James Publishing

Dear Revdex.com:We sell law books for practicing lawyersOur books are not designed for laypeople like Ms***, which is the root of the problem here.In the legal world “citation” means a reference to case lawIt does not identify the plaintiff as being in a particular categoryOur book Federal Employment Jury instructions does contain the 1,citations described in its advertisingThat description has caused no problems or generated any complaints from the thousands of lawyers and law librarians who have purchased the book.Are some of the defendants who end up in federal court private employers like Wal-mart and Ford whose citations are complained about by Ms***? Of courseI don't understand why she would Conclude otherwise-If Ms [redacted] is going to attempt to do her own legal research without the training that three years of law school provides, she needs to know that she is likely to make some mistakesShe has definitely made one here.And since the mistake is hers and not ours, no, we are not going to make an exception to our policy and provide her a refund[redacted] Founder and managing editor www.JamesPublishing.com

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the
business in reference to complaint ID ***, and have determined that this
proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference,
details of the offer I reviewed appear below
[Has Mr*** not heard of the term
"Pro Se" I'll define it since it seems as though he hasn't
Pro Se: comes from Latin, literally
meaning "on behalf of themselves", which basically means advocating
on one's own behalf before a court, rather than being represented by a lawyer
I can attach their website information where no where does it state
"practicing lawyers" Which is one of the problems here
Why don't they advertise correctly? Another problem! All I am asking for is the cost of
the shipping to me and the cost, which I paid for a total of $34.65, THAT'S
IT!! He wants to go through all of this trouble to dispute that
How ridiculous is this!
I have an attorney for one
of my cases against the federal governmentIt costs a lot of money to hire an
attorney, which is why I wanted to represent myself in another case I
have All that attorney cited and can only cite are federal employers’
cases (NO OTHER TYPE OF EMPLOYERS) can be cited I will attach an example
of what that attorney did for me (see, exhibit # 1) It will clearly
demonstrate that they can't use case law (citations) from federal court
(regardless if it states federal in the name of the court. It has nothing to do with federal
employees or employers). Yes, we
can take a case to federal court, but not before our administrative process and
the attorney’s in the case have to use FEDERAL EMPLOYEE’s and FEDERAL EMPLOYERS
when they cite cases. He, Mr***,
needs to understand that by him not doing that is his huge mistake
Please see exhibit # 2, I’ve
attached. I’ve printed out their
main page. I also went to where
they advertise the “Federal Employment Jury Instructions” and they changed a
couple of things. See where it
states “Description” and the second full paragraph where it is
highlighted. They changed
that. It used to state “1,case
citations”. The next page they
changed that too where it is highlighted.
Anyway, Mr*** admits that there were “1,citation described in
its advertising” in his response
Nevertheless, as a federal
employee working for a FEDERAL EMPLOYER and not Wal-Mart or Ford, case
citations that are used have to be from a federal employee filing a lawsuit
against a FEDERAL EMPLOYER and not a private company
Not sure why Mr*** is stating
that I’ve concluded otherwise that Wal-Mart or Ford could not go to federal
court. Of course, they canI’ve
never stated that. I merely
mentioned them by stating “I cannot just put a private employers’ name such as
Wal-Mart” in a case citation in bringing a lawsuit since I am a FEDERAL
EMPLOYEE
It seems as though Mr***
needs to brush up on what federal
employee’s and federal employer’s can do when it comes to quoting
citations in a legal matter
I don’t need to have the training
that three years of law school provides.
I’m doing quite fine. Mr
*** needs to know that he needs to again, know what federal employee’s and
federal employer’s are required to do instead of simply making a HUGE MISTAKE
as Mr*** has done and simply stating whatever in his response without
knowing what they have to do in a legal matter
The advertising that he shows by
naming the book “Federal Employment Jury Instructions” is simply wrong,
advertisement and purely MISLEADING!
They need to name it something else like “private industry jury
instructions”, so that another intelligent lay person such as myself would not
buy the book and have to return it since the book DID NOT contain what it advertised! It didn’t contain FEDERAL EMPLOYER
citations! That’s the whole
problem here and Mr*** can’t understand that. He needs to concede and admit his advertising is misleading,
wrong and simply change it
By Mr***, standing by his
ADVERTISEMENT, then people are going to return the book. Just because he can state that in his
advertising on his website to attempt to sell book, is simply unethical
It is not my mistake that I make
in my complaint. It is Mr***’s
HUGE MISTAKE by not knowing what federal employee’s and federal employer’s can
cite in their pleadings; and, he should know it. As I have proven my case once again, he should refund me my
$34.65.]
Regards,
*** ***

*** ***To: ***Subject: RE: the "FL FAMILY LAW AND PRACTICE" BOOK FROM JAMES PUBUSHINGDear Mr ***,We apolgize for the delay in shipment of the book you purchasedIt turns out the book went into backorder due to aprinting problem that was beyond our controlAs such,
it was difficult for us to give an exact time as to when it would beavailable again to shipWe did track your order and show that it was delivered to youBecause of the delay in delivery,we would like to credit back your credit card for the purchase price, including the shipping chargeWe are going to giveyou the book at no charge and apologize for your inconvenience.You will see a credit to your card within the next couple of days.Regards,*** *** Sales RepresentativeJames PublishingAND ATTORNEY MARKETING*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ** ***

Dear Revdex.com:We sell law books for practicing lawyers. Our books are not designed for laypeople like Ms. [redacted], which is the root of the problem here.In the legal world “citation” means a reference to case law. It does not identify the plaintiff as being in a particular category. Our book Federal...

Employment Jury instructions does contain the 1,000 citations described in its advertising. That description has caused no problems or generated any complaints from the thousands of lawyers and law librarians who have purchased the book.Are some of the defendants who end up in federal court private employers like Wal-mart and Ford whose citations are complained about by Ms. [redacted]? Of course. I don't understand why she would Conclude otherwise. -If Ms. [redacted] is going to attempt to do her own legal research without the training that three years of law school provides, she needs to know that she is likely to make some mistakes. She has definitely made one here.And since the mistake is hers and not ours, no, we are not going to make an exception to our policy and provide her a refund.[redacted] Founder and managing editor www.JamesPublishing.com