I am rejecting this response for several reasonsNone of the tests that were run were for allergies, I was told she was testing me for lymphoma, AIDS and Lime DiseaseShe did not run any blood tests, because in order to do that she would have had to
have drawn my blood, she only took a chunk out of my arm and left a ridiculous stich that had to be cut out of my armWhen I complained about all of this and requested a new doctor he agreed her methods were ridiculous and it was obvious I was having an allergic reaction to pollen in the airHe apologized extensively for her subjecting me to her methods, and this is her colleague! I complained that day and everyday since and their response has simply been well this is just what we doAs medical professionals if what they do is subject patients to unnecessary testing to fill their pockets then the medical board needs to examine themWhen I mentioned this to my primary care physician he explained to me that his office has received several complaints from patients they referred there for the exact same reasons I had issuesHis office will no longer be referring patients and he is recommending that their network stops using them as a recommended dermatologistI am not the only person who has had an issue with their version of "treatment"
I am rejecting this response for several reasonsNone of the tests that were run were for allergies, I was told she was testing me for lymphoma, AIDS and Lime DiseaseShe did not run any blood tests, because in order to do that she would have had to
have drawn my blood, she only took a chunk out of my arm and left a ridiculous stich that had to be cut out of my armWhen I complained about all of this and requested a new doctor he agreed her methods were ridiculous and it was obvious I was having an allergic reaction to pollen in the airHe apologized extensively for her subjecting me to her methods, and this is her colleague! I complained that day and everyday since and their response has simply been well this is just what we doAs medical professionals if what they do is subject patients to unnecessary testing to fill their pockets then the medical board needs to examine themWhen I mentioned this to my primary care physician he explained to me that his office has received several complaints from patients they referred there for the exact same reasons I had issuesHis office will no longer be referring patients and he is recommending that their network stops using them as a recommended dermatologistI am not the only person who has had an issue with their version of "treatment"
See business response attached: