Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below [To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, we would like to know your view on the matter.] Regards, Corey *** The process, through the channel of distributors, was never conveyed to the purchaserIn fact, it is unfair and a deceptive trade practiceDiesel Forward has the original turbo belonging to complainant and therefore they are subjecting the livelihood of the complainant to economic loss and trying to insure that the complainant to purchasing another turbo though their companyThe complainant does not want any other product from this company due to the fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent inducement of a contract and unfair and deceptive trade practice of the said "distribution channel." Asking the complainant to purchase another product is not realisticIn addition, the the actions of the "distribution channel" are liable for fraudulent conveyance of a contract under Tennessee LawThe scheme is set up by the "distribution channel" to take your old rebuildable part so that you have to keep deal with the "distribution channel" whether you like their product or notMoreover, it is impossible to tell how the turbo failed if it was installation issues, although the product installed was by a certified diesel mechanic, or a product defectIn the end, it's a subjective opinion in which Diesel Forward plays both judge and jury that renders a subjective opinion to defraud unsuspecting consumers out of money and to keep the same consumer dealing with the "distribution channel" and suffer economic loss while they decide if they want to refund the money belonging to the consumerAll they had to do from the start was to send a replacement and take the defective part backHowever, if they choose to litigate the matter in General Sessions Court in the State of Tennessee then that will be the next step
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below [To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, we would like to know your view on the matter.] Regards, Corey *** The process, through the channel of distributors, was never conveyed to the purchaserIn fact, it is unfair and a deceptive trade practiceDiesel Forward has the original turbo belonging to complainant and therefore they are subjecting the livelihood of the complainant to economic loss and trying to insure that the complainant to purchasing another turbo though their companyThe complainant does not want any other product from this company due to the fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent inducement of a contract and unfair and deceptive trade practice of the said "distribution channel." Asking the complainant to purchase another product is not realisticIn addition, the the actions of the "distribution channel" are liable for fraudulent conveyance of a contract under Tennessee LawThe scheme is set up by the "distribution channel" to take your old rebuildable part so that you have to keep deal with the "distribution channel" whether you like their product or notMoreover, it is impossible to tell how the turbo failed if it was installation issues, although the product installed was by a certified diesel mechanic, or a product defectIn the end, it's a subjective opinion in which Diesel Forward plays both judge and jury that renders a subjective opinion to defraud unsuspecting consumers out of money and to keep the same consumer dealing with the "distribution channel" and suffer economic loss while they decide if they want to refund the money belonging to the consumerAll they had to do from the start was to send a replacement and take the defective part backHowever, if they choose to litigate the matter in General Sessions Court in the State of Tennessee then that will be the next step
Company states that they had a sales person reach out to him directly to resolve the issues