted] was fully informed of all services and their related fees offered by

Davison, BEFORE he entered into any contract. The services for which there existed a contract

have been performed. No additional contracts have been entered and no additional payments

have been received. There is no basis to warrant a refund for services rendered.

Consumer

Response:

First, I would like to thank you for reviewing my complaint with Davison & Co., which I strongly feel

misrepresents their company’s services. Beside the numerous phone conversations I’ve had with their

Sales Executive. I also had several emails exchanges with their representative. Among the few expensive

options their company’s offer, they also have a low cost, upfront financial plan to help move my idea to

proto-type development. Attached with this letter is the email for your review.

When I asked about this low cost option during our phone conversation, I was told that was not an option

for me at this time.

If you need any additional information or have any further questions, please feel free to contact me direct

at the telephone number below.

Review: breach of contract, design and built sample product to present to company for lic. 8 to 12 weeks time frame .is now 16 weeks . paid in full. need electrical semantics blue print, design blue print, also working sampleas described in contract. attorney sent letter but no response.Desired Settlement: refund of full amount,or have project completed in 14 days

Business

Response:

See attached File

Dear [redacted];??

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted] against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 08/01/2013. Mr. [redacted] alleges a breach of contract, a lack of response to his attorney, and a time delay in completing services. Each issue will be addressed below. As indicated, Mr. [redacted] has secured counsel who has contacted Davison and set forth in detail the allegation of a breach of contract. Enclosed, please find a copy of our reply to Mr. [redacted]’s attorney which addresses the allegation of a breach. Please note that the enclosures referenced in the letter have not been supplied for confidentiality purposes. Mr. [redacted] alleges an “8 to 12 weeks time frame” in his complaint. I am unaware of the basis for this timeframe, as it is not set forth in the applicable contract. Regardless, Mr. [redacted] made payment on his contract on 04/05/2013 and Davison provided to him a proposed design for a product sample on or about 06/12/2013, less than 10 weeks from the time the contract term began. Mr. [redacted] has not approved the proposed design. Davison has attempted to address his concerns with the design; however Mr. [redacted] has decided to secure counsel to pursue the matter. Mr. [redacted]’s complaint sets forth no basis to warrant a refund. As detailed in our letter to his attorney, Davison remains committed to his project and hopes to move forward in a positive direction.??

Davison Design and Development, Inc.

Review: 230+ complaints in last 3 years, 200+ complaints regarding Products / Services, what has to be done to end this madness? This company has been in trouble in the past for what seems to be the same types of issues still going on today.

Our saga with Davison started in 2009 and is on-going today. After successfully securing US Patent #US [redacted] on November 8th, 2008, we engaged with Davison in 2009 to assist us with marketing the patent/concept to potential manufacturers. At the time, we had a fully functional prototype (see [redacted] ), video of it working, and positive feedback from all who saw it. Davison convinced us our prototype was not good enough, and they had to create a new one that was more prepared for manufacturing, this of course came with a cost of ~$9,220.

Their prototype was completed in 2009 and we were charged another ~$400 x 2 to create two boxes to ship the prototype to two potential companies; shipments that never occurred. In 2010 we questioned what was going on and were given a run around. We asked that the prototype be shipped to us in Florida so we could ensure it worked, but they could not ship it as it was “too awkward and costly to package”? Really? No activity occurred the remainder of 2010. So, in 2011 my father drove from Allentown, PA to Pittsburgh, PA to pick it up and drive it to me in Florida where it was tested and it failed miserably. We have a video of it in a pool, with an 8 year old on it and it sank like an anchor.

Following the failed testing of the prototype their educated engineers created with high tech equipment, (remember, we had a working prototype from the start that was made in a shed without high tech equipment), we wrote the President and Licensing Coordinator requesting a refund, see attached. A phone call ensued and the President assured me they would make things right at no additional cost to us. So, a year later, in 2012 they developed a second prototype and sent us a video of it working, not nearly as well as the one we initially created in 2008.

Since 2012, we have had no further activity. We have been working with them since 2009 and not one company has yet had the opportunity to review it. So, basically we paid them to create a prototype that is no comparison to what we had to start, all we wanted was help finding a manufacturer. We are in to Davison for a grand total of $18,220. DON’T DO IT PEOPLE – find a better, more ethical company to work with. Don’t make the same mistake me and apparently lots of other folks have. This is most likely a lost cause but after seeing all the current, similar, complaints; I figured I would add our saga to the mix. If anyone is pursuing legal action, count us in, Corporations should not be permitted to take advantage of hard working Americans this way.Desired Settlement: A refund, or delivery of a manufacturer.

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted]against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 01/26/2015. At the outsetit should be clarified that Mr. [redacted]’s project was actually submitted as ajoint project, theother individual being Mr. [redacted]l. As will be detailed below, each step of thedevelopment and presentation process was conducted with the express written approval andauthorization of both Mr. [redacted] and Mr. [redacted]l.We understand that customer service is vital in all businesses and is imperative whenoperating a successful business. Customer concerns upset everyone and our staff works very hardto troubleshoot them so communication errors are kept to a minimum. From the time of an initialcontact, through the research and development of a new product idea, to the presentation of aclient’s product sample, we try to maintain an open channel of communication, disclosing ourservices and fees upfront and securing our clients’ approval and authorization throughout theprocess. Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, clients are occasionally dissatisfied, particularlywhen their product ideas are not licensed. This appears to be the case in Mr. [redacted]’ssituation.His complaint contains numerous false and defamatory statements. He alleges there hasbeen no activity on his project since 2012 this is false. We continued to work with him through2013. He authorized a presentation of the project in February 2013, and the presentation wasmade in April 2013. Our last contact with him was on December 02, 2013. He alleges “not onecompany has yet had the opportunity to review” his project this is false. He specificallyauthorized, in writing, three presentations of his project. All three presentations were made,however no corporation chose to license the product idea. Finally, his post completely ignoresthe fact that each step of the process was performed with his express written approval andauthorization. He even completed questionnaires in which he provided positive feedback.On 02/09 2009 Mr. [redacted] and Mr. [redacted]l entered an agreement for the designand construction of a product sample. A proposed design was prepared and submitted for theirapproval. They approved the product sample design in July 2009 and completed a questionnaireabout the design providing positive feedback. Based upon this approval, the physical productsample was constructed and presentation materials prepared. The presentation material, in theform of an Executive Briefing, which included an actual photograph of the constructed productsample, was provided to them. On 10/30/2009, they authorized, in writing, the presentation of theproduct sample to a corporation and completed a questionnaire about the Executive Briefing inwhich they provided positive feedback. The product idea was presented; unfortunately, thecorporation chose not to license the product idea. At their express direction, a secondpresentation was made to a second corporation, who again chose not to license the idea. Asnoted in the complaint, the product sample was re-designed following concerns they hadexpressed. This re-design was performed at no cost to the clients. They approved the re-designedsample in November 2012. Presentation materials were again created and they authorized a thirdpresentation on 02/14/2013. This presentation was made; again the corporation did not licensethe idea. Our last contact with the clients was in December 2013.Throughout this process, they had been continually apprised of the status throughconsistent updates. We contacted them to discuss further services which they have not engaged.As such, we have completed all services with their approval, authorization and to theirdocumented satisfaction. We have not received any further authorization to pursue additionalpresentations. As stated, our last contact was in December 2013. Now, more than a year later,Mr. [redacted] feels justified in filing this complaint. There is no basis to warrant a refund forservices performed with the clients’ express written approval and with their express writtenauthorization.Attached, please find copies of the various approvals, authorizations and completedquestionnaires referenced above. Note the actual approved designs have been redacted forconfidentiality purposes. In the interest of customer satisfaction, we will offer two additionalpresentations at no cost to the clients. If they choose to accept this offer, they need only contactour Licensing Department who will coordinate the necessary paperwork to authorize thepresentations.Sincerely[redacted]Associate CounselDavison Design and Development, Inc.EnclosuresTurning ideas

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted]against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about 01/26/2015. At the outsetit should be clarified that Mr. [redacted]’s project was actually submitted as ajoint project, theother individual being Mr. [redacted]l. As will be detailed below, each step of thedevelopment and presentation process was conducted with the express written approval andauthorization of both Mr. [redacted] and Mr. [redacted]l.We understand that customer service is vital in all businesses and is imperative whenoperating a successful business. Customer concerns upset everyone and our staff works very hardto troubleshoot them so communication errors are kept to a minimum. From the time of an initialcontact, through the research and development of a new product idea, to the presentation of aclient’s product sample, we try to maintain an open channel of communication, disclosing ourservices and fees upfront and securing our clients’ approval and authorization throughout theprocess. Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, clients are occasionally dissatisfied, particularlywhen their product ideas are not licensed. This appears to be the case in Mr. [redacted]’ssituation.His complaint contains numerous false and defamatory statements. He alleges there hasbeen no activity on his project since 2012 this is false. We continued to work with him through2013. He authorized a presentation of the project in February 2013, and the presentation wasmade in April 2013. Our last contact with him was on December 02, 2013. He alleges “not onecompany has yet had the opportunity to review” his project this is false. He specificallyauthorized, in writing, three presentations of his project. All three presentations were made,however no corporation chose to license the product idea. Finally, his post completely ignoresthe fact that each step of the process was performed with his express written approval andauthorization. He even completed questionnaires in which he provided positive feedback.On 02/09 2009 Mr. [redacted] and Mr. [redacted]l entered an agreement for the designand construction of a product sample. A proposed design was prepared and submitted for theirapproval. They approved the product sample design in July 2009 and completed a questionnaireabout the design providing positive feedback. Based upon this approval, the physical productsample was constructed and presentation materials prepared. The presentation material, in theform of an Executive Briefing, which included an actual photograph of the constructed productsample, was provided to them. On 10/30/2009, they authorized, in writing, the presentation of theproduct sample to a corporation and completed a questionnaire about the Executive Briefing inwhich they provided positive feedback. The product idea was presented; unfortunately, thecorporation chose not to license the product idea. At their express direction, a secondpresentation was made to a second corporation, who again chose not to license the idea. Asnoted in the complaint, the product sample was re-designed following concerns they hadexpressed. This re-design was performed at no cost to the clients. They approved the re-designedsample in November 2012. Presentation materials were again created and they authorized a thirdpresentation on 02/14/2013. This presentation was made; again the corporation did not licensethe idea. Our last contact with the clients was in December 2013.Throughout this process, they had been continually apprised of the status throughconsistent updates. We contacted them to discuss further services which they have not engaged.As such, we have completed all services with their approval, authorization and to theirdocumented satisfaction. We have not received any further authorization to pursue additionalpresentations. As stated, our last contact was in December 2013. Now, more than a year later,Mr. [redacted] feels justified in filing this complaint. There is no basis to warrant a refund forservices performed with the clients’ express written approval and with their express writtenauthorization.Attached, please find copies of the various approvals, authorizations and completedquestionnaires referenced above. Note the actual approved designs have been redacted forconfidentiality purposes. In the interest of customer satisfaction, we will offer two additionalpresentations at no cost to the clients. If they choose to accept this offer, they need only contactour Licensing Department who will coordinate the necessary paperwork to authorize thepresentations.Sincerely[redacted]Associate CounselDavison Design and Development, Inc.EnclosuresTurning ideas

Consumer

Response:

We did

sign off on two, very generic, “Product Rendering Forms” & “Shipping

Procedure Agreements”. At the time, our

assumption was that the actual prototype rendered in the photograph

worked. These forms were signed off for

presentations & shipments [redacted] We received no proof these presentations ever

occurred. We were told they were completed and that the company was not

interested, that was it. It would have

been nice to actually see the presentations and/or proposals that were

submitted to them for review. Did it contain

competitive information, estimated production costs, estimated revenue by

product line (water/ice rescue, water recreation, exercise, ice fishing, etc…)???

If this type of information was not presented, and the prototype did not work,

why would anyone be interested in manufacturing it? How was the prototype shipped to them? It could not be shipped to us when we

requested it for testing following the second rejection. What was their feedback? Were they asked to complete a survey and/or

questionnaire regarding what they did like, did not like, and reasons for it

not being a fit in their product line?

We did

have a number of concerns with the design of their prototype after we saw the

final renderings. Our concerns were

verbally dismissed, and we were told that any potential companies would address

the short comings through their own R&D department. After hearing this

“over-used” response numerous times, we felt they had no intentions of

correcting the problems. In our

opinion, we were “strong armed” into moving forward with their vision not

ours. Also in our opinion, we believe

Davison lacked the creative capacity to make something eye appealing and the

engineering fortitude to make something that worked. They made us something we were not expecting,

it did not perform as intended, and they refuse to refund any money.

It was

around this time we began to get suspicious, and expanded our due diligence of

Davison (albeit late), and discovered a history of exactly what we were

experiencing. Please search google:

“Davison lawsuits”.

Following

our drive to Pittsburgh to pick up the first prototype, and the failed test, we

asked Davison to redo it, which they did and provided a video of it

working. Not nearly as well as our

original prototype, but it at least floated (not like their first attempt), and

it was able to propel on water.

We

signed off on a third set of forms for the second prototype. At the end of our rope now, but what else did

we have to lose at this point? The third presentation was for [redacted], and

we were again told the same thing… they have no interest, and provided no

supporting specifically what these companies thought; if in fact a presentation

was completed. The only way to improve what we have is to listen to the folks

that would be responsible for making & selling it, then going back to the

drawing board and working together to make it happen.

We do appreciate

the offer to present to two more companies, but hesitant to accept this offer

until we know exactly what will be presented and can review the presentation,

proposal, executive briefing, etc….prior.

How will the prototype be shipped?

Who are the target companies? Can

we get some sort of guarantee that we can review all this and that we will get

feedback, positive or negative, following?

Our

primary goal is to prevent this type of thing happening to anyone else. In our opinion, and apparently a number of

other folks that have posted on Western PA Revdex.com and other consumer protection

websites, the business practices of Davison might still be considered questionable. We are hopeful for a positive outcome but

wonder if that can ever be achieved.Regards,

Consumer

Response:

We did

sign off on two, very generic, “Product Rendering Forms” & “Shipping

Procedure Agreements”. At the time, our

assumption was that the actual prototype rendered in the photograph

worked. These forms were signed off for

presentations & shipments [redacted] We received no proof these presentations ever

occurred. We were told they were completed and that the company was not

interested, that was it. It would have

been nice to actually see the presentations and/or proposals that were

submitted to them for review. Did it contain

competitive information, estimated production costs, estimated revenue by

product line (water/ice rescue, water recreation, exercise, ice fishing, etc…)???

If this type of information was not presented, and the prototype did not work,

why would anyone be interested in manufacturing it? How was the prototype shipped to them? It could not be shipped to us when we

requested it for testing following the second rejection. What was their feedback? Were they asked to complete a survey and/or

questionnaire regarding what they did like, did not like, and reasons for it

not being a fit in their product line?

We did

have a number of concerns with the design of their prototype after we saw the

final renderings. Our concerns were

verbally dismissed, and we were told that any potential companies would address

the short comings through their own R&D department. After hearing this

“over-used” response numerous times, we felt they had no intentions of

correcting the problems. In our

opinion, we were “strong armed” into moving forward with their vision not

ours. Also in our opinion, we believe

Davison lacked the creative capacity to make something eye appealing and the

engineering fortitude to make something that worked. They made us something we were not expecting,

it did not perform as intended, and they refuse to refund any money.

It was

around this time we began to get suspicious, and expanded our due diligence of

Davison (albeit late), and discovered a history of exactly what we were

experiencing. Please search google:

“Davison lawsuits”.

Following

our drive to Pittsburgh to pick up the first prototype, and the failed test, we

asked Davison to redo it, which they did and provided a video of it

working. Not nearly as well as our

original prototype, but it at least floated (not like their first attempt), and

it was able to propel on water.

We

signed off on a third set of forms for the second prototype. At the end of our rope now, but what else did

we have to lose at this point? The third presentation was for [redacted], and

we were again told the same thing… they have no interest, and provided no

supporting specifically what these companies thought; if in fact a presentation

was completed. The only way to improve what we have is to listen to the folks

that would be responsible for making & selling it, then going back to the

drawing board and working together to make it happen.

We do appreciate

the offer to present to two more companies, but hesitant to accept this offer

until we know exactly what will be presented and can review the presentation,

proposal, executive briefing, etc….prior.

How will the prototype be shipped?

Who are the target companies? Can

we get some sort of guarantee that we can review all this and that we will get

feedback, positive or negative, following?

Our

primary goal is to prevent this type of thing happening to anyone else. In our opinion, and apparently a number of

other folks that have posted on Western PA Revdex.com and other consumer protection

websites, the business practices of Davison might still be considered questionable. We are hopeful for a positive outcome but

wonder if that can ever be achieved.Regards,

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the additional comments submitted by Mr. [redacted] regarding the above referenced complaint. Without reiteration, Davison’s original response of 02/03/2015 is incorporated as if fully set forth herein.As detailed in the initial response, Mr. [redacted] approved the original design of his product sample, completed a questionnaire giving positive feedback and authorized the presentation to two targeted companies. After those companies declined to pursue his product idea, Mr, [redacted] raised concerns about the product sample. At no cost to him, the product sample was redesigned. Again, he approved the re-design, and authorized a third presentation. Again, the product idea was not licensed. Now, more than a year after our last contact with Mr. [redacted], he alleges he was “strong armed”. This allegation has no factual basis and evidences a retrospective rationalization. The new product development process is a high risk venture. There is no guarantee that a particular product idea will be licensed and no guarantee of a financial gain. All of our disclosures and contracts have numerous, explicit statements on that point.While this is of little comfort to a client who has expended considerable time, money, effort and emotion into a project, the fact that a particular project does not bring financial gain to the client does not invalidate the services that were provided. nor does it alter the fact that said services were provided with the client’s approval and authorization.Mr. [redacted] raises questions about the offer of two additional presentations at no cost to him. The specific targeted corporation would be selected by the Licensing Department. Mr. [redacted] would be provided with their identity, as well as information about Davison’s past presentations to each corporation. With regard to the form of presentation, that depends largely upon the practices and preferences of the particular targeted company. Typically, the initial presentation is visual, descriptive information provided to the company contact and the product sample is shipped upon request. The authorization to make the presentation (a copy of which was previously provided) explicitly states; “I authorize Davison to ship visual information prior to shipping product sample materials.” At all times, Davison endeavors to present a client’s product idea in a manner that will allow a full and fair evaluation from the targeted corporation. He also requests a “guarantee” that the targeted corporation will provide feedback. This is a detail that Davison has no control over, thus can provide no such guarantee. Simply put, many companies do not provide an explanation of their decision. Accordingly, Davison can not relay to the client more detail than what is shared by the targeted corporation.Davison continues its offer of two additional presentations at no cost to the client. If he chooses to accept this offer, he need only contact our Licensing Department who will coordinate the necessary paperwork to authorize the presentations.Associate CounselDavison Design and Development, Inc.Turning ideas into products

Review: At first Davison was prompt with there emails & phone calls. until they got about 10,000$ + US out of me. then sent me to the Licensing Department. in a short time they wanted another 400.$ to target a Corporation. ok I sent it. in return I asked to send me the prototype and a copy of there presentation to the CO. not a photo. I want to see if it works. that was Nov.30 2015. no response; they don't return my emails my phone calls and they say will call me on certain day and don't All I wanted is to see if they were a scam or not. plus since then I keep getting different ladies 3 of them now, with the same voice, in 1 year. I have saved all emails in another program, if you need more info. no problem. thank-you for your time and please reply.Desired Settlement: still waiting for the prototype, called [redacted], it's a cleaning system to clean a [redacted]

Business

Response:

This letter is in response to the above referenced complaint filed by Mr. [redacted] against Davison Design and Development, Inc. (Davison) on or about02/10/2016. We understand that customer service is vital in all businesses and isimperative when operating a successful business. Customer concerns upset everyone andour staff works very hard to troubleshoot them so communication errors are kept to aminimum. From the time of an initial contact, through the research and development of anew product idea, to the presentation of a client’s product sample, we try to maintain anopen channel of communication, disclosing our services and fees upfront and securingour clients’ approval and authorization throughout the process. Unfortunately, despiteour best efforts, communication errors occasionally occur.Having reviewed Mr. [redacted]’s file, there has been a delay in providing hisproduct sample to him. To the extent this delay has caused any inconvenience to him,Davison extends its apology. I have contacted the pertinent departments to expedite theshipment of his product sample and Mr. [redacted] will be contacted when the shipmentoccurs. If he has any further questions, or issues, he may contact me directly.David ** D[redacted]Associate CounselDavison Design and Development, Inc.

Consumer

Response:

2-24-2016Thank-you very much for your time, PS please don't miss understand me. Davison has lost my trust. there was nothing else I could do but to take some action, I will believe there words when I see my prototype in my hands. we will go from there; again thank-you. trust me I will be in touch with davison to see what's going on.