j.E.TContractingApril 16, 2017DBA 1st Choice Renovations [redacted] Dear Revdex.com Personnel,We , as a company, understand the consumer's frustrations but this particular whole story is not one sidedThey are correct on their payment statements, however little if any was said about the consumer making changes to the original drawings and/or contract through our job foreman instead of either co-owner.These changes made are known as extra work orders or change ordersBy construction rights, these changes must be made on paper, signed off on by the customer and the co-owners of our company due to being financial issuesThe changes that were made by the customer were only made through the job foreman, and not the owners in which they obviously felt they could convince.The customer’s correct in saying that at the time time of meeting with the inspector, funds were running low and we were in the process of filing for Chapter Bankruptcy to restructure our businessThe budget for their job contributed to this action but the customer did not say the thousands of personal money put into their job by the co-owners of 1st Choice Renovations.When we couldn’t answer calls when “demanded" by the customer, the customer then said that if we come on their property that we would be arrested for trespassing as well as the customer stating that they were purposely holding our tools and property left on the jobsite to be seized as ransom.Since this time, the owner and/or their police officer friend has filed suit against usWe are making the attempts to meet and come to an amicable resolution by that time.In closing, we as a company did not just take $43,from them or will it take near $26,to finalize this job if handled the proper way.Respectfully,Justin T***Bernie S*1st Choice Renovations
j.E.TContractingApril 16, 2017DBA 1st Choice Renovations [redacted] Dear Revdex.com Personnel,We , as a company, understand the consumer's frustrations but this particular whole story is not one sidedThey are correct on their payment statements, however little if any was said about the consumer making changes to the original drawings and/or contract through our job foreman instead of either co-owner.These changes made are known as extra work orders or change ordersBy construction rights, these changes must be made on paper, signed off on by the customer and the co-owners of our company due to being financial issuesThe changes that were made by the customer were only made through the job foreman, and not the owners in which they obviously felt they could convince.The customer’s correct in saying that at the time time of meeting with the inspector, funds were running low and we were in the process of filing for Chapter Bankruptcy to restructure our businessThe budget for their job contributed to this action but the customer did not say the thousands of personal money put into their job by the co-owners of 1st Choice Renovations.When we couldn’t answer calls when “demanded" by the customer, the customer then said that if we come on their property that we would be arrested for trespassing as well as the customer stating that they were purposely holding our tools and property left on the jobsite to be seized as ransom.Since this time, the owner and/or their police officer friend has filed suit against usWe are making the attempts to meet and come to an amicable resolution by that time.In closing, we as a company did not just take $43,from them or will it take near $26,to finalize this job if handled the proper way.Respectfully,Justin T***Bernie S
*1st Choice Renovations