This company SUCKS! STAY AWAY! THEY WILL RIP YOU OFF!
NEVER SIGN THE LAST COMPLETION DOCUMENT IF YOU USE THEM. THEY WILL GOUGE YOU FOR EVERY PENNY THEY CAN WITH NO RESULTS. BY ME NOT SIGNING IT THEY COULD NOT COLLECT FROM ME FOR THE $13,000 WORHT OF WORK THEY PROMISED ME THEY COULD DO BUT FAILED COMPLETELY! AFTER THEY WERE PAID OVER $50,000. THEY BOAST THEY HAVE EMPLOYEES THAT ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE. COMPLETELY FALSE! STAY AWAY!
GPS is a management consulting company providing analytical and consulting services to small and mid-sized businesses owners throughout the United StatesAn appointment with a sales representative was set with Mr [redacted] for January 19, Mr [redacted] met with the sales representative and discussed the nature of his business and the problems he was experiencing as a business owner An agreement to have an analysis conducted was reached and the Senior Business Analyst arrived on January 22, 2018, to provide the requested services The fee for services was $payable upon satisfactory completion of the analysis According to the records, [redacted] Repair signed an Agreement for Services with GPS on January 23, 2018, for consulting hours at the rate of $per man-hour worked As scheduled, the consultants arrived at Mr [redacted] place of business on January 24, During the first two days of consulting the Senior Project Manager created a Value Enhancement Plan outlining goals to be accomplished in the hours of consulting contracted He approved the Plan on January 25, On February 1, 2018, Mr [redacted] informed the Consultants that he does not wish to continue with the serviceAccording to the Agreement for Services, Mr [redacted] was presented with a final invoice for services which he refused to pay In addition, Mr [redacted] put a STP on the checks previously issued to GPS On February 6, 2018, GPS reached out to Mr [redacted] to assist him in meeting his financial obligation Per Mr [redacted] ' request, GPS settled this matter for a nominal fee, which is subject to the confidentiality of the agreement We wish Mr [redacted] the best with his business and consider this matter resolved at this time
GPS has searched their records in an attempt to identify Pat [redacted] as a client GPS has no records indicating that Pat [redacted] has ever been a client or prospective client GPS takes issue with the accusations made in the submission to the Revdex.com GPS has provided thousands of clients with valuable consulting services that have proven to be of enormous benefit Every client has a myriad of needs, which are specific to their business The sales methodologies employed by GPS personnel are not deceptive and the only pressure of any kind experienced by a business owner is the pressure to address an issue they are having in their business to prevent any further degradation of their profits This type of pressure is a daily occurrence in the life of a business owner The services provided by GPS are designed to significantly reduce this pressure, not add to it The cost associated with allowing a problem to persist in a business is not insignificant, as every business owner knows Whether business owners undertake to fix the problems themselves or employ professionals to assist them the cost of those efforts is always significant One of the differences between GPS and other consulting firms is that GPS allows the business owner to terminate the consulting engagement at any time and only expects to be paid for the services previously delivered In fact, GPS delivers the services before ever asking to be paid, whereas most other consulting firms require payment in advance for their servicesPat [redacted] indicates that services were purchased from GPS on December 8, No purchase price is identified and there is no disputed amount Additionally, there is no desired settlement provided As a result of its investigation, GPS does not believe that Pat [redacted] was ever a client of GPS and that this specific complaint has no basis in fact Due to the spurious nature of this complaint and the fact that no specific problems associated with GPS or its personnel are identified, GPS requests that this complaint be removed as it appears to be a disingenuous attempt to disparage the reputation of GPS
GPS is a management consulting company providing analytical and consulting services to small and mid-sized businesses owners throughout the United StatesAn appointment with a sales representative was set with Mr [redacted] for January 19, Mr [redacted] met with the sales representative and discussed the nature of his business and the problems he was experiencing as a business owner An agreement to have an analysis conducted was reached and the Senior Business Analyst arrived on January 22, 2018, to provide the requested services The fee for services was $payable upon satisfactory completion of the analysis According to the records, [redacted] Repair signed an Agreement for Services with GPS on January 23, 2018, for consulting hours at the rate of $per man-hour worked As scheduled, the consultants arrived at Mr [redacted] place of business on January 24, During the first two days of consulting the Senior Project Manager created a Value Enhancement Plan outlining goals to be accomplished in the hours of consulting contracted He approved the Plan on January 25, On February 1, 2018, Mr [redacted] informed the Consultants that he does not wish to continue with the serviceAccording to the Agreement for Services, Mr [redacted] was presented with a final invoice for services which he refused to pay In addition, Mr [redacted] put a STP on the checks previously issued to GPS On February 6, 2018, GPS reached out to Mr [redacted] to assist him in meeting his financial obligation Per Mr [redacted] ' request, GPS settled this matter for a nominal fee, which is subject to the confidentiality of the agreement We wish Mr [redacted] the best with his business and consider this matter resolved at this time
GPS has searched their records in an attempt to identify Pat [redacted] as a client GPS has no records indicating that Pat [redacted] has ever been a client or prospective client GPS takes issue with the accusations made in the submission to the Revdex.com GPS has provided thousands of clients with valuable consulting services that have proven to be of enormous benefit Every client has a myriad of needs, which are specific to their business The sales methodologies employed by GPS personnel are not deceptive and the only pressure of any kind experienced by a business owner is the pressure to address an issue they are having in their business to prevent any further degradation of their profits This type of pressure is a daily occurrence in the life of a business owner The services provided by GPS are designed to significantly reduce this pressure, not add to it The cost associated with allowing a problem to persist in a business is not insignificant, as every business owner knows Whether business owners undertake to fix the problems themselves or employ professionals to assist them the cost of those efforts is always significant One of the differences between GPS and other consulting firms is that GPS allows the business owner to terminate the consulting engagement at any time and only expects to be paid for the services previously delivered In fact, GPS delivers the services before ever asking to be paid, whereas most other consulting firms require payment in advance for their servicesPat [redacted] indicates that services were purchased from GPS on December 8, No purchase price is identified and there is no disputed amount Additionally, there is no desired settlement provided As a result of its investigation, GPS does not believe that Pat [redacted] was ever a client of GPS and that this specific complaint has no basis in fact Due to the spurious nature of this complaint and the fact that no specific problems associated with GPS or its personnel are identified, GPS requests that this complaint be removed as it appears to be a disingenuous attempt to disparage the reputation of GPS