Sign in

Long Subaru, Inc.

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Long Subaru, Inc.? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Long Subaru, Inc.

Long Subaru, Inc. Reviews (3)

Complaint on Long Subaru for Dishonest Sales Practice, Sales Pressure, Misrepresenting car price & problems and purposefully Wasting Warranty period. I had purchased a 2006 BMW 325xi from Long Subaru. I was offered 2 Test -Drives for making my purchase decision. The vehicle drove well for the short Test-Drives. The Sales Representative said that the only issue with the car was that it had an Oil Leak and they would replace the Oil Pan Gasket. But in-order to do that, I would have to sign all the paperwork. And pay the booking amount. Unless I sign the paperwork and process Finance, they would still have the car in the market and not do the repairs. Vehicle was priced at $12,471 ($1,200 more than KBB dealer recommended price). They mentioned $12,471 as KBB value on the car whereas, it was actually $11,260 when I checked on KBB website. When asked about price, they were unwilling to accept the wrong pricing and didn't budge to negotiate and they said they would give me 1-month warranty and 1 oil change instead. They misrepresented the value of the car as KBB value when it was not, it was their own value. I was pressurized. I had to sign the paperwork on 22 April 2015. They purposefully applied warranty from that date, not delivery date. When I asked why it doesn't start from delivery date, they said all dates should match and otherwise they wouldn't be able to process my documents. They came up with stories every day to delay delivery: 1. Started working on the car at their workshop for 24-point check 2. Detailing Car (1 Day)3. Took to BMW workshop for oil leak fix (5 days)4. Back to their workshop for re-check, found Starter issue (4 days)5. Took to BMW workshop for Starter issue fix (3 days)6. Back to their workshop for re-check (2 Days)7. Took to CT-DMV for registration (1 Day)8. Detailing Car (1 Day)I was able to take delivery only on 8th May 2015 (lost 17 days of warranty period). I found the car driven more than 300 miles and dusty, not clean. 2 days after delivery and driving only about 300 miles only, I found fluid leak from 2 places. Car was heating up, leaking coolant (bluish/green fluid), and oil leak from other side. I called back on 11th May 2015. They couldn't take me until 14th May 2015, as their service department was busy. This wasted another 4 days of my warranty time. When I got there, they checked the car and refused to acknowledge coolant and car heating issue (They said there is no problem with the coolant system). They acknowledged the oil leak from one of the axles that connect to the transmission. They said the sealant was worn out and need to be replaced. This they said happens over time, and not something sudden. This meant, it existed and they wanted me to bring the vehicle in, so they can use more warranty time to fix this. They set me on a loaner vehicle and said my car would be taken to BMW workshop and wouldn't be back until 22nd May 2015. They purposefully utilized ALL my warranty period (27 of the 30 days). So, if I don't have much possession of the vehicle, I wouldn't have much time finding mechanical issues and report to dealership. The vehicle has mechanical issues that were not brought to my attention at the time of Sale such as: 1. Oil leak from engine (only this was mentioned) 2. Starter problem 3. Oil leak from transmission/axle 4. Coolant leak issue5. Engine heating issue There could be other issues that I don't know of. By not mentioning these issues, they were able to charge me full price for the vehicle. If they had brought to my attention, these issues, the car would have been valued $2000 or more less. They didn't want me to spend time to find these issues myself during warranty period. For this, they wasted my warranty period completely. I possessed the vehicle only for 3 days during their 1-month warranty. Warranty: 22 Apr 2015 to 22 May 2015. I possessed the vehicle from 8th May 2015 till 11th May 2015 when I reported the issue.Desired SettlementNow, I am at a lack of trust with Long Subaru's product Sales and Service department. With so many issues, I am demanding actual warranty application and reimbursement for charging more than market price for mechanically defective product that was totally misrepresented. This is the settlement I seek at a bare minimum: 1. I want all the mechanical issues I had highlighted, to be corrected. 2. I want at-least a 3-months warranty application from the date of delivery after fixing all issues with the car (22 May 2015 and later when they deliver). 3. I want reimbursement of $2000, they charged in excess while misrepresenting a mechanically defect free product over KBB pricing and for all the pain an agony in dealing with them. 4. Mats on the trunk are missing, need to be replaced. 5. The spare key unit that is present inside the glove compartment is missing the key. Only the casing is present, need to be replaced. 6. Proper Detailing of the car as it was not done at all. The rims and body has grease all over it.Business Response Mr. [redacted] originally found our vehicle online based one his wants and needs. We are over 50 miles away from his home so for him to be interested in our vehicle, it had to be priced fairly and competitively with other similar vehicles in the market. After three visits and several vehicles, Mr. [redacted] agreed to pay the price that we were asking for the vehicle (we are a one price store and this was explained to him on every occasion) and at no time was there any "pressure" to purchase the vehicle. It was very obvious that Mr. [redacted] liked this vehicle as he made three trips from Hartford in one week. He simply didn't want to pay the price we advertised the vehicle for online. Upon agreeing to buy the car, Mr. [redacted] was given the chance to purchase an extended warranty since a vehicle with 88k miles only has a 30 day warranty as required by the State of Mass. He opted to not purchase additional coverage and signed a bill of sale stating that he was aware of the coverage on the vehicle.The customer had been told from the first visit that there was an oil leak that we needed to repair and this would be done once the vehicle was sold. Due to the complexity of the repair, we sent it to a shop that is more familiar with fixing BMW's. The vehicle was ready for pick up on 5/8, which was a little longer than we had hoped for. We were concerned about a potential starter issue but was determined that it is operating as designed. A few days after the actual delivery, Mr. [redacted] brought the vehicle back for an "oil leak". The leak was not oil but from the axle seal (not even near the oil leak repair) where it appears that he may have run something over since the leak was significant and not there before. There was also a gouge in axle that had no rust, indicating it was very recent and it would have been noticed by our techs and our vendor who did the repair. We repaired this under Mr. [redacted]'s 30 day warranty with a small deductible even though it highly likely that this was something we would not be responsible for and Mr. [redacted] was provided a free loaner vehicle while this was being completed. The repair took approximately three business days.The concern about the overall condition and cleanliness of the car or brake dust on his wheels is a known issue for BMW and was not mentioned during the sales OR delivery process. We are willing to address the cleanliness issues (by appointment) at our facility.We are also more than willing to adjust the start date warranty of the vehicle to when it was picked up, which was May 8 from when he would receive 30 days and 1250 miles (per MA lemon law). There will be no price adjustment, additional warranty or compensation made to Mr. [redacted] has we negotiated in good faith and did everything we promised, including fixing the axle seal at no cost to him other than his small deductible. Consumer Response (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)I do not accept the response from the business, as there are a lot of false claims from their end and some of their statements seem very surprising to me. I would like to respond to every incorrect statement on this response as I find the response very offensive. "Mr. [redacted] originally found our vehicle online based one his wants and needs. We are over 50 miles away from his home so for him to be interested in our vehicle, it had to be priced fairly and competitively with other similar vehicles in the market. After three visits and several vehicles, Mr. [redacted] agreed to pay the price that we were asking for the vehicle (we are a one price store and this was explained to him on every occasion) and at no time was there any "pressure" to purchase the vehicle. It was very obvious that Mr. [redacted] liked this vehicle as he made three trips from Hartford in one week. He simply didn't want to pay the price we advertised the vehicle for online." YES, I DID FIND THE VEHICLE ONLINE. I HAD TRAVELLED EVERY TIME FROM MY FRIENDS PLACE IN WEST BROOKFIELD, WHO HAD ACCOMPANIED ME IN 3 OF THE 5 OCCATIONS I HAD BEEN THERE. THE DEALERSHIP WAS ONE OF THE MANY I HAVE BEEN VISITING IN AND AROUND HARTFORD AND WEST BROOKFIELD. THEY ARE AWARE OF THIS FACT TOO. I HAVE NEVER DENIED THE FACT THAT I HAD BEEN INTRESTED IN THE VEHICLE. ON THE 1st VISIT I QUESTIONED THE PRICE ON THE VEHICLE AS BEING $1100 MORE THAN KBB VALUE, AS I WANTED TO KNOW THE BASIS OF THIS PRICING. THE SALES REP (MR. DEAN [redacted]) RUDELY CLOSED HIS BOOKS, STOOD AND WALKED AWAY. I HAD TO SPEAK TO THE MANAGER THE NEXT DAY IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND WHY I WAS INSULTED THAT WAY. THE MANAGER EXPLAINED ABOUT THEIR 'FAIR PRICING POLICY' AND ASKED ME TO COME IN AGAIN APOLOGISING ON THE WAY I HAD BEEN TREATED. HE ALSO MENTIONED THAT HE WILL PERSONALLY LOOK INTO THE CAR AND CHECK ON ALL THE MECHANICAL ISSUES IT HAS, CORRECT ALL THAT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED, ARRANGE FOR MISSING COMPONENTS LIKE MANUAL, KEYS ETC., PROVIDE ME A 30 DAY WARRANTY AND ALSO THE 1st OIL CHANGE. AS A CUSTOMER, I DIDN'T WANT TO FRAME AN OPINION ON THE DEALERSHIP BECAUSE OF ONE PERSON'S BEHAVIOUR AND SO I PAID MORE VISITS. I DID NOT INTERACT WITH THAT SALES REP ANY MORE. I HAD INTERACTED WITH RAY [redacted] AND JOSH [redacted] AFTER THAT TALK WITH THE MANAGER TO UNDERSTAND THE 'FAIR PRICING POLICY', I HAD NEVER QUESTIONED ON THE PRICE (I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE STATEMENT WHERE THEY HAD TO EXPLAIN TO ME THE PRICING POLICY EVERYTIME - THIS NEVER OCCURRED AFTER MY 1ST VISIT AND IS A TOTAL LIE). MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT WHEN I PAY THE PRICE ADVERTISED BY THE DEALERSHIP, I WOULD GET A DEFECT FREE CAR WITH ALL MECHANICAL ISSUES FIXED WITH PROMISED 30-DAY WARRANTY AND THAT WAS THE PROMISE GIVEN TO ME. IF I KNEW THAT THEY WOULD ONLY FIX FEW ISSUES WITH THE CAR AND GIVE ME ONLY 5 OUT OF THE PROMISED 30 DAY WARRANTY, THIS PRODUCT IS DEFINITELY NOT WORTH IT'S PRICE. THAT'S WHY I HAD TO REACH Revdex.com. I AM NOW LEFT WITH A CAR THAT'S LEAKING COOLANT AND HEATING ENGINE. I ALSO NOTICED THAT IT'S LEAKING WIPER FLUID. THERE ARE PLENTY OF CARS IN THE MARKET IN EQUAL CONDITION MUCH LESSER IN PRICE BY. THE DEALERSHIP HAS CHEATED ME BY PROMISING ME, FOR THE PRICE PAID THEY WOULD SEND ME HOME WITH A CLEAN DEFECT FREE CAR. "Upon agreeing to buy the car, Mr. [redacted] was given the chance to purchase an extended warranty since a vehicle with 88k miles only has a 30 day warranty as required by the State of Mass. He opted to not purchase additional coverage and signed a bill of sale stating that he was aware of the coverage on the vehicle." THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMMUNICATED TO ME. I AM HEARING THIS FOR THE FIRST TIME. "A few days after the actual delivery, Mr. [redacted] brought the vehicle back for an "oil leak". The leak was not oil but from the axle seal (not even near the oil leak repair) where it appears that he may have run something over since the leak was significant and not there before. There was also a gouge in axle that had no rust, indicating it was very recent and it would have been noticed by our techs and our vendor who did the repair. We repaired this under Mr. [redacted]'s 30 day warranty with a small deductible even though it highly likely that this was something we would not be responsible for and Mr. [redacted] was provided a free loaner vehicle while this was being completed. The repair took approximately three business days." I HAD TAKEN DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE ON 5/8 (FRIDAY NIGHT). I HAD DRIVEN THE VEHICLE TO 'ASHLAND,MA' [redacted] TO GET THE CAR BLESSED (THIS IS A CUSTOM FOLLOWED IN MY CULTURE). THE TOTAL DRIVE WAS ON HIGHWAY ROADS AND LESS THAN 200 MILES. I HAD NOTICED THE BLUISH GREEN FLUID LEAK ON THE DRIVERS SIDE AS EARLY AS SUNDAY NIGHT AND CALLED IN 1ST THING MONDAY MORNING. WHEN I BROUGHT THE CAR IN THEY DIDN'T EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THE PROBLEM I HIGHLIGHTED, BUT TOLD ME ABOUT THE LEAK IN THE PASSENGER SIDE. I ASKED TO SEE THE LEAK AREA AND THE TECHNICIAN TOLD ME THAT THE SEAL HAS BUSTED DUE TO WEAR OVER YEARS. ON TOUCHING THE OIL, HE EVEN MENTIONED THAT THIS MIGHT HAVE BEEN HAPPENING FOR A WHILE NOW (THIS MEANT, THE PROBLEM MIGHT HAVE EXISTED EVEN BEFORE I TOOK DELIVERY). I HAD TO BEAR THE DEDUCTIBLE EVEN THOUGH IT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CHARGED TO ME THEORETICALLY. THEY DID NOT FIX THE COOLANT LEAK AND ENGINE HEATING ISSUE STILL. "The concern about the overall condition and cleanliness of the car or brake dust on his wheels is a known issue for BMW and was not mentioned during the sales OR delivery process. We are willing to address the cleanliness issues (by appointment) at our facility." I HAD TO BRING THIS ISSUE INTO ATTENTION DUE TO THE FOLLOWING REASON: JOSH [redacted] CALLED ME ON 5/5 EVENING TO TELL ME THEY RECEIVED THE CAR FROM BMW WORKSHOP WITH ALL ISSUES FIXED. HE WOULD NEED 1 DAY TO TAKE IT TO DMV TO GET IT REGISTERED AND 1 DAY TO DETAIL THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO ME ONLY ON FRIDAY 5/8 EVENING. THIS WAS DONE PURPOSEFULLY, KNOWING SATURDAY AND SUNDAY ARE HOLIDAYS THAT WAY BETWEEN 5/5 AND 5/11, THEY COULD WASTE ANOTHER 7 DAYS OF MY WARRANTY TIME. I WOULD NOT HAVE MINDED IF THE CAR WAS DETAILED AS PROMISED, BUT IT WAS NOT. IT WAS HANDED OVER VERY DUSTY, ESPECIALLY THE RIMS WERE EXTREMELY FULL OF GREASE. MY COMPLAINT IS NOT IN REGARDS TO THE DEALERSHIPS PRICING POLICY. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY JUSTIFIABLE IF THEY HAD ACTED AS PER THEIR PROMISE. INSTEAD THEY HAVE PUT ME TO EXTREME DISTRESS. THEY WERE NOT EVEN READY TO ACKNOWLEDGE MY PROBLEM. MY COMPLAINT IS IN REGARDS TO BREAK IN TRUST ON NOT RECEIVING THE PROMISED SERVICE FOR THE PRICE BEING PAID. THE SETTLEMENT I SEEK IS VERY REASONABLE AND LOW, ESPECIALLY AFTER HAVING TO UNDERGO ALL THIS STRESS FOR THE LAST 2 MONTHS. A PART OF MY SETTLEMENT INCLUDES MISSING COMPONENTS TO MY VEHICLE THAT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED YET, HOWEVER I HAVE BEEN CHARGED. This is the settlement I seek at a bare minimum: 1. I want all the mechanical issues I had highlighted, to be corrected. 2. I want at-least a 3-months warranty application from the date of delivery after fixing all issues with the car (22 May 2015 and later when they had delivered). 3. I want reimbursement of $2000, they charged in excess while misrepresenting a mechanically defect free product over KBB pricing and for all the pain an agony in dealing with them. 4. Mats on the trunk are missing, need to be provided. 5. The spare key unit that is present inside the glove compartment is missing the key. Only the casing is present, need to be provided. 6. Proper Detailing of the car as it was not done at all. The rims and body has grease all over it. I HOPE MY COMPLAINT STANDS AS A LESSON FOR THE DEALERSHIP, NOT TO TAKE THEIR CUSTOMER FOR A RIDE CASHING IN ON THEIR INTEREST. I ALSO HOPE MY COMPLAINT STANDS AS A LESSON FOR CUSTOMERS TO SET THE EXPECTATION WITH SUCH DEALERS AND NOT SIGN PURCHASE DOCUMENTS BEFORE GETTING ALL THE ISSUES FIXED AND MUCH MORE I HAVE GONE THROUGH WITH THIS DEAL. Final Business Response Long Subaru will look at the concern of a leak on Mr. [redacted] BMW until June 20, 2015 under the warranty provided at the time of sale. Any and all other issues associated with this transaction would be at the expense of Mr. [redacted]

The vehicle purchased was advertised (and I was told in person) that it had never been in an accident. The Car Fax also stated this.The vehicle (a 2011 Subaru Forester) was test driven on a cloudy day and picked-up at night. On the first sunny day I noticed that there was missing paint at the edge of the hood in the front and paint (or marks) on the emblem. Further inspection showed blemishes/scuff marks/cracks in the chrome and red paint on the bumper. Pieces were broken and missing from the grill. Dealership was contacted and I drove the car there to be inspected. Buffing was done to the emblem to remove the paint. No other repair was completed or agreed upon and no offers of compensation were offered. After stating that I was very disappointed, I was left standing in the middle of the dealership as the man who sold me the vehicle went back to his desk.Desired SettlementI am seeking monetary compensation or free repair of all damages.Business Response Contact Name and Title: [redacted]Contact Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX[redacted]Contact Email: [redacted]@longauto.comI will be happy to look at Mr. [redacted]'s vehicle and see what we can do. We also go by information provided by CarFax but sometimes there can be a minor incident that will require small cosmetic repairs that we may not know about and was not reported to CarFax.

Long Subaru failed to honor contract and used coercion and threats to obtain reversal paper signatures.Arrived at Long Subaru on 4/9/14 interested in purchasing a used vehicle. My girlfriend and I were approached by a sales agent, [redacted] who notified me that they had a used 2012 Impreza recently arrive on the lot. After driving the car, I loved it and he had us sit down to see what he could do for payments. I gave him all of my information regarding my Honda Element which I would be using as a trade-in and he came up with a payment of roughly $245/mo. I was happy with this number and after he returned from the finance office to check my credit and his numbers, we moved forward with the transaction. The contracts were signed and I agreed to pick up the car the next day. Everything was going well until about 3 weeks later when the dealership called to tell me there was a "problem" and I needed to come in. Unfortunately I did and upon arriving on 4/28/14 in the evening, I was confronted by the financial rep who told me that a mathematical error had been made on their end and that I need to hand over the Impreza and take home my Honda that they had legally purchased from me 3 wks earlier. I was in shock and not really sure what my options were. They told me I had none and unless I wanted to be making two car payments, I should sign over the Impreza to them. I feel they used threats and coercion to get me to sign the reversal papers. This was and error made by them and therefore should be absorbed by them. I attempted to work with them and offered to pay more to keep the car, but they did not want to work with me. I feel they realized the scope of their error and wanted to dispose of me quickly before I came to my senses. I eventually signed the papers that evening and left in my old car, feeling extremely depressed. Especially after noticing that they had stripped the expensive windshield wipers that I had purchased off of my old vehicle and replaced them with lesser quality ones. I was told to return with the extra set of keys if I want to get my registration returned and have my inspection sticker done for my Honda. Upon doing this, I had a minor verbal dispute with the [redacted], after he informed me that this was all my fault because I didn't pick up on the error. This was ridiculous to me since both of his paid staff members missed it as well. At this time he informed me that he had no interest in giving me an inspection sticker and I was asked to leave. This man was childish, beyond rude, and never even apologized for the incident or even accepted the slightest bit of blame.Desired SettlementI'm not sure what my options are in this case. I signed the reversal papers. On the other hand, legal contracts clearly mean nothing to this establishment unless they serve their purposes, so why should the reversal papers be valid? I would love to have my car back and the initial contract reinstated. If this is not possible I would like some sort of punitive damages. I was embarrassed and mistreated by these people. At the very least they should have some kind of punishment.. i.e. business fine/probation. Not sure what can be done. Still trying to get past the anger and frustration with this whole incident. I would greatly appreciate any help/direction you could give me. Thank you.Business Response Contact Name and Title: [redacted]Contact Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXXx[redacted]Contact Email: [redacted]@longauto.comThis customer has experienced a very difficult situation and is understandably disappointed. We can only sincerely apologize for the inconvenience again. During the finance process, the lienholder was applied to for a balance owed on the trade. Due to the age and mileage of the Honda, the payoff amount seemed appropriate to us. Of all the parties involved, we the dealer are at a disadvantage as we have no direct access to information and rely on the numbers given by the lienholder and confirmed by the customer. Both the dealer and the customer signed agreeing on the amount we, the dealer, would be paying to the lienholder. Most customers have a good estimate of payoff and would have questioned an over $15,000 balance discrepancy. If the customer had questioned the payoff given to the dealership when we called while he was sitting at the desk, all of this would have been avoided. Regardless, it does not change the fact that the customer still owed the total amount to the lienholder - that was a previous agreement that was between the two of them. This was a unique situation for us and a difficult call to make. Due to the combined loan amounts owed there were limited options available to the customer. It seemed reasonable to offer the customer a complete reversal and release him from obligation to us which is what he chose. All monies were refunded to him including those spent by him on accessories and an air filter. His Honda was returned fully detailed, free LOF, and free state inspection sticker. All of those cost were absorbed by us. As this situation proves, contracts are not meaningless. The written contract is what both parties looked at to determine responsibility and course of action. There was simply an honest miscommunication between the bank and the dealer. It is hard to believe the customer was not aware of his actual payoff was $15,000 more than quoted considering he had just bought the car a little over a year ago. It seems like he was hoping that all of this would make the problem go away and he wouldn't be responsible for his actual payoff.We view this matter as a closed case and the customer is not owed any money. Consumer Response (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)Is that their definition of detailing?! Leaving a car sitting on the lot, untouched for weeks...except to pull off the windshield wipers? Word to the wise...never get your vehicle "detailed" at Long Subaru.As for the rest of their response, it should be ignored since it was written by [redacted]; a virtually useless entity haunting that dealership. Upon notification of the numerous errors made by his staff, he made no attempt to come to a business agreement with me and behaved childishly by turning his back on me and refusing to give me me an inspection sticker simply because I had the nerve to complain about their questionable business practices. They were never at any disadvantage, as he claimed, and were given direct access to numbers by the lien holder as well as myself. When sitting across form the salesman, [redacted] I offered to show him the amount I owed on my current vehicle and was told that it wouldn't be necessary since he already had the numbers he needed. Then they proceeded to write the number down incorrectly on more than one occasion... which I questioned on more than one occasion. I ask again, how is this my error?? Also, my credit was checked and they never asked me to sign anything as I've done in other more reputable establishments...is this legal? In addition to this, the day after signing the contracts, I received a call from the finance manager again stating that there was an error made and that my payments would actually be around $10 lower than his initial calculation! This means that they once again "checked" the numbers and found an error in my favor. Now they have the gaul to try to foist the blame onto me and insinuate that I planned to have them pay off my car by ignoring their error?! Quite simply, I trusted their math (big mistake) and when I looked at the paperwork, I didn't see the decimal point in the wrong place. I still maintain, that is what they are there for. As I previously mentioned, the contracts were signed by both parties and were legally binding. Therefore, I no longer owed the balance on that vehicle because I no longer owned it...they did when they bought it from me. This is why they would like to consider this whole matter closed. I however do not and neither does the Attorney General.Final Business Response Mr. [redacted] had just purchased his vehicle less than 18 months ago and knew all along his payoff was considerably more than what he agree to. Our original paperwork stated that his payoff was $1600 which we had every reason to believe, even though he knew this was not accurate (actual payoff of over $16,000). We provided Mr. [redacted] with a few options to resolve this matter including paying or financing the difference of the actual payoff. He was unable to accept any of the options presented due to the amount of the difference, and still stay within the lenders guidelines (and his desired payment). Regardless of the error, it is not our responsibility to pay this difference nor does it satisfy his obligation to the bank. Mr. [redacted] received his original car back with a fresh oil and filter change, new wipers to match the originals, reimbursement for an air filter and $29 for his state inspection. It is our belief that this is a closed matter.

Check fields!

Write a review of Long Subaru, Inc.

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Long Subaru, Inc. Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Description: Auto Dealers-New Cars, Auto Service - Window Tinting, Wheel Alignment, Fr & Axle Service - Auto, Auto Paintless Dent Repair, Auto Detailing, Auto Inspection Stations, Auto Services, Transmissions-Automobile, Tire Dealers, Auto Body Repair & Painting, Towi

Address: 7 Sutton Rd, Webster, Massachusetts, United States, 01570-3136

Phone:

Show more...

Web:

long.subarudealer.com

This site can’t be reached

Shady, yet now dead: once upon a time this website was reported to be associated with Long Subaru, Inc., but after several inspections we’ve come to the conclusion that this domain is no longer active.



Add contact information for Long Subaru, Inc.

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated