Louisiana-Pacific Corporation

We have already addressed this in our first two responsesWe are not responsible nor will we refund any money on mr [redacted] s used speakers Kevin h*** ownerSoundsational

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that the response would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below correction to my previous math:($+ I gave him an extra $for his time and trouble).>>I sold them for $200, so he owes me $45.Addressing seller's issues in his response to my complaint:>the speakers cost him over $1,000/pair>That's what they cost when they were new years agoSeller wanted to sell them to me for $for the pair, until I pointed out that the blue book value is $184-$for the pair.They then agreed to $for the pair.Note in the below email from seller that they at first said that the speakers cost much more than they actually did."$1000/each" (real price pointed out to him by me: $1000/for the pair when new.)As Mr [redacted] didn't bring a receiver to test the speakers himself,>>>So we have a business man who's dealt in stereos for years, and who does not have a blue book for pricing stereo equipment, and does not have a receiver at his stereo store so that a person can see how the speakers soundI'm expected to unhook my entire stereo system to bring in my stereo receiver to test the speakersThe speakers obviously worked flawlessly for him for over SIX MONTHS!! >>There is nothing obvious about thisThe speaker made noise once in a while, and I assumed it was the recordings that I was playing, and not the speakerInterestingly enough he was still able to sell them for only $less than he purchased them for originally.>>I wanted $for themTold the buyer what was wrong with the speaker, and said that he can return them if doesn't like themThe buyer said that he'll give $200, and I'll never have to hear from him again because his friend can probably fix the problem speakerI agreed to this arrangement.Below is some relevant correspondence between me and the sellerOn 7/13/16, [redacted] .net wrote: Customer called and He said he will take the $> On Jul 12, 2016, at 7:PM, l [redacted] > wrote:>> nah, I can't do itit sounds like he's misremembering, or he> overpaid> when he bought themall he's got to do is do a web search.> I got a 2nd confirmation from audio solutions in broad ripple> on> the> blue book value for used and new:> blue book value for used is $184-for the pair(new -> $1000> for> a> new> pair)>> my offer of $is good until tomorrow, then i'll start> looking> for> new speakers online.> On 7/12/16, [redacted] .net> > wrote:> NopeHe paid $1000/each and said he wouldn't take less than> $400/pair> as> his are in perfect working condition.> On 7/12/16, [redacted] .net> > wrote:> Info I was sent.>> He's asking $200/each.I can send the entire email correpondence if it will help make the details of the exchange as clear as possible.What I think happened is that the person with the speakers maybe knew that one was blown, and maybe knew that he was trying to charge me twice as much as the speakers are worth - according to the blue book value, and that the middleman seller (brian) did not test the speakers, or did not test them correctly.But the whole thing with the blown speaker, and trying to charge me twice as much as the blue book value seems like scam or incompetenceIt's one of these.This purchase transaction turned out to be a complete waste of time and money for meEnd Regards, [redacted]

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ***, and have determined that the response would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below
This purchase transaction turned out to be a complete waste of time and money for methe item was broken.plus I gave him an extra $for the transaction, which he has not acknowledged in any of his replies
Regards,
*** ***

*** *** originally came into the shop to on 7/4/to have us replace a blown tweeter on a used set of speakers that he had purchased a replacement part for. During the process of repairing the speaker, Mr*** decided to purchase replacement tower speakers
instead. Mr*** asked my opinion about a few speakers he was looking at ordering online until I told him about a customer of ours that was looking at selling his tower speakers to upgrade to some newer speakers. This other customer had contacted me the previous week asking if I would help him sell his used Cerwin Vega Model RL18P tower speakers for $400.00/pair as the speakers cost him over $1,000/pair when he bought them new. I told Mr*** about the used Cerwin Vegas and he negotiated the price of the speakers down to $for the pair. I made it very clear to Mr*** that I was not making any money off this transaction and was simply linking these two individuals up. The speakers were dropped off at my shop on 7/16/2016. As a customer service to Mr***, I tested the tower speakers individually with a digital multimeter and the impedance of all the drivers tested perfectly. They also all tone generated perfectly. As Mr*** didn't bring a receiver to test the speakers himself, I also had one of my techs connect an ipod to the built in sub amp and subwoofer to also show Mr*** that the sub section was working flawlessly. Mr *** purchased the speakers and was aware that they were sold to him by the customer as "USED WITH NO WARRANTY". I also held the money he dropped off for hours before it was released to the seller so that Mr, *** had adequate time to check out the used speakers. The speakers obviously worked flawlessly for him for over SIX MONTHS!! I wasn't contacted about any problem with these speakers until Jan 28th 2017. At that time Mr*** said in an email that he felt like the used speakers he purchased off one of our customers over months ago had a bad speaker in it that he hadn't previously noticed. He then wrote me on Feb 14th saying that he had sold the used tower speakers on craigslist for $and wanted me to refund him $or he would call the police and report me to the Revdex.com. Mr*** never had anyone actually even verify that anything was blown or damaged at any point on these speakers--he simply "assumed" they were blown, "assumed" they had been blown for over months and then decided to sell them on craigslist. Interestingly enough he was still able to sell them for only $less than he purchased them for originally. At Soundsational we have prided ourselves on our customer service for the last years of being in business in this area but this consumer is simply being unreasonable and we will absolutely NOT refund him ANY money on these non warrantied and used speakers he purchased last year off a customer and then decided to sell on Craigslist

Mr [redacted] purchased used speakers off of a customer NOT the store.  He had adequate time to check out and test the speakers and report an issue (which he did not).  The speakers were sold to him by a customer as used with NO warranty.  He didn't report any problem on his non warranty used speakers for almost 6 months.  Before he even had them checked out to even verify any potential problem he sold them to someone else on craigslist.  We will not pay Mr. [redacted] anything simply because he has threatened this business.  We pride ourselves in our outstanding customer service over our 22 plus years of business but any problem Mr. [redacted] has is not with this business.

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that the response would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
correction to my previous math:($225 + I gave him an extra $20 for his time and trouble).>>I sold them for $200, so he owes me $45.Addressing seller's issues in his response to my complaint:>the speakers cost him over $1,000/pair>That's what they cost when they were new 10 years ago. Seller wanted to sell them to me for $400 for the pair, until I pointed out that the blue book value is $184-$225 for the pair.They then agreed to $225 for the pair.Note in the below email from seller that they at first said that the speakers cost much more than they actually did."$1000/each" (real price pointed out to him by me: $1000/for the pair when new.)As Mr. [redacted] didn't bring a receiver to test the speakers himself,>>>So we have a business man who's dealt in stereos for 22 years, and who does not have a blue book for pricing stereo equipment, and does not have a receiver at his stereo store so that a person can see how the speakers sound. I'm expected to unhook my entire stereo system to bring in my stereo receiver to test the speakers. The speakers obviously worked flawlessly for him for over SIX MONTHS!! >>There is nothing obvious about this. The speaker made noise once in a while, and I assumed it was the recordings that I was playing, and not the speaker. Interestingly enough he was still able to sell them for only $25 less than he purchased them for originally.>>I wanted $225 for them. Told the buyer what was wrong with the speaker, and said that he can return them if doesn't like them. The buyer said that he'll give $200, and I'll never have to hear from him again because his friend can probably fix the problem speaker. I agreed to this arrangement.Below is some relevant correspondence between me and the seller. On 7/13/16, [redacted].net wrote: Customer called and He said he will take the $225. > On Jul 12, 2016, at 7:16 PM, l[redacted] > wrote:>> nah, I can't do it. it sounds like he's misremembering, or he> overpaid> when he bought them. all he's got to do is do a web search.> I got a 2nd confirmation from audio solutions in broad ripple> on> the> blue book value for used and new:> blue book value for used is $184-225 for the pair. (new -> $1000> for> a> new> pair)>> my offer of $225 is good until tomorrow, then i'll start> looking> for> new speakers online.> On 7/12/16, [redacted].net> > wrote:> Nope. He paid $1000/each and said he wouldn't take less than> $400/pair> as> his are in perfect working condition.> On 7/12/16, [redacted].net> > wrote:> Info I was sent.>> He's asking $200/each.I can send the entire email correpondence if it will help make the details of the exchange as clear as possible.What I think happened is that the person with the speakers maybe knew that one was blown, and maybe knew that he was trying to charge me twice as much as the speakers are worth - according to the blue book value, and that the middleman seller (brian) did not test the speakers, or did not test them correctly.But the whole thing with the blown speaker, and trying to charge me twice as much as the blue book value seems like scam or incompetence. It's one of these.This purchase transaction turned out to be a complete waste of time and money for me. End.  
Regards,
[redacted]

We have already addressed this in our first two responses. We are not responsible nor will we refund any money on mr [redacted]s used speakers.  Kevin h[redacted] owner. Soundsational

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that the response would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
this message is to the Revdex.com mediator:so, now that you have enough info to make a decision, are you going to decide who is right and finish this process, or are you just going to stand back and let the back and forth continue indefinitely? 
Regards,
[redacted]