Laguna Woods Village

Dear Ms [redacted] , we have determined the corporation is not obligated to respond to this complaint through the Revdex.com; however, please be advised the Board of Directors of United Laguna Woods Mutual is following the provisions of it’s governing documents and has responded directly to Ms*** on the matter Thank you, and best regards, [redacted] CMCA, AMSConstruction Services Manager Laguna Woods Village Phone 949- [redacted]

Revdex.com:I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ***, and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.Please see the attached DOCUMENTATION / INFORMATION &ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONSRegards,*** ***

Dear Ms***, we have determined the corporation is not obligated to respond to this complaint through
the Revdex.com; however, please be advised the Board of Directors of United Laguna Woods Mutual is following the provisions of it’s governing documents and has responded directly to Ms*** on the matter.
Thank you, and best regards, ***
*** *** CMCA, AMSConstruction Services Manager Laguna Woods Village Phone 949-***

Dear ***, the Member’s request she be allowed to continue sub-letting her manor was denied by the United Laguna Woods Mutual (ULWM) Board of Directors on August 11, 2015. In a letter advising her of the decision, the Board cited the following. ULWM Bylaws: Article III, Section 6. Transfer of Memberships, Sub-section (a) Death of Member with No Surviving Member provides that she, as STTE, are afforded two options. She may choose to either 1) become a Member of the Corporation or 2) sell the Membership to any person who has been duly approved by the Corporation as a Member. Further, Article of the Occupancy Agreement: Subletting Prohibited, concludes with the statement that “Consent to one subletting shall not obligate the Corporation to consent to any other subletting.” Therefore, although she had received permission in the past to sublet the dwelling unit, that permission is now being withheld by ULWM. Finally, Article of the Occupancy Agreement, Successors, Assignees, Etc., which was executed by her father, stipulates the provisions of the Occupancy Agreement shall be binding on the successors, assignees, heirs and personal representatives of the Member. Subsequent to the notice re: the Board’s decision via a letter dated August 21, 2015, the member appealed the decision. On September 18, 2015, the Board, again, denied the request, and reminded her via letter she either needs to become a member, or sell the membership. She was also noticed that failure to do either would result in a member disciplinary hearing Best regards, ***

Dear Ms. [redacted], we have determined the corporation is not obligated to respond to this complaint through the Revdex.com; however, please be advised the Board of Directors of United Laguna Woods Mutual is following the provisions of it’s governing documents and  has responded directly to Ms. [redacted]...

on the matter.    Thank you, and best regards, [redacted] CMCA, AMSConstruction Services Manager Laguna Woods Village Phone 949-[redacted]

Revdex.com:I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.Please see 
the attached DOCUMENTATION / INFORMATION &
ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS
Regards,[redacted]

Dear [redacted], the Member’s request she be allowed to continue sub-letting her manor was denied by the United Laguna Woods Mutual (ULWM) Board of Directors on August 11, 2015.  In a letter advising her of the decision, the Board cited the following.  ULWM Bylaws:  Article III, Section 6.  Transfer of Memberships, Sub-section (a) Death of Member with No Surviving Member provides that she, as STTE, are afforded two options.  She may choose to either 1) become a Member of the Corporation or  2) sell the Membership to any person who has been duly approved by the Corporation as a Member.  Further, Article 7 of the Occupancy Agreement: Subletting Prohibited, concludes with the statement that “Consent to one subletting shall not obligate the Corporation to consent to any other subletting.”  Therefore, although she had received permission in the past to sublet the dwelling unit, that permission is now being withheld  by ULWM.  Finally, Article 24 of the Occupancy Agreement, Successors, Assignees, Etc., which was executed by her father, stipulates the provisions of the Occupancy Agreement shall be binding on the successors, assignees, heirs and personal representatives of the Member.  Subsequent to the notice re: the Board’s decision via a letter dated August 21, 2015, the member appealed the decision.  On September 18, 2015, the Board, again, denied the request, and reminded her via letter she either needs to become a member, or sell the membership.  She was also noticed that failure to do either would result in a member disciplinary hearing.   
Best regards, [redacted]