Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response offer made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below What was the date that John PFry is referring to when states tbat the represent return my call after I called twice? I did not speak with the representative after my two called attempts I did not talk to her and leave her on holdWe spoke once prior to this loint in time while I was in an airport, and we lost connection during that timeAt no point did a second conversation occur between the representative and I It is unfortunate that the firm refuses to let me either listen to or recieve colies ofcthe recorded conversations vetween me and tbe representativeSince it is against their policy, perhaps I can see a copy of such a policyIf not, I demand a copy of the recorded conversation involving the representative and I I dont have recorded conversations of fhe resentative and my coworker, but according to him, she did state that she was from the law office of john pFry a.d tbat she needed to speak with meEven this was tok much information and a violation of my privacySbe should have o.lh made atte,pts to contact me through my direct extension only, not anyone elses Revdex.com, I would to recieve a coly of the firms policy stating that I cannot recieve copies of my recorded conversafions with the representiveIf not, Im demanding copies of those recorded conversations, if they exist af all Regards, [redacted] Ii
As I stated in my original response, this office attempted to contact an individual at a telephone number that appears to belong to Mr [redacted] We were informed on that date, April 15, 2014, that the person we were seeking was not there at that timeWe called the number again on April 22, 2014, and informed by Mr [redacted] that the person we were seeking did not live thereNo further calls were made to that numberHowever, my office did receive a subsequent call from the person we wished to speak with and an amicable communication was had and a successful resolution was made Sincerely, John PFrye, Esq
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and find that this resolution would be satisfactory to me I will wait for the business to perform this action and, if it does, will consider this complaint resolved Just don't call me anymore Regards, [redacted]
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and find that this resolution would be satisfactory to me I will wait for the business to perform this action and, if it does, will consider this complaint resolved Regards, [redacted] ***
I have reviewed the response offer made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed They must remove the association with me and this debt For starters the social they have does not match mine, I do not have a [redacted] account and my name is not [redacted] as stated in the companies responseClearly they have the wrong person are not to communicate or associate this debt with me in any way shape or mannerI do not and will not need to contact the companyWrong name is social is more than suffice detail for them to know they have the wrong personThis is not a case of identity theft as they speculate below as once again the social and name do not match mine therefore there is no identity theft Regards, [redacted]
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response offer made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below The people calling misrepresented their identity and on more than one occasion informed that they were seeking a different individualThe person they were seeking did return their call and left their phone number which the firm never called, but recalled meThey lie
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response offer made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below What was the date that John PFry is referring to when states tbat the represent return my call after I called twice? I did not speak with the representative after my two called attempts I did not talk to her and leave her on holdWe spoke once prior to this loint in time while I was in an airport, and we lost connection during that timeAt no point did a second conversation occur between the representative and I It is unfortunate that the firm refuses to let me either listen to or recieve colies ofcthe recorded conversations vetween me and tbe representativeSince it is against their policy, perhaps I can see a copy of such a policyIf not, I demand a copy of the recorded conversation involving the representative and I I dont have recorded conversations of fhe resentative and my coworker, but according to him, she did state that she was from the law office of john pFry a.d tbat she needed to speak with meEven this was tok much information and a violation of my privacySbe should have o.lh made atte,pts to contact me through my direct extension only, not anyone elses Revdex.com, I would to recieve a coly of the firms policy stating that I cannot recieve copies of my recorded conversafions with the representiveIf not, Im demanding copies of those recorded conversations, if they exist af all Regards, [redacted] Ii
As I stated in my original response, this office attempted to contact an individual at a telephone number that appears to belong to Mr [redacted] We were informed on that date, April 15, 2014, that the person we were seeking was not there at that timeWe called the number again on April 22, 2014, and informed by Mr [redacted] that the person we were seeking did not live thereNo further calls were made to that numberHowever, my office did receive a subsequent call from the person we wished to speak with and an amicable communication was had and a successful resolution was made Sincerely, John PFrye, Esq
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and find that this resolution would be satisfactory to me I will wait for the business to perform this action and, if it does, will consider this complaint resolved Just don't call me anymore Regards, [redacted]
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and find that this resolution would be satisfactory to me I will wait for the business to perform this action and, if it does, will consider this complaint resolved Regards, [redacted] ***
I have reviewed the response offer made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed They must remove the association with me and this debt For starters the social they have does not match mine, I do not have a [redacted] account and my name is not [redacted] as stated in the companies responseClearly they have the wrong person are not to communicate or associate this debt with me in any way shape or mannerI do not and will not need to contact the companyWrong name is social is more than suffice detail for them to know they have the wrong personThis is not a case of identity theft as they speculate below as once again the social and name do not match mine therefore there is no identity theft Regards, [redacted]
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response offer made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below The people calling misrepresented their identity and on more than one occasion informed that they were seeking a different individualThe person they were seeking did return their call and left their phone number which the firm never called, but recalled meThey lie