J M W Properties

Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because: While I acknowledge that the Oregon Parking/Carport Agreement DOES clearly state that "the owner/agent may tow a vehicle without notice to the owner/operator of the vehicle if the vehicle blocks or prevents entry to the premises", I maintain that my vehicle was NOT in fact blocking entry to the premisesAs stated in my initial complaint, the driveway is plenty wide enough to allow cars to pass even with vehicles parked on both sidesAdditionally, my car was not even parked directly across from another vehicle/space, but was instead several car-lengths back from the nearest car on the opposite side, leaving not only enough space for one-direction traffic, but for two-direction traffic as well.? In regards to the parking agreement Rules and Regulations #11, "resident may not park in areas not designated for parking, or blocking entrances", I argue that JMW Properties failed to properly designate parking/non-parking areas.? At the time I parked my car, all of the marked spaces were full, leaving only the unmarked curb along which to parkI DID hesitate to park there, and made a point of looking for signage to indicate the legality of doing soThere is noneNot a single "No Parking" sign is posted along the entire length of the driveway, except in the fire laneThere is an area of curb marked in yellow (around a curve) and another marked in red (the fire lane)*(See photos)These areas were clearly marked as no-parking zones, and as such I avoided themThe rest of the curb was entirely unmarked, with no indication that parking was not allowedShould JMW Properties partner with Retriever Towing in such a way that allows them to tow vehicles without manager request or approval, JMW should assume the responsibility of providing adequate regulatory signage, making a? reasonable? effort to communicate parking regulations to tenantsStating after the fact that I "parked in an illegal spot", but providing zero indication whatsoever that is was considered illegal, seems shockingly unfair.? Sincerely, [redacted] ***

Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because: While I acknowledge that the Oregon Parking/Carport Agreement DOES clearly state that "the owner/agent may tow a vehicle without notice to the owner/operator of the vehicle if the vehicle blocks or prevents entry to the premises", I maintain that my vehicle was NOT in fact blocking entry to the premisesAs stated in my initial complaint, the driveway is plenty wide enough to allow cars to pass even with vehicles parked on both sidesAdditionally, my car was not even parked directly across from another vehicle/space, but was instead several car-lengths back from the nearest car on the opposite side, leaving not only enough space for one-direction traffic, but for two-direction traffic as well In regards to the parking agreement Rules and Regulations #11, "resident may not park in areas not designated for parking, or blocking entrances", I argue that JMW Properties failed to properly designate parking/non-parking areasAt the time I parked my car, all of the marked spaces were full, leaving only the unmarked curb along which to parkI DID hesitate to park there, and made a point of looking for signage to indicate the legality of doing soThere is noneNot a single "No Parking" sign is posted along the entire length of the driveway, except in the fire laneThere is an area of curb marked in yellow (around a curve) and another marked in red (the fire lane)*(See photos)These areas were clearly marked as no-parking zones, and as such I avoided themThe rest of the curb was entirely unmarked, with no indication that parking was not allowedShould JMW Properties partner with Retriever Towing in such a way that allows them to tow vehicles without manager request or approval, JMW should assume the responsibility of providing adequate regulatory signage, making a reasonable effort to communicate parking regulations to tenantsStating after the fact that I "parked in an illegal spot", but providing zero indication whatsoever that is was considered illegal, seems shockingly unfair Sincerely, [redacted] ***

These are the facts:
Her car was in fact towed by *** *** but the manager did not call to have it towed. *** *** noticed it was in the wrong spot and towed it
Per the Oregon Parking/Carport Agreement which she signed on 07/30/2015, which clearly states
the following: Under Towing, #1, Owner/Agent may tow vehicle without notice to the owner or operator of vehicle: …b. blocks or prevents entry to Premises
Also on the parking agreement under Rules and Regulations # Resident assumes all responsibilities, and indemnifies and holds Owner/Agent harmless, for any damages or claims that may be caused by or arise out of Resident’s or Resident’s guest use of parking areas
# states…Resident may not park in….areas not designated for parking, or blocking entrances…
There is clearly marked parking on one side of the driveway, the other side is not marked for parking. The space at the end of the driveway is open for cars, one to enter one to exit. She blocked one side making it to only one side of the driveway could be used and there are no parking spaces marked on that side.
While I can empathize with her that she had to spend some money to get her car out, she broke the rule. Should she want to get her money back, or feels this is an invalid tow, she will need to take it up with *** ***
Thank you,

Complaint: ***I am rejecting this response because:
While I acknowledge that the Oregon Parking/Carport Agreement DOES clearly state that "the owner/agent may tow a vehicle without notice to the owner/operator of the vehicle if the vehicle blocks or prevents entry to the premises", I maintain that my vehicle was NOT in fact blocking entry to the premisesAs stated in my initial complaint, the driveway is plenty wide enough to allow cars to pass even with vehicles parked on both sidesAdditionally, my car was not even parked directly across from another vehicle/space, but was instead several car-lengths back from the nearest car on the opposite side, leaving not only enough space for one-direction traffic, but for two-direction traffic as well.
In regards to the parking agreement Rules and Regulations #11, "resident may not park in areas not designated for parking, or blocking entrances", I argue that JMW Properties failed to properly designate parking/non-parking areas. At the time I parked my car, all of the marked spaces were full, leaving only the unmarked curb along which to parkI DID hesitate to park there, and made a point of looking for signage to indicate the legality of doing soThere is noneNot a single "No Parking" sign is posted along the entire length of the driveway, except in the fire laneThere is an area of curb marked in yellow (around a curve) and another marked in red (the fire lane)*(See photos)These areas were clearly marked as no-parking zones, and as such I avoided themThe rest of the curb was entirely unmarked, with no indication that parking was not allowedShould JMW Properties partner with Retriever Towing in such a way that allows them to tow vehicles without manager request or approval, JMW should assume the responsibility of providing adequate regulatory signage, making a reasonable effort to communicate parking regulations to tenantsStating after the fact that I "parked in an illegal spot", but providing zero indication whatsoever that is was considered illegal, seems shockingly unfair.
Sincerely,*** ***

These are the facts:
Her car was in fact towed by *** *** but the manager did not call to have it towed. *** *** noticed it was in the wrong spot and towed it
Per the Oregon Parking/Carport Agreement which she signed on 07/30/2015, which clearly states
the following: Under Towing, #1, Owner/Agent may tow vehicle without notice to the owner or operator of vehicle: …b. blocks or prevents entry to Premises
Also on the parking agreement under Rules and Regulations # Resident assumes all responsibilities, and indemnifies and holds Owner/Agent harmless, for any damages or claims that may be caused by or arise out of Resident’s or Resident’s guest use of parking areas
# states…Resident may not park in….areas not designated for parking, or blocking entrances…
There is clearly marked parking on one side of the driveway, the other side is not marked for parking. The space at the end of the driveway is open for cars, one to enter one to exit. She blocked one side making it to only one side of the driveway could be used and there are no parking spaces marked on that side.
While I can empathize with her that she had to spend some money to get her car out, she broke the rule. Should she want to get her money back, or feels this is an invalid tow, she will need to take it up with *** ***
Thank you,

Complaint: [redacted]I am rejecting this response because:
While I acknowledge that the Oregon Parking/Carport Agreement DOES clearly state that "the owner/agent may tow a vehicle without notice to the owner/operator of the vehicle if the vehicle blocks or prevents entry to the premises", I maintain that my vehicle was NOT in fact blocking entry to the premises. As stated in my initial complaint, the driveway is plenty wide enough to allow cars to pass even with vehicles parked on both sides. Additionally, my car was not even parked directly across from another vehicle/space, but was instead several car-lengths back from the nearest car on the opposite side, leaving not only enough space for one-direction traffic, but for two-direction traffic as well. 
In regards to the parking agreement Rules and Regulations #11, "resident may not park in areas not designated for parking, or blocking entrances", I argue that JMW Properties failed to properly designate parking/non-parking areas. At the time I parked my car, all of the marked spaces were full, leaving only the unmarked curb along which to park. I DID hesitate to park there, and made a point of looking for signage to indicate the legality of doing so. There is none. Not a single "No Parking" sign is posted along the entire length of the driveway, except in the fire lane. There is an area of curb marked in yellow (around a curve) and another marked in red (the fire lane)*(See photos). These areas were clearly marked as no-parking zones, and as such I avoided them. The rest of the curb was entirely unmarked, with no indication that parking was not allowed. Should JMW Properties partner with Retriever Towing in such a way that allows them to tow vehicles without manager request or approval, JMW should assume the responsibility of providing adequate regulatory signage, making a reasonable effort to communicate parking regulations to tenants. Stating after the fact that I "parked in an illegal spot", but providing zero indication whatsoever that is was considered illegal, seems shockingly unfair. 
Sincerely,[redacted]