Lopez Teodosio & Larkin, LLC

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the responseIf no reason is received your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved] Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because: In his 8/10/response Mr Larkin correctly states that, if a partnership/LLC is granted an extension of time to file, the final due date K-forms can be distributed is 9/15/XX, not 4/15/XXIn fact, the CPLLC and LLC have been received, sent via USPS Certified Mail postmarked 8/12/ What is not answered in his response is any reason for the purposeful withholding of this information, requested via e-mail and in writing many times starting in early May A simple response during this period, stating the returns were "on extension" could have resolved this matter without forcing me to make complaints to the Revdex.com, IRS, PA Department of State Professional Licensing and AICPA Professional Ethics Division I do not know which complaint inspired the forms to be sent, and thank the Revdex.com for its helpfulness I continue to assert that this firm, and Mr Larkin, have misused their position of control and have breached common business ethics This should be noted in records should membership in the Revdex.com be requested, or if other inquiries are received The legal requirements may have now been met, however your own statement "Start with Trust" should not condone these behaviorsThank you for your involvement, I'll consider this matter closed Regards, [redacted] ***

August 10, Dear Madam/Sir,I am responding to the above captioned complaint (copy attached) by [redacted] ***Please note the Internal Revenue Service requirement to provide a form Schedule K-for a partnership is September 15, for the year ending December 31, (provided the partnership is on extension)Both partnerships are on extension (as they were for the year ending December 31, 2013) [redacted] is incorrect when he states the Schedule K-1’s must be provided by April 15, The required Schedule K-1’s will be provided with the prescribed time frameVery truly yours William LCPA Managing Partner

August 10, 2015Dear Madam/Sir,I am responding to the above captioned complaint (copy attached) by [redacted] ***Please note the Internal Revenue Service requirement to provide a form Schedule K-for a partnership is September 15, for the year ending December 31, (provided the partnership is on extension)Both partnerships are on extension (as they were for the year ending December 31, 2013) [redacted] is incorrect when he states the Schedule K-1’s must be provided by April 15, The required Schedule K-1’s will be provided with the prescribed time frame.Very truly yoursWilliam L.CPA Managing Partner

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the responseIf no reason is received your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved]
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:In his 8/10/response Mr Larkin correctly states that, if a partnership/LLC is granted an extension of time to file, the final due date K-forms can be distributed is 9/15/XX, not 4/15/XXIn fact, the CPLLC and LLC have been received, sent via USPS Certified Mail postmarked 8/12/ What is not answered in his response is any reason for the purposeful withholding of this information, requested via e-mail and in writing many times starting in early May A simple response during this period, stating the returns were "on extension" could have resolved this matter without forcing me to make complaints to the Revdex.com, IRS, PA Department of State Professional Licensing and AICPA Professional Ethics Division I do not know which complaint inspired the forms to be sent, and thank the Revdex.com for its helpfulness I continue to assert that this firm, and Mr Larkin, have misused their position of control and have breached common business ethics This should be noted in records should membership in the Revdex.com be requested, or if other inquiries are received The legal requirements may have now been met, however your own statement "Start with Trust" should not condone these behaviors.Thank you for your involvement, I'll consider this matter closed
Regards,
*** * ***

August 10, 2015Dear Madam/Sir,I am responding to the above captioned complaint (copy attached) by [redacted]. Please note the Internal Revenue Service requirement to provide a form Schedule K-1 for a partnership is September 15, 2015 for the year ending December 31, 2014 (provided the partnership is...

on extension). Both partnerships are on extension (as they were for the year ending December 31, 2013). [redacted] is incorrect when he states the Schedule K-1’s must be provided by April 15, 2015. The required Schedule K-1’s will be provided with the prescribed time frame.Very truly yoursWilliam L.CPA Managing Partner

August 10, 2015
Dear Madam/Sir,I am responding to the above captioned complaint (copy attached) by [redacted]. Please note the Internal Revenue Service requirement to provide a form Schedule...

K-1 for a partnership is September 15, 2015 for the year ending December 31, 2014 (provided the partnership is on extension). Both partnerships are on extension (as they were for the year ending December 31, 2013). [redacted] is incorrect when he states the Schedule K-1’s must be provided by April 15, 2015. The required Schedule K-1’s will be provided with the prescribed time frame.
Very truly yours
William L.
CPA Managing Partner

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved]
 Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because:
In his 8/10/2015 response Mr Larkin correctly states that, if a partnership/LLC is granted an extension of time to file, the final due date K-1 forms can be distributed is 9/15/XX, not 4/15/XX. In fact, the 2014 CPLLC and CP-II LLC have been received, sent via USPS Certified Mail postmarked 8/12/2015.  What is not answered in his response is any reason for the purposeful withholding of this information, requested via e-mail and in writing many times starting in early May 2015.  A simple response during this period, stating the returns were "on extension" could have resolved this matter without forcing me to make complaints to the Revdex.com, IRS, PA Department of State Professional Licensing and AICPA Professional Ethics Division.  I do not know which complaint inspired the forms to be sent, and thank the Revdex.com for its helpfulness.  I continue to assert that this firm, and Mr Larkin, have misused their position of control and have breached common business ethics.  This should be noted in records should membership in the Revdex.com be requested, or if other inquiries are received.  The legal requirements may have now been met, however your own statement "Start with Trust" should not condone these behaviors.
Thank you for your involvement, I'll consider this matter closed.
Regards,
[redacted]