I am rejecting this response because: 1) Karvo admits to grinding up the road and the aprons into my shopping center, they admit that they left the road and my aprons in a ground down state to a certain millage for over three monthsI claim that leaving the aprons into a shopping center ground down for three months directly caused the damage to the tires as per the police report and they admit that they had a contract to repave the road so they are responsible for the damage causedI have asked for a copy of this contract which Karvo claims they have abided by during the project because they and their insurer claim they did nothing wrong under the 'contract'My request to be given a copy of the contract was refusedThe refusal to provide a copy of the contract in question is an admission that they have something to hideWithout a copy of the contract to review, there is no way to verify that Karvo was not negligent to grind down my aprons and leave the jobsite for three months which is the cause of the damage to tires as shoppers entered into my shopping center in OctoberHad Karvo paved in July, August or September, this would never had happened 2) I called ODOT to complain and was not told that I was responsible to call Karvo directlyI contacted Columbus ODOT first and was directed to call District I called Craig K [redacted] on July 28th to register my concern about this situation and Craig told me that my aprons would be repaved soon while they were left in bad condition until OctoberIf MrK [redacted] did not call Karvo about my concern or did not tell me to call Karvo, then Karvo cannot claim they have no liability for the damage they caused to the two patrons who drove in to shop at my Plaza in OctoberKarvo has not answered why it left my aprons ground down for three monthsSince both tires were damaged in early October, had Karvo paved the aprons any time from July to the end of September, this damage would not have happenedJust because the contract allows a date range, this does not mean that Karvo can leave the jobsite at my shopping center in bad condition for months without caring what happens or being mindful that shoppers and drivers may have their tires damaged as a result of failing to repave the shopping center aprons soonerThis is negligence 3) Karvo did pave the first layer soon after they milled the roadYet, they failed to pave the asphalt layer all the way to the aprons, which would have prevented this tire damage to two carsThis shows disregard for the shopping center and all of its businesses who rely on traffic patrons for their businessI recently was told that a third tire was also damagedKarvo knew or should have known that shopping center aprons should not be left ground down for months and they could have easily paved up to the aprons if they knew that they would not be back until October to finish the jobKarvo knew it was leaving the site in an unsafe condition and acted with disregardThe proof is in the damaged tires and Karvo is 100% to blame for the way they conducted the job that caused this to happen$to fix this problem is reasonable and a lesson should be learned not to grind down commercial aprons and leave them for extended periods of timeThis trouble was being asked for by Karvo and its owner 4) ODOT may share the blame by not acting promptly enough to oversee the jobsiteEspecially after I called to complain and bring the situation to MrK [redacted] 's attention in JulySince ODOT hired Karvo, the damage caused by Karvo cannot be dismissed by stating it was my fault for not calling them directlyIt was also ODOT's responsibility to oversee Karvo betterKarvo's workers ground down the road and showed disregard for the shopping center's apronsKarvo should simply do the right business thing and repay me $for the damage caused to the car’s tires after Karvo left the jobsite in an unsafe condition for months and invited this problem that they now want to refuse to own up toI was told by Craig this would be taken care of soon and it was not taken care of soon enough to prevent tire damages to multiple vehiclesPatrons to my shopping center and I should not have to pay for Karvo's negligence 5) This site is called the Revdex.com and the Revdex.com is the proper place to air this complaint against KarvoIf Karvo was a better business, then none of this would be necessaryKarvo should have taken proper steps to safeguard motorists entering my shopping center and they did notIf Karvo was a better business, they would realize that leaving the job for three months in an unsafe condition and unfinished caused problems for our road and the residents and shoppers on RtIf Karvo was a better business, they would accept that they caused this $damage as a cost of doing business and do the right thing by me and the damaged motorists who were suddenly stranded and inconvenienced with flat tiresIf Karvo was a better business, then someone over there would understand and pay $to repair the damaged tires and move forwardBut, Karvo is not a better businessIt grinds down aprons and roads and leaves for months and is content to let [redacted] s deny the claimIt is bad business and it has left all the people I talk to about this paving project with a bad rating for Karvo for its bad business practice and refusal to pay $when this contract was likely for hundreds of thousands of dollarsThe Revdex.com should take a look at Karvo's business practices and downgrade Karvo's rating for these reasons and as part of its rating service to the general public Karvo needs to pay $for damages it caused and only that will close this claim
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 9, 2015/12/30) */
***
We received your letter requesting clarification for Revdex.com case # ***
Ms***
*** has not submitted any evidence to support her claim
Ohio law states that the claimant must prove their case and that providing the preponderance of evidence lies with the claimant
You may contact me either through email or phone if you would like more information
I can provide you with all the correspondences between us
Thank you
Manny
Emanuel * S***
Safety & Claims Consultant
***
Karvo Paving Company
Hudson Drive
Stow, OH
***
www.karvopaving.com
I am rejecting this response because:
1) Karvo admits to grinding up the road and the aprons into my shopping center, they admit that they left the road and my aprons in a ground down state to a certain millage for over three months. I claim that leaving the aprons into a shopping center ground down for three months directly caused the damage to the tires as per the police report and they admit that they had a contract to repave the road so they are responsible for the damage caused. I have asked for a copy of this contract which Karvo claims they have abided by during the project because they and their insurer claim they did nothing wrong under the 'contract'. My request to be given a copy of the contract was refused. The refusal to provide a copy of the contract in question is an admission that they have something to hide. Without a copy of the contract to review, there is no way to verify that Karvo was not negligent to grind down my aprons and leave the jobsite for three months which is the cause of the damage to tires as shoppers entered into my shopping center in October. Had Karvo paved in July, August or September, this would never had happened.
2) I called ODOT to complain and was not told that I was responsible to call Karvo directly. I contacted Columbus ODOT first and was directed to call District 12. I called Craig K[redacted] on July 28th to register my concern about this situation and Craig told me that my aprons would be repaved soon while they were left in bad condition until October. If Mr. K[redacted] did not call Karvo about my concern or did not tell me to call Karvo, then Karvo cannot claim they have no liability for the damage they caused to the two patrons who drove in to shop at my Plaza in October. Karvo has not answered why it left my aprons ground down for three months. Since both tires were damaged in early October, had Karvo paved the aprons any time from July to the end of September, this damage would not have happened. Just because the contract allows a date range, this does not mean that Karvo can leave the jobsite at my shopping center in bad condition for months without caring what happens or being mindful that shoppers and drivers may have their tires damaged as a result of failing to repave the shopping center aprons sooner. This is negligence.
3) Karvo did pave the first layer soon after they milled the road. Yet, they failed to pave the asphalt layer all the way to the aprons, which would have prevented this tire damage to two cars. This shows disregard for the shopping center and all of its businesses who rely on traffic patrons for their business. I recently was told that a third tire was also damaged. Karvo knew or should have known that shopping center aprons should not be left ground down for months and they could have easily paved up to the aprons if they knew that they would not be back until October to finish the job. Karvo knew it was leaving the site in an unsafe condition and acted with disregard. The proof is in the damaged tires and Karvo is 100% to blame for the way they conducted the job that caused this to happen. $345 to fix this problem is reasonable and a lesson should be learned not to grind down commercial aprons and leave them for extended periods of time. This trouble was being asked for by Karvo and its owner.
4) ODOT may share the blame by not acting promptly enough to oversee the jobsite. Especially after I called to complain and bring the situation to Mr. K[redacted]'s attention in July. Since ODOT hired Karvo, the damage caused by Karvo cannot be dismissed by stating it was my fault for not calling them directly. It was also ODOT's responsibility to oversee Karvo better. Karvo's workers ground down the road and showed disregard for the shopping center's aprons. Karvo should simply do the right business thing and repay me $345 for the damage caused to the car’s tires after Karvo left the jobsite in an unsafe condition for months and invited this problem that they now want to refuse to own up to. I was told by Craig this would be taken care of soon and it was not taken care of soon enough to prevent tire damages to multiple vehicles. Patrons to my shopping center and I should not have to pay for Karvo's negligence.
5) This site is called the Revdex.com and the Revdex.com is the proper place to air this complaint against Karvo. If Karvo was a better business, then none of this would be necessary. Karvo should have taken proper steps to safeguard motorists entering my shopping center and they did not. If Karvo was a better business, they would realize that leaving the job for three months in an unsafe condition and unfinished caused problems for our road and the residents and shoppers on Rt. 283. If Karvo was a better business, they would accept that they caused this $345 damage as a cost of doing business and do the right thing by me and the damaged motorists who were suddenly stranded and inconvenienced with flat tires. If Karvo was a better business, then someone over there would understand and pay $345 to repair the damaged tires and move forward. But, Karvo is not a better business. It grinds down aprons and roads and leaves for months and is content to let [redacted]s deny the claim. It is bad business and it has left all the people I talk to about this paving project with a bad rating for Karvo for its bad business practice and refusal to pay $345 when this contract was likely for hundreds of thousands of dollars. The Revdex.com should take a look at Karvo's business practices and downgrade Karvo's rating for these reasons and as part of its rating service to the general public.
Karvo needs to pay $345 for damages it caused and only that will close this claim.
We received an email from [redacted] on November 28,2016 on a property damage claim with ODOT [redacted] 2016 project. In accordance with our contract with ODOT any property damage claim must be investigated by Karvo/and or our insurance company [redacted]’s and once the investigation is...
completed a written report is to be sent to ODOT. The decision was sent on December 5, 2016 that Karvo was following all specifications with ODOT and at no time were we notified of any issues during the course of the project. Due to these facts Karvo was not liable for this claim. The timeline for SR-283 road construction is below: 7/11: Pavement Milling 1.25" - mainline starting at E.331st Street and going East7/12: Remove concrete drive aprons back 2' then replace with asphalt7/13: Pavement Milling 1.25" - finish balance of mainline milling and mill all intersections7/19: Pavement repairs7/20: Pavement repairs7/21: Perform 2' widening and drive apron milling back 2' and at a depth of 1.25"7/22: Perform 2' widening and drive apron milling back 2' and at a depth of 1.25"7/23: Place asphalt intermediate course 1"7/25: Place asphalt intermediate course 1"7/29: Adjust water valves9/6: Adjust water valve, manholes, and catch basins9/7: Adjust water valve, manholes, and catch basins10/6: Place asphalt surface course 1.25"10/7: Place asphalt surface course 1.25"10/11: Place asphalt surface course 1.25"10/17: Berm shoulders The project contract with ODOT was to start 6/1/16 and be completed 10/17/16 all within the contract. Below is a copy of a letter from ODOT to Mr. [redacted] that describes the claim process for ODOT District 12: Dear Mr. [redacted], Thank you for your email. I apologize for any inconvenience this incident may have created. If you would like to file a claim for damage to your vehicle/property, your first course of action should be to contact the contractor working in the area at the information below. If you find the contractor unresponsive, or your claim is denied by them, then please contact the Ohio Court of Claims at 800.824.8263 or visit the court on the Web at http://www.cco.state.oh.us/. Unless you are declared legally indigent by the Court, there will be a $25.00 fee to file your claim. KARVO PAVING COMPANY 4524 Hudson Dr.Stow, OH 44224-1702Phone: 330-929-9616Fax: 330-929-9620E-Mail: [email protected]...⇄
We have investigated this claim with our Insurer and our requirements with this ODOT project and have concluded Karvo companies is not liable for this loss. Please see attached process for any ODOT project claims.
I am rejecting this response because: 1) Karvo admits to grinding up the road and the aprons into my shopping center, they admit that they left the road and my aprons in a ground down state to a certain millage for over three monthsI claim that leaving the aprons into a shopping center ground down for three months directly caused the damage to the tires as per the police report and they admit that they had a contract to repave the road so they are responsible for the damage causedI have asked for a copy of this contract which Karvo claims they have abided by during the project because they and their insurer claim they did nothing wrong under the 'contract'My request to be given a copy of the contract was refusedThe refusal to provide a copy of the contract in question is an admission that they have something to hideWithout a copy of the contract to review, there is no way to verify that Karvo was not negligent to grind down my aprons and leave the jobsite for three months which is the cause of the damage to tires as shoppers entered into my shopping center in OctoberHad Karvo paved in July, August or September, this would never had happened 2) I called ODOT to complain and was not told that I was responsible to call Karvo directlyI contacted Columbus ODOT first and was directed to call District I called Craig K [redacted] on July 28th to register my concern about this situation and Craig told me that my aprons would be repaved soon while they were left in bad condition until OctoberIf MrK [redacted] did not call Karvo about my concern or did not tell me to call Karvo, then Karvo cannot claim they have no liability for the damage they caused to the two patrons who drove in to shop at my Plaza in OctoberKarvo has not answered why it left my aprons ground down for three monthsSince both tires were damaged in early October, had Karvo paved the aprons any time from July to the end of September, this damage would not have happenedJust because the contract allows a date range, this does not mean that Karvo can leave the jobsite at my shopping center in bad condition for months without caring what happens or being mindful that shoppers and drivers may have their tires damaged as a result of failing to repave the shopping center aprons soonerThis is negligence 3) Karvo did pave the first layer soon after they milled the roadYet, they failed to pave the asphalt layer all the way to the aprons, which would have prevented this tire damage to two carsThis shows disregard for the shopping center and all of its businesses who rely on traffic patrons for their businessI recently was told that a third tire was also damagedKarvo knew or should have known that shopping center aprons should not be left ground down for months and they could have easily paved up to the aprons if they knew that they would not be back until October to finish the jobKarvo knew it was leaving the site in an unsafe condition and acted with disregardThe proof is in the damaged tires and Karvo is 100% to blame for the way they conducted the job that caused this to happen$to fix this problem is reasonable and a lesson should be learned not to grind down commercial aprons and leave them for extended periods of timeThis trouble was being asked for by Karvo and its owner 4) ODOT may share the blame by not acting promptly enough to oversee the jobsiteEspecially after I called to complain and bring the situation to MrK [redacted] 's attention in JulySince ODOT hired Karvo, the damage caused by Karvo cannot be dismissed by stating it was my fault for not calling them directlyIt was also ODOT's responsibility to oversee Karvo betterKarvo's workers ground down the road and showed disregard for the shopping center's apronsKarvo should simply do the right business thing and repay me $for the damage caused to the car’s tires after Karvo left the jobsite in an unsafe condition for months and invited this problem that they now want to refuse to own up toI was told by Craig this would be taken care of soon and it was not taken care of soon enough to prevent tire damages to multiple vehiclesPatrons to my shopping center and I should not have to pay for Karvo's negligence 5) This site is called the Revdex.com and the Revdex.com is the proper place to air this complaint against KarvoIf Karvo was a better business, then none of this would be necessaryKarvo should have taken proper steps to safeguard motorists entering my shopping center and they did notIf Karvo was a better business, they would realize that leaving the job for three months in an unsafe condition and unfinished caused problems for our road and the residents and shoppers on RtIf Karvo was a better business, they would accept that they caused this $damage as a cost of doing business and do the right thing by me and the damaged motorists who were suddenly stranded and inconvenienced with flat tiresIf Karvo was a better business, then someone over there would understand and pay $to repair the damaged tires and move forwardBut, Karvo is not a better businessIt grinds down aprons and roads and leaves for months and is content to let [redacted] s deny the claimIt is bad business and it has left all the people I talk to about this paving project with a bad rating for Karvo for its bad business practice and refusal to pay $when this contract was likely for hundreds of thousands of dollarsThe Revdex.com should take a look at Karvo's business practices and downgrade Karvo's rating for these reasons and as part of its rating service to the general public Karvo needs to pay $for damages it caused and only that will close this claim
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 9, 2015/12/30) */
***
We received your letter requesting clarification for Revdex.com case # ***
Ms***
*** has not submitted any evidence to support her claim
Ohio law states that the claimant must prove their case and that providing the preponderance of evidence lies with the claimant
You may contact me either through email or phone if you would like more information
I can provide you with all the correspondences between us
Thank you
Manny
Emanuel * S***
Safety & Claims Consultant
***
Karvo Paving Company
Hudson Drive
Stow, OH
***
www.karvopaving.com
I am rejecting this response because:
1) Karvo admits to grinding up the road and the aprons into my shopping center, they admit that they left the road and my aprons in a ground down state to a certain millage for over three months. I claim that leaving the aprons into a shopping center ground down for three months directly caused the damage to the tires as per the police report and they admit that they had a contract to repave the road so they are responsible for the damage caused. I have asked for a copy of this contract which Karvo claims they have abided by during the project because they and their insurer claim they did nothing wrong under the 'contract'. My request to be given a copy of the contract was refused. The refusal to provide a copy of the contract in question is an admission that they have something to hide. Without a copy of the contract to review, there is no way to verify that Karvo was not negligent to grind down my aprons and leave the jobsite for three months which is the cause of the damage to tires as shoppers entered into my shopping center in October. Had Karvo paved in July, August or September, this would never had happened.
2) I called ODOT to complain and was not told that I was responsible to call Karvo directly. I contacted Columbus ODOT first and was directed to call District 12. I called Craig K[redacted] on July 28th to register my concern about this situation and Craig told me that my aprons would be repaved soon while they were left in bad condition until October. If Mr. K[redacted] did not call Karvo about my concern or did not tell me to call Karvo, then Karvo cannot claim they have no liability for the damage they caused to the two patrons who drove in to shop at my Plaza in October. Karvo has not answered why it left my aprons ground down for three months. Since both tires were damaged in early October, had Karvo paved the aprons any time from July to the end of September, this damage would not have happened. Just because the contract allows a date range, this does not mean that Karvo can leave the jobsite at my shopping center in bad condition for months without caring what happens or being mindful that shoppers and drivers may have their tires damaged as a result of failing to repave the shopping center aprons sooner. This is negligence.
3) Karvo did pave the first layer soon after they milled the road. Yet, they failed to pave the asphalt layer all the way to the aprons, which would have prevented this tire damage to two cars. This shows disregard for the shopping center and all of its businesses who rely on traffic patrons for their business. I recently was told that a third tire was also damaged. Karvo knew or should have known that shopping center aprons should not be left ground down for months and they could have easily paved up to the aprons if they knew that they would not be back until October to finish the job. Karvo knew it was leaving the site in an unsafe condition and acted with disregard. The proof is in the damaged tires and Karvo is 100% to blame for the way they conducted the job that caused this to happen. $345 to fix this problem is reasonable and a lesson should be learned not to grind down commercial aprons and leave them for extended periods of time. This trouble was being asked for by Karvo and its owner.
4) ODOT may share the blame by not acting promptly enough to oversee the jobsite. Especially after I called to complain and bring the situation to Mr. K[redacted]'s attention in July. Since ODOT hired Karvo, the damage caused by Karvo cannot be dismissed by stating it was my fault for not calling them directly. It was also ODOT's responsibility to oversee Karvo better. Karvo's workers ground down the road and showed disregard for the shopping center's aprons. Karvo should simply do the right business thing and repay me $345 for the damage caused to the car’s tires after Karvo left the jobsite in an unsafe condition for months and invited this problem that they now want to refuse to own up to. I was told by Craig this would be taken care of soon and it was not taken care of soon enough to prevent tire damages to multiple vehicles. Patrons to my shopping center and I should not have to pay for Karvo's negligence.
5) This site is called the Revdex.com and the Revdex.com is the proper place to air this complaint against Karvo. If Karvo was a better business, then none of this would be necessary. Karvo should have taken proper steps to safeguard motorists entering my shopping center and they did not. If Karvo was a better business, they would realize that leaving the job for three months in an unsafe condition and unfinished caused problems for our road and the residents and shoppers on Rt. 283. If Karvo was a better business, they would accept that they caused this $345 damage as a cost of doing business and do the right thing by me and the damaged motorists who were suddenly stranded and inconvenienced with flat tires. If Karvo was a better business, then someone over there would understand and pay $345 to repair the damaged tires and move forward. But, Karvo is not a better business. It grinds down aprons and roads and leaves for months and is content to let [redacted]s deny the claim. It is bad business and it has left all the people I talk to about this paving project with a bad rating for Karvo for its bad business practice and refusal to pay $345 when this contract was likely for hundreds of thousands of dollars. The Revdex.com should take a look at Karvo's business practices and downgrade Karvo's rating for these reasons and as part of its rating service to the general public.
Karvo needs to pay $345 for damages it caused and only that will close this claim.
We received an email from [redacted] on November 28,2016 on a property damage claim with ODOT [redacted] 2016 project. In accordance with our contract with ODOT any property damage claim must be investigated by Karvo/and or our insurance company [redacted]’s and once the investigation is...
completed a written report is to be sent to ODOT. The decision was sent on December 5, 2016 that Karvo was following all specifications with ODOT and at no time were we notified of any issues during the course of the project. Due to these facts Karvo was not liable for this claim. The timeline for SR-283 road construction is below: 7/11: Pavement Milling 1.25" - mainline starting at E.331st Street and going East7/12: Remove concrete drive aprons back 2' then replace with asphalt7/13: Pavement Milling 1.25" - finish balance of mainline milling and mill all intersections7/19: Pavement repairs7/20: Pavement repairs7/21: Perform 2' widening and drive apron milling back 2' and at a depth of 1.25"7/22: Perform 2' widening and drive apron milling back 2' and at a depth of 1.25"7/23: Place asphalt intermediate course 1"7/25: Place asphalt intermediate course 1"7/29: Adjust water valves9/6: Adjust water valve, manholes, and catch basins9/7: Adjust water valve, manholes, and catch basins10/6: Place asphalt surface course 1.25"10/7: Place asphalt surface course 1.25"10/11: Place asphalt surface course 1.25"10/17: Berm shoulders The project contract with ODOT was to start 6/1/16 and be completed 10/17/16 all within the contract. Below is a copy of a letter from ODOT to Mr. [redacted] that describes the claim process for ODOT District 12: Dear Mr. [redacted], Thank you for your email. I apologize for any inconvenience this incident may have created. If you would like to file a claim for damage to your vehicle/property, your first course of action should be to contact the contractor working in the area at the information below. If you find the contractor unresponsive, or your claim is denied by them, then please contact the Ohio Court of Claims at 800.824.8263 or visit the court on the Web at http://www.cco.state.oh.us/. Unless you are declared legally indigent by the Court, there will be a $25.00 fee to file your claim. KARVO PAVING COMPANY 4524 Hudson Dr.Stow, OH 44224-1702Phone: 330-929-9616Fax: 330-929-9620E-Mail: [email protected]...⇄
We have investigated this claim with our Insurer and our requirements with this ODOT project and have concluded Karvo companies is not liable for this loss. Please see attached process for any ODOT project claims.