Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2014/11/17) */ THERE IS NO VALIDITY TO THIS COMPLAINT, I HAVE SPOKEN TO MY LAWYER AND HE ADVISED ME TO SEND MR [redacted] A LETTER TO REQUEST THAT HE REMOVE THIS COMPLAINT THE LOT THAT WE BUILT ON WAS LOWER AND REQUIRED ABOUT A FT RETAINING WALL SEPERATING THE LOTSTHIS WALL WAS PLACED WELL OVER FT ON OUR SIDE OF THE PROPERTY BEACAUSE OF THE AMOUNT OF UTILITIES RUNNING DOWN THE PROPERTY LINE(WE NEVER CAME WITHEN FEET OF MR [redacted] 'S PROPERTYTHE RETAINING WALL WAS BUILT BY PROFESSIONAL'S AND WAS BACKFILLED PROPERLYANYTIME GROUND IS DISTURBED THERE IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE SETTLING THAT OCCURSWE HAVE HAD OUR CREWS OVER THREE TIMES TO TOUCHUP THE BACKFILL OF THE RETAINING WALLSO HIS CLAIMS THAT MY SUPERVISOR IGNORED HIM ARE FALSEI CAN PROVIDE PICTURES IF NEED BEALL I ASK IS THAT THIS COMPLAINT BE REMOVED BECAUSE THERE IS NO VALIDITY TO THIS COMPLAINT AT ALL
Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2014/11/17) */ THERE IS NO VALIDITY TO THIS COMPLAINT, I HAVE SPOKEN TO MY LAWYER AND HE ADVISED ME TO SEND MR [redacted] A LETTER TO REQUEST THAT HE REMOVE THIS COMPLAINT THE LOT THAT WE BUILT ON WAS LOWER AND REQUIRED ABOUT A FT RETAINING WALL SEPERATING THE LOTSTHIS WALL WAS PLACED WELL OVER FT ON OUR SIDE OF THE PROPERTY BEACAUSE OF THE AMOUNT OF UTILITIES RUNNING DOWN THE PROPERTY LINE(WE NEVER CAME WITHEN FEET OF MR [redacted] 'S PROPERTYTHE RETAINING WALL WAS BUILT BY PROFESSIONAL'S AND WAS BACKFILLED PROPERLYANYTIME GROUND IS DISTURBED THERE IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE SETTLING THAT OCCURSWE HAVE HAD OUR CREWS OVER THREE TIMES TO TOUCHUP THE BACKFILL OF THE RETAINING WALLSO HIS CLAIMS THAT MY SUPERVISOR IGNORED HIM ARE FALSEI CAN PROVIDE PICTURES IF NEED BEALL I ASK IS THAT THIS COMPLAINT BE REMOVED BECAUSE THERE IS NO VALIDITY TO THIS COMPLAINT AT ALL