Landtek Landscape Technologies

RevDex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below. I have sent a detailed offer to professional collection agency in regards to the false inaccurate billing from Landtek. I have made them an offer that I feel is very fair and just given the circumstances at hand. My offer is based upon the following: Letters text ex tenants that lived n properties current tenants still in properties local contractor as a witness ex employee of landtek cancelled llc checks other hired help to perform duties landtek failed to do but billed for that only list a few facts from my considerable documentation that I have against landtek and their very inaccurate billing. I would also challenge landtek to give me the exact dates in which they performed services for these months and the time of day. As stated in the very beginning, I have never signed a contract or agreement with landtek for services rendered since 2003. I completely refuse to pay for any finance charge imposed to their constant neglect of dispute dated back to 2012. I would once again ask for a signed contract or agreement for services rendered. Besides the fact that this company was billing me in single name but cashing my LLC checks since 2003 up to 2012. If this offer is not accepted, I will then assume landtek and I will not be able to resolve this issue. Regards, [redacted]

Thank you for contacting us regarding a complaint you have received from a consumerI would like to address the concerns of this consumer and the facts on this account
LandTek Incprovided seasonal service for the consumer going back to March The billing information she gave to us at
that time was in her name and her home addressWe have performed seasonal work for this customer each year since and all invoices were billed in her personal nameShe has never told us to change the billing name on their invoices to a BusinessThe current outstanding balance is for services we rendered for her in On April 30, we sent her an invoice for services renderedAnother invoice was sent on 05/31/and 07/31/for more services renderedShe did not send payment in nor did she call us to dispute the invoicesShe also did not call us to discontinue serviceWe made several attempts to call her regarding her outstanding invoices but never received a return call from herBecause she had been a customer since we continued to provide service for her in August 2012, September 2012, October and November To date we have not been paid for the services
The consumer mentioned that LandTek Incis being managed by a different person*** *** the project manager and customer contact with LandTek Inc., has been employed with the company since the first invoice was billed to the consumer in We do not require customers to sign a contract for residential service and the service we were providing for this consumer was for residential serviceWe did not have a signed contract with her in 2009, 2010, or either but she did pay for those services
In conclusion, the consumer states this should be under her LLC and not her personal name but she is the one who provided the billing information to us in her personal name and she has been billed accordingly since She never called us and requested the name on the invoice be changedShe states she did not have a signed contract with LandTek Incand therefore she does not owe us for our servicesShe did not have a signed contract for services she received in 2009, 2010, or yet she paid for all of those servicesA signed contract is not required to perform or receive lawn care servicesShe states that we did not provide the services she owes for but she never contacted us to dispute any of the invoices sent to her each month or to cancel serviceThe consumer claims LandTek Incis being managed by a different person but the project manager and customer contact, *** ***, has been employed with LandTek Incsince she started using us in
The settlement that the consumer is requesting is for this account to be removed off her credit fileThe account is being reported under the name the consumer provided to us when she set the account up and the same name she has been billed under for five yearsThis is a valid debt
Respectfully,
LandTek Inc

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
I have sent a detailed offer to professional collection agency in regards to the false inaccurate billing from Landtek.  I have made them an offer that I feel is very fair and just given the circumstances at hand.  My offer is based upon the following:
Letters
text
ex tenants that lived n properties
current tenants still in properties
local contractor as a witness
ex employee of landtek
cancelled llc checks
other hired help to perform duties landtek failed to do but billed for
that only list a few facts from my considerable documentation that I have against landtek and their very inaccurate billing.  I would also challenge landtek to give me the exact dates in which they performed services for these months and the time of day.  As stated in the very beginning, I have never signed a contract or agreement with landtek for services rendered since 2003.  I completely refuse to pay for any finance charge imposed to their constant neglect of dispute dated back to 2012.  I would once again ask for a signed contract or agreement for services rendered.  Besides the fact that this company was billing me in single name but cashing my LLC checks since 2003 up to 2012. 
If this offer is not accepted, I will then assume landtek and I will not be able to resolve this issue.
Regards,
[redacted]

The issue at hand is a disagreement as to whether services were rendered. We did provide service, for many months, to this customer. The project manager, [redacted], has verified that this information is correct. We do not believe we can come to an agreement as this former customer wishes to avoid paying for the service we provided her. Unfortunately, that is not a solution we can agree to.