Erik B. Jensen

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the responseIf no reason is received your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved] Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because: The use of the word "slick" is defamation as well as slander, because it is not trueI won my eviction case in court, because [redacted] a) used by proxy, their employee, [redacted] , whom I had a Protection From Abuse order which is in effect until 2/17/2016, after he violated the temporary one to harrass me because the eviction was filed AFTER I opened up license and Inspection tickets B) the complaint that I filed with District 1, is factual and supported with evidenceDuring my first meeting with Brandon P [redacted] , he asled me if , "the owners have any money, so we can sue them for retaliation ", which to me was odd, because I was interested in just my tenant/landlord case, not a consumer caseMrJensen and MrP [redacted] have used their ties to the local justice system's sub-culture, to retaliate against me, including the use of my past hospitalizations, that were the direct result of childhood abuseMy practitioner, who is licensed, has made the appropriate notes, concerning not only this firms behavior, but the actions of [redacted] ***, who represented [redacted] in Family Court, without the appropriate liability insuranceBased on these facts, it is clear that all of the attorneys mentioned, are not only unprofessional but unethicalIt's odd, that the opposing counsel, [redacted] has such a close relationship with my ex attorneysThese were the "charges" MrP [redacted] was stating that I owe [redacted] ***, is in house council for [redacted] , and I have emails from her, instructing me to contact her with any and all concernsSo it seems MrP [redacted] is the "slick " one, in this equation As this case unfolds, it appears that Erik Jensen has provided you with unnecessary information, in an attempt to sway your opinionHad I been quilty of his and [redacted] ***'s baseless accusations, I would have court cases against me, which as of today I do notFurthermore, please advise Erik Jensen and Brandon P [redacted] , that any action against me, will be considered retaliation Regards, [redacted]

I am in receipt of your July 17, letter in regard to the above complaint filed by Ms***. I did not receive any prior communication in regard to this matter. Please fax to me the complaint so I may respond accordingly.Very truly yours,ERIK BJENSENEBJ/tk

December 22, Dear *** ***:
Thank you for your letter of December 10, I am enclosing the letter that she filed in dispute with the bar association with all the attached correspondenceBasically, *** *** did pay $to my firm to negotiate with her Landlord, which we
did successfully, $represents the referral and information service initial consultation fee plus we are required to give them 10% of the actual remaining $500, or $to the service.She is absolutely incorrect about signing the agreementShe signed in the incorrect place, I am enclosing a copy of sameShe has a binding agreement with usWe charged a flat fee of $to negotiate a solutionMrP*** did a wonderful job in dealing with her situationWe bill at $an hourI am attaching my associate's billable time in this case as well*** *** is disingenuous with you, She created much more work than necessary by asking us to negotiate an extension on her time to move out of her rented unit with her LandlordWe worked out that agreementShe then became upset with the Landlord because the Landlord stated all of her bad behaviorAs you can see from the enclosed documentation, her complaint is baseless and I ask that it be dismissedPlease also see email of December 18, from the lawyer referral service advising they will not take any further action with regard to *** ***'s complaintThere will be no refund to *** *** as these fees were earned and the fact that she did not sign the contract appropriately is irrelevant, given that she did sign the contract, Additionally, the contract specifically states what the terms of the services wereShe is being quite slick and disingenuous by using a technicality that is not applicable in this caseIf you need any information, please feel free to contact meI will be out of the country from the 19th to the 4th of JanuaryHappy Holidays.Very Truly Yours,
ERIK BJENSEN

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the responseIf no reason is received your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved]
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:The use of the word "slick" is defamation as well as slander, because it is not trueI won my eviction case in court, because *** *** a) used by proxy, their employee, *** ***, whom I had a Protection From Abuse order which is in effect until 2/17/2016, after he violated the temporary one to harrass me because the eviction was filed AFTER I opened up license and Inspection tickets B) the complaint that I filed with District 1, is factual and supported with evidenceDuring my first meeting with Brandon P***, he asled me if , "the owners have any money, so we can sue them for retaliation ", which to me was odd, because I was interested in just my tenant/landlord case, not a consumer case.MrJensen and MrP*** have used their ties to the local justice system's sub-culture, to retaliate against me, including the use of my past hospitalizations, that were the direct result of childhood abuseMy practitioner, who is licensed, has made the appropriate notes, concerning not only this firms behavior, but the actions of *** ***, who represented *** *** *** in Family Court, without the appropriate liability insuranceBased on these facts, it is clear that all of the attorneys mentioned, are not only unprofessional but unethicalIt's odd, that the opposing counsel, *** *** has such a close relationship with my ex attorneysThese were the "charges" MrP*** was stating that I owe*** ***, is in house council for *** ***, and I have emails from her, instructing me to contact her with any and all concernsSo it seems MrP*** is the "slick " one, in this equation. As this case unfolds, it appears that Erik Jensen has provided you with unnecessary information, in an attempt to sway your opinionHad I been quilty of his and *** ***'s baseless accusations, I would have court cases against me, which as of today I do notFurthermore, please advise Erik Jensen and Brandon P***, that any action against me, will be considered retaliation.
Regards,
*** ***

December 22, 2015Dear [redacted]:Thank you for your letter of December 10, 2015. I am enclosing the letter that she filed in dispute with the bar association with all the attached correspondence. Basically, [redacted] did pay $535 to my firm to negotiate with her Landlord, which we did successfully. $35 represents the referral and information service initial consultation fee plus we are required to give them 10% of the actual remaining $500, or $50 to the service.She is absolutely incorrect about signing the agreement. She signed in the incorrect place, I am enclosing a copy of same. She has a binding agreement with us. We charged a flat fee of $500 to negotiate a solution. Mr. P[redacted] did a wonderful job in dealing with her situation. We bill at $325 an hour. I am attaching my associate's billable time in this case as well. [redacted] is disingenuous with you. She created much more work than necessary by asking us to negotiate an extension on her time to move out of her rented unit with her Landlord. We worked out that agreement. She then became upset with the Landlord because the Landlord stated all of her bad behavior. As you can see from the enclosed documentation, her complaint is baseless and I ask that it be dismissed. Please also see email of December 18, 2015 from the lawyer referral service advising they will not take any further action with regard to [redacted]'s complaint.There will be no refund to [redacted] as these fees were earned and the fact that she did not sign the contract appropriately is irrelevant, given that she did sign the contract. Additionally, the contract specifically states what the terms of the services were. She is being quite slick and disingenuous by using a technicality that is not applicable in this case.If you need any information, please feel free to contact me. I will be out of the country from the 19th to the 4th of January. Happy Holidays.Very Truly Yours,ERIK B. JENSEN

December 22, 2015Dear [redacted]:Thank you for your letter of December 10, 2015. I am enclosing the letter that she filed in dispute with the bar association with all the attached correspondence. Basically, [redacted] did pay $535 to my firm to negotiate with her Landlord, which we did...

successfully, $35 represents the referral and information service initial consultation fee plus we are required to give them 10% of the actual remaining $500, or $50 to the service.She is absolutely incorrect about signing the agreement. She signed in the incorrect place, I am enclosing a copy of same. She has a binding agreement with us. We charged a flat fee of $500 to negotiate a solution. Mr. P[redacted] did a wonderful job in dealing with her situation. We bill at $325 an hour. I am attaching my associate's billable time in this case as well. [redacted] is disingenuous with you, She created much more work than necessary by asking us to negotiate an extension on her time to move out of her rented unit with her Landlord. We worked out that agreement. She then became upset with the Landlord because the Landlord stated all of her bad behavior. As you can see from the enclosed documentation, her complaint is baseless and I ask that it be dismissed. Please also see email of December 18, 2015 from the lawyer referral service advising they will not take any further action with regard to [redacted]'s complaint.There will be no refund to [redacted] as these fees were earned and the fact that she did not sign the contract appropriately is irrelevant, given that she did sign the contract, Additionally, the contract specifically states what the terms of the services were. She is being quite slick and disingenuous by using a technicality that is not applicable in this case.If you need any information, please feel free to contact me. I will be out of the country from the 19th to the 4th of January. Happy Holidays.Very Truly Yours,ERIK B. JENSEN

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved]
 Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because:
The use of the word "slick" is defamation as well as slander,  because it is not true. I won my eviction case in court, because [redacted] a) used by proxy, their employee, [redacted],  whom I had a Protection From Abuse order which is in effect until 2/17/2016, after he violated the temporary one to harrass me because the eviction was filed AFTER I opened up license and Inspection tickets . B) the complaint that I filed with District 1, is factual and supported with evidence. During my first meeting with Brandon P[redacted],  he asled me if , "the owners have any money,  so we can sue them for retaliation ", which to me was odd,  because I was interested in just my tenant/landlord case, not a consumer case.
Mr. Jensen and Mr. P[redacted] have used their ties to the local justice system's sub-culture, to retaliate against me, including the use of my past hospitalizations, that were the direct result of childhood abuse. My practitioner, who is licensed,  has made the appropriate notes, concerning not only this firms behavior, but the actions of [redacted], who represented [redacted] in Family Court,  without the appropriate liability insurance. Based on these facts, it is clear that all of the attorneys mentioned, are not only unprofessional but unethical. It's odd, that the opposing counsel,  [redacted] has such a close relationship with my ex attorneys. These were the "charges" Mr. P[redacted] was stating that I owe. [redacted], is in house council for [redacted],  and I have emails from her, instructing me to contact her with any and all concerns. So it seems Mr. P[redacted] is the "slick " one, in this equation. 
As this case unfolds,  it appears that Erik Jensen has provided you with unnecessary information,  in an attempt to sway your opinion. Had I been quilty of his and [redacted]'s baseless accusations,  I would have court cases against me, which as of today I do not. Furthermore,  please advise Erik Jensen and Brandon P[redacted],  that any action against me, will be considered retaliation. 
Regards,
[redacted]

December 22, 2015
Dear [redacted]:
Thank you for your letter of December 10, 2015. I am enclosing the letter that she filed in dispute with the bar association with all the attached correspondence. Basically, [redacted] did pay $535 to my firm to negotiate with her Landlord, which we did successfully. $35 represents the referral and information service initial consultation fee plus we are required to give them 10% of the actual remaining $500, or $50 to the service.
She is absolutely incorrect about signing the agreement. She signed in the incorrect place, I am enclosing a copy of same. She has a binding agreement with us. We charged a flat fee of $500 to negotiate a solution. Mr. P[redacted] did a wonderful job in dealing with her situation. We bill at $325 an hour. I am attaching my associate's billable time in this case as well. [redacted] is disingenuous with you. She created much more work than necessary by asking us to negotiate an extension on her time to move out of her rented unit with her Landlord. We worked out that agreement. She then became upset with the Landlord because the Landlord stated all of her bad behavior. As you can see from the enclosed documentation, her complaint is baseless and I ask that it be dismissed. Please also see email of December 18, 2015 from the lawyer referral service advising they will not take any further action with regard to [redacted]'s complaint.
There will be no refund to [redacted] as these fees were earned and the fact that she did not sign the contract appropriately is irrelevant, given that she did sign the contract. Additionally, the contract specifically states what the terms of the services were. She is being quite slick and disingenuous by using a technicality that is not applicable in this case.
If you need any information, please feel free to contact me. I will be out of the country from the 19th to the 4th of January. Happy
Holidays.
Very Truly Yours,
ERIK B. JENSEN