Sign in

Integral One Network Solutions LLC

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Integral One Network Solutions LLC? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Integral One Network Solutions LLC

Integral One Network Solutions LLC Reviews (7)

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the responseIf no reason is received your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved] Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because:- Administrators responsible for Statistics and Accounting courses, as well as Division Deans, serving as the investigators into matters in these courses under their purview, is a clear conflict of interest- The school claims that the Accounting instructor responded to a due date inquiry I have a copy of the email, and a follcomplaint to the Dean of The School of Business (attached,) stating that the instructor did not respond This can be clearly proven via a formal email discovery initiated by the Revdex.com.- At no point did the Accounting instructor communicate that the due date discrepancies spread across the syllabus, the College's online portal, and the College's 3rd party education provider site were intended to "give the student more time." Again, no indication as to why the discrepancies existed was given, as can be found in a (timestamped) discovery of the online portal and college email system Again, the instructor didn't explain the due date discrepancies or announce additional exercises at all Knowing what was expected of you was all a roll-of-the-dice Knowing when an exam is due is the difference between a.) having adequate time to prepare for a exam and b.) completely failing the exam because you missed the deadline This is not a minor discrepancy.- The Statistics courses were not well organized and the instructor's poor use of the English language is disruptive This can be demonstrated through a formal audit of the course by the Revdex.com My complaint did not indicate a communications problem with the Statistics instructor The Statistics instructor made claims that the college overburdened him and made him late in the delivery of course materials He also provided [redacted] links in lieu of lectures, leaving it to the students to determine what content was applicable to the course vswhat was not He cited that he could not guarantee that the links were safe The college has not commented on these specific complaints and is attempting a smokescreenI take issue with paying for this as an "education," and ask for an email discovery on behalf of the Revdex.com for record of email / [redacted] system communications from [redacted] to the [redacted] course in Spring - Having an "A" in all courses at the time of withdrawal was 100% of my own accord and not due to the college's delivery of educational contentThe course materials were either nonexistent (Statistics) or not updated for current course materials (Accounting.) I had to teach myself everything using resources external to the college's materials, a method I could not keep up with Again, my attempts to reign the college in went unanswered or responded to with things like "potentially unsafe" links to online video sites such as [redacted] .- The previous course withdrawals took place nearly years ago, as a young twenty-something student I am now a year old adultA closer look at my later course performance at the school (2009) will show consistent performance and no similar pattern The courses I took in were delivered well, applicable to my job, and quite enjoyable, which is why I returned to continue my studies (I cited this in my original letter to Student Affairs.) Finding the courses in this particular program to be sub-par for the reasons cited above, I took proactive measures to alleviate myself of being stuck in an unproductive, poorly delivered degree program.I am confident that the Revdex.com has concerns for prospective students of the BDT and Applied Management Distance Learning programs at Penn College The College's conflict-of-interest approach to resolving matters, denial of events that can be clearly tracked via email discovery, and hiding behind "policy" are indicative of an unwillingess to admit and repair flaws in their grossly overpriced programs Of the two parties involved in this matter, I ask which party is showing a concern for the consumer?I am willing to accept a tuition balance of $at Penn College with the understanding that I pay the [redacted] Student Loan balance of $through [redacted] Financial Services Regards, [redacted]

October 25, 2017Dear [redacted] ***, Pennsylvania College of Technology certainly understands the financial investment our students make for their education, and we work diligently to help them succeed. It Is difficult when a student chooses to withdraw from school, and we make every ejffort to... explain the ramifications of this action through face-to-face conversations and written notifications.Penn Coliege has a tuition-refund policy, which is explained to students several times throughout the matriculation process and again when a student is withdrawing from the College. In addition, when initially applying for financial aid, the student electronically agrees to the "Statement of educational purpose and crediting of financial aid funds for this and all future academic years at Pennsylvania College of Technology." Within this statement, the student acknowledges understanding, and accepts responsibility for, amounts due the College, as well as an understanding that, if payments are not made, an outside college agency will be utilized and fees assessed. When a student withdraws from the College, federal law requires that the College return loan funds to the lender based upon length of attendance. As a result of the return of Joan funds and the College's tuition-refund policy, an amount was due from the student.The student received nine billing notices over a nine-month period, including several notifications that the account would be sent to collection, and fees would be assessed by the agency. Over this nine-month period, the student never contacted the College; therefore, the account was turned over to collection in June 2016. The student contacted the College in May 2017, almost a year after the account had been sent to collection.The College adhered to policy and complied with federal regulations in this matter. The billing process at Penn College is very thorough, and students are given many opportunities to respond before we send accounts to the collection agency, which is what Was done in this case, to no avail.Sincerely,Suzanne S.Vice President for Finance/CFO

November 15, 2017Dear *** ***,Please be advised that the collection agency utilized by the Colege is in fact licensed under thestate of Florida, under the license name of *** *** *** ***.Because the College has not received the appropriate disclosure authorization, the College is unable to provide additional information regarding the complaint. I will not respond to any further complaints without the appropriate consent.The College adhered to policy and complied with federal regulations in this matterThe debt owed to the College is valid.Sincerely,Suzanne S.Vice President for Finance/CFO

October 25, 2017Dear [redacted], Pennsylvania College of Technology certainly understands the financial investment our students make for their education, and we work diligently to help them succeed. It Is difficult when a student chooses to withdraw from school, and we make every ejffort to...

explain the ramifications of this action through face-to-face conversations and written notifications.Penn Coliege has a tuition-refund policy, which is explained to students several times throughout the matriculation process and again when a student is withdrawing from the College. In addition, when initially applying for financial aid, the student electronically agrees to the "Statement of educational purpose and crediting of financial aid funds for this and all future academic years at Pennsylvania College of Technology." Within this statement, the student acknowledges understanding, and accepts responsibility for, amounts due the College, as well as an understanding that, if payments are not made, an outside college agency will be utilized and fees assessed. When a student withdraws from the College, federal law requires that the College return loan funds to the lender based upon length of attendance. As a result of the return of Joan funds and the College's tuition-refund policy, an amount was due from the student.The student received nine billing notices over a nine-month period, including several notifications that the account would be sent to collection, and fees would be assessed by the agency. Over this nine-month period, the student never contacted the College; therefore, the account was turned over to collection in June 2016. The student contacted the College in May 2017, almost a year after the account had been sent to collection.The College adhered to policy and complied with federal regulations in this matter. The billing process at Penn College is very thorough, and students are given many opportunities to respond before we send accounts to the collection agency, which is what Was done in this case, to no avail.Sincerely,Suzanne S.Vice President for Finance/CFO

August 3, 2015Pennsylvania College of Technology received your communication on 10 July 2015. President G[redacted] communicated with you on 20 July regarding the need for additional time, to which you responded on 21 July. We have since received permission of the former student to share elements of his...

educational record relevant to this matter. On behalf of President Davie Jane G[redacted], l offer the attached as the College's response to the complaint filed by D[redacted], a former student at the College (Revdex.com case identification [redacted]).The claims made by [redacted] are unsubstantiated as you can see in the College's response, I will be happy to provide further information should you desire.Best Regards,Paul S.Vice President for Academic Affairs & Provost

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved]
 Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because:- Administrators responsible for Statistics and Accounting courses, as well as Division Deans, serving as the investigators into matters in these courses under their purview, is a clear conflict of interest- The school claims that the Accounting instructor responded to a due date inquiry.  I have a copy of the email, and a follow-up complaint to the Dean of The School of Business (attached,) stating that the instructor did not respond.  This can be clearly proven via a formal email discovery initiated by the Revdex.com.- At no point did the Accounting instructor communicate that the due date discrepancies spread across the syllabus, the College's online portal, and the College's 3rd party education provider site were intended to "give the student more time."  Again, no indication as to why the discrepancies existed was given, as can be found in a (timestamped) discovery of the online portal and college email system.  Again, the instructor didn't explain the due date discrepancies or announce additional exercises at all.  Knowing what was expected of you was all a roll-of-the-dice.  Knowing when an exam is due is the difference between a.) having adequate time to prepare for a exam and b.) completely failing the exam because you missed the deadline.  This is not a minor discrepancy.- The Statistics courses were not well organized and the instructor's poor use of the English language is disruptive.  This can be demonstrated through a formal audit of the course by the Revdex.com.  My complaint did not indicate a communications problem with the Statistics instructor.  The Statistics instructor made claims that the college overburdened him and made him late in the delivery of course materials.  He also provided [redacted] links in lieu of lectures, leaving it to the students to determine what content was applicable to the course vs. what was not.  He cited that he could not guarantee that the links were safe.   The college has not commented on these specific complaints and is attempting a smokescreen. I take issue with paying for this as an "education," and ask for an email discovery on behalf of the Revdex.com for record of email / [redacted] system communications from [redacted] to the [redacted] course in Spring 2015.
- Having an "A" in all courses at the time of withdrawal was 100% of my own accord and not due to the college's delivery of educational content. The course materials were either nonexistent (Statistics) or not updated for current course materials (Accounting.)  I had to teach myself everything using resources external to the college's materials, a method I could not keep up with.  Again, my attempts to reign the college in went unanswered or responded to with things like "potentially unsafe" links to online video sites such as [redacted].- The previous course withdrawals took place nearly 15 years ago, as a young twenty-something student.  I am now a 35 year old adult. A closer look at my later course performance at the school (2009) will show consistent performance and no similar pattern.  The courses I took in 2009 were  delivered well, applicable to my job, and quite enjoyable, which is why I returned to continue my studies (I cited this in my original letter to Student Affairs.).  Finding the courses in this particular program to be sub-par for the reasons cited above, I took proactive measures to alleviate myself of being stuck in an unproductive, poorly delivered degree program.I am confident that the Revdex.com has concerns for prospective students of the BDT and Applied Management Distance Learning programs at Penn College.  The College's conflict-of-interest approach to resolving matters, denial of events that can be clearly tracked via email discovery, and hiding behind "policy" are indicative of an unwillingess to admit and repair flaws in their grossly overpriced programs.  Of the two parties involved in this matter, I ask which party is showing a concern for the consumer?I am willing to accept a tuition balance of $0 at Penn College with the understanding that I pay the [redacted] Student Loan balance of $2382.17 through [redacted] Financial Services. 
Regards,
[redacted]

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed as Answered]
 Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because:  Ms. S[redacted] is incorrect as the organization is not doing business under that title in the State of Florida. While Ms. S[redacted] continues to provide unfruitful response I will escalate the matter through another channel. Ms. S[redacted] should know that her representation of the college is an absolute embarrassment. 
Regards,
[redacted]

Check fields!

Write a review of Integral One Network Solutions LLC

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Integral One Network Solutions LLC Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Add contact information for Integral One Network Solutions LLC

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated