Jim Dickinson Auto Tech

1. Mr. *** of Dickson Auto Tech indicated that he had the hard-to-find parts to repair the air conditioning for a 2015 Ford Explorer. The work requested was to delete the rear air conditioning by capping it. There was a bay charge, and the car was left with him to conduct an assessment. On the invoice it reads: "Air conditioning system inspect and report check to see if able to block off rear ac." This Mr. *** disputes. He now claims that because there was no inspection (which is incorrect), he is not responsible if the air conditioner works or not after capping the back air conditioner. It is clear the vehicle was left in his possession for him to conduct the required initial inspection. There was a bay charge of $56.96.

2. The total payment for inspecting the vehicle and then returning the vehicle for the capping of the rear air conditioner was $1,320.99. The deposit was paid by myself on June 19: $264.36. The balance of $1,056.63 was paid by *** *** on June 22. This is clearly gouging.

3. On June 22, when the payment was made, there was only slight air conditioning. Over a period of a week or two, there was no air conditioning. On three separate occasions since June 22, I brought the car back to Mr. *** and requested that he "top up" the air conditioning. It is important to note that on each and every occasion, Mr. *** REFUSED TO TOP UP THE AIR CONDITIONER. On one occasion he stated that if I drove on the highway, it would improve, which it didn't. Today, I again approached Mr. *** and asked him to top it up once again. He replied that there was obviously a leak. He also claimed, today, on July 11, that I had somehow waived the inspection and that he was not accountable for anything else other than capping. When I am overpaying in desperation the amount of $1,320.99, why would I ever waive the inspection when the inspection had already taken place (bay fee/inspection report)?

4. Seeking refund.