In response to the complaint from [redacted] that Jon Rush Construction, LLC over charged him on construction services provided [redacted] claims that he had an agreement with the Jon Rush Construction LLCThe only documents provided to him during our discussions were a preliminary budget and preliminary sample contract that were never signed off on or accepted by either partyThe billing that was done was according to the preliminary budget that had been providedIt is irrelevant what a sub contractor charges a general contractor for services when there is no contract spelling out the terms of any agreementThe LLC's billing to the client is based solely on the LLC's determination of work provided and excessive meeting times with the potential clientDuring the meetings Mr [redacted] stated over and over that he enjoyed suing people and would gladly do so if given any opportunity to do soHe also disclosed that he suffered from multiple health issues and early dementia that caused him to be unable to function mentally correctly at timesHe explained on several occasions that he had not had a good relationship with any construction company in the past and that he had fired most of them.He also made many derogatory statements about his relationship towards the County inspectors and building departments that had dealt with in the past.As for the lien wavier, it is very common for general contractors to help sub-contractors with their billing and other items during a jobA sub-contractor might not have time to bill and so the general contractor simply makes a invoice for them or other paperwork in order to speed things alongUnlike larger commercial companies, small contractors do not normally have as much help with the paperwork side of the business Mr [redacted] cannot produce a signed contract stating the terms of the relationship with the LLC because it does not existThe billing that happened for not only the invoice in question, but for the other ones as well, was done according to the preliminary budget provided by the LLCIf Mr [redacted] had a complaint regarding the billing, he never mentioned it or paused to ask any questionsIt was assumed that he was aware of the budget line items that he was being billed for as we had gone over them several timesEven if he were not aware of the budget line items or had not taken time to review them, it was only a preliminary budget that suggested what items might cost during the buildNo hard bids had been asked for nor received from the general contractor or any sub contractorAll sub contractors were paid according their invoices and terms in a timely manor and all work preformed was done so in a workman like manor
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:Again all of this has nothing to do with Forgery & Embezziling $from meTher is no business or industry standerds that supports this type practice, #i do have a contract from jon rush construction with a budget sign by jon rush to build a ne buildingat cost + 12% builders fee#the very first invoice from jon rush construction dated 7/12/for $+ 12% builders fee $was paid 7/17/#but sub invoice & lien waiver sign by sub supplied by jon rush construction were forged to support the embezzled amount.#the actual invoice and lien waiver signed by the subthat he supplied me is $now that plus the 12% builders fee according to your contract is $= $the fact is jon rush of jon rush construction embezzled $from meand I want it backand by the way you brought your wife in to this when she came with you to my house representing your company as helping design interior of housealso after retiring from two buissness of years I have never sued eny onebut since you said you are not going to respond enymore maybe I should
Sincerely,
*** ***
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:
stating a bunch of lies about me is not very professional considering you have still not addressed the #fact that jon rush construction billed me $7/12/for *** *** excavating and was paid 7/17/in fullnot noing the bill & lien waiver were forgedwitch I havethe actual bill and lien waiver from *** *** excavating witch I also have is for $now the fake bill is $pluss 12% contractors fee $= $the real bill $plus 12% contractor fee of $= $leaving a $that was embezzled from me from jon rushall I want is for the money to be returnedand if you and your wife are as good of Christians as you told me and my wife you will
Sincerely,
*** ***
The bill that was submitted to cover excavation expenses was not from [redacted] excavation directly but was billed according to normal practices, ( I have made invoices and lien waivers for [redacted] and others many time through the years), because [redacted] had not turned a bill into the LLC. If you notice the dates are very different on the billing. Once again, it is irrelevant what the bill to the general contractor is. You would not have been given this bill anyway as there was no agreement in place stating the terms of our relationship. This would be like going to [redacted] and complaining that you did not have the price [redacted] paid on a product and therefore you thought it was not fair for [redacted] to charge you there retail price without you knowing their wholesale price. You had no agreement with the LLC for the budget or contract. Therefore what the LLC billed for is irrelevant to your accusations that have now fallen to invoking some sort of moralistic innuendo meant to disparage the character of my wife. That's pretty desperate and low. At the end of the day, if you wanted a fixed price on construction, you should have agreed to terms that would allow that to take place. This is the last time I will respond to or read anything from this forum.
In response to the complaint from [redacted] that Jon Rush Construction, LLC over charged him on construction services provided. [redacted] claims that he had an agreement with the Jon Rush Construction LLC. The only documents provided to him during our discussions were a preliminary budget...
and preliminary sample contract that were never signed off on or accepted by either party. The billing that was done was according to the preliminary budget that had been provided. It is irrelevant what a sub contractor charges a general contractor for services when there is no contract spelling out the terms of any agreement. The LLC's billing to the client is based solely on the LLC's determination of work provided and excessive meeting times with the potential client. During the meetings Mr [redacted] stated over and over that he enjoyed suing people and would gladly do so if given any opportunity to do so. He also disclosed that he suffered from multiple health issues and early dementia that caused him to be unable to function mentally correctly at times. He explained on several occasions that he had not had a good relationship with any construction company in the past and that he had fired most of them.He also made many derogatory statements about his relationship towards the County inspectors and building departments that had dealt with in the past.As for the lien wavier, it is very common for general contractors to help sub-contractors with their billing and other items during a job. A sub-contractor might not have time to bill and so the general contractor simply makes a invoice for them or other paperwork in order to speed things along. Unlike larger commercial companies, small contractors do not normally have as much help with the paperwork side of the business. Mr [redacted] cannot produce a signed contract stating the terms of the relationship with the LLC because it does not exist. The billing that happened for not only the invoice in question, but for the other ones as well, was done according to the preliminary budget provided by the LLC. If Mr. [redacted] had a complaint regarding the billing, he never mentioned it or paused to ask any questions. It was assumed that he was aware of the budget line items that he was being billed for as we had gone over them several times. Even if he were not aware of the budget line items or had not taken time to review them, it was only a preliminary budget that suggested what items might cost during the build. No hard bids had been asked for nor received from the general contractor or any sub contractor. All sub contractors were paid according their invoices and terms in a timely manor and all work preformed was done so in a workman like manor.
In response to the complaint from [redacted] that Jon Rush Construction, LLC over charged him on construction services provided [redacted] claims that he had an agreement with the Jon Rush Construction LLCThe only documents provided to him during our discussions were a preliminary budget and preliminary sample contract that were never signed off on or accepted by either partyThe billing that was done was according to the preliminary budget that had been providedIt is irrelevant what a sub contractor charges a general contractor for services when there is no contract spelling out the terms of any agreementThe LLC's billing to the client is based solely on the LLC's determination of work provided and excessive meeting times with the potential clientDuring the meetings Mr [redacted] stated over and over that he enjoyed suing people and would gladly do so if given any opportunity to do soHe also disclosed that he suffered from multiple health issues and early dementia that caused him to be unable to function mentally correctly at timesHe explained on several occasions that he had not had a good relationship with any construction company in the past and that he had fired most of them.He also made many derogatory statements about his relationship towards the County inspectors and building departments that had dealt with in the past.As for the lien wavier, it is very common for general contractors to help sub-contractors with their billing and other items during a jobA sub-contractor might not have time to bill and so the general contractor simply makes a invoice for them or other paperwork in order to speed things alongUnlike larger commercial companies, small contractors do not normally have as much help with the paperwork side of the business Mr [redacted] cannot produce a signed contract stating the terms of the relationship with the LLC because it does not existThe billing that happened for not only the invoice in question, but for the other ones as well, was done according to the preliminary budget provided by the LLCIf Mr [redacted] had a complaint regarding the billing, he never mentioned it or paused to ask any questionsIt was assumed that he was aware of the budget line items that he was being billed for as we had gone over them several timesEven if he were not aware of the budget line items or had not taken time to review them, it was only a preliminary budget that suggested what items might cost during the buildNo hard bids had been asked for nor received from the general contractor or any sub contractorAll sub contractors were paid according their invoices and terms in a timely manor and all work preformed was done so in a workman like manor
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:Again all of this has nothing to do with Forgery & Embezziling $from meTher is no business or industry standerds that supports this type practice, #i do have a contract from jon rush construction with a budget sign by jon rush to build a ne buildingat cost + 12% builders fee#the very first invoice from jon rush construction dated 7/12/for $+ 12% builders fee $was paid 7/17/#but sub invoice & lien waiver sign by sub supplied by jon rush construction were forged to support the embezzled amount.#the actual invoice and lien waiver signed by the subthat he supplied me is $now that plus the 12% builders fee according to your contract is $= $the fact is jon rush of jon rush construction embezzled $from meand I want it backand by the way you brought your wife in to this when she came with you to my house representing your company as helping design interior of housealso after retiring from two buissness of years I have never sued eny onebut since you said you are not going to respond enymore maybe I should
Sincerely,
*** ***
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:
stating a bunch of lies about me is not very professional considering you have still not addressed the #fact that jon rush construction billed me $7/12/for *** *** excavating and was paid 7/17/in fullnot noing the bill & lien waiver were forgedwitch I havethe actual bill and lien waiver from *** *** excavating witch I also have is for $now the fake bill is $pluss 12% contractors fee $= $the real bill $plus 12% contractor fee of $= $leaving a $that was embezzled from me from jon rushall I want is for the money to be returnedand if you and your wife are as good of Christians as you told me and my wife you will
Sincerely,
*** ***
The bill that was submitted to cover excavation expenses was not from [redacted] excavation directly but was billed according to normal practices, ( I have made invoices and lien waivers for [redacted] and others many time through the years), because [redacted] had not turned a bill into the LLC. If you notice the dates are very different on the billing. Once again, it is irrelevant what the bill to the general contractor is. You would not have been given this bill anyway as there was no agreement in place stating the terms of our relationship. This would be like going to [redacted] and complaining that you did not have the price [redacted] paid on a product and therefore you thought it was not fair for [redacted] to charge you there retail price without you knowing their wholesale price. You had no agreement with the LLC for the budget or contract. Therefore what the LLC billed for is irrelevant to your accusations that have now fallen to invoking some sort of moralistic innuendo meant to disparage the character of my wife. That's pretty desperate and low. At the end of the day, if you wanted a fixed price on construction, you should have agreed to terms that would allow that to take place. This is the last time I will respond to or read anything from this forum.
In response to the complaint from [redacted] that Jon Rush Construction, LLC over charged him on construction services provided. [redacted] claims that he had an agreement with the Jon Rush Construction LLC. The only documents provided to him during our discussions were a preliminary budget...
and preliminary sample contract that were never signed off on or accepted by either party. The billing that was done was according to the preliminary budget that had been provided. It is irrelevant what a sub contractor charges a general contractor for services when there is no contract spelling out the terms of any agreement. The LLC's billing to the client is based solely on the LLC's determination of work provided and excessive meeting times with the potential client. During the meetings Mr [redacted] stated over and over that he enjoyed suing people and would gladly do so if given any opportunity to do so. He also disclosed that he suffered from multiple health issues and early dementia that caused him to be unable to function mentally correctly at times. He explained on several occasions that he had not had a good relationship with any construction company in the past and that he had fired most of them.He also made many derogatory statements about his relationship towards the County inspectors and building departments that had dealt with in the past.As for the lien wavier, it is very common for general contractors to help sub-contractors with their billing and other items during a job. A sub-contractor might not have time to bill and so the general contractor simply makes a invoice for them or other paperwork in order to speed things along. Unlike larger commercial companies, small contractors do not normally have as much help with the paperwork side of the business. Mr [redacted] cannot produce a signed contract stating the terms of the relationship with the LLC because it does not exist. The billing that happened for not only the invoice in question, but for the other ones as well, was done according to the preliminary budget provided by the LLC. If Mr. [redacted] had a complaint regarding the billing, he never mentioned it or paused to ask any questions. It was assumed that he was aware of the budget line items that he was being billed for as we had gone over them several times. Even if he were not aware of the budget line items or had not taken time to review them, it was only a preliminary budget that suggested what items might cost during the build. No hard bids had been asked for nor received from the general contractor or any sub contractor. All sub contractors were paid according their invoices and terms in a timely manor and all work preformed was done so in a workman like manor.