Sign in

First Health Choice Inc.

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about First Health Choice Inc.? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews First Health Choice Inc.

First Health Choice Inc. Reviews (5)

• The tenant’s lease, the form of which is the residential lease provided by the Virginia Association of REALTORS, provides that notice to terminate must be given a minimum of sixty (60) days prior to the end of a term Without timely notice, the lease renews on a month-to-month basis,
requiring a rolling day notice. • The tenant’s lease amendment provided an extension of the term of the lease through July 31, That amendment very specifically confirmed addressed only the term of the lease and was clear that all other terms of the lease remained unaltered.• Our office sends notices to tenants well in advance of the sixty day notice period as a courtesy reminder asking if they plan to renew or if they plan to vacate at the end of their then-current term The tenant received and acted on the first notice (when we extended their initial lease term) and received and did not act on the second notice • An administrative assistant in our office, *** ***, contacted the tenant to confirm their plans when we did not receive the form or any other communication from the tenant • The tenant contacted us on July 14, the same day she submitted a complaint with the Revdex.com We reviewed all of the above with the tenant, discussing the specific lease provisions and paragraph references with her We asked the tenant if she would consider a compromise solution and asked her what she would propose The tenant spoke with her husband and called back with the following proposal: the landlord retain the security deposit (the equivalent of a month’s rent), the tenant would be allowed to leave their possessions in the apartment through August 31, and the lease be terminated as of August 31, (as opposed to September 30, 2017) Waldvogel Commercial Properties, Incand the landlord would have access to the unit for purposes of showing it during August We agreed on behalf of the landlord, accepting the tenant’s entire proposal We believe this matter was resolved very well for both parties *** ** *** ***Vice President & COOWaldvogel Commercial Properties, Inc

I have reviewed the response offer made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
The business claims that "holdover rent" applies to the circumstances, however, as my person was not occupying the unit, this does not apply -- "abandoned property" applies. A few of my possessions remained in the garage after my lease termination and I did use the garage for storing my car and performing maintenance work on my motorcycle for ONE WEEKEND after my lease  had expired. I did so while house and dog sitting for a former neighbor and with the express permission of the other building tenants. Also, I was not in possession of the keys and garage door opener as claimed by Waldvogel. The keys and garage door opener were in the garage the entire time; I simply retrieved them from the garage as their employee was unable to locate them (I had told the former employee where they were stashed). I am fully prepared to file suit against Waldvogel and I intend to name the property owner as a defendant as well. My attorney is fully aware of all of the circumstances and assures me that Waldvogel "does not have a leg to stand on". A certain Waldvogel employee may remember my attorney as the middle aged brunette woman that I got into my car with outside of the property around August 3rd. I confidently exclaimed then that I would enjoy taking the company to court (although, I may have used more colorful verbiage). My family and friends who helped me move out are more than willing to testify to the facts that I did, in fact, leave the keys and garage door opener stashed in the garage when I moved out at the end of June. Furthermore, my primary employer will confirm, as will my credit card receipts, that I was out of town in [redacted] and [redacted] up until the last week in July. My brother will confirm that I lived with him while I was not out of town for business, except for the Friday through Monday in early August that I was apartment and dog sitting for my former neighbor. This can be resolved out of court for a mere $1,425 (the full amount of my security deposit). Should I have to proceed further, the cost of resolution will greatly increase. I'd like to make a point that this is not about the money. This is about principle. I make 6 figures a year working 25-30 hours per week as a computer hacker (I know this sounds ridiculous but if Waldvogel will refer to my application they will see that my employer is the top application security consulting firm in the world). I am lucky to have so much disposable time and income and I apply both to right the wrongs of greedy and abusive companies such as Waldvogel. Furthermore, my profession connects me with a lot of powerful and influential people and organizations (e.g., lawyers, politicians, hackers, etc.). Many have become close personal friends and aid me in my fights for justice such as this. I choose my battles carefully; Waldvogel should do the same. This message, as well the initial complaint will be submitted to the Vice President and COO of Waldvogel via the email address provided. If this issue is not resolved to my satisfaction by Friday, September 18th, 2015 I will take legal action.  Regards,  
[redacted]

After reviewing again the complaint with our client, the property owner, it has been determined that the July rent ($950) which was deducted from the complainant's security deposit will be retuned to him. The only amount being withheld is that for cleaning the apartment unit and the grease in the garage (in the amount of $177.25). A check in the amount of $950 will be processed and mailed today.

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution would be satisfactory to me. I still do not believe they are just in charging me for cleaning and I do not hold Waldvogel in my good graces, but, I will accept an additional refund of $950 and be content. I will wait for the business to perform this action and, if it does, will consider this complaint resolved.
Regards,
[redacted]

In response to Revdex.com Case #[redacted]:
Mr. [redacted] gave notice on April 26, 2015, pursuant to his lease, to terminate the lease effective June 30, 2015 (the end of the existing term). During the term of his lease, Mr. [redacted] had use of a parking space and a storage locker in the on-site basement...

garage. Mr. [redacted] retained the garage door opener that was given to him with the keys to his unit, and continued to use the garage for his motorcycle and the storage locker for his personal storage, until August 3, 2015 when an employee of Waldvogel Commercial Properties, Inc. encountered him in the garage at the property. At that time, Mr. [redacted] provided our employee with the garage door opener and additional keys to the property. Our employee told Mr. [redacted] that he must remove all personal property (including the motorcycle) from the premises by the end of the business day.
Since Mr. [redacted] continued to occupy the property for more than a month following the termination of his lease, the equivalent of one month’s rent was applied to his security deposit, as permitted by Paragraph 28 (“Holdover Rent”) of the Lease.
As to Mr. [redacted]’s assertion that he was given permission by another tenant to use space in the garage, no one other than the property owner can grant such permission.
Mr. [redacted] left the apartment dirty and it required professional cleaning. The garage space used by Mr. [redacted] also required cleaning. Mr. [redacted] was clearly doing maintenance on his motorcycle in that spot, as observed by our employee on August 3, and the motor oil was fresh upon the removal of his motorcycle. The direct charges for this cleaning was further deducted from the security deposit, in the amount of $177.25.
The lease requires that the security deposit, or the appropriate portion thereof, be returned to the tenant within 45 following termination of the lease and the tenant’s vacating of the property. Mr. [redacted] remained in possession of the property until August 3. Our office sent Mr. [redacted] a letter explaining these deductions from his security deposit in a letter dated and mailed August 17, 2015.
Waldvogel Commercial Properties believes we acted in accordance with the terms of the lease with regard Mr. [redacted]’s occupancy.
Should you have questions or if additional information is needed please contact [redacted] Vice President and COO at [redacted]

Check fields!

Write a review of First Health Choice Inc.

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

First Health Choice Inc. Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Address: 30 Franklin Road, SW Suite 400, Riverton, Utah, United States, 84065-7110

Phone:

Show more...

Web:

www.allamericanlender.com

This site can’t be reached

Shady, yet now dead: once upon a time this website was reported to be associated with First Health Choice Inc., but after several inspections we’ve come to the conclusion that this domain is no longer active.



Add contact information for First Health Choice Inc.

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated