Sign in

Dynamic Inspection Services, LLC

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Dynamic Inspection Services, LLC? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Dynamic Inspection Services, LLC

Dynamic Inspection Services, LLC Reviews (2)

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint [redacted] and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint. 
[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, Please let us know below why you are rejecting the offer made by the business.]
I do not find this response satisfactory and I would like to state that I was not in fact there for the entirety of the inspection but was only able to show up for the last 15-20 minutes. This was enough time to be told about what he claimed to have inspected but not enough to confirm the nature of his methods and their thoroughness, or lack thereof.In response to the HVAC unit my main point of complaint was that the conditions of the operating components were not adequately inspected. If all he did was turn the unit on and take a picture of it then I do not believe that to be a service worthy of payment. I was unaware that the scope of the inspection of that unit was going to be of such a superficial nature.In regards to the water heater, he lists in the report that he inspected the unit as in the comments of section 5 even saying there were no visible signs of leakage. But if he didn't look at the unit he couldn't see whether there were any leaks or not. There are in fact no pictures of the water heater in the report because he never looked at it and therefore shouldn't have commented that it was inspected since he had no knowledge of its condition.Contractually speaking, he may be absolved from any obligation to make amends or take any responsibility for inaccurate, incomplete, and uninformed conclusions. In that case, there may very well be nothing I can do about that, but my complaints about the quality of his work and questions of his competency to professionally inspect and inform regarding major purchasing concerns still stand.If I had known that the extent of his inspection would largely consist of flipping light switches and running faucets I would never have paid for such an "inspection" in the first place as I could easily have performed those actions on my own. I was under the impression that the inspection would help indicate points of major concern for potentially expensive repairs so they could be negotiated properly before purchasing the home. If I was mistaken in that and all the inspection was to offer was a superficial examination of the property and its equipment then I would have never requested the inspection in first place. While I realize the potential for a problem to go unnoticed due to human error, missing two major problems that cost thousands of dollars to repair is not acceptable and brings into question how much effort was put into examining the property. Given the absence of any visual evidence that the water heater was inspected and the inconsistencies in how he describes its working condition despite offering no details regarding the unit itself largely drive my criticism regarding the operational status of the HVAC unit. I have no way of knowing how much effort was put into examining that unit and its corresponding components and have only his word regarding their operational status, something that has come to mean very little as the situation continued to develop.I never contacted him directly with any concerns because I did not believe that he would offer any assistance or compensation considering my lack of good faith in him as a professional. It was recommended to me that I at least file a complaint to the Revdex.com to allow the quality of his work to go on record as a cautionary tale to any who would seek
his services. Having licensed and qualified technicians do thorough
examinations of areas of concern would have been a better course of
action, one that I largely regret not requesting in lieu of this cursory
and frivolous level of examination. If that's all he is contractually obligated to provide, then I may be left with no recourse in this matter, but I do not believe his services would be of any value to anyone who happens to have any problem that isn't glaringly obvious and would therefore require no inspection to discover in the first place. My mistake was allowing myself to accept the recommendation of an inspection that failed to deliver any useful information, and the cost of the complications due to these overlooked issues continues to rise, financially and otherwise, and I am currently unable to determine the full scope of these ramifications or what the full extent of the cost will entail.
Regards,
[redacted]

[redacted]
 
[redacted]
This is the first
notification I have received that [redacted] had a problem. As per the
attached inspection agreement signed by [redacted], I should have been
notified within 14 days of discovery of a problem...

and I would have addressed
the issues within 48 hours. This is the paragraph from the agreement.
 
DISPUTE RESOLUTION: Should a concern or dispute arise
over the condition of an inspected item after the date of the inspection, Client
agrees to notify the Company in writing within fourteen (14) days of the
discovery of the condition and provide the Company with the opportunity to
re-inspect the disputed item and document any concerns prior to the
commencement of repair or replacement work.
 
Due
to the lack of notification during the past eight months since the inspection,
we are unable to do anything at this point.
 
I am sorry to hear about this but would like to address the issues in [redacted]
statement.
1)
HVAC – on the day of the inspection the report shows  at  #8.1 HEATING TEMPERATURE
DIFFERENTIAL **Comments:  Inspected  The temperature
differential of furnace serving the main level was 112 degrees from the supply
registers and 74 degrees from the return register, which is normal. **And
at  #9.1
COOLING TEMPERATURE DIFFERENTIAL **Comments:  Inspected  The temperature differential of condensing unit
serving the main level was 55 degrees from the supply registers and 75 degrees
from the return register, which is normal.** The temperature outside was 75
degrees. [redacted] was present at the inspection and if the compressor were
faulty and not working it would have been impossible to get the temperature
differential and he would have known at that time that there was something
wrong and it would have been in my report.
2) Water
heater – The water heater was located in a concealed closet behind a panel and
so the plumbing to the water heater was not visible. As per the report @ #5.  WATER HEATER Styles & Materials


WATER HEATER MANUFACTURER:
UNKNOWN


WATER HEATER POWER SOURCE:
ELECTRICITY


WATER HEATER CAPACITY:
UNKNOWN




WATER HEATER LOCATION:
CONCEALED CLOSET PANEL


WATER HEATER AGE:
UNKNOWN


 


Please note that this is a 20 year old mobile home which has the
typical black netting under floor framing which prevents inspection of floor
framing, plumbing pipes and insulation, however, there were no active water
leaks into the crawl space on the day of the inspection.
 Sincerely, [redacted]

Check fields!

Write a review of Dynamic Inspection Services, LLC

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Dynamic Inspection Services, LLC Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Add contact information for Dynamic Inspection Services, LLC

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated