Sign in

Ideal Automotive Service

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Ideal Automotive Service? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Ideal Automotive Service

Ideal Automotive Service Reviews (4)

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 9, 2016/09/07) */ On April we responded to a Home Warranty claim for 2-HBW for a malfunctioning tub spoutWe replaced the tub spout with an identical spoutDuring the repair we informed the customer that the original installation had no interior wall support to hold the spout tightly in place and silicon caulk had been holding it thereAnd in order for it to be installed correctly we would have to cut a hole in the wall to access the pipe to install a supportThe home owner denied to have the work done properly stating to "just install it as it was"Not allowing us to temporarily brace the spout externally against the opposite side of the tub long enough for the caulk to set up and hold...leaving a small gap between the wall and spout as it was originallyWe caulked the gapThe customer approved the work and paid the $deductible Per the home owners 2-HBW policy, the deductibles are due upon arrival regardless whether or not any work is performed On April the home owner called to voice her concerns and was put on schedule tentatively for the 28th On April according to our bank a Stop Payment was issued for the $checkUpon which we were charged $ On April the appointment was rescheduled to May 5thNo notes were added as to why On May the home owner filed this complaint with the Revdex.com On May 5th we returned to the home to find the spout working ok and installed as it was originallyNo resolution to be made We do apologize for any miscommunications Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (3000, 11, 2016/09/15) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) I do not accept the response from BareTech PlumbingI do not recall stating, "just install it as it was" when referring to the faucetHowever, if such statement was made, the faucet was not installed as it wasBefore the attempted repair, the faucet was attached to the base of the tub/and no caulk was visibleThis is not the case now Furthermore, BareTech Plumbing stated they came out to my home and spoke with me on May 5th, after this claim was madeThis is not trueI have not heard from anyone with BareTech since filling my claim As stated above, the faucet is not properly installed and there is unsightly caulk showing, I would like to have my faucet fixed properly and promptly There is no miscommunication, just a lacking of professionalism and thoroughness Thanks Final Business Response / [redacted] (4000, 15, 2016/11/22) */ We are in attempts to contact the home owner to try and resolve this issueSeveral calls have been made with no responseWe will continue to call her

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 9, 2015/07/29) */ On June we received a work order to diagnose a leaking water heaterWe submitted diagnosis to The warranty company.The WC calls the Mrs.owner and informs her of their coverage limits and their out of pocket expenseLater in the day the owner calls back to the WC agreeing to pay the $The WC then informs us to proceedOn the 17th we replaced the gallon w/h with an equal gallon w/hTested for proper operations and cleaned upWhile cleaning the owner asked us the please leave the w/h's cardboard box for their bonfireOn the 18th we returned on complaint, no hot waterUpon arrival there was hot waterThey had not checked it since immediately after it was installedWe left and informed the WC of findingsThe WC then called the owner to impose a $service fee which they quickly reversedAll correspondences with the WC are documented word for wordThis is the first we have heard of an issueHonestly from reading the complaint we get the feeling he's speaking of a different job from somewhere else? First he states that he has $coverageHe has $He states that we told him he needs a cut off valve, circuit breaker and an electrical inspection and a disposal feeNoThere were no electrical issues and we did not tell themThe warranty company called them to tell them of their coverageThe WC gave them the prices for each item and reasons for themThe Warranty Company Dictates all prices and code requirementsThe owner agreed to the out of pocket expenseThe owner states we found a gallon instead of the NoFirst off they don't make a gallonIn these installations they are all gallonIn most cases a larger unit won't fit the spaceOwner states we did not put the drain pan back under the heaterThere was no drain pan under the heater nor is it required by codeOwner states we tripped the breaker on before filling it with water thus blowing out the elementsNoAfter installation the unit was tested for proper operations and it checked out fineOwner states that we left the cardboard box there to get rained onNoThe Mrsowner asked us to leave it there for the bonfireOwner states there was no electrical inspectionCorrectWhy would there be if there was no electrical work performedIf it had been needed then the WC would have dispatched an Electrical companyOwner states he has tried to contact us several times with no luckNoWe have had no further communication since the installOwner states he said he has a yard dumpster we can put the water heater in instead of being charged $disposalNoNo mention of a dumpster or a $disposal chargeSide noteIt is illegal to dispose of appliances in a dumpsterOwner states the morning after they still had no hot water and it took us days to come backNo and noWe come back that same morning and yes they had hot waterShe had not checked it since it was installedOwner stats that when we came back to see what was wrong with the heater, we told him that the breaker just needed to be tripped back onNoThe water was hot when we got thereOwner states we tried to charge him for coming back to check the issueNoWe left the home and then informed the WC of the diagnosisThe WC then called the owner about the Call out charge but then quickly reversed itOwner stated that we told them the circuit breaker needed to be replaced with the correct oneNoThis never happenedIf it did then the WC would have dispatched and electricianOwner states that we took out a amp breaker and installed a ampNoWe do not do electrical workAnd again the warranty company sends electricians for electricalOwner states he has called several times to our office to resolve these issuesNoThis is the first we've heard of a problemNoteMr owner was out of town before during and after this workHe was belligerent at the out of pocket expense until his father in law (a plumber by trade) explained the code requirements and assured him he was not being overcharged for fictitious code requirementsWe are unaware of any additional work that has been done or whyThe $the customer was charged was by the warranty companyNot usThe WC receives a diagnoses with pics then directs the contractor of what to doThe WC dictates all work to be performed and at what priceNoteThe WC's pricing is about half off the regular pricing so the owner received a good job at an incredible priceNoteThe mother in law paid for the servicesWe do try to do our very best by our customers and we stand behind our workWe are a member of this community also and would not betray our neighborsAs a God fearing Christian, if this complaint were true, I would not be able to sleep at nightPlease call if you have any questions as I have a lot of them myselfSignedConfused by Complaint

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 9, 2016/09/07) */
On April we responded to a Home Warranty claim for 2-HBW for a malfunctioning tub spoutWe replaced the tub spout with an identical spoutDuring the repair we informed the customer that the original installation had no interior wall
support to hold the spout tightly in place and silicon caulk had been holding it thereAnd in order for it to be installed correctly we would have to cut a hole in the wall to access the pipe to install a supportThe home owner denied to have the work done properly stating to "just install it as it was"Not allowing us to temporarily brace the spout externally against the opposite side of the tub long enough for the caulk to set up and hold...leaving a small gap between the wall and spout as it was originallyWe caulked the gapThe customer approved the work and paid the $deductible
Per the home owners 2-HBW policy, the deductibles are due upon arrival regardless whether or not any work is performed
On April the home owner called to voice her concerns and was put on schedule tentatively for the 28th
On April according to our bank a Stop Payment was issued for the $checkUpon which we were charged $
On April the appointment was rescheduled to May 5thNo notes were added as to why
On May the home owner filed this complaint with the Revdex.com
On May 5th we returned to the home to find the spout working ok and installed as it was originallyNo resolution to be made
We do apologize for any miscommunications
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 11, 2016/09/15) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
I do not accept the response from BareTech PlumbingI do not recall stating, "just install it as it was" when referring to the faucetHowever, if such statement was made, the faucet was not installed as it wasBefore the attempted repair, the faucet was attached to the base of the tub/and no caulk was visibleThis is not the case now
Furthermore, BareTech Plumbing stated they came out to my home and spoke with me on May 5th, after this claim was madeThis is not trueI have not heard from anyone with BareTech since filling my claim
As stated above, the faucet is not properly installed and there is unsightly caulk showing, I would like to have my faucet fixed properly and promptly
There is no miscommunication, just a lacking of professionalism and thoroughness
Thanks
Final Business Response /* (4000, 15, 2016/11/22) */
We are in attempts to contact the home owner to try and resolve this issueSeveral calls have been made with no responseWe will continue to call her

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 9, 2015/07/29) */
On June 16 we received a work order to diagnose a leaking water heater. We submitted diagnosis to The warranty company.The WC calls the Mrs.owner and informs her of their coverage limits and their out of pocket expense. Later in the day the...

owner calls back to the WC agreeing to pay the $345. The WC then informs us to proceed. On the 17th we replaced the 30 gallon w/h with an equal 30 gallon w/h. Tested for proper operations and cleaned up. While cleaning the owner asked us the please leave the w/h's cardboard box for their bonfire. On the 18th we returned on complaint, no hot water. Upon arrival there was hot water. They had not checked it since immediately after it was installed. We left and informed the WC of findings. The WC then called the owner to impose a $130 service fee which they quickly reversed. All correspondences with the WC are documented word for word. This is the first we have heard of an issue. Honestly from reading the complaint we get the feeling he's speaking of a different job from somewhere else? First he states that he has $800 coverage. He has $850. He states that we told him he needs a cut off valve, circuit breaker and an electrical inspection and a disposal fee. No. There were no electrical issues and we did not tell them. The warranty company called them to tell them of their coverage. The WC gave them the prices for each item and reasons for them. The Warranty Company Dictates all prices and code requirements. The owner agreed to the out of pocket expense. The owner states we found a 45 gallon instead of the 30. No. First off they don't make a 45 gallon. In these installations they are all 30 gallon. In most cases a larger unit won't fit the space. Owner states we did not put the drain pan back under the heater. There was no drain pan under the heater nor is it required by code. Owner states we tripped the breaker on before filling it with water thus blowing out the elements. No. After installation the unit was tested for proper operations and it checked out fine. Owner states that we left the cardboard box there to get rained on. No. The Mrs. owner asked us to leave it there for the bonfire. Owner states there was no electrical inspection. Correct. Why would there be if there was no electrical work performed. If it had been needed then the WC would have dispatched an Electrical company. Owner states he has tried to contact us several times with no luck. No. We have had no further communication since the install. Owner states he said he has a 9 yard dumpster we can put the water heater in instead of being charged $65 disposal. No. No mention of a dumpster or a $65 disposal charge. Side note. It is illegal to dispose of appliances in a dumpster. Owner states the morning after they still had no hot water and it took us 2 days to come back. No and no. We come back that same morning and yes they had hot water. She had not checked it since it was installed. Owner stats that when we came back to see what was wrong with the heater, we told him that the breaker just needed to be tripped back on. No. The water was hot when we got there. Owner states we tried to charge him for coming back to check the issue. No. We left the home and then informed the WC of the diagnosis. The WC then called the owner about the Call out charge but then quickly reversed it. Owner stated that we told them the circuit breaker needed to be replaced with the correct one. No. This never happened. If it did then the WC would have dispatched and electrician. Owner states that we took out a 30 amp breaker and installed a 20 amp. No. We do not do electrical work. And again the warranty company sends electricians for electrical. Owner states he has called several times to our office to resolve these issues. No. This is the first we've heard of a problem. Note. Mr owner was out of town before during and after this work. He was belligerent at the out of pocket expense until his father in law (a plumber by trade) explained the code requirements and assured him he was not being overcharged for fictitious code requirements. We are unaware of any additional work that has been done or why. The $345 the customer was charged was by the warranty company. Not us. The WC receives a diagnoses with pics then directs the contractor of what to do. The WC dictates all work to be performed and at what price. Note. The WC's pricing is about half off the regular pricing so the owner received a good job at an incredible price. Note. The mother in law paid for the services. We do try to do our very best by our customers and we stand behind our work. We are a member of this community also and would not betray our neighbors. As a God fearing Christian, if this complaint were true, I would not be able to sleep at night. Please call if you have any questions as I have a lot of them myself. Signed... Confused by Complaint

Check fields!

Write a review of Ideal Automotive Service

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Ideal Automotive Service Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Address: 5615 Memorial Dr, Stone Mountain, Georgia, United States, 30083-3256

Phone:

Show more...

Web:

This website was reported to be associated with Ideal Automotive Service.



Add contact information for Ideal Automotive Service

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated