October 2, Ms [redacted] Revdex.com of San Diego Viewridge Avenue, Suite San Diego, CA Ms [redacted] ***, Re: I.D # #[redacted] - [redacted] This correspondence is in response to Complaint ID #[redacted] filed by [redacted] on September 22, Whereas the [redacted] s have wrongfully accused [redacted] Construction Incof 'Billing or Collection Issues'These allegations are simply not true As with a large percentage of [redacted] Construction Incclients, the [redacted] s were introduced to us by a previous client referralThe short relationship with the [redacted] s was fraught with difficulties, suspicions, constant accusations and frequent innuendos of impending termination of [redacted] Construction Incservices It was because this was a referral that we were willing to overlook, what many would deem as; unreasonable behaviorFor brevity sake, we provide the following timeline, summarization and evidentiary attachments explaining how we arrived at this situation 07/05/ The initial contract was entered into on 7/05/(Exhibit A)The scope of work was determined after a meeting with the [redacted] s in which they informed us of what they wanted remodeled in their new homeThe total amount of the contract was $124,During construction the [redacted] s made several changes to the scope of work and a second contract was entered into on 07/30/(Exhibit B) The total amount of the revised contract was $111, 07/11/ Originally the [redacted] s were going to compete the rough electrical themselves, and use a different contractor for the windowsIn early July, the [redacted] s asked for pricing for the rough electrical and window installationOn 07/11/we provided C0#(Exhibit C)On 7/13/the change order was approved by both parties On 7/28/ We sent invoice [redacted] (Exhibit D) which included a contractor's mark -upWe received the attached email (Exhibit D) and because this client is a referral we agreed to remove the contractors ma 08/05/ Upon [redacted] 's request we provided Change order #($1,300.00} (Exhibit E)We received the attached request for reduced pricing on 08/05/($1,170.00} (Exhibit E)Again because this was a referral we agreed to reduce the change order (Exhibit E)It remained unsigned 08/08/2014- 08/18/ During this time it was decided that we would not be undertaking the kitchen remodel because the Owners wanted to use a different contractor who would not pull permitsThings became problematic and antagonistic (Exhibit F)The [redacted] s wanted the Supervisor replaced, complained about window installation/insulation and wanted to modify all change orders on hand 8/20/ Due to the [redacted] s unprofessional and aggressive manner, [redacted] Construction Incoffered to allow the [redacted] s to take over the project on 08/20/(Exhibit G)They did not accept the offer, therefore, a change order was not createdIn fact the [redacted] 's stated, 'please move forward' (Exhibit G)As a result we continued with the projectWe pulled and paid for permits on the afternoon of 8/20/We scheduled all inspections, met with inspectors and had all of our work inspected and approved by the City of San Diego Building Dept 09/22/ We presented all invoices to the [redacted] s and they in turn made payment after making various deductions, however, they refused to pay invoice [redacted] (Exhibit H) [redacted] Construction mailed a 'Final Demand for Payment invoice' via certified mail, which the [redacted] s received on 09/22/ (Exhibit H)It appears that after receiving out certified demand for payment, the [redacted] s retaliated by filing a complaint with the Revdex.com Throughout this project, we utilized change orders for ALL changes to the contractA total of change orders were generated, some were signed others were notWe even included change orders that reflected 'no charge' to Owner (Exhibit 1}Therefore the Owner's claims are invalid Yours sincerely, [redacted] Construction Inc
October 2, Ms [redacted] Revdex.com of San Diego Viewridge Avenue, Suite San Diego, CA Ms [redacted] ***, Re: I.D # #[redacted] - [redacted] This correspondence is in response to Complaint ID #[redacted] filed by [redacted] on September 22, Whereas the [redacted] s have wrongfully accused [redacted] Construction Incof 'Billing or Collection Issues'These allegations are simply not true As with a large percentage of [redacted] Construction Incclients, the [redacted] s were introduced to us by a previous client referralThe short relationship with the [redacted] s was fraught with difficulties, suspicions, constant accusations and frequent innuendos of impending termination of [redacted] Construction Incservices It was because this was a referral that we were willing to overlook, what many would deem as; unreasonable behaviorFor brevity sake, we provide the following timeline, summarization and evidentiary attachments explaining how we arrived at this situation 07/05/ The initial contract was entered into on 7/05/(Exhibit A)The scope of work was determined after a meeting with the [redacted] s in which they informed us of what they wanted remodeled in their new homeThe total amount of the contract was $124,During construction the [redacted] s made several changes to the scope of work and a second contract was entered into on 07/30/(Exhibit B) The total amount of the revised contract was $111, 07/11/ Originally the [redacted] s were going to compete the rough electrical themselves, and use a different contractor for the windowsIn early July, the [redacted] s asked for pricing for the rough electrical and window installationOn 07/11/we provided C0#(Exhibit C)On 7/13/the change order was approved by both parties On 7/28/ We sent invoice [redacted] (Exhibit D) which included a contractor's mark -upWe received the attached email (Exhibit D) and because this client is a referral we agreed to remove the contractors ma 08/05/ Upon [redacted] 's request we provided Change order #($1,300.00} (Exhibit E)We received the attached request for reduced pricing on 08/05/($1,170.00} (Exhibit E)Again because this was a referral we agreed to reduce the change order (Exhibit E)It remained unsigned 08/08/2014- 08/18/ During this time it was decided that we would not be undertaking the kitchen remodel because the Owners wanted to use a different contractor who would not pull permitsThings became problematic and antagonistic (Exhibit F)The [redacted] s wanted the Supervisor replaced, complained about window installation/insulation and wanted to modify all change orders on hand 8/20/ Due to the [redacted] s unprofessional and aggressive manner, [redacted] Construction Incoffered to allow the [redacted] s to take over the project on 08/20/(Exhibit G)They did not accept the offer, therefore, a change order was not createdIn fact the [redacted] 's stated, 'please move forward' (Exhibit G)As a result we continued with the projectWe pulled and paid for permits on the afternoon of 8/20/We scheduled all inspections, met with inspectors and had all of our work inspected and approved by the City of San Diego Building Dept 09/22/ We presented all invoices to the [redacted] s and they in turn made payment after making various deductions, however, they refused to pay invoice [redacted] (Exhibit H) [redacted] Construction mailed a 'Final Demand for Payment invoice' via certified mail, which the [redacted] s received on 09/22/ (Exhibit H)It appears that after receiving out certified demand for payment, the [redacted] s retaliated by filing a complaint with the Revdex.com Throughout this project, we utilized change orders for ALL changes to the contractA total of change orders were generated, some were signed others were notWe even included change orders that reflected 'no charge' to Owner (Exhibit 1}Therefore the Owner's claims are invalid Yours sincerely, [redacted] Construction Inc